Plaque PsoriasisPhase 2NCT02129777
Efficacy and Safety of Namilumab (MT203) for Plaque Psoriasis
A Phase 2 study testing Namilumab in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Takeda at 10 sites in Canada.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to establish proof of efficacy for namilumab in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, measured as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)75 response rate at Week 12. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Plaque Psoriasis
- What is being tested?
- Namilumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 122 participants
- Where
- 10 sitesCanada
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to Feb 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Is male or female aged 18 to 70 years, inclusive.
- Is suffering from active but clinically stable plaque psoriasis (for at least 6 months) involving >=10% of their body surface area and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score >=12.
- Must have been a candidate for, or have received, >= phototherapy or systemic psoriasis therapy.
- A male participant who is non-sterilized and sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential agrees to use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent throughout the duration of the study (including the treatment period and 18 weeks after last dose of study medication).
- A female participant of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a non-sterilized male partner agrees to routinely use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent throughout the duration of the study (including the treatment period and 18 weeks after last dose of study medication).
- In the opinion of the investigator, is capable of understanding and complying with protocol requirements.
- The participant or, when applicable, the participant's legally acceptable representative signs and dates a written informed consent form and any required privacy authorization prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
Who cannot join
- Has received any investigational agent during an interval equivalent to 5 half- lives for that agent agent - or an interval of 30 days if longer - prior to the study Baseline clinic visit, or is participating / plans to participate in any other clinical trial during this study.
- Has received namilumab, any other Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) / GM-CSF receptor or granulocyte stimulating factor (G-GSF) signaling inhibitor either in a previous clinical study or as a therapeutic agent.
- Is required to take excluded medications.
- Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to namilumab or any of the contents of the formulation.
- Has other forms of psoriasis (eg drug-induced psoriasis, pustular, erythrodermic, exfoliative, inverse and/or guttate psoriasis).
- Evidence of skin conditions other than psoriasis (eg, eczema) at the time of the Screening clinic visit, or between the Screening visit and study drug initiation, that would interfere with evaluations of the effect of investigational product on psoriasis.
Show all 24Show fewer
- Has a history or evidence of a clinically significant disorder (including but not limited to cardiopulmonary, oncologic, renal, metabolic, hematologic or psychiatric), condition or disease that, in the opinion of the investigator and Takeda physician would pose a risk to participant safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion.
- Evidence of clinically uncontrolled respiratory disease (including sarcoidosis) on the basis of data from the subjects' respiratory assessments - including chest X-ray, lung function tests (forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV1], forced vital capacity [FVC], peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR]) and pulse oximetry performed at Screening. The subjects must have saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2) ≥ 94%, FEV1 and/or FVC ≥ 60 % of predicted values at Screening and Baseline and no uncontrolled lung disease. Subject treatment initiated or modified to control lung disease within 24 weeks prior to Screening must be considered exclusionary.
- History of clinically significant interstitial lung disease - e.g. chronic or recurrent pulmonary infection where macrophages are important for the clearance of the infection (such as Pneumocystis (carinii) jiroveci pneumonia, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, Nocardia infections, Actinomyces infection).
- Presence or history of active tuberculosis (TB) or latent TB infection, where no anti-TB treatment has been given or where successful completion of an appropriate course of anti-TB therapy cannot be documented.
- A positive QuantiFERON-TB Gold test and / or evidence of active or latent TB by chest X- ray, not accompanied by initiation of an approved regimen of anti-TB therapy at least 12 months prior to the Baseline clinic visit.
- Has a history of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and / or history of severe COPD exacerbation(s), or a history of asthma with exacerbations requiring hospitalization, within the last 12 months prior to the Screening visit.
- History of methotrexate treatment-associated lung toxicity.
- Has a history of cancer within the last 10 years except for adequately managed basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin or in situ carcinoma of the cervix treated and considered cured.
- Has a history of treatment with anti-cancer chemotherapy (e.g. alkylating agents, anti-metabolites, purine analogues) and/or monoclonal antibodies, or has received GM-CSF / G-CSF treatment associated with chemotherapy within the last 5 years.
- Has an underlying condition that predisposes to infections (eg immunodeficiency, history of poorly controlled diabetes, splenectomy).
- Has any clinically significant illness within 4 weeks prior to the first dose of study medication or during the study - including acute or chronic infectious disease, which may influence the outcome of the study.
