AzTrials
AzTrials

Calcific Aortic StenosisPhase 2SALTIRE IINCT02132026

Study Investigating the Effect of Drugs Used to Treat Osteoporosis on the Progression of Calcific Aortic Stenosis.

A Phase 2 study testing Denosumab and Alendronic Acid in people with Calcific Aortic Stenosis, run by University of Edinburgh at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Aortic stenosis is a condition whereby one of the heart valves (aortic valve) becomes narrowed, due to calcium deposition, over time. This can lead to chest pain, heart failure and sudden death. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Calcific Aortic Stenosis
What is being tested?
Denosumab and Alendronic Acid
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
152 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
12 Nov 2014to 28 Nov 2019
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • age >50 years
  • peak aortic jet velocity of >2.5 m/s on Doppler echocardiography
  • grade 2-4 calcification of the aortic valve on echocardiography

Who cannot join

  • Anticipated or planned aortic valve surgery in the next 6 months,
  • Life expectancy <2 years,
  • Inability to undergo scanning
  • Treatment for osteoporosis with bisphosphonates or denosumab.
  • Long-term corticosteroid use.
  • Abnormalities of the oesophagus or conditions which delay oesophageal/gastric emptying,
  • 8) Inability to sit or stand for at least 30 minutes, 9) Known allergy or intolerance to alendronate or denosumab, or any of their excipients, 10) Hypocalcaemia, 11) Maintenance calcium supplementation, 12) Dental extraction within 6 months, 13) History of osteonecrosis of the jaw, 14) Major or untreated cancers, 15) Poor dental hygiene, 16) Women of child-bearing potential who have experienced menarche, are pre-menopausal, have not been sterilised or who are currently pregnant, 17) Women who are breastfeeding, 18) Renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 mL/min), 19) Allergy or contraindication to iodinated contrast, 20) Inability or unwilling to give informed consent, 21) Likelihood of non-compliance to treatment allocation or study protocol

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Clinical Research Facility University of Edinburgh

    Edinburgh, EH16 4SA

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: SALTIRE II: Bisphosphonates and RANKL Inhibition in Aortic Stenosis

Aortic stenosis is a condition whereby one of the heart valves (aortic valve) becomes narrowed, due to calcium deposition, over time. This can lead to chest pain, heart failure and sudden death. It is the commonest valve disease requiring surgery in the developed world and as the population becomes increasingly older, it is predicted that the prevalence of aortic stenosis will double in the next 20 years. Currently the only treatment is replacement of the aortic valve. Whilst this is excellent treatment, not everyone is suitable for it.

The primary objective of our study is to determine whether 2 drugs used in the treatment of osteoporosis (a condition of bone thinning) can halt/retard the progression of aortic stenosis. This is on the basis that studies have suggested that altered regulation of calcium metabolism may be an important mechanism perpetuating the disease. Both drugs work by reducing calcium release into the bloodstream from bones and therefore calcification of the aortic valve.

Read more

150 patients will therefore be randomly allocated to either of the trial drugs which are denosumab,the bisphosphonate (alendronic acid), or a placebo.

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanning is a technique where biochemically active molecules are injected and are taken up at sites of ongoing calcification activity where they emit radiation and can be detected by the PET scanner. We have previously shown that this technique can demonstrate areas of newly developing calcification on an aortic valve.

We therefore propose that patients receiving bisphosphonates or denosumab will have reduced evidence of active calcification and slower progression of their disease at two years as assessed by Echocardiography (ultrasound) and a change in their calcium score (quantity of calcium on the aortic valve measured using Computed Tomography [CT] ).

The data from this study will then be used to design a larger trial.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Aortic Stenosis is a common cause of valvular heart disease in which the valve cusps become progressively calcified. The only available treatment is aortic valve replacement and previous attempts at providing medical therapies to modify the disease process have proved unsuccessful.

Pathophysiology of Aortic Stenosis. The initiating event is believed to be caused by mechanical damage to the cells lining the valve in a process similar to that which occurs in atherosclerosis. However the propagating mechanism is more likely to be that of active calcification. In support of this, a growing body of pre-clinical and clinical data indicates that treatments for osteoporosis, which work by preventing the breakdown of bone and therefore calcium release into the blood, can reduce calcium deposition (calcification) of the blood vessels. These agents therefore hold considerable promise as novel therapies for aortic stenosis.

