Postoperative PainNCT02130544
Acute Pain Management Following Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Comparison of Lobectomy and Wedge Resection
An observational study of Postoperative Pain, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Viedo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) have became popular in recent years. There is no golden rule of postoperative analgesia for VATS. Compared with lobectomy, wedge resection preserves better pulmonary function and is suitable for elder patients and patients who could not afford to have lobectomy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Pain
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to Apr 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Selected patients are from the hospital patients who are arranged to have video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy or wedge resection
Who may be able to join
- Age >= 20
- Using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative analgesia
- ASA physical status classification I-III
Who cannot join
- Staying in intensive care unit after surgery
- Emergency surgery
- Pregnancy
- Other surgery incisions which are not used for the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
- Patients never use intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
Ya-Jung cheng, +886-2-2312-3456 ext. 65523, chengyj@ntu.edu.tw
About this study
Viedo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) have became popular in recent years. There is no golden rule of postoperative analgesia for VATS. Compared with lobectomy, wedge resection preserves better pulmonary function and is suitable for elder patients and patients who could not afford to have lobectomy. In addition to surgery time、recovery time and hospital stay, wound incisions and organization damages are different,too. Will patients also have different response to pain control after these two surgery? The retrospective study is to compared the differences of postoperative pain management between VATS lobectomy and wedge resection.
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Postoperative
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Postoperative pain scale
Measured: postoperative day 1 to day 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completionApr 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionApr 2015 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Postoperative PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National Taiwan University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ya-Jung Cheng, Principal investigator, National Taiwan University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02130544
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201403039RIND
- Status last verified
- Dec 2014
- First submitted
- 1 May 2014
- Last updated
- 5 Dec 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Dec 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Acute Pain Management Following Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: Comparison of Lobectomy and Wedge Resection
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02130544
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201403039RIND
- Conditions
- Postoperative Pain
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National Taiwan University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Apr 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Viedo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery(VATS) have became popular in recent years. There is no golden rule of postoperative analgesia for VATS. Compared with lobectomy, wedge resection preserves better pulmonary function and is suitable for elder patients and patients who could not afford to have lobectomy. In addition to surgery time、recovery time and hospital stay, wound incisions and organization damages are different,too. Will patients also have different response to pain control after these two surgery? The retrospective study is to compared the differences of postoperative pain management between VATS lobectomy and wedge resection.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Selected patients are from the hospital patients who are arranged to have video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lobectomy or wedge resection
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age >= 20
- Using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative analgesia
- ASA physical status classification I-III
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Staying in intensive care unit after surgery
- Emergency surgery
- Pregnancy
- Other surgery incisions which are not used for the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
- Patients never use intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Postoperative pain scale
Time frame: postoperative day 1 to day 3
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Dec 2014.
Related trials for Postoperative Pain
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
RecruitingPhase 2
REctus Sheath Trial
Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Pain in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section at Assuit University Hospital
Cesarean Section
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ya-Jung Cheng principal investigator
National Taiwan University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Postoperative Pain, run by National Taiwan University Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Fu-Lan Chuang (+886-953358755, uniques3146@yahoo.com.tw), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Postoperative pain scale (time frame: postoperative day 1 to day 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Dec 2014.