Eisenmenger SyndromeNCT02119442
Transcatheter Valve Implantation in Patients With Dysfunctional Left and Right Sided Heart Valves
A study testing Transcather Valve Implantation in people with Eisenmenger Syndrome, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A growing body of data, suggests that transcatheter valves are effective when implanted in other locations (mitral, aortic, tricuspid) and in high pressure environments. The investigators plan to offer transcatheter valve implantation as an alternative to high risk surgery in patients who require revision of a… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Eisenmenger Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Transcather Valve Implantation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 90 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2013to Feb 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients will be considered eligible for transcatheter valve implantation if the risk of serious morbidity or mortality with surgical intervention is deemed to be greater than 10 percent by the treating cardiologist and consulting surgeon. The Melody Valve is intended for use in the following clinical conditions:
- Existence of a full (circumferential) RVOT conduit that was equal to or greater than 16 mm in diameter when originally implanted, AND
- Dysfunctional RVOT conduits with a clinical indication for intervention, AND EITHER
- Regurgitation ≥ moderate
- Stenosis: mean right ventricular outflow tract gradient ≥ 35 mmHg
- The Edwards Sapien Valve will be used in the aortic position for valves and conduits larger than 23mm in diameter with a landing zone less than 26-27mm, otherwise the melody valve will be considered
- The Edwards Sapien Vavle will also be considered in other positions that have an adequate landing zone and a large enough circumference
- The Melody valve may be utilized outside of its approved indications for valve replacement in high risk surgical patients
Who cannot join
- There are no known contraindications for implantation of the Melody Valve or the Edwards Sapien Valve
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of California Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095
About this study
A growing body of data, suggests that transcatheter valves are effective when implanted in other locations (mitral, aortic, tricuspid) and in high pressure environments. The investigators plan to offer transcatheter valve implantation as an alternative to high risk surgery in patients who require revision of a stenotic or regurgitant valve in the non-pulmonary position (mitral, aortic, tricuspid). This therapy can provide an alternative to patients who may be considered high risk and may not be able to survive a surgical procedure.The use of the devices on this protocol are for medical treatment and are not part of a clinical trial.
Read the detailed description
Many forms of congenital and structural heart disease require surgical placement of prosthetic valves and conduits. These conditions include many common congenital heart abnormalities such as Tetralogy of Fallot, Double Outlet Right Ventricle, Truncus Arteriosus and patients who require the Ross procedure for aortic stenosis. There are a variety of acquired conditions, including calcific aortic valve stenosis that may require surgical or transcatheter valve treatment. Unfortunately, when valved conduits are placed surgically, they ultimately become narrowed or regurgitant and require periodic replacement. Thus, patients with these conditions often undergo multiple open heart surgeries during their lifetime. Although the risk of mortality with this kind of surgery is low, surgical intervention is associated with significantly longer recovery times and more patient discomfort when compared to transcatheter interventions. Over the last decade, techniques have been developed to palliate these forms of congenital and structural heart disease using catheters inserted through blood vessels in the groin. These transcatheter techniques have allowed patients to delay or avoid open heart surgery.
The Medtronic Melody Trancatheter Valve and the Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve are both bioprosthetic valves mounted within metal stents. Their entire structure is collapsible, allowing it to be inserted through delivery sheaths and threaded into the heart, typically without the need of surgical cardiopulmonary bypass. Some of these procedures may be performed using a hybrid technique of minimal surgical access and transcatheter valve delivery. The valves can then be expanded into place by inflating a balloon (similar to how stents are placed elsewhere in the heart, like the coronary artery). The Melody Valve received a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) from the FDA and the Edwards Sapien Valve has market approval from the FDA.The investigators plan to offer these transcatheter valves as alternatives to eligible patients who require replacement of a stenotic or regurgitant valve in all left and right sided positions.