Denosumab in Aortic Stenosis Denosumab is a drug which prevents bone cells called osteoclasts from breaking down bone and releasing calcium into the blood. For this reason it is used to treat osteoporosis. It works on a specific pathway which we believe to be important in regulating calcium release from bone. Mice engineered with defects within this pathway were found to have increased bone breakdown and blood vessel calcification. Furthermore there have been two studies to assess the role of this pathway in patients with aortic valve disease. Both studies have also demonstrated altered regulation within this pathway

Bisphosphonates in Aortic Stenosis Bisphosphonates are a group of drugs widely used for the treatment of osteoporosis and also prevent bone breakdown by osteoclasts. They have also been shown to have important cardiovascular effects with a consistent reduction in calcification of blood vessels and the aortic valve. This in part appears to be a consequence of their inhibition of bone breakdown but also by reducing the production of key inflammatory substances implicated in the early stages of aortic stenosis. We plan on using alendronic acid which is a bisphosphonate commonly used in the management of osteoporosis.

PET CT scanning in Aortic Stenosis. 18F-NaF (Sodium Fluoride) is biochemical compound which preferentially binds to regions of newly developing calcification and emits radiation. When used in combination with Computed Tomography (CT) it enables it to be localized. This way we are able to identify areas of newly developing calcification on an aortic valve.

In previous studies in our institution, we demonstrated we could quantify 18F-NaF uptake in the aortic valve and that there was a progressive rise in activity with increasing disease severity. We found that at At 1 year, the baseline 18F-NaF uptake emerged as a powerful predictor of the progression in aortic valve calcification. Following analysis of 2 year follow up data, 18F-NaF emerged as an independent predictor of aortic valve replacement and cardiovascular mortality

Therefore these findings have led us to propose that

  1. Calcification is the key driver to Aortic Stenosis Progression
  2. We want to reduce calcification activity using Denosumab and Biphosphonates
  3. We predict that this will reduce the 18F-NaF signal and disease progression on Echocardiography and CT.

STUDY DESIGN This will be a double-blind, randomized, placebo-control trial of denosumab and alendronic acid in patients with aortic stenosis.

Study population and randomization

We aim to recruit 170 patients in total with non-rheumatic calcific aortic stenosis.

20 patients will only participate in scan-rescan reproducibility studies. They will not proceed to the randomization stage.

Of the remaining 150 patients, 75 subjects will be randomized (2:1) to either subcutaneous denosumab 60 mg (n=50) or matched placebo (n=25) every 6 months; and a further 75 will be randomized (2:1) to oral alendronate 70 mg (n=50) or matched placebo (n=25) once weekly

Assessment and follow up

All subjects will undergo a standardized clinical assessment at baseline and every six months. Data will be collected with respect to symptomatic status, the trial safety endpoints, routine biochemical profiling, biomarkers, quality of life questionnaires and electrocardiography.

Aortic stenosis severity will be assessed at baseline and every 6 months by echocardiography performed by a single, dedicated sonographer to maximize reproducibility. Severity will be assessed using the peak and mean aortic valve pressure gradients (this technique is used to monitor aortic stenosis severity; the higher the pressure gradient across the aortic valve the more severe the narrowing). We will also calculate the aortic valve area and calcification score.

PET CT and CT calcium scoring.

Both will be performed using a combined PET and 128-multidetector CT scanner (Biograph 128, Siemens).

CT calcium scoring measures the amount of calcium in the valve and will be assessed at baseline, 6 months and 2 years. It will act as an additional marker of disease severity and progression alongside Echocardiography. Those with a heart rate of >65 /min will be given heart-slowing medication (beta blockers) if deemed safe. The region of the aortic valve will be then be scanned during a breath hold.

18F-NaF PET uptake will be measured at baseline, and 6 months to assess the early impact of the intervention on valvular calcification activity. PET images on their own are difficult to interpret as they do not tell you where the radiation is coming from. For this reason the PET needs to be performed alongside CT which gives us images of the aortic valve. By superimposing the two images we are able to identify where the 'PET signal' is originating from.

