Nutrition Aspect of CancerALIM-KNCT02151214
Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition in Patients at the Palliative Phase of Cancer.
A study testing Parenteral nutrition in people with Nutrition Aspect of Cancer and End Stage Cancer, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon at 13 sites in France.
Trial summary
In malnourished patients in the palliative phase of cancer, the question is raised of the relevance of implementing artificial nutritional assistance instead of oral feeding when this is possible. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nutrition Aspect of Cancer, End Stage Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Parenteral nutrition
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 106 participants
- Where
- 13 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 27 Jul 2012to 11 Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult patients (aged >18 years) suffering from cancer at the palliative stage, i.e. patients in whom the main aim of treatment is to limit pain and discomfort
- curative treatment has either been discontinued, or may still be ongoing but with little expected benefit in terms of overall survival
- patients must already have a functional central venous catheter in place
- present malnutrition defined as a body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m² in patients aged <70 years or <21 kg/m² in patients aged ≥70 years; or weight loss of 2% in 1 week, 5% in 1 month, or 10% in 6 months
- patients must have a functional digestive tract
- patients able to express themselves easily in French and answer questionnaires
Who cannot join
- Any condition that prevents orally feeding (especially patients with cancer of the upper aero-digestive tract, esophagus, obstructive stomach)
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis if it causes symptoms of sub-occlusion or bowel obstruction
- Non functional digestive tract (bowel obstruction, tumor compression)
- Patients with haematological cancers undergoing bonemarrow transplant,
- Life expectancy is less than 1 month
- Any contraindications to the parenteral nutrition prescription
Show all 11Show fewer
- Parenteral nutrition that is ongoing or dating from less than one month;
- Presence of gastrostomy or jejunostomy;
- Persisting sensation of hunger in aphagic patients
- Patients participating in another ongoing clinical trial Adult
- Patients under legal guardianship
Trial locations and contacts
13 sites in 1 country.
13 sites in 1 country
France13 sites
Palliative Care Unit - CHU Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25000
Centre François Baclesse
Caen, 14000
Centre hospitalier Henri Mondor
Créteil, 94010
Centre Georges François Leclerc
Dijon, 21000
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, 59000
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69008
Institut Paoli calmettes
Marseille, 13009
Hopital de la Timone
Marseille
Institut Curie
Paris, 75005
Insitut Jean Godinot
Reims, 51100
Centre Paul Strauss
Strasbourg, 67065
Centre de cancérologie de Lorraine
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, 94805
About this study
Official title: Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition on the Quality of Life and Overall Survival in Patients in the Palliative Phase of Cancer.
In malnourished patients in the palliative phase of cancer, the question is raised of the relevance of implementing artificial nutritional assistance instead of oral feeding when this is possible.
Medical prescription and implementation of artificial nutrition at this stage of the illness seem less governed by data acquired by science than by subjective reasons (related to beliefs, to a cultural or religious tradition, to the symbolic role of eating, to the deeply ingrained fear of dying of hunger, to a portrayal of care, etc.) while interacting with teams, the patient and his family and relatives.
Read more
And yet, the benefits/risk balance and the effect on quality of life of parenteral nutrition in a palliative situation for patients presenting with a normal alimentary tract is poorly understood. The discomfort and risks of central venous or nasogastric artificial nutrition require that the benefits of artificial nutrition be proven. The nature of these benefits relate first and foremost to the quality of life experienced by the patient in such a context. Only a controlled randomized study may lead to an optimal palliative nutritional management of undernutrition to be determined, and to inform the patient and his/her relatives clearly in order for them to express their preferences.
We hypothesize that abstaining from artificial parenteral central venous nutrition and associated hydration for nutritional purposes improves quality of life without significant loss of survival compared to implementing artificial nutrition, when considered, in the absence of any specific curative treatment in anorexic patients in the palliative phase of cancer.
To test this hypothesis, we propose to carry out a multicenter, prospective, controlled, randomized study in order to evaluate the efficacy of implementing parenteral nutrition compared to abstaining from doing so on the quality of life of undernourished patients in the palliative phase of cancer. The effect on overall survival and the nutritional parameters will be evaluated.
The ALIM K trial will be carried out in 13 centres specializing in supportive and onco-hematology care .