- Has a known history of infection with hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or has serological findings at the Screening visit which indicate active or latent hepatitis B, hepatitis C or HIV infection.
- Has, in the judgment of the investigator, clinically significant abnormal clinical laboratory parameters at Screening including, but not limited to: Hemoglobin <8.5 g/dL, Neutrophils <1500/mm^3, Platelet count <75 000 cells/mm^3 and AST or ALT >2 x ULN.
- Has a history of drug abuse (defined as any illicit drug use), or a history of alcohol abuse within 2 years prior to the Screening visit.
- Any other condition that, in the judgment of the investigator, might cause this study to be detrimental to the participant's health.
- If female, is (a) pregnant / lactating / intending to become pregnant before or within the period of 18 weeks immediately after receiving the last dose of study medication; (b) intending to donate ova during this time period.
- Intends to donate sperm during the course of this study or within a period of 18 weeks after receiving the last dose of study medication.
- Is an immediate family member, study site employee, or is in a dependent relationship with a study site employee involved in conduct of this study (eg, spouse, parent, child, sibling), or may consent under duress.
Trial locations and contacts
10 sites in 1 country.
10 sites in 1 country
Canada10 sites
Study site
Barrie, Ontario
Study site
Calgary, Alberta
Study site
Edmonton, Alberta
Study site
Hamilton, Ontario
Study site
Markham, Ontario
Study site
North Bay, Ontario
Study site
Peterborough, Ontario
Study site
Québec, Quebec
Study site
Richmond Hill, Ontario
Study site
Waterloo, Ontario
About this study
Official title: A Multi-Centre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding and Proof of Concept Study, to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Namilumab/MT203 at 4 Different Subcutaneous Doses - Together With an Open-Label, Dose-Escalated Extension to Assess Safety and Efficacy of One Year Treatment - in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
The purpose of this study is to establish proof of efficacy for namilumab in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, measured as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)75 response rate at Week 12.
Read the detailed description
The drug tested in this study is called namilumab. Namilumab was tested to prove its effectiveness in treating moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. This study looked at improvement of plaque psoriasis in participants who take namilumab.
The study enrolled 122 participants. Participants were randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of five treatment groups that were undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study (unless there was an urgent medical need):
- Namilumab subcutaneous injection 300 mg Day 1, 150 mg Days 15, 43 and 71
- Namilumab subcutaneous injection 160 mg Day 1, 80 mg Days 15, 43 and 71
- Namilumab subcutaneous injection 100 mg Day 1, 50 mg Days 15, 43 and 71
- Namilumab subcutaneous injection 40 mg Day 1, 20 mg Days 15, 43 and 71
- Placebo (dummy inactive subcutaneous injection) - this is a liquid solution that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient Days 1, 15, 43 and 71.
This study consisted of two parts. Eligible participants received 10 weeks of treatment with double-blinded study medication, followed by an extended treatment period (active extension period, intended to be 52 weeks) with open-label study medication. At Week 12, participants were assessed for primary endpoint response, which determined the course of their progression through the open-label treatment period. Participants who showed >=75% reduction of Baseline (Day 1) PASI at Week 12, "Responders", began a washout interval (for a maximum of 24 weeks) with no use of study medication: this interval continued until a partial (25%) loss of Week 12 treatment response is recorded in assessments conducted on a 2-weekly basis - thereby prompting the start of dosing with open-label (OL) study medication (Day 0 OL through Week 52 OL). In contrast, participants who did not show >=75% reduction of Baseline PASI score at Week 12, "Partial/Non-Responders", began the open-label extension period 4 weeks after the final dose of blinded study medication.
Participants were then followed-up through an 18-week post-treatment assessment period during which no medication was given. During the open-label extension period participants began dosing with 80 mg namilumab; however, if an inadequate treatment response was recorded, then dose escalation to 150 mg namilumab was implemented.