To ensure optimal image quality patients will be required to adhere to a high fat, low carbohydrate diet for 48 hours prior to the scan. The subject will then be cannulated to enable injection of the 18F-NaF tracer. They will then rest in a quiet environment for 60 minutes to enable the tracer to reach the valve before transfer to the imaging suite. Those with a heart rate of >65 /min will be given beta-blockade if it is deemed suitable and safe. This is routine practice in cardiac CT. A scout CT will be performed to allow optimal alignment of the PET and CT scanners (so we can be sure the radiation we are detecting is coming from the aortic valve). The patient will then be asked to lie still for 30 minutes so that the PET data can be acquired.

Finally a 'CT angiogram' will be performed of the aortic valve. This involves image acquisition following injection of a radio opaque dye into the aorta. This again allows more accurate localization of our PET signal.

The additional twenty patients will only undergo repeat PET/CT imaging within 2 weeks of their baseline scan to investigate scan-rescan reproducibility of the 18F-NaF PET signal. They will not proceed with the trial beyond this stage to avoid facing increased radiation exposure.

Being tested
Denosumab, Alendronic Acid, Denosumab Placebo, Alendronic Acid Placebo
Keywords
Aortic Stenosis, Denosumab, Alendronic Acid, Osteoporosis
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve, Calcification of, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Osteoporosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DenosumabDrug

    Also called Prolia, Marketing Authorisation Number : EU/1/11/703/003, ATC number M05BX04

  • Alendronic AcidDrug

    Also called Marketing Authorisation Number PL 30306/0032, ATC codes M05B A04

  • Denosumab PlaceboDrug

    subcutaneous injection of 0.9%Saline at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months

  • Alendronic Acid PlaceboDrug

    Inert Capsule containing lactose monohydrate manufactured and labelled by Investigational Supplies Group (ISG) University of Edinburgh.

Study groups in NCT02132026
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Alendronic AcidActive comparator50 patients will receive once weekly Alendronic Acid tablets (70mg).
Receives: Drug: Alendronic Acid
Alendronic Acid placeboPlacebo comparator25 patients will receive alendronic acid placebo tablets.
Receives: Drug: Alendronic Acid Placebo
DenosumabActive comparator50 patients will receive 6 monthly denosumab injections
Receives: Drug: Denosumab
Denosumab PlaceboPlacebo comparator25 patients will receive a 6 monthly placebo injection.
Receives: Drug: Denosumab Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in aortic valve calcium score

    The change in calcium score will be assessed using computed tomography and is an assessment of disease severity.

    Measured: Measured at Baseline, 6 months and 2 years

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in aortic valve 18F-NaF uptake

    This is determined by positron emission tomography and is a measure of calcification activity.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and 6 months

  2. Change in aortic-jet velocity

    This will be determined by Doppler echocardiography and is a measure of disease severity.

    Measured: Measured at baseline, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months

  3. Change in thoracic aortic and coronary artery calcium score

    This will be determined by computed tomography and is an additional assessment of vascular calcification.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and 2 years

  4. Change in thoracic spine bone mineral density

    This will be determined by quantitative computed tomography.

    Measured: Measured at baseline and 2 years

  5. Change in quality of life determined by Short Form 36 Questionnaire

    Questionnaire

    Measured: Measured at baseline and 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start12 Nov 2014
  3. Primary completion28 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion28 Nov 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
152 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02132026
Sponsor's protocol ID
SALTIRE2-2014
Acronym
SALTIRE II
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
2 May 2014
Last updated
14 Oct 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Dweck MR, Jenkins WS, Vesey AT, Pringle MA, Chin CW, Malley TS, Cowie WJ, Tsampasian V, Richardson H, Fletcher A, Wallace WA, Pessotto R, van Beek EJ, Boon NA, Rudd JH, Newby DE. 18F-sodium fluoride uptake is a marker of active calcification and disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Mar;7(2):371-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.113.001508. Epub 2014 Feb 7.

    PubMed 24508669
  • Dweck MR, Khaw HJ, Sng GK, Luo EL, Baird A, Williams MC, Makiello P, Mirsadraee S, Joshi NV, van Beek EJ, Boon NA, Rudd JH, Newby DE. Aortic stenosis, atherosclerosis, and skeletal bone: is there a common link with calcification and inflammation? Eur Heart J. 2013 Jun;34(21):1567-74. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht034. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

    PubMed 23391586
  • Dweck MR, Joshi FR, Newby DE, Rudd JH. Noninvasive imaging in cardiovascular therapy: the promise of coronary arterial (1)(8)F-sodium fluoride uptake as a marker of plaque biology. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2012 Sep;10(9):1075-7. doi: 10.1586/erc.12.104. No abstract available.

