AzTrials
AzTrials

Allergic RhinitisPhase 2GRAMALNCT02126111

Efficacy of a Depigmented Extract of Phleum in Local Allergic Rhinitis

A Phase 2 study testing DEPIGOID phleum in people with Allergic Rhinitis, run by Plaza del Hospital Civil at 2 sites in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is evaluate the efficacy of a depigmented grass extract in the treatment of local allergic rhinitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Allergic Rhinitis
What is being tested?
DEPIGOID phleum
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
56 participants
Where
2 sitesSpain
Study dates
Oct 2010to Apr 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Local allergic rhinitis with sensitization to grass pollen
  • Skin prick test and serum specific IgE negative to grass pollen.
  • Positive Nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT) to grass pollen and/or positive nasal specific IgE to grass pollen.
  • Written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Immunological diseases
  • Heart diseases that limit the use of adrenaline. For example, severe hypertension or treatment with beta-blockers.
  • Treatment with beta-blockers
  • Severe psychological disorders
  • Severe atopic dermatitis
  • FEV1 < 70% of reference value after treatment
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Hypersensitivity or intolerance to excipients and / or medication trial.
  • Failure to adequately perform diagnostic tests or treatment.
  • Sensitization to other allergens (perennial or seasonal) with clinical relevance for the subject and that may interfere in the evaluation of the response.
  • Immunotherapy in the 5 years prior to their inclusion in the study.
  • Pregnant women or at risk of pregnancy and lactating women.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Spain2 sites
  • Hospital Infanta Leonor

    Madrid, Madrid

  • Hospital Regional Universitario Carlos Haya

    Málaga, Malaga

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Efficacy of a Depigmented Extract of Phleum in the Treatment of Local Allergic Rhinitis

The purpose of this study is evaluate the efficacy of a depigmented grass extract in the treatment of local allergic rhinitis.

Being tested
DEPIGOID phleum, DEPIGOID Placebo
Medical subject headings
Rhinitis, Allergic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DEPIGOID phleumBiological

    Subcutaneous Immunotherapy with modified extract of Phleum pollen.

  • DEPIGOID PlaceboBiological

    Placebo for subcutaneous administration

Study groups in NCT02126111
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DEPIGOID phleumActive comparatorThe active treatment arm receive active phleum pollen immunotherapy (Depigoid 100% phleum). Depigmented and polymerized allergen extract of Phleum pollen for subcutaneous injection.
Receives: Biological: DEPIGOID phleum
DEPIGOID Placebo & DEPIGOID PhleumPlacebo comparatorThis arm receive DEPIGOID Placebo during the first year, and DEPIGOID Phleum during the second year of study. DEPIGOID Placebo contains the same composition as in the active DEPIGOID Phleum with the only difference being the exclusion of the phleum pollen allergen extract.
Receives: Biological: DEPIGOID phleum; Biological: DEPIGOID Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Symptoms and medication scores comparison between active and placebo group

    Patients were provided a diary to score the severity of their symptoms and the use of rescue medication during 4 weeks in two consecutive springs.

    Nasal symptoms of rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, sneezing, nasal itching, and ocular symptoms were recorded using a 4-point categorical scale from 0 to 3 (0: no symptoms, 1:mild, 2:moderate; 3:severe).

    The use of rescue medication was recorded in the patient diary according to the following score:

    Oral antihistamines (1 tablet = 1 point); intranasal corticosteroids (400mcg/day of beclometasone or equivalent = 1.4 points); and ocular antihistamines (1 dose = 1 point).

    Measured: two years

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Response to nasal allergen provocation test with phleum (NAPT-Phl)

    The response to NAPT-Phl with increasing concentrations of phleum pratense (0.001-0.01-0.05-0.1 mcg/ml) will be evaluated by nasal symptoms and acoustic rhinometry.

    Measured: two years

  2. Skin prick-test (SPT) with phleum.

    Evaluation of SPT wheal size.

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Intradermal test (IDT) with phleum

    IDT wheal and erythema size.

    Measured: 2 years

  4. FEV1

    Measured: 2 years

  5. Quality of life questionnaire RQLQ

    Measured: 2 years

  6. Flow cytometry study for determination of IFN-gamma, IL-13, IL-5, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-2 in peripheral blood and nasal lavage

    Measured: 2 years

  7. Determination of tryptase, eosinophil cationic protein, IgG, IgG4, specific IgE to grass (Phl p1, Phl p5, Phl p7, Phl p12) in peripheral blood and nasal lavage.

    Measured: 2 years

  8. Heart rate

    Measured: 2 years

  9. Blood pressure

    Measured: 2 years

  10. Adverse events

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2010
  3. Primary completionApr 2016
  4. Study completionApr 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
56 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02126111
Sponsor's protocol ID
MBG6043179
Acronym
GRAMAL
Status last verified
Nov 2016
First submitted
12 Feb 2014
Last updated
8 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Rondon C, Blanca-Lopez N, Campo P, Mayorga C, Jurado-Escobar R, Torres MJ, Canto G, Blanca M. Specific immunotherapy in local allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with Phleum pratense subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy. Allergy. 2018 Apr;73(4):905-915. doi: 10.1111/all.13350. Epub 2017 Nov 28.

    PubMed 29168570

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing DEPIGOID phleum in people with Allergic Rhinitis, run by Plaza del Hospital Civil at 2 sites in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Symptoms and medication scores comparison between active and placebo group (time frame: two years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02126111, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in