The intended role of the Melody Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve is to restore pulmonary valve function in patients with a dysfunctional RVOT conduit and a clinical indication for pulmonary valve replacement. Unlike currently available options for pulmonary valve replacement, the TPV is intended to be placed with a transcatheter delivery system, and thus does not require surgical incisions, open heart surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, or the various morbidities associated with surgical pulmonary valve replacement. The Edwards Sapien Valve is delivered in the same manner, but was intended for use in the aortic position. The ultimate goals and durability of the TPV may differ among patients with different indications. At a minimum, the intention is that the TPV will improve hemodynamic function, mitigate the adverse impact of valve regurgitation and/or obstruction, and effectively extend the longevity of the existing conduit and defer or obviate the need for conduit replacement. These techniques may decrease the number of open heart surgeries required over the course of a patient's lifetime, thereby decreasing the cumulative morbidity and risk associated with such operations.
With regards to valve replacement in any position with an adequate landing zone, the Melody Valve and Edwards Sapien Valve are presently being utilized at multiple United States centers for valve replacement in all positions in patients who are considered high risk candidates for surgical valve replacement. A recent article published by Zahn et al reported an experience in tricuspid valve implantations at three United States centers and one Austrailian center. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Tricuspid regurgitation was reduced to mild or none in all patients. Noted complications were consistent with known risks of cardiac catheterization and Melody Valve implantation, regardless of indication. Similarly, an article published by Kenny et al demonstrated the successful implantation of the Sapien valve in the tricuspid position. Gillespie et al, recently published a series of Melody implants in the mitral position in sheep that had undergone annuloplasty ring placement. Other investigators have successfully implanted the Melody valve in the aortic and mitral positions in patients with good immediate and short/intermediate term outcomes (Ben-Gal et al, Hasan et al, Gossl et al). The Edwards Sapien Valve has several reports of positive outcomes when implanted within the aortic position (Thomas et al, Moat et al, Webb et al) and two case series that report encouraging results when placed in the mitral position. (Seiffert et al, Cheung et al)
- Conditions
- Eisenmenger Syndrome
- Being tested
- Transcather Valve Implantation
- Keywords
- Eisenmenger Syndrome, Pulmonary Arterial Hyptertension
- Medical subject headings
- Eisenmenger Complex
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcather Valve ImplantationDevice
Also called Medtronic Melody Transcatheter Valve; Melody TPV 20 PB1016:Melody TPV 22 PB1018, Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve
Transcather Valve Implantation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter Valve Implantation | Other | Intervention, Transcatheter Valve Implantation with Melody or Sapien bioprosthetic valve Standard of care intervention. Receives: Device: Transcather Valve Implantation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants Who Developed Infective Endocarditis
The investigator will be assessing the efficacy of transcatheter heart valve (THV) by evaluating survival and development of infective endocarditis as an adverse event.
Measured: 8 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2013
- Primary completionFeb 2018
- Study completionFeb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Eisenmenger SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jamil Aboulhosn, University of California, Los Angeles
- Investigators
- Jamil A Aboulhosn, MD, FACC, Principal investigator, University of California, Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02119442
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13-001008
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 8 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 30 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Kondo N, Shuto T, McGarvey JR, Koomalsingh KJ, Takebe M, Gorman RC, Gorman JH 3rd, Gillespie MJ. Melody valve-in-ring procedure for mitral valve replacement: feasibility in four annuloplasty types. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.12.021.
PubMed 22364973Riede FT, Dahnert I. Implantation of a Melody valve in tricuspid position. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 1;80(3):474-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23404. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
PubMed 22105855Ben-Gal Y, Finkelstein A, Bruckheimer E, Banai S, Keren G, Kramer A, Uretzky G. Transapical implantation of a Melody valve in a degenerated low-diameter prosthetic aortic valve. Circulation. 2013 Apr 23;127(16):e553-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.127027. No abstract available.