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Being tested
- Namilumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Drug therapy
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NamilumabDrug
Also called MT203
Namilumab subcutaneous injection
PlaceboDrug
Placebo subcutaneous injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Blinded period: Namilumab 300 mg + namilumab 150 mg | Experimental | Namilumab 300 mg (2 separate injections of 150 mg), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by namilumab 150 mg subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. Receives: Drug: Namilumab |
| Blinded period: Namilumab 160 mg + namilumab 80 mg | Experimental | Namilumab 160 mg (2 separate injections of 80 mg), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by namilumab 80 mg subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. Receives: Drug: Namilumab |
| Blinded period: Namilumab 100 mg + namilumab 50 mg | Experimental | Namilumab 100 mg (2 separate injections of 50 mg), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by namilumab 50 mg subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. Receives: Drug: Namilumab |
| Blinded period: Namilumab 40 mg + namilumab 20 mg | Experimental | Namilumab 40 mg (2 separate injections of 20 mg), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by namilumab 20 mg subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. Receives: Drug: Namilumab |
| Blinded period: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo (2 separate injections), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by placebo, subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Open label: Namilumab 80 mg | Experimental | Namilumab 80 mg subcutaneous injection, at Week 0 and every 4 weeks thereafter up to 52 weeks (active extension period) - if appropriate on the basis of treatment response. Receives: Drug: Namilumab |
| Open label: Namilumab 150 mg | Experimental | Namilumab 150 mg, subcutaneous injection, from Week 8 and then every 4 weeks thereafter up to 52 weeks (active extension period) - if appropriate on the basis of treatment response. Receives: Drug: Namilumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75 Percent Reduction From Baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI75 Response) at Week 12
PASI is an assessment of psoriasis lesion severity and affected body area combined into single score. The body was divided into 4 sections: head (h), trunk (t), upper (u) and lower (l) extremities. For each section, percent body surface area (A) involved was estimated: 0= No involvement to 6= 90-100 percent (%). Severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D); scale: 0= no symptoms to 4= very marked. Final PASI = 0.1(Eh + Ih + Dh)Ah + 0.3(Et + It + Dt)At + 0.2(Eu + Iu + Du)Au + 0.4(El + Il + Dl)Al where head: 0.1, upper extremities (arms): 0.2, trunk: 0.3, lower extremities (legs): 0.4 (corresponding to approximately 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of body surface area, respectively); total possible score range: 0= no disease to 72= maximal disease. Participants showing at least 75% reduction in PASI score relative to baseline PASI Score are reported.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (17)
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75 Percent Reduction From Baseline PASI Score (PASI75 Response) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10
PASI is an assessment of psoriasis lesion severity and affected body area combined into single score. The body was divided into 4 sections: head (h), trunk (t), upper (u) and lower (l) extremities. For each section, percent body surface area (A) involved was estimated: 0= No involvement to 6= 90-100 percent (%). Severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D); scale: 0= no symptoms to 4= very marked. Final PASI = 0.1(Eh + Ih + Dh)Ah + 0.3(Et + It + Dt)At + 0.2(Eu + Iu + Du)Au + 0.4(El + Il + Dl)Al where head: 0.1, upper extremities (arms): 0.2, trunk: 0.3, lower extremities (legs): 0.4 (corresponding to approximately 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of body surface area, respectively); total possible score range: 0= no disease to 72= maximal disease. Participants showing at least 75% reduction in PASI score relative to baseline PASI Score are reported.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 10
Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
PASI is an assessment of psoriasis lesion severity and affected body area combined into single score. The body was divided into 4 sections: head (h), trunk (t), upper (u) and lower (l) extremities. For each section, percent body surface area (A) involved was estimated: 0= No involvement to 6= 90-100 percent (%). Severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D); scale: 0= no symptoms to 4= very marked. Final PASI = 0.1(Eh + Ih + Dh)Ah + 0.3(Et + It + Dt)At + 0.2(Eu + Iu + Du)Au + 0.4(El + Il + Dl)Al where head: 0.1, upper extremities (arms): 0.2, trunk: 0.3, lower extremities (legs): 0.4 (corresponding to approximately 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of body surface area, respectively); total possible score range: 0= no disease to 72= maximal disease.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline PASI Score (PASI50 Response) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
PASI is an assessment of psoriasis lesion severity and affected body area combined into single score. The body was divided into 4 sections: head (h), trunk (t), upper (u) and lower (l) extremities. For each section, percent body surface area (A) involved was estimated: 0= No involvement to 6= 90-100 percent (%). Severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D); scale: 0= no symptoms to 4= very marked. Final PASI = 0.1(Eh + Ih + Dh)Ah + 0.3(Et + It + Dt)At + 0.2(Eu + Iu + Du)Au + 0.4(El + Il + Dl)Al where head: 0.1, upper extremities (arms): 0.2, trunk: 0.3, lower extremities (legs): 0.4 (corresponding to approximately 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of body surface area, respectively); total possible score range: 0= no disease to 72= maximal disease. Participants showing at least 50% reduction in PASI score relative to baseline PASI Score are reported.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline PASI Score (PASI90 Response) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
PASI is an assessment of psoriasis lesion severity and affected body area combined into single score. The body was divided into 4 sections: head (h), trunk (t), upper (u) and lower (l) extremities. For each section, percent body surface area (A) involved was estimated: 0= No involvement to 6= 90-100 percent (%). Severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D); scale: 0= no symptoms to 4= very marked. Final PASI = 0.1(Eh + Ih + Dh)Ah + 0.3(Et + It + Dt)At + 0.2(Eu + Iu + Du)Au + 0.4(El + Il + Dl)Al where head: 0.1, upper extremities (arms): 0.2, trunk: 0.3, lower extremities (legs): 0.4 (corresponding to approximately 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of body surface area, respectively); total possible score range: 0= no disease to 72= maximal disease. Participants showing at least 90% reduction in PASI score relative to baseline PASI Score are reported.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Point Improvement From Baseline in Static Physicians Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
