ALLNCT02133599
Prediction of Excretion and Toxicity of High Dose Methotrexate in Children and Adolescents With ALL
A study testing IOHEXOL in people with ALL, run by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Each year approximately 2,900 children and adolescents less than 20 years old are diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute lymphoblastic lymphoma in the United States. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 21 years
- Conditions the study is for
- ALL
- What is being tested?
- IOHEXOL
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 24 Jul 2014to 27 Feb 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 21 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically confirmed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (ALL) in patients in first remission at the start of Interim Maintenance I. HDMTX is administered during the phase of chemotherapy referred to as "Interim Maintenance I". Interim maintenance I occurs after induction and consolidation, is approximately 64 days in duration, and involves administration of four doses of HDMTX, with a dose given approximately every two weeks.
- Age 2-21 years with a weight of ≥ 13.2 lbs. and a hemoglobin ≥ 7.0
- Karnofsky/Lansky performance score of ≥ 50 (See Appendix II).
- Patients must receive high-dose Methotrexate (HDMTX; 5g/m2) as part of their standard or COG study chemotherapy. The current COG protocols which involve HDMTX include the following: AALL0232, AALL0434, and AALL1131.
- Patients must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment and cannot be lactating.
- All subjects must have given signed, informed consent prior to registration on study.
Who cannot join
- Hypersensitivity to iohexol, iodine, other contrast material
- Hypersensitivity to shellfish
- Prior treatment with HDMTX
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hosptial of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
About this study
Official title: Prediction of Excretion and Toxicity of High Dose Methotrexate in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma
Each year approximately 2,900 children and adolescents less than 20 years old are diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute lymphoblastic lymphoma in the United States. (For the purposes of this protocol, ALL will be used to refer to patients with either acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute lymphoblastic lymphoma as patients are treated in the same manner.) High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX; 5 g/m2) remains an important component of standard treatment for most ALL patients. However, high plasma and intracellular MTX concentrations (defined as a MTX level of >1 µmol/L at 42 hours and > 0.40 µmol/L at 48 hours) can quickly lead to acute kidney, bone marrow, liver, skin, central nervous system, and gastrointestinal toxicities requiring extended hospitalization and delays in subsequent chemotherapy treatments.
This study seeks to identify more sensitive markers of kidney injury that could serve as better predictors of delayed excretion and/or toxicity of HDMTX. This study is a pilot repeated-measures feasibility study.
Read more
Hypothesis 1: Directly measured GFR (mGFR, a type of test to measure the filtering rate of kidneys) by iohexol clearance obtained prior to HDMTX will demonstrate greater sensitivity and specificity for prediction of delayed MTX excretion and/or toxicity in children and adolescents with ALL than serum creatinine (sCr) alone or sCr used for eGFR calculation. If this study proves that mGFR is a better predictor of delayed MTX excretion and/or toxicity, then another study will be developed in the future to determine if modifying the HDMTX dose or adjusting supportive care based on mGFR will prevent delayed clearance and toxicity without impacting patient survival.
Hypothesis 2: Those participants prospectively demonstrating delayed MTX excretion or toxicity will exhibit elevation of kidney injury biomarkers less than 24 hours following initiation of HDMTX infusion compared to pre-chemotherapy measurements. These biomarkers will increase prior to a measurable sCr elevation.
Read the detailed description
Using this approach, retrospective clinical data from our patient population has identified a significant number of HDMTX treatments associated with delayed MTX excretion (defined as a MTX level of >1 µmol/L at 42 hours and > 0.40 µmol/L at 48 hours) and secondary toxicity. From January 2012-May 2013, 16 ALL patients received 64 total HDMTX doses (4 cycles each). At 48 hours post-HDMTX infusion, 27 doses (42%) exhibited delayed MTX clearance [median plasma MTX level 0.41 µmol/L (range, 0.01-1.6 µmol/L) above the 48-hour clearance level of 0.40 µmol/L]. Mucositis, cytopenias, skin rashes, and subsequent chemotherapy delays were noted in 31%, 31%, 6%, and 34% of doses respectively. Toxicities in combination with delayed MTX clearance occurred in 17 doses (27%) and toxicity without delayed clearance occurred in 18 doses (28%). Also, a mean increase in sCr of 17% (range 0-57.6%) above pre-HDMTX baseline was observed. Although measurements of sCr are used per the standard of care as an indirect marker of kidney injury, the known delay in sCr rise following nephrotoxic (drug-induced) kidney injury (KI) eliminates its use as a point of care surrogate marker for kidney toxicity. Therefore, this study seeks to identify more sensitive markers of kidney injury that could serve as better predictors of delayed excretion and/or toxicity of HDMTX. This study is a pilot repeated-measures feasibility study.