PubMed 23609553Cheung AW, Gurvitch R, Ye J, Wood D, Lichtenstein SV, Thompson C, Webb JG. Transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantations for a failed bioprosthesis: a case series. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Mar;141(3):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.026. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
PubMed 21269643Kenny D, Hijazi ZM, Walsh KP. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):267-70. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23016. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
PubMed 21766424
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcatheter Valve Implantation in Patients With Dysfunctional Left and Right Sided Heart Valves
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02119442
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 13-001008
- Conditions
- Eisenmenger Syndrome
- Keywords
- Eisenmenger Syndrome, Pulmonary Arterial Hyptertension
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 90 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2013
- Primary completion
- Feb 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A growing body of data, suggests that transcatheter valves are effective when implanted in other locations (mitral, aortic, tricuspid) and in high pressure environments. The investigators plan to offer transcatheter valve implantation as an alternative to high risk surgery in patients who require revision of a stenotic or regurgitant valve in the non-pulmonary position (mitral, aortic, tricuspid). This therapy can provide an alternative to patients who may be considered high risk and may not be able to survive a surgical procedure.The use of the devices on this protocol are for medical treatment and are not part of a clinical trial.
Detailed description
Many forms of congenital and structural heart disease require surgical placement of prosthetic valves and conduits. These conditions include many common congenital heart abnormalities such as Tetralogy of Fallot, Double Outlet Right Ventricle, Truncus Arteriosus and patients who require the Ross procedure for aortic stenosis. There are a variety of acquired conditions, including calcific aortic valve stenosis that may require surgical or transcatheter valve treatment. Unfortunately, when valved conduits are placed surgically, they ultimately become narrowed or regurgitant and require periodic replacement. Thus, patients with these conditions often undergo multiple open heart surgeries during their lifetime. Although the risk of mortality with this kind of surgery is low, surgical intervention is associated with significantly longer recovery times and more patient discomfort when compared to transcatheter interventions. Over the last decade, techniques have been developed to palliate these forms of congenital and structural heart disease using catheters inserted through blood vessels in the groin. These transcatheter techniques have allowed patients to delay or avoid open heart surgery.
The Medtronic Melody Trancatheter Valve and the Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart Valve are both bioprosthetic valves mounted within metal stents. Their entire structure is collapsible, allowing it to be inserted through delivery sheaths and threaded into the heart, typically without the need of surgical cardiopulmonary bypass. Some of these procedures may be performed using a hybrid technique of minimal surgical access and transcatheter valve delivery. The valves can then be expanded into place by inflating a balloon (similar to how stents are placed elsewhere in the heart, like the coronary artery). The Melody Valve received a humanitarian device exemption (HDE) from the FDA and the Edwards Sapien Valve has market approval from the FDA.The investigators plan to offer these transcatheter valves as alternatives to eligible patients who require replacement of a stenotic or regurgitant valve in all left and right sided positions.
The intended role of the Melody Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve is to restore pulmonary valve function in patients with a dysfunctional RVOT conduit and a clinical indication for pulmonary valve replacement. Unlike currently available options for pulmonary valve replacement, the TPV is intended to be placed with a transcatheter delivery system, and thus does not require surgical incisions, open heart surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, or the various morbidities associated with surgical pulmonary valve replacement. The Edwards Sapien Valve is delivered in the same manner, but was intended for use in the aortic position. The ultimate goals and durability of the TPV may differ among patients with different indications. At a minimum, the intention is that the TPV will improve hemodynamic function, mitigate the adverse impact of valve regurgitation and/or obstruction, and effectively extend the longevity of the existing conduit and defer or obviate the need for conduit replacement. These techniques may decrease the number of open heart surgeries required over the course of a patient's lifetime, thereby decreasing the cumulative morbidity and risk associated with such operations.