sPGA for psoriasis is scored on a 6-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, plaque elevation and skin scaling across all psoriatic lesions. sPGA of psoriasis scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe). Participants who had >=2 point improvement are reported.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving a sPGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
sPGA for psoriasis is scored on a 6-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, plaque elevation and skin scaling across all psoriatic lesions. sPGA of psoriasis scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe). 'Clear' and 'Almost clear' included all participants who had scored a 0 or 1.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Change From Baseline in sPGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
sPGA for psoriasis is scored on a 6-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, plaque elevation and skin scaling across all psoriatic lesions. sPGA of psoriasis scale ranges from 0 (clear) to 5 (very severe).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Assessment of BSA with psoriasis was performed by means of the palm method, where the palm of the participant's hand represented 1% of BSA. The affected areas were then calculated by their size compared to the participant's palm.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Itching Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Assessments were performed using a portable electronic device, which was kept and used by the participant throughout the duration of the study. Participants were asked to indicate their level of itching by marking a horizontal line with "No itch" at the left extreme and "Worst itch imaginable" at the right extreme (scale ranging from 0 - 10, but not shown on the line). Each assessment was intended to capture the severity of itching experienced during the previous 24 hours.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in VAS Joint Pain Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Assessments were performed using a portable electronic device, which was kept and used by the participant throughout the duration of the study. Participants were asked to indicate their severity of joint pain by marking a horizontal line with "No pain" at the left extreme and "Worst pain imaginable" at the right extreme (scale ranging from 0 - 10, but not shown on the line). Each assessment was intended to capture the severity of pain experienced during the previous 24 hours.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in VAS Morning Stiffness Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Assessments were performed using a portable electronic device, which was kept and used by the participant throughout the duration of the study. Participants were asked to indicate their level of morning stiffness by marking a horizontal line with "No stiffness" at the left extreme and "Very severe stiffness" at the right extreme (scale ranging from 0 - 10, but not shown on the line). Each assessment was intended to capture the severity of stiffness experienced by the participant since waking on that particular day.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Assessments were performed using a portable electronic device, which was kept and used by the participant throughout the duration of the study. Duration of stiffness was elicited in response to a standard question included in the portable device.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 12
The DLQI is a 10-point rating scale for determining the impact of dermatological conditions on the participant's quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). Maximum total score is 30, where 0-1 represents "No effect at all on participant's life" and 21-30 "Extremely large effect on participant's life" - higher scores indicating poorer quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 12
SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. These 8 aspects are summarized as physical and mental health summary scores. The score range for the physical and mental health scores is 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D)- Index Score at Week 12
EQ-5D-Index score is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. The profile allows participants to rate their health state in 5 health domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The score ranges from -0.594 to 1.000. The higher score indicates a better health state perceived by the participant.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Week 12
EQ-5D-VAS is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm ("Worst imaginable health state") to 100 mm ("Best imaginable health state"); higher scores indicate a better health state.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lunula, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop [salmon patch dyschromia]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 [absence of psoriasis] to 4 [presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores = more severe psoriasis.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 May 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionSep 2015
- Study completionFeb 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Plaque PsoriasisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by TakedaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Takeda
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Clinical Science, Study director, Takeda
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02129777
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M1-1188_203
- Other IDs
- U1111-1146-1219, 2013-002806-30, 172235
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Papp KA, Gooderham M, Jenkins R, Vender R, Szepietowski JC, Wagner T, Hunt B, Souberbielle B; NEPTUNE investigators. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jun;180(6):1352-1360. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17195. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
PubMed 30207587
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multi-Centre, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Dose-Finding and Proof of Concept Study, to Assess the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Namilumab/MT203 at 4 Different Subcutaneous Doses - Together With an Open-Label, Dose-Escalated Extension to Assess Safety and Efficacy of One Year Treatment - in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02129777
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M1-1188_203
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Keywords
- Drug therapy
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 122 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TakedaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 May 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 7 Apr 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to establish proof of efficacy for namilumab in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, measured as Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)75 response rate at Week 12.
