Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)NCT02131311
A Clinical Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of a Disposable Intra-vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
A study testing disposable, single-use pessary in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI), run by Procter and Gamble at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the pessary device by assessing reduction in urine leakage in approximately 80 women with SUI. Efficacy will be assessed by pad weight gain, frequency of stress urinary incontinence events, and a quality of life questionnaire. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
- What is being tested?
- disposable, single-use pessary
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to Sep 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- be female 18 years or older;
- provide written informed consent prior to study participation and receive a signed copy;
- be in generally good health as determined by the Investigator;
- have a ≥ 3 month history of experiencing SUI (self reported);
- be willing to use the pessary investigational device to control stress urinary incontinence;
- be willing to comply with study requirements and instructions;
Who cannot join
- pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the study;
- within 3 months post partum;
- intrauterine device (IUD) placement of less than 6 months;
- has self-reported difficulty emptying her bladder;
- a history of Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) or symptoms consistent with TSS;
- experience difficulty inserting or wearing an intra-vaginal device, including a tampon;
Show all 9Show fewer
- vaginal surgery, perineal surgery, uterine surgery, or abortion (spontaneous or induced) within the past 3 months;
- has any Screening laboratory value outside the laboratory reference range considered clinically significant by the Investigator which could impact the safety of the subject or the outcome of the study;
- for any reason, the Investigator decides that the subject should not participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Clinical Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of a Disposable Intra-vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the pessary device by assessing reduction in urine leakage in approximately 80 women with SUI. Efficacy will be assessed by pad weight gain, frequency of stress urinary incontinence events, and a quality of life questionnaire.
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
- Being tested
- disposable, single-use pessary
- Keywords
- single use, disposable, pessary, stress urinary incontinence, sui
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Stress
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
disposable, single-use pessaryDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| pessary | Experimental | disposable, single-use pessary Receives: Device: disposable, single-use pessary |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Responders for Pad Weight Gain or SUI Episodes
Measured: from the 14-day baseline period to the last 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in Stress Urinary Incontinence Episodes
change from baseline as measured as reduction (improvement) in stress urinary incontinence episodes. Positive values are indicative of efficacious outcome.
Measured: from the 14-day baseline period to the last 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Change in Pad Weight Gain
change from baseline as measured as reduction (improvement) in pad weight gain. Positive values are indicative of efficacious outcome.
Measured: from the 14-day baseline period to the last 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7)
The IIQ-7 is based on 7 questions referring to areas which may have been influenced or changed by accidental urine loss and/or prolapse. These questions are assigned a value of, 0 = 'Not at all,' 1= 'Slightly,' 2 = 'Moderately,' or 3 'Greatly.' The IIQ-7 is scored by taking the average score of items and then multiplying the average by 33 1/3 to put scores on a scale from 0 to 100. A lower score is considered less impact to quality of life and a higher score reflects more impact to quality of life. In the same manner, a reduction in scores from baseline reflects improved quality of life.
Measured: baseline and end-of-treatment
Change in Stress Urinary Incontinence Episodes
change from baseline as measured as reduction (improvement) in stress urinary incontinence episodes. Positive values are indicative of efficacious outcome.
Measured: from the 14-day baseline period to the first 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Change in Pad Weight Gain
change from baseline as measured as reduction (improvement) in pad weight gain. Positive values are indicative of efficacious outcome.
Measured: from the 14-day baseline period to the first 7 days of a 14-day device usage period
Percentage of Responders for Pad Weight Gain or SUI Episodes
Measured: from the 14-day baseline period to the first 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completionSep 2014
- Study completionSep 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Procter and Gamble
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Randall Severance, MD, Principal investigator, Radiant Research, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02131311
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012118
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 2 May 2014
- Last updated
- 24 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Clinical Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of a Disposable Intra-vaginal Device for Stress Urinary Incontinence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02131311
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2012118
- Conditions
- Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
- Keywords
- single use, disposable, pessary, stress urinary incontinence, sui
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Procter and GambleIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Mar 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will evaluate the effectiveness of the pessary device by assessing reduction in urine leakage in approximately 80 women with SUI. Efficacy will be assessed by pad weight gain, frequency of stress urinary incontinence events, and a quality of life questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| pessary | Experimental | Device: disposable, single-use pessarydisposable, single-use pessary |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- be female 18 years or older;
- provide written informed consent prior to study participation and receive a signed copy;
- be in generally good health as determined by the Investigator;
- have a ≥ 3 month history of experiencing SUI (self reported);
- be willing to use the pessary investigational device to control stress urinary incontinence;
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant during the study;
- within 3 months post partum;
- intrauterine device (IUD) placement of less than 6 months;
- has self-reported difficulty emptying her bladder;
- a history of Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) or symptoms consistent with TSS;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| disposable, single-use pessary | Device | pessary |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Responders for Pad Weight Gain or SUI Episodes
Time frame: from the 14-day baseline period to the last 7 days of 14-day device usage period
6 secondary outcomes
Change in Stress Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Time frame: from the 14-day baseline period to the last 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Change in Pad Weight Gain
Time frame: from the 14-day baseline period to the last 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Change in Quality of Life as Measured by Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7)
Time frame: baseline and end-of-treatment
Change in Stress Urinary Incontinence Episodes
Time frame: from the 14-day baseline period to the first 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Change in Pad Weight Gain
Time frame: from the 14-day baseline period to the first 7 days of a 14-day device usage period
Percentage of Responders for Pad Weight Gain or SUI Episodes
Time frame: from the 14-day baseline period to the first 7 days of 14-day device usage period
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Mar 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Active, not recruiting
A Study to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the UrOActive® Artificial Urinary sPHincter (AUS)
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
Recruiting
Comparing the Effect of Two Types of Pelvic Floor Muscle Stimulation Devices to Improve Symptoms of Urinary Incontinence in Women.
Urinary Incontinence, Mixed Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Effect of High-Intensity Focused Electromagnetic (HIFEM) Technology in the Treatment of SUI in Chinese Men Undergone Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
Urinary Incontinence , Stress, Prostatectomy
Recruiting
The Effects of Expiratory Muscle Strength Training in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence
Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Randall Severance, MD principal investigator
Radiant Research, Inc.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing disposable, single-use pessary in people with Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI), run by Procter and Gamble at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Mar 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Responders for Pad Weight Gain or SUI Episodes (time frame: from the 14-day baseline period to the last 7 days of 14-day device usage period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2016.