With regards to valve replacement in any position with an adequate landing zone, the Melody Valve and Edwards Sapien Valve are presently being utilized at multiple United States centers for valve replacement in all positions in patients who are considered high risk candidates for surgical valve replacement. A recent article published by Zahn et al reported an experience in tricuspid valve implantations at three United States centers and one Austrailian center. Procedural success was achieved in all patients. Tricuspid regurgitation was reduced to mild or none in all patients. Noted complications were consistent with known risks of cardiac catheterization and Melody Valve implantation, regardless of indication. Similarly, an article published by Kenny et al demonstrated the successful implantation of the Sapien valve in the tricuspid position. Gillespie et al, recently published a series of Melody implants in the mitral position in sheep that had undergone annuloplasty ring placement. Other investigators have successfully implanted the Melody valve in the aortic and mitral positions in patients with good immediate and short/intermediate term outcomes (Ben-Gal et al, Hasan et al, Gossl et al). The Edwards Sapien Valve has several reports of positive outcomes when implanted within the aortic position (Thomas et al, Moat et al, Webb et al) and two case series that report encouraging results when placed in the mitral position. (Seiffert et al, Cheung et al)
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transcatheter Valve Implantation | Other | Device: Transcather Valve ImplantationIntervention, Transcatheter Valve Implantation with Melody or Sapien bioprosthetic valve Standard of care intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patients will be considered eligible for transcatheter valve implantation if the risk of serious morbidity or mortality with surgical intervention is deemed to be greater than 10 percent by the treating cardiologist and consulting surgeon. The Melody Valve is intended for use in the following clinical conditions:
- Existence of a full (circumferential) RVOT conduit that was equal to or greater than 16 mm in diameter when originally implanted, AND
- Dysfunctional RVOT conduits with a clinical indication for intervention, AND EITHER
- Regurgitation ≥ moderate
- Stenosis: mean right ventricular outflow tract gradient ≥ 35 mmHg
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- There are no known contraindications for implantation of the Melody Valve or the Edwards Sapien Valve
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcather Valve ImplantationAlso: Medtronic Melody Transcatheter Valve; Melody TPV 20 PB1016:Melody TPV 22 PB1018, Edwards SAPIEN Transcatheter Heart ValveTranscather Valve Implantation | Device | Transcatheter Valve Implantation |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants Who Developed Infective Endocarditis
Time frame: 8 years
The investigator will be assessing the efficacy of transcatheter heart valve (THV) by evaluating survival and development of infective endocarditis as an adverse event.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Apr 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22364973Kondo N, Shuto T, McGarvey JR, Koomalsingh KJ, Takebe M, Gorman RC, Gorman JH 3rd, Gillespie MJ. Melody valve-in-ring procedure for mitral valve replacement: feasibility in four annuloplasty types. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Mar;93(3):783-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.12.021.
- Background: PubMed 22105855Riede FT, Dahnert I. Implantation of a Melody valve in tricuspid position. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Sep 1;80(3):474-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23404. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
- Background: PubMed 23609553Ben-Gal Y, Finkelstein A, Bruckheimer E, Banai S, Keren G, Kramer A, Uretzky G. Transapical implantation of a Melody valve in a degenerated low-diameter prosthetic aortic valve. Circulation. 2013 Apr 23;127(16):e553-6. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.127027. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21269643Cheung AW, Gurvitch R, Ye J, Wood D, Lichtenstein SV, Thompson C, Webb JG. Transcatheter transapical mitral valve-in-valve implantations for a failed bioprosthesis: a case series. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Mar;141(3):711-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.11.026. Epub 2011 Jan 26.
- Background: PubMed 21766424Kenny D, Hijazi ZM, Walsh KP. Transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement with the Edwards SAPIEN valve. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):267-70. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23016. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
Related trials for Eisenmenger Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Sota-ES - Sotatercept in Patients With Congenital Heart Disease and Eisenmenger´s Syndrome
Congenital Heart Disease (CHD), Eisenmenger Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study of Sotatercept for Patients With Eisenmenger Syndrome or Unrepaired Shunt-Associated Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Resistant to Vasodilator Therapy
Eisenmenger Syndrome, Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension of Congenital Heart Disease
RecruitingObservational study
COMPERA / COMPERA-KIDS
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH), Pulmonary Hypertension (PH)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jamil A Aboulhosn, MD, FACC principal investigator
University of California, Los Angeles
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Transcather Valve Implantation in people with Eisenmenger Syndrome, run by University of California, Los Angeles at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants Who Developed Infective Endocarditis (time frame: 8 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02119442, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Apr 2019.