- Conditions
- Nutrition Aspect of Cancer, End Stage Cancer
- Being tested
- Parenteral nutrition
- Keywords
- Palliative Phase of Cancer, Quality of life, Parenteral nutrition, Undernutrition
- Medical subject headings
- Hyperphagia, Malnutrition
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Parenteral nutritionOther
Administration of standard intravenous nutritional products. The products are commonly used in the department where the research is conducted
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Parenteral nutrition | Experimental | Parenteral nutrition will be administered to the patients Receives: Other: Parenteral nutrition |
| Normal per os nutrition | No intervention | The patients will eat orally |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
QLQ-C15-Pal to assess Quality of Life through the physical functioning, Global Health Status and fatigue subscales
The EORTC -The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-Pal - Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative is used.
Physical functioning, global health status and fatigue are compared between the 2 groups.
Measured: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Secondary outcomes (5)
QUAL-E Measuring Quality of Life at the end of Life
Questionaire for patients who believe they are nearing the end of life and comparison between the 2 groups.
Measured: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Overall survival
Comparison of overall survival between the 2 groups
Measured: Time from randomization to death
Other (non-primary-end point) domains of the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire (pain, emotional function, nausea/vomiting, appetite, dyspnea, constipation, and sleep)
Comparison of other domains of the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire between the 2 groups.
Measured: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Body weight
Body weight will be compared between the 2 groups .
Measured: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Body Mass Index
Body Mass Index will be compared between the 2 groups .
Measured: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study start27 Jul 2012
- Primary completion11 Dec 2017
- Study completion11 Dec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Nutrition Aspect of CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut Curie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Centre Paul Strauss, Institut Jean-Godinot, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Centre Leon Berard, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Centre Oscar Lambret, Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Centre Francois Baclesse, Hôpital de la Timone (MARSEILLE)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Régis AUBRY, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
- Investigators
- Regis Aubry, Prof., Principal investigator, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02151214
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ALIM-K
- Acronym
- ALIM-K
- Status last verified
- Sep 2018
- First submitted
- 27 May 2014
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Pazart L, Cretin E, Grodard G, Cornet C, Mathieu-Nicot F, Bonnetain F, Mercier M, Cuynet P, Bouleuc C, Aubry R; ALIM-K study investigational group. Parenteral nutrition at the palliative phase of advanced cancer: the ALIM-K study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Sep 24;15:370. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-370.
PubMed 25248371Bouleuc C, Garabige V, Grodard G, Anota A, Aubry R, Marchal T. Impact of parenteral nutrition on oral intake and eating pleasure in advanced cancer patients: A sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2026 Apr;72:102905. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.102905. Epub 2026 Jan 12.
PubMed 41534624
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition on the Quality of Life and Overall Survival in Patients in the Palliative Phase of Cancer.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02151214
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALIM-K / ALIM-K
- Conditions
- Nutrition Aspect of Cancer, End Stage Cancer
- Keywords
- Palliative Phase of Cancer, Quality of life, Parenteral nutrition, Undernutrition
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 106 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de BesanconUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut Curie, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Centre Paul Strauss, Institut Jean-Godinot, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Centre Leon Berard, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Centre Oscar Lambret, Centre Georges Francois Leclerc, Centre Francois Baclesse, Hôpital de la Timone (MARSEILLE)
- Study start
- 27 Jul 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 11 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In malnourished patients in the palliative phase of cancer, the question is raised of the relevance of implementing artificial nutritional assistance instead of oral feeding when this is possible.
Medical prescription and implementation of artificial nutrition at this stage of the illness seem less governed by data acquired by science than by subjective reasons (related to beliefs, to a cultural or religious tradition, to the symbolic role of eating, to the deeply ingrained fear of dying of hunger, to a portrayal of care, etc.) while interacting with teams, the patient and his family and relatives.
And yet, the benefits/risk balance and the effect on quality of life of parenteral nutrition in a palliative situation for patients presenting with a normal alimentary tract is poorly understood. The discomfort and risks of central venous or nasogastric artificial nutrition require that the benefits of artificial nutrition be proven. The nature of these benefits relate first and foremost to the quality of life experienced by the patient in such a context. Only a controlled randomized study may lead to an optimal palliative nutritional management of undernutrition to be determined, and to inform the patient and his/her relatives clearly in order for them to express their preferences.