Substantial evidence demonstrates sCr, alone or used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), overestimates kidney filtering function when compared with direct measurement of GFR [3]. A new, commonly used equation for estimating the GFR uses values of sCr, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and cystatin C. Conversely, a direct measurement of kidney filtering function (mGFR) can be accomplished by determining the plasma (part of the blood) iohexol (Omnipaque300, GE Healthcare) clearance rate (rate at which the iohexol is removed from the body by the kidneys) over a period of 300 minutes, and has been documented as a sensitive and accurate measure of renal filtering function [4]. Plasma clearance of iohexol is an optimal method of determining mGFR, particularly in children, because it is not radioactive, is non-ionic, has a low osmolality, has been proven to be a safe and non-toxic X-ray contrast medium, and is excreted from the plasma exclusively by the kidneys [5]. Iohexol is a well-known contrast agent that is already FDA-approved for use in urographic procedures, angiographic procedures, and for the measurement of GFR (See Appendix I for more information on the history and safety of iohexol use for GFR measurement). Iohexol clearance from plasma has been shown in several studies to be a suitable method of determining GFR in adults [6] and children [7, 8, 9].
Given that standard oncology care relies on sCr values and eGFR, the kidney filtering function is likely often overestimated, which can result in an increased incidence of delayed MTX excretion and subsequent toxicity. Therefore, mGFR may provide an optimal method to more accurately determine kidney filtering function and thereby allow prediction of which ALL patients will develop delayed MTX excretion and/or toxicity. The utility of mGFR in predicting MTX excretion delay and/or toxicity has not been previously studied.
In addition, earlier recognition of kidney injury following HDMTX administration could also be evaluated using biomarkers in blood and urine. If these biomarkers are found to be useful in diagnosing early kidney injury, these tests may become a new clinical point of care in the future that could allow earlier and thus more effective clinical intervention in ALL patients. These interventions include increased intravenous hydration, which decreases the associated end-organ toxicities.
Urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and clusterin, serum cystatin C, and plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 (pFGF23) are biomarkers that appear earlier and are more sensitive than sCr in the setting of kidney injury. In fact, a detectable increase in sCr does not occur until 24-48 hours after a primary renal injury [2]. KIM-1, a type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein, is not expressed in normal kidneys, but is exhibited at high levels in proximal tubule epithelial cells and is excreted into the urine within 6-12 hours after toxic or ischemic injury [10, 11, 12]. Similarly, clusterin expression is induced by glomerular, tubular, or papillary kidney injury, with increased urine concentrations at 8, 24, and 48 hours post-toxic exposure [12, 13]. Cystatin C, a cysteine protease inhibitor, is not affected by age, gender, race, or overall muscle mass, making it a useful glomerular filtration marker in early KI. In a prospective study, cystatin C rise preceded an increase in sCr by 1-2 days [14]. FGF23 increases as early as within one hour of acute KI induction in mice and remains elevated in chronically compromised GFR, thereby serving as a useful biomarker in both acute and chronic KI [15]. In addition, plasma FGF23 has recently been show to be a strong predictor for risk of adverse outcomes in adults with acute kidney injury (AKI), with the median FGF 23 level obtained within 24 hours of admission being 5.5 times higher in patients with AKI compared to "control" ICU patients without kidney injury and almost 20 times higher than the upper limit of normal [16]. Therefore, KIM-1, clusterin, cystatin C, and FGF23 could provide earlier detection of kidney injury related to HDMTX when compared with sCr measurements. The utility of these biomarkers in identifying early kidney injury following treatment with HDMTX has not been previously studied. This study will compare these biomarkers with sCr pre-, intra-, and post-HDMTX treatment to determine their utility in detecting early kidney injury.