    PubMed 23098140
  • Dweck MR, Jones C, Joshi NV, Fletcher AM, Richardson H, White A, Marsden M, Pessotto R, Clark JC, Wallace WA, Salter DM, McKillop G, van Beek EJ, Boon NA, Rudd JH, Newby DE. Assessment of valvular calcification and inflammation by positron emission tomography in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2012 Jan 3;125(1):76-86. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.051052. Epub 2011 Nov 16.

    PubMed 22090163
  • Oikonomou EK, Craig NJ, Holste G, Vasisht Shankar S, White AC, Mahendran M, Newby DE, Dweck MR, Khera R. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Echocardiography as a Surrogate for Multimodality Aortic Stenosis Imaging: Post Hoc Analysis of a Clinical Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2026 Feb;19(2):e018353. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.125.018353. Epub 2025 Dec 31.

    PubMed 41473954
  • Geers J, Manral N, Razipour A, Park C, Tomasino GF, Xing E, Grodecki K, Kwiecinski J, Pawade T, Doris MK, Bing R, White AC, Droogmans S, Cosyns B, Slomka PJ, Newby DE, Dweck MR, Dey D. Epicardial adipose tissue, myocardial remodelling and adverse outcomes in asymptomatic aortic stenosis: a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Heart. 2025 Jun 26;111(14):686-694. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2024-324925.

    PubMed 40050004
  • Geers J, Bing R, Pawade TA, Doris MK, Daghem M, Fletcher AJ, White AC, Forsyth L, Evans E, Kwiecinski J, Williams MC, van Beek EJR, Kwak S, Peeters FECM, Tzolos E, Slomka PJ, Lucatelli C, Ralston SH, Prendergast B, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Effect of Denosumab or Alendronate on Vascular Calcification: Secondary Analysis of SALTIRE2 Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e032571. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032571. Epub 2024 Sep 9.

    PubMed 39248270
  • Pawade TA, Doris MK, Bing R, White AC, Forsyth L, Evans E, Graham C, Williams MC, van Beek EJR, Fletcher A, Adamson PD, Andrews JPM, Cartlidge TRG, Jenkins WSA, Syed M, Fujisawa T, Lucatelli C, Fraser W, Ralston SH, Boon N, Prendergast B, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Effect of Denosumab or Alendronic Acid on the Progression of Aortic Stenosis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2021 Jun 22;143(25):2418-2427. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053708. Epub 2021 Apr 29.

    PubMed 33913339
  • Pawade T, Clavel MA, Tribouilloy C, Dreyfus J, Mathieu T, Tastet L, Renard C, Gun M, Jenkins WSA, Macron L, Sechrist JW, Lacomis JM, Nguyen V, Galian Gay L, Cuellar Calabria H, Ntalas I, Cartlidge TRG, Prendergast B, Rajani R, Evangelista A, Cavalcante JL, Newby DE, Pibarot P, Messika Zeitoun D, Dweck MR. Computed Tomography Aortic Valve Calcium Scoring in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 Mar;11(3):e007146. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.007146.

    PubMed 29555836
  • Pawade TA, Cartlidge TR, Jenkins WS, Adamson PD, Robson P, Lucatelli C, Van Beek EJ, Prendergast B, Denison AR, Forsyth L, Rudd JH, Fayad ZA, Fletcher A, Tuck S, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Optimization and Reproducibility of Aortic Valve 18F-Fluoride Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016 Oct;9(10):e005131. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005131.

    PubMed 27733431
  • Pawade TA, Newby DE, Dweck MR. Calcification in Aortic Stenosis: The Skeleton Key. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Aug 4;66(5):561-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.05.066.

    PubMed 26227196
  • Pawade TA, Newby DE. Treating aortic stenosis: arresting the snowball effect. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 May;13(5):461-3. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2015.1037284. Epub 2015 Apr 16.

    PubMed 25882205

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Denosumab and Alendronic Acid in people with Calcific Aortic Stenosis, run by University of Edinburgh at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in aortic valve calcium score (time frame: Measured at Baseline, 6 months and 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02132026, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in