Detailed description
The drug tested in this study is called namilumab. Namilumab was tested to prove its effectiveness in treating moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis. This study looked at improvement of plaque psoriasis in participants who take namilumab.
The study enrolled 122 participants. Participants were randomly assigned (by chance, like flipping a coin) to one of five treatment groups that were undisclosed to the patient and study doctor during the study (unless there was an urgent medical need):
- Namilumab subcutaneous injection 300 mg Day 1, 150 mg Days 15, 43 and 71
- Namilumab subcutaneous injection 160 mg Day 1, 80 mg Days 15, 43 and 71
- Namilumab subcutaneous injection 100 mg Day 1, 50 mg Days 15, 43 and 71
- Namilumab subcutaneous injection 40 mg Day 1, 20 mg Days 15, 43 and 71
- Placebo (dummy inactive subcutaneous injection) - this is a liquid solution that looks like the study drug but has no active ingredient Days 1, 15, 43 and 71.
This study consisted of two parts. Eligible participants received 10 weeks of treatment with double-blinded study medication, followed by an extended treatment period (active extension period, intended to be 52 weeks) with open-label study medication. At Week 12, participants were assessed for primary endpoint response, which determined the course of their progression through the open-label treatment period. Participants who showed >=75% reduction of Baseline (Day 1) PASI at Week 12, "Responders", began a washout interval (for a maximum of 24 weeks) with no use of study medication: this interval continued until a partial (25%) loss of Week 12 treatment response is recorded in assessments conducted on a 2-weekly basis - thereby prompting the start of dosing with open-label (OL) study medication (Day 0 OL through Week 52 OL). In contrast, participants who did not show >=75% reduction of Baseline PASI score at Week 12, "Partial/Non-Responders", began the open-label extension period 4 weeks after the final dose of blinded study medication.
Participants were then followed-up through an 18-week post-treatment assessment period during which no medication was given. During the open-label extension period participants began dosing with 80 mg namilumab; however, if an inadequate treatment response was recorded, then dose escalation to 150 mg namilumab was implemented.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 7
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Blinded period: Namilumab 300 mg + namilumab 150 mg | Experimental | Drug: NamilumabNamilumab 300 mg (2 separate injections of 150 mg), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by namilumab 150 mg subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. |
| Blinded period: Namilumab 160 mg + namilumab 80 mg | Experimental | Drug: NamilumabNamilumab 160 mg (2 separate injections of 80 mg), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by namilumab 80 mg subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. |
| Blinded period: Namilumab 100 mg + namilumab 50 mg | Experimental | Drug: NamilumabNamilumab 100 mg (2 separate injections of 50 mg), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by namilumab 50 mg subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. |
| Blinded period: Namilumab 40 mg + namilumab 20 mg | Experimental | Drug: NamilumabNamilumab 40 mg (2 separate injections of 20 mg), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by namilumab 20 mg subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. |
| Blinded period: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo (2 separate injections), subcutaneous injection, on Day 1, followed by placebo, subcutaneous injection, on Days 15, 43 and 71. |
| Open label: Namilumab 80 mg | Experimental | Drug: NamilumabNamilumab 80 mg subcutaneous injection, at Week 0 and every 4 weeks thereafter up to 52 weeks (active extension period) - if appropriate on the basis of treatment response. |
| Open label: Namilumab 150 mg | Experimental | Drug: NamilumabNamilumab 150 mg, subcutaneous injection, from Week 8 and then every 4 weeks thereafter up to 52 weeks (active extension period) - if appropriate on the basis of treatment response. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Is male or female aged 18 to 70 years, inclusive.
- Is suffering from active but clinically stable plaque psoriasis (for at least 6 months) involving >=10% of their body surface area and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score >=12.
- Must have been a candidate for, or have received, >= phototherapy or systemic psoriasis therapy.