- Conditions
- ALL
- Being tested
- IOHEXOL
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IOHEXOLDrug
Also called Iohexol, Omnipaque 300
Patients receive 5 mL of Iohexol prior to cycle 1 and 4 of HDMTX
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Iohexol | Other | All patients will receive two Iohexol clearance tests, 5 mL each time before cycle 1 and 4 of HDMTX Receives: Drug: IOHEXOL |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Iohexol clearance results
A change from baseline Iohexol clearance results after about six weeks
Measured: An expected average of 6 weeks or more between the two Iohexol clearances
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in serum creatinine
A change from baseline serum creatinine results after about six weeks
Measured: An expected average of about 6 weeks between measures
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study start24 Jul 2014
- Primary completion26 Feb 2019
- Study completion27 Feb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ALLStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amy Walz, MD, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
- Investigators
- Amy Walz, MD, Study chair, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hosptial of Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02133599
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CMH 14CC06
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 5 May 2014
- Last updated
- 2 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Nguyen MT, Devarajan P. Biomarkers for the early detection of acute kidney injury. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008 Dec;23(12):2151-7. doi: 10.1007/s00467-007-0470-x. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
PubMed 17394022Schwartz GJ, Munoz A, Schneider MF, Mak RH, Kaskel F, Warady BA, Furth SL. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Mar;20(3):629-37. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008030287. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
PubMed 19158356Berg UB, Back R, Celsi G, Halling SE, Homberg I, Krmar RT, Monemi KA, Oborn H, Herthelius M. Comparison of plasma clearance of iohexol and urinary clearance of inulin for measurement of GFR in children. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Jan;57(1):55-61. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
PubMed 20870329Back SE, Krutzen E, Nilsson-Ehle P. Contrast media as markers for glomerular filtration: a pharmacokinetic comparison of four agents. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1988 May;48(3):247-53. doi: 10.3109/00365518809167491.
PubMed 3375780Krutzen E, Back SE, Nilsson-Ehle P. Determination of glomerular filtration rate using iohexol clearance and capillary sampling. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1990 May;50(3):279-83. doi: 10.3109/00365519009091579.
PubMed 2162080Gaspari F, Perico N, Ruggenenti P, Mosconi L, Amuchastegui CS, Guerini E, Daina E, Remuzzi G. Plasma clearance of nonradioactive iohexol as a measure of glomerular filtration rate. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995 Aug;6(2):257-63. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V62257.
PubMed 7579093Stake G, Monn E, Rootwelt K, Monclair T. The clearance of iohexol as a measure of the glomerular filtration rate in children with chronic renal failure. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1991 Dec;51(8):729-34. doi: 10.3109/00365519109104587.
PubMed 1806987Holmquist P, Torffvit O, Sjoblad S. Metabolic status in diabetes mellitus affects markers for glomerular filtration rate. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003 Jun;18(6):536-40. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1086-4. Epub 2003 Apr 16.
PubMed 12698326Adiyanti SS, Loho T. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) biomarker. Acta Med Indones. 2012 Jul;44(3):246-55.
PubMed 22983082Han WK, Bailly V, Abichandani R, Thadhani R, Bonventre JV. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. Kidney Int. 2002 Jul;62(1):237-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00433.x.
PubMed 12081583Wunnapuk K, Liu X, Peake P, Gobe G, Endre Z, Grice JE, Roberts MS, Buckley NA. Renal biomarkers predict nephrotoxicity after paraquat. Toxicol Lett. 2013 Oct 9;222(3):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
PubMed 23954200Dieterle F, Perentes E, Cordier A, Roth DR, Verdes P, Grenet O, Pantano S, Moulin P, Wahl D, Mahl A, End P, Staedtler F, Legay F, Carl K, Laurie D, Chibout SD, Vonderscher J, Maurer G. Urinary clusterin, cystatin C, beta2-microglobulin and total protein as markers to detect drug-induced kidney injury. Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):463-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1622.
PubMed 20458316Herget-Rosenthal S, Marggraf G, Husing J, Goring F, Pietruck F, Janssen O, Philipp T, Kribben A. Early detection of acute renal failure by serum cystatin C. Kidney Int. 2004 Sep;66(3):1115-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00861.x.
PubMed 15327406Christov M, Waikar SS, Pereira RC, Havasi A, Leaf DE, Goltzman D, Pajevic PD, Wolf M, Juppner H. Plasma FGF23 levels increase rapidly after acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2013 Oct;84(4):776-85. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.150. Epub 2013 May 8.
