In-Hospital Cardiac ArrestHWDNCT02122549
Hospital Wearable Defibrillator Inpatient Study
A study testing HWD1000 in people with In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by Zoll Medical Corporation at 8 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This study will obtain device-human interaction evaluations for the HWD1000 within the controlled environment of the hospital as well as establish that the safety profile is similar to outpatient wearable cardioverter-defibrillators use. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- What is being tested?
- HWD1000
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 59 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to Jul 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients whom a physician deems at risk of sudden cardiac arrest during the hospitalization period (patients will be monitored using the hospital's telemetry system). Specific inclusion criteria are:
- Hospitalized patients having continuous independent ECG monitoring.
- Patients at risk of sudden cardiac arrest during the hospitalization period as determined by the investigating physician.
- Patient ≥18 years of age (over the legal age of providing consent).
Who cannot join
- Patients with an active implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
- Patients with an active unipolar pacemaker.
- Patients with physical or mental conditions preventing them from interacting with or wearing the device as determined by the investigating physician.
- Patients having an advanced directive prohibiting resuscitation.
- Patients having bandages or other clinical condition preventing the HWD use.
- Patients unable to consent.
- Patients having recently experienced an arrhythmic storm.
- Patients prone to paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia.
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 1 country.
8 sites in 1 country
United States8 sites
Study site
Atlantis, Florida
Study site
Danbury, Connecticut
Study site
Iowa City, Iowa
Study site
Jupiter, Florida
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Saint Paul, Minnesota
Study site
Seattle, Washington
About this study
This study will obtain device-human interaction evaluations for the HWD1000 within the controlled environment of the hospital as well as establish that the safety profile is similar to outpatient wearable cardioverter-defibrillators use.
Read the detailed description
A multi-center prospective study of hospitalized patients whom a physician deems at risk of sudden cardiac arrest during the hospitalization period, wearing the HWD1000 hospital wearable defibrillator in order to evaluate caregiver and patient interactions with the device. In addition, ECG signal quality will be reviewed to confirm the HWD1000 safety profile.
- Conditions
- In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- Being tested
- HWD1000
- Keywords
- In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Telemetry
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HWD1000Device
Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator designed for inpatient use
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HWD1000 | Experimental | Subjects using HWD1000 Receives: Device: HWD1000 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Time Rhythm Monitoring by the HWD1000 is Compromised Due to ECG Noise.
The amount of time that the HWD1000 is unable to monitor the subject's rhythm status is the primary safety measure. The specific goals are that average monitoring will be inhibited by noise no greater than 2% of the time worn (at least 24 hours) and monitoring using single lead analysis will be no greater than 5% of the time worn (at least 24 hours).
Measured: 24 hours or longer
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completionJul 2015
- Study completionJul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for In-Hospital Cardiac ArrestStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zoll Medical Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Steven J Szymkiewicz, MD, Principal investigator, Zoll Medical Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02122549
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 90D0118
- Acronym
- HWD
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 17 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 31 May 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hospital Wearable Defibrillator Inpatient Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02122549
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HWD / 90D0118
- Conditions
- In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- Keywords
- In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Telemetry
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zoll Medical CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 31 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will obtain device-human interaction evaluations for the HWD1000 within the controlled environment of the hospital as well as establish that the safety profile is similar to outpatient wearable cardioverter-defibrillators use.
Detailed description
A multi-center prospective study of hospitalized patients whom a physician deems at risk of sudden cardiac arrest during the hospitalization period, wearing the HWD1000 hospital wearable defibrillator in order to evaluate caregiver and patient interactions with the device. In addition, ECG signal quality will be reviewed to confirm the HWD1000 safety profile.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HWD1000 | Experimental | Device: HWD1000Subjects using HWD1000 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients whom a physician deems at risk of sudden cardiac arrest during the hospitalization period (patients will be monitored using the hospital's telemetry system). Specific inclusion criteria are:
- Hospitalized patients having continuous independent ECG monitoring.
- Patients at risk of sudden cardiac arrest during the hospitalization period as determined by the investigating physician.
- Patient ≥18 years of age (over the legal age of providing consent).
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients with an active implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.
- Patients with an active unipolar pacemaker.
- Patients with physical or mental conditions preventing them from interacting with or wearing the device as determined by the investigating physician.
- Patients having an advanced directive prohibiting resuscitation.
- Patients having bandages or other clinical condition preventing the HWD use.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HWD1000Wearable cardioverter-defibrillator designed for inpatient use | Device | HWD1000 |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Time Rhythm Monitoring by the HWD1000 is Compromised Due to ECG Noise.
Time frame: 24 hours or longer
The amount of time that the HWD1000 is unable to monitor the subject's rhythm status is the primary safety measure. The specific goals are that average monitoring will be inhibited by noise no greater than 2% of the time worn (at least 24 hours) and monitoring using single lead analysis will be no greater than 5% of the time worn (at least 24 hours).
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruitingObservational study
CAROTID DOPPLER AND CEREBRAL OXIMERY IN POST CARDIAC ARREST ICU PATIENTS
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Carotid Doppler
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Compression-Only Versus Standard Basic Life Support Training in Nursing Students
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation, Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Not yet recruiting
Execution of Prehospital Transesophageal Echocardiography During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Patients With Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA)
Active, not recruiting
The REVIVE-PEEP Trial: Positive End-expiratory Pressure Versus Sham Valve/Zero End-expiratory Pressure in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Manual Ventilation to Improve Neurological Outcomes at Discharge in Adult Patients Suffering an Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest, Out-Of-Hospital
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steven J Szymkiewicz, MD principal investigator
Zoll Medical Corporation
8 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing HWD1000 in people with In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, run by Zoll Medical Corporation at 8 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 31 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Time Rhythm Monitoring by the HWD1000 is Compromised Due to ECG Noise. (time frame: 24 hours or longer). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2017.