AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical Intraepithelial NeoplasiaPhase 2/3NCT02130323

Topical Imiquimod vs. LEEP for Women With Carcinoma In-situ of the Cervix

A Phase 2/3 study testing Imiquimod and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in people with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

OBJECTIVE: The standard of care for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to 3 (CIN 2-3) has been the excision of the cervical transformation zone by way of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization (CKC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and older, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
What is being tested?
Imiquimod and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2015to 9 May 2017
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy women older than age 21, military or civilian
  • Negative pregnancy test results
  • Confirmed CIN 2-3 on cervical biopsy with a negative endocervical curettage (ECC) and satisfactory colposcopy visualizing the complete transformation zone of the cervix.
  • The patient will be available and in the San Diego area for 6 months after enrollment to complete the clinic visits and follow up.

Who cannot join

  • Positive CIN 2-3 on ECC
  • Presence of cancer
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Immuno-compromised (systemic lupus erythematosus, kidney transplant)
  • Hepatitis
  • Hypersensitivity to Imiquimod
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Crohn's disease
  • Human Immunodeficiency virus

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego

    San Diego, California, 92134-5000

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial of Non-inferiority of Topical Imiquimod vs. LEEP for Women With Carcinoma In-situ of the Cervix

OBJECTIVE: The standard of care for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 to 3 (CIN 2-3) has been the excision of the cervical transformation zone by way of a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization (CKC). However, it has been recognized that these procedures can increase the risks for pre-term labor in women who still desire to conceive. Recent studies have shown that medical treatment with Imiquimod, a topical immune response modulator, has significant effects on histological regression of CIN 2-3 when compared with placebo. The investigators propose that treatment with Imiquimod may be preferable offering similar outcomes on histological regression when compared with excision or ablation while potentially avoiding or reducing the number of surgical procedure that places them at risk for future pregnancies.

Read the detailed description

MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled trial of patients with CIN 2-3 to receive either surgical excision with LEEP or CKC versus medical therapy with Imiquimod once weekly inserted vaginally for 16 weeks. Inclusion criteria are women age 21 years or older with confirmed histological diagnosis of CIN 2-3 with a normal endocervical curettage (ECC) if obtained and satisfactory colposcopy (the transformation zone of the cervix was completely visualized.) Exclusion criteria include positive CIN2-3 on ECC, presence of cancer, pregnancy or lactation, immune deficiency, hepatitis, or hypersensitivity to Imiquimod. Patients will be randomized to receive excision with LEEP/CKC or Imiquimod 250 mg (5%) cream (12.5 mg of active ingredient) inserted vaginally once a week for 16 weeks.

The primary outcome will be histological regression to CIN 1 or less. Secondary outcomes will be complete histological regression, high-risk Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) clearance, Clearance of HPV 16, 18/45, and patient tolerance of Imiquimod regimen. Follow up with repeat pap, HPV typing to include 16 and 18/45 subtyping, and colposcopy with directed cervical biopsy will be performed at 6 months post initiation of treatment. Patients unable to complete at least 8 treatments and miss two treatments consecutively will be considered failures and offered immediate LEEP. Those patients that complete 8 treatments of Imiquimod will be reevaluated 6 months from initiating treatment. Demographic information will be obtained to include age, gravidity and parity, smoking history, and contraceptive use.

Descriptive statistics will include numbers and rates of occurrence with confidence intervals of regression, pre, and post-treatment HPV including HPV 16 and 18/45 typing, and adverse effects. The assumed regression rate for the LEEP arm varies within studies. We are choosing a conservative estimate of 85% regression rate from CIN2+ to CIN1 or less. More recently in a 2014 publication in the Journal of Virology (Author Antonio Frega, Journal of Clinical Virology 60 (2014) 39-43) 13% of the LEEP patients out of 475 had residual disease after LEEP. In this study they excluded the 10% of patients that had had positive margins on their LEEP specimen. We are not excluding them as this is intent to treat study. For Imiquimod the Grimm study found a 73.3% regression rate with those treated with the active ingredient. A non-inferiority-type design for two proportions using differences is used in which the difference between treatments is defined as medical treatment being preferable if the regression rate is not more than 15% below that of the excisional treatment. Comparison of the regression rates of the two treatments will be made by a non-inferiority Fisher's exact test.

Required sample size was assessed using the PASS software of the NCSS statistical package. Using power = 0.80 and alpha = 0.05, a power analysis predicts the need for 68 patients per arm for 136. Post-treatment HPV rates will be compared similarly. We will recruit 75 patients to each arm to buffer for a dropout rate.

Being tested
Imiquimod, Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
Keywords
Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Imiquimod
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ImiquimodDrug

    Also called Aldara

    12.5mg (5%) once a week vaginally for 16 weeks

  • Loop Electrosurgical Excision ProcedureProcedure or surgery

    Also called LEEP

    Patients with CIN 2-3 will be randomized to receive intervention, CKC or LEEP versus medical therapy with Imiquimod.

Study groups in NCT02130323
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Loop Electrosurgical Excision ProcedureActive comparatorExcision of the cervical transformation zone by way of the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) or cold knife conization (CKC).
Receives: Procedure: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure
ImiquimodExperimentalImiquimod 12.5mg intravaginally once weekly for 16 weeks
Receives: Drug: Imiquimod

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Human Papillomavirus(HPV) Clearance

    HPV clearance will be determined by pathology and HPV testing, followed by colposcopy.

    Descriptive statistics will include numbers and rates of occurrence with confidence intervals of regression, pre and post-treatment HPV including Human Papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16) and HPV 18/45 typing, and adverse effects. A non-inferiority type design is used in which the difference between treatments is defined as medical treatment being preferable if the regression rate is not more than 10% below that of the excisional treatment. Comparison of the regression rates of the two treatments will be made by a non-inferiority Fisher's exact test.

    Measured: 6 months from treatment initiation

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Evidence of local or systemic side effects of Imiquimod cream

    Patients will be seen in dysplasia clinic at Naval Medical Center San Diego (NMCSD) every 4 weeks while in treatment to determine tolerability of the Imiquimod Arm. Patients with significant symptoms will be asked to delay using Imiquimod until symptoms resolve before resuming. Patients unable to complete at least 4 weeks of treatment (1 treatment per week), will be offered immediate LEEP or surveillance at the 6 month follow up.

    Measured: Every 4 weeks after initiation of Imiquimod Arm for 16 weeks

  2. Evidence of local or systemic side effects of Imiquimod cream

    Patients will be provided a daily phone number to a qualified nurse regarding any symptoms experienced while on the Imiquimod arm of the study. Patients will be instructed to be evaluated in the Emergency Department after clinic hours if needed for up to 6 months after study initiation.

    Measured: Daily after initiation of Imiquimod treatment Arm, up to 6 months after study initiation

  3. Number of Participants with Serious and Non-Serious Adverse Events

    All reported Adverse Events will be captured on the Adverse Event report.

    Measured: Up to 6 months after study initiation

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 May 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2015
  3. Primary completion21 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion9 May 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02130323
Sponsor's protocol ID
NMCSD.2014.0040
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
24 Apr 2014
Last updated
27 Jun 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Imiquimod and Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure in people with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, run by United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Human Papillomavirus(HPV) Clearance (time frame: 6 months from treatment initiation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in