PubMed 23657144Leaf DE, Wolf M, Waikar SS, Chase H, Christov M, Cremers S, Stern L. FGF-23 levels in patients with AKI and risk of adverse outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012 Aug;7(8):1217-23. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00550112. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
PubMed 22700885
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prediction of Excretion and Toxicity of High Dose Methotrexate in Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Lymphoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02133599
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CMH 14CC06
- Conditions
- ALL
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Jul 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Feb 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Each year approximately 2,900 children and adolescents less than 20 years old are diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute lymphoblastic lymphoma in the United States. (For the purposes of this protocol, ALL will be used to refer to patients with either acute lymphoblastic leukemia or acute lymphoblastic lymphoma as patients are treated in the same manner.) High-dose methotrexate (HDMTX; 5 g/m2) remains an important component of standard treatment for most ALL patients. However, high plasma and intracellular MTX concentrations (defined as a MTX level of >1 µmol/L at 42 hours and > 0.40 µmol/L at 48 hours) can quickly lead to acute kidney, bone marrow, liver, skin, central nervous system, and gastrointestinal toxicities requiring extended hospitalization and delays in subsequent chemotherapy treatments.
This study seeks to identify more sensitive markers of kidney injury that could serve as better predictors of delayed excretion and/or toxicity of HDMTX. This study is a pilot repeated-measures feasibility study.
Hypothesis 1: Directly measured GFR (mGFR, a type of test to measure the filtering rate of kidneys) by iohexol clearance obtained prior to HDMTX will demonstrate greater sensitivity and specificity for prediction of delayed MTX excretion and/or toxicity in children and adolescents with ALL than serum creatinine (sCr) alone or sCr used for eGFR calculation. If this study proves that mGFR is a better predictor of delayed MTX excretion and/or toxicity, then another study will be developed in the future to determine if modifying the HDMTX dose or adjusting supportive care based on mGFR will prevent delayed clearance and toxicity without impacting patient survival.
Hypothesis 2: Those participants prospectively demonstrating delayed MTX excretion or toxicity will exhibit elevation of kidney injury biomarkers less than 24 hours following initiation of HDMTX infusion compared to pre-chemotherapy measurements. These biomarkers will increase prior to a measurable sCr elevation.
Detailed description
Using this approach, retrospective clinical data from our patient population has identified a significant number of HDMTX treatments associated with delayed MTX excretion (defined as a MTX level of >1 µmol/L at 42 hours and > 0.40 µmol/L at 48 hours) and secondary toxicity. From January 2012-May 2013, 16 ALL patients received 64 total HDMTX doses (4 cycles each). At 48 hours post-HDMTX infusion, 27 doses (42%) exhibited delayed MTX clearance [median plasma MTX level 0.41 µmol/L (range, 0.01-1.6 µmol/L) above the 48-hour clearance level of 0.40 µmol/L]. Mucositis, cytopenias, skin rashes, and subsequent chemotherapy delays were noted in 31%, 31%, 6%, and 34% of doses respectively. Toxicities in combination with delayed MTX clearance occurred in 17 doses (27%) and toxicity without delayed clearance occurred in 18 doses (28%). Also, a mean increase in sCr of 17% (range 0-57.6%) above pre-HDMTX baseline was observed. Although measurements of sCr are used per the standard of care as an indirect marker of kidney injury, the known delay in sCr rise following nephrotoxic (drug-induced) kidney injury (KI) eliminates its use as a point of care surrogate marker for kidney toxicity. Therefore, this study seeks to identify more sensitive markers of kidney injury that could serve as better predictors of delayed excretion and/or toxicity of HDMTX. This study is a pilot repeated-measures feasibility study.