We hypothesize that abstaining from artificial parenteral central venous nutrition and associated hydration for nutritional purposes improves quality of life without significant loss of survival compared to implementing artificial nutrition, when considered, in the absence of any specific curative treatment in anorexic patients in the palliative phase of cancer.
To test this hypothesis, we propose to carry out a multicenter, prospective, controlled, randomized study in order to evaluate the efficacy of implementing parenteral nutrition compared to abstaining from doing so on the quality of life of undernourished patients in the palliative phase of cancer. The effect on overall survival and the nutritional parameters will be evaluated.
The ALIM K trial will be carried out in 13 centres specializing in supportive and onco-hematology care .
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Parenteral nutrition | Experimental | Other: Parenteral nutritionParenteral nutrition will be administered to the patients |
| Normal per os nutrition | No intervention | –The patients will eat orally |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- adult patients (aged >18 years) suffering from cancer at the palliative stage, i.e. patients in whom the main aim of treatment is to limit pain and discomfort
- curative treatment has either been discontinued, or may still be ongoing but with little expected benefit in terms of overall survival
- patients must already have a functional central venous catheter in place
- present malnutrition defined as a body mass index (BMI) <18.5 kg/m² in patients aged <70 years or <21 kg/m² in patients aged ≥70 years; or weight loss of 2% in 1 week, 5% in 1 month, or 10% in 6 months
- patients must have a functional digestive tract
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Any condition that prevents orally feeding (especially patients with cancer of the upper aero-digestive tract, esophagus, obstructive stomach)
- Peritoneal carcinomatosis if it causes symptoms of sub-occlusion or bowel obstruction
- Non functional digestive tract (bowel obstruction, tumor compression)
- Patients with haematological cancers undergoing bonemarrow transplant,
- Life expectancy is less than 1 month
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Parenteral nutritionAdministration of standard intravenous nutritional products. The products are commonly used in the department where the research is conducted | Other | Parenteral nutrition |
Primary outcome
QLQ-C15-Pal to assess Quality of Life through the physical functioning, Global Health Status and fatigue subscales
Time frame: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
The EORTC -The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C15-Pal - Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 15 Palliative is used. Physical functioning, global health status and fatigue are compared between the 2 groups.
5 secondary outcomes
QUAL-E Measuring Quality of Life at the end of Life
Time frame: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Overall survival
Time frame: Time from randomization to death
Other (non-primary-end point) domains of the QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire (pain, emotional function, nausea/vomiting, appetite, dyspnea, constipation, and sleep)
Time frame: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Body weight
Time frame: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Body Mass Index
Time frame: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2018.
- Background: PubMed 25248371Pazart L, Cretin E, Grodard G, Cornet C, Mathieu-Nicot F, Bonnetain F, Mercier M, Cuynet P, Bouleuc C, Aubry R; ALIM-K study investigational group. Parenteral nutrition at the palliative phase of advanced cancer: the ALIM-K study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Sep 24;15:370. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-370.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41534624Bouleuc C, Garabige V, Grodard G, Anota A, Aubry R, Marchal T. Impact of parenteral nutrition on oral intake and eating pleasure in advanced cancer patients: A sub-analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2026 Apr;72:102905. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.102905. Epub 2026 Jan 12.
Related trials for Nutrition Aspect of Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Immunonutrition vs EPA-DHA Enriched Nutritional Support in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Surgery
Nutrition Aspect of Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Enhancing Cancer Care: RestoreMe App for Personalized Nutrition and Activity in Cancer Patients
Nutrition Aspect of Cancer, Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Malnutrition and Sarcopenia Screening in Chemotherapy Patients
Nutrition Aspect of Cancer, Sarcopenia
RecruitingObservational study
InterNatIonal CHildhood Leukemia Microbiome/MEtabolome Cohort
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Nutrition Aspect of Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Mesenteric Lymph Node Metastasis and Nutritional Status After Bowel Resection for Ovarian Cancer
Progression-Free Survival, Overall Survival
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Regis Aubry, Prof. principal investigator
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
13 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Parenteral nutrition in people with Nutrition Aspect of Cancer and End Stage Cancer, run by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon at 13 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 13 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
QLQ-C15-Pal to assess Quality of Life through the physical functioning, Global Health Status and fatigue subscales (time frame: Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02151214, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2018.