- A male participant who is non-sterilized and sexually active with a female partner of childbearing potential agrees to use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent throughout the duration of the study (including the treatment period and 18 weeks after last dose of study medication).
- A female participant of childbearing potential who is sexually active with a non-sterilized male partner agrees to routinely use adequate contraception from signing of the informed consent throughout the duration of the study (including the treatment period and 18 weeks after last dose of study medication).
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Has received any investigational agent during an interval equivalent to 5 half- lives for that agent agent - or an interval of 30 days if longer - prior to the study Baseline clinic visit, or is participating / plans to participate in any other clinical trial during this study.
- Has received namilumab, any other Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) / GM-CSF receptor or granulocyte stimulating factor (G-GSF) signaling inhibitor either in a previous clinical study or as a therapeutic agent.
- Is required to take excluded medications.
- Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergies to namilumab or any of the contents of the formulation.
- Has other forms of psoriasis (eg drug-induced psoriasis, pustular, erythrodermic, exfoliative, inverse and/or guttate psoriasis).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NamilumabAlso: MT203Namilumab subcutaneous injection | Drug | Blinded period: Namilumab 100 mg + namilumab 50 mg, Blinded period: Namilumab 160 mg + namilumab 80 mg, Blinded period: Namilumab 300 mg + namilumab 150 mg, Blinded period: Namilumab 40 mg + namilumab 20 mg, Open label: Namilumab 150 mg, Open label: Namilumab 80 mg |
| PlaceboPlacebo subcutaneous injection | Drug | Blinded period: Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75 Percent Reduction From Baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI75 Response) at Week 12
Time frame: Week 12
PASI is an assessment of psoriasis lesion severity and affected body area combined into single score. The body was divided into 4 sections: head (h), trunk (t), upper (u) and lower (l) extremities. For each section, percent body surface area (A) involved was estimated: 0= No involvement to 6= 90-100 percent (%). Severity was estimated by clinical signs: erythema (E), induration (I), and desquamation (D); scale: 0= no symptoms to 4= very marked. Final PASI = 0.1(Eh + Ih + Dh)Ah + 0.3(Et + It + Dt)At + 0.2(Eu + Iu + Du)Au + 0.4(El + Il + Dl)Al where head: 0.1, upper extremities (arms): 0.2, trunk: 0.3, lower extremities (legs): 0.4 (corresponding to approximately 10%, 20%, 30%, and 40% of body surface area, respectively); total possible score range: 0= no disease to 72= maximal disease. Participants showing at least 75% reduction in PASI score relative to baseline PASI Score are reported.
17 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75 Percent Reduction From Baseline PASI Score (PASI75 Response) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, and 10
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 10
Change From Baseline in PASI Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50 Percent Reduction From Baseline PASI Score (PASI50 Response) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving 90 Percent Reduction From Baseline PASI Score (PASI90 Response) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 2 Point Improvement From Baseline in Static Physicians Global Assessment (sPGA) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Percentage of Participants Achieving a sPGA Response of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10 and 12
Change From Baseline in sPGA Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Itching Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in VAS Joint Pain Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in VAS Morning Stiffness Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in Duration of Morning Stiffness at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D)- Index Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-VAS Score at Week 12
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Mean Change From Baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 6, 10, and 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30207587Papp KA, Gooderham M, Jenkins R, Vender R, Szepietowski JC, Wagner T, Hunt B, Souberbielle B; NEPTUNE investigators. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) as a therapeutic target in psoriasis: randomized, controlled investigation using namilumab, a specific human anti-GM-CSF monoclonal antibody. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Jun;180(6):1352-1360. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17195. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
Related trials for Plaque Psoriasis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Dose Ranging Study of ORKA-001 in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of CS32582 in Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Zasocitinib in Adults With Non-pustular Palmoplantar Psoriasis
Palmoplantar Psoriasis
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Investigate the Effectiveness of Tirzepatide (LY3298176) Following Initiation of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque PsO and Obesity or Overweight in Clinical Practice (TOGETHER AMPLIFY-PsO)
Psoriasis, Overweight or Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of JNJ-77242113 for the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis
Plaque Psoriasis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Director, Clinical Science study director
Takeda
10 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Namilumab in people with Plaque Psoriasis, run by Takeda at 10 sites in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 10 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 7 Apr 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants Achieving 75 Percent Reduction From Baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score (PASI75 Response) at Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02129777, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2017.