Substantial evidence demonstrates sCr, alone or used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), overestimates kidney filtering function when compared with direct measurement of GFR [3]. A new, commonly used equation for estimating the GFR uses values of sCr, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and cystatin C. Conversely, a direct measurement of kidney filtering function (mGFR) can be accomplished by determining the plasma (part of the blood) iohexol (Omnipaque300, GE Healthcare) clearance rate (rate at which the iohexol is removed from the body by the kidneys) over a period of 300 minutes, and has been documented as a sensitive and accurate measure of renal filtering function [4]. Plasma clearance of iohexol is an optimal method of determining mGFR, particularly in children, because it is not radioactive, is non-ionic, has a low osmolality, has been proven to be a safe and non-toxic X-ray contrast medium, and is excreted from the plasma exclusively by the kidneys [5]. Iohexol is a well-known contrast agent that is already FDA-approved for use in urographic procedures, angiographic procedures, and for the measurement of GFR (See Appendix I for more information on the history and safety of iohexol use for GFR measurement). Iohexol clearance from plasma has been shown in several studies to be a suitable method of determining GFR in adults [6] and children [7, 8, 9].
Given that standard oncology care relies on sCr values and eGFR, the kidney filtering function is likely often overestimated, which can result in an increased incidence of delayed MTX excretion and subsequent toxicity. Therefore, mGFR may provide an optimal method to more accurately determine kidney filtering function and thereby allow prediction of which ALL patients will develop delayed MTX excretion and/or toxicity. The utility of mGFR in predicting MTX excretion delay and/or toxicity has not been previously studied.
In addition, earlier recognition of kidney injury following HDMTX administration could also be evaluated using biomarkers in blood and urine. If these biomarkers are found to be useful in diagnosing early kidney injury, these tests may become a new clinical point of care in the future that could allow earlier and thus more effective clinical intervention in ALL patients. These interventions include increased intravenous hydration, which decreases the associated end-organ toxicities.
Urinary kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) and clusterin, serum cystatin C, and plasma fibroblast growth factor 23 (pFGF23) are biomarkers that appear earlier and are more sensitive than sCr in the setting of kidney injury. In fact, a detectable increase in sCr does not occur until 24-48 hours after a primary renal injury [2]. KIM-1, a type 1 transmembrane glycoprotein, is not expressed in normal kidneys, but is exhibited at high levels in proximal tubule epithelial cells and is excreted into the urine within 6-12 hours after toxic or ischemic injury [10, 11, 12]. Similarly, clusterin expression is induced by glomerular, tubular, or papillary kidney injury, with increased urine concentrations at 8, 24, and 48 hours post-toxic exposure [12, 13]. Cystatin C, a cysteine protease inhibitor, is not affected by age, gender, race, or overall muscle mass, making it a useful glomerular filtration marker in early KI. In a prospective study, cystatin C rise preceded an increase in sCr by 1-2 days [14]. FGF23 increases as early as within one hour of acute KI induction in mice and remains elevated in chronically compromised GFR, thereby serving as a useful biomarker in both acute and chronic KI [15]. In addition, plasma FGF23 has recently been show to be a strong predictor for risk of adverse outcomes in adults with acute kidney injury (AKI), with the median FGF 23 level obtained within 24 hours of admission being 5.5 times higher in patients with AKI compared to "control" ICU patients without kidney injury and almost 20 times higher than the upper limit of normal [16]. Therefore, KIM-1, clusterin, cystatin C, and FGF23 could provide earlier detection of kidney injury related to HDMTX when compared with sCr measurements. The utility of these biomarkers in identifying early kidney injury following treatment with HDMTX has not been previously studied. This study will compare these biomarkers with sCr pre-, intra-, and post-HDMTX treatment to determine their utility in detecting early kidney injury.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Iohexol | Other | Drug: IOHEXOLAll patients will receive two Iohexol clearance tests, 5 mL each time before cycle 1 and 4 of HDMTX |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 21 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Histologically confirmed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Acute Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (ALL) in patients in first remission at the start of Interim Maintenance I. HDMTX is administered during the phase of chemotherapy referred to as "Interim Maintenance I". Interim maintenance I occurs after induction and consolidation, is approximately 64 days in duration, and involves administration of four doses of HDMTX, with a dose given approximately every two weeks.
- Age 2-21 years with a weight of ≥ 13.2 lbs. and a hemoglobin ≥ 7.0
- Karnofsky/Lansky performance score of ≥ 50 (See Appendix II).
- Patients must receive high-dose Methotrexate (HDMTX; 5g/m2) as part of their standard or COG study chemotherapy. The current COG protocols which involve HDMTX include the following: AALL0232, AALL0434, and AALL1131.
- Patients must have a negative urine pregnancy test prior to enrollment and cannot be lactating.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Hypersensitivity to iohexol, iodine, other contrast material
- Hypersensitivity to shellfish
- Prior treatment with HDMTX
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IOHEXOLAlso: Iohexol, Omnipaque 300Patients receive 5 mL of Iohexol prior to cycle 1 and 4 of HDMTX | Drug | Iohexol |
Primary outcome
Change in Iohexol clearance results
Time frame: An expected average of 6 weeks or more between the two Iohexol clearances
A change from baseline Iohexol clearance results after about six weeks
1 secondary outcome
Change in serum creatinine
Time frame: An expected average of about 6 weeks between measures
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Aug 2021.
- Background: PubMed 17394022Nguyen MT, Devarajan P. Biomarkers for the early detection of acute kidney injury. Pediatr Nephrol. 2008 Dec;23(12):2151-7. doi: 10.1007/s00467-007-0470-x. Epub 2007 Mar 30.
- Background: PubMed 19158356Schwartz GJ, Munoz A, Schneider MF, Mak RH, Kaskel F, Warady BA, Furth SL. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Mar;20(3):629-37. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008030287. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
- Background: PubMed 20870329Berg UB, Back R, Celsi G, Halling SE, Homberg I, Krmar RT, Monemi KA, Oborn H, Herthelius M. Comparison of plasma clearance of iohexol and urinary clearance of inulin for measurement of GFR in children. Am J Kidney Dis. 2011 Jan;57(1):55-61. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
- Background: PubMed 3375780Back SE, Krutzen E, Nilsson-Ehle P. Contrast media as markers for glomerular filtration: a pharmacokinetic comparison of four agents. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1988 May;48(3):247-53. doi: 10.3109/00365518809167491.
- Background: PubMed 2162080Krutzen E, Back SE, Nilsson-Ehle P. Determination of glomerular filtration rate using iohexol clearance and capillary sampling. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1990 May;50(3):279-83. doi: 10.3109/00365519009091579.
- Background: PubMed 7579093Gaspari F, Perico N, Ruggenenti P, Mosconi L, Amuchastegui CS, Guerini E, Daina E, Remuzzi G. Plasma clearance of nonradioactive iohexol as a measure of glomerular filtration rate. J Am Soc Nephrol. 1995 Aug;6(2):257-63. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V62257.
- Background: PubMed 1806987Stake G, Monn E, Rootwelt K, Monclair T. The clearance of iohexol as a measure of the glomerular filtration rate in children with chronic renal failure. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1991 Dec;51(8):729-34. doi: 10.3109/00365519109104587.
- Background: PubMed 12698326Holmquist P, Torffvit O, Sjoblad S. Metabolic status in diabetes mellitus affects markers for glomerular filtration rate. Pediatr Nephrol. 2003 Jun;18(6):536-40. doi: 10.1007/s00467-003-1086-4. Epub 2003 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 22983082Adiyanti SS, Loho T. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) biomarker. Acta Med Indones. 2012 Jul;44(3):246-55.
- Background: PubMed 12081583Han WK, Bailly V, Abichandani R, Thadhani R, Bonventre JV. Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): a novel biomarker for human renal proximal tubule injury. Kidney Int. 2002 Jul;62(1):237-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00433.x.
- Background: PubMed 23954200Wunnapuk K, Liu X, Peake P, Gobe G, Endre Z, Grice JE, Roberts MS, Buckley NA. Renal biomarkers predict nephrotoxicity after paraquat. Toxicol Lett. 2013 Oct 9;222(3):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 20458316Dieterle F, Perentes E, Cordier A, Roth DR, Verdes P, Grenet O, Pantano S, Moulin P, Wahl D, Mahl A, End P, Staedtler F, Legay F, Carl K, Laurie D, Chibout SD, Vonderscher J, Maurer G. Urinary clusterin, cystatin C, beta2-microglobulin and total protein as markers to detect drug-induced kidney injury. Nat Biotechnol. 2010 May;28(5):463-9. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1622.
Related trials for ALL
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Extension Study of Safety and Tolerability of DDY391 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis (CDDY391A12201-extension)
Moderate to Severe Psoriatic Arthritis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy Walz, MD study chair
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hosptial of Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing IOHEXOL in people with ALL, run by Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Iohexol clearance results (time frame: An expected average of 6 weeks or more between the two Iohexol clearances). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02133599, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2021.