Pancreatic CancerPhase 3NCT02117479
Study of Ruxolitinib in Pancreatic Cancer Patients (Janus 1)
A Phase 3 study testing Ruxolitinib and Capecitabine in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Incyte Corporation at 230 sites in 12 countries.
Trial summary
Determining the efficacy, based upon overall survival, of ruxolitinib added to capecitabine for the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pancreatic Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Ruxolitinib and Capecitabine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 321 participants
- Where
- 230 sitesin 12 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
- Advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that is inoperable or metastatic.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2
- Received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic disease (not including neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy).
- ≥ 2 weeks elapsed from the completion of previous treatment regimen and participants must have recovered or be at a new stable baseline from any related toxicities.
- Radiographically measurable or evaluable disease
Show all 9Show fewer
- Modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) of 1 or 2 as defined below:
- mGPS of 1: C-reactive protein >10 mg/L and albumin ≥35 g/L
- mGPS of 2: C-reactive protein >10 mg/L and albumin <35 g/L
Who cannot join
- Received more than 1 prior regimen for advanced or metastatic disease.
- Ongoing radiation therapy, radiation therapy administered within 30 days of enrollment.
- Concurrent anticancer therapy (eg, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, immunotherapy, biologic therapy, hormonal therapy, investigational therapy, or tumor embolization).
- Prior severe reaction to fluoropyrimidines, known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (DPD), or other known hypersensitivity to active substances, including fluorouracil (5-FU), or ruxolitinib, or any of their excipients.
- Prior treatment with a JAK inhibitor for any indication.
Trial locations and contacts
230 sites in 12 countries.
230 sites in 12 countries
United States153 sites
Study site
Anaheim, California
Study site
Ann Arbor, Michigan
Study site
Annapolis, Maryland
Study site
Arlington, Texas
Study site
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Study site
Ashland, Kentucky
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia
Study site
Aurora, Colorado
Study site
Austell, Georgia
Study site
Austin, Texas
Study site
Avondale, Arizona
Study site
Bakersfield, California
Study site
Baltimore, Maryland
Study site
Beaumont, Texas
Study site
Bedford, Texas
Study site
Berkeley, California
Study site
Bethesda, Maryland
Study site
Beverly Hills, California
Study site
Binghamton, New York
Study site
Blacksburg, Virginia
Study site
Boca Raton, Florida
Study site
Bolivar, Missouri
Study site
Boulder, Colorado
Study site
Canton, Ohio
Study site
Carrollton, Georgia
Study site
Cartersville, Georgia
Study site
Cedar Park, Texas
Study site
Chandler, Arizona
Study site
Charleston, South Carolina
Study site
Chattanooga, Tennessee
Study site
Chicago, Illinois
Study site
Chula Vista, California
Study site
Colorado Springs, Colorado
Study site
Columbus, Ohio
Study site
Covina, California
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Denton, Texas
Study site
Denver, Colorado
Study site
Detroit, Michigan
Study site
Douglasville, Georgia
Study site
Downey, California
Study site
Durham, North Carolina
Study site
East Orange, New Jersey
Study site
El Cajon, California
Study site
El Paso, Texas
Study site
Eugene, Oregon
Study site
Farmington, New Mexico
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Fresh Meadows, New York
Study site
Fullerton, California
Study site
Gilbert, Arizona
Study site
Gilroy, California
Study site
Glendale, Arizona
Study site
Glendale, California
Study site
Goshen, Indiana
Study site
Grand Junction, Colorado
Study site
Hastings, Nebraska
Study site
Hinsdale, Illinois
Study site
Hollywood, Florida
Study site
Hot Springs, Arkansas
Study site
Houston, Texas
Study site
Hudson, New York
Study site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Study site
Johnson City, New York
Study site
Jonesboro, Arkansas
Study site
Kalamazoo, Michigan
Study site
Kalispell, Montana
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Knoxville, Tennessee
Study site
La Mesa, California
Study site
Lansing, Michigan
Study site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Study site
Lebanon, New Hampshire
Study site
Long Beach, California
Study site
Longmont, Colorado
Study site
Los Angeles, California
Study site
Louisville, Kentucky
Study site
Lynwood, California
Study site
Madison, Wisconsin
Study site
Marietta, Georgia
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee
Study site
Mesa, Arizona
Study site
Metairie, Louisiana
Study site
Miami, Florida
Study site
Middletown, Ohio
Study site
Modesto, California
Study site
Montebello, California
Study site
Nashville, Tennessee
Study site
New Britain, Connecticut
Study site
New Haven, Connecticut
Study site
New Orleans, Louisiana
Study site
New York, New York
Study site
Newark, Delaware
Study site
Newnan, Georgia
Study site
Niles, Illinois
Study site
Northridge, California
Study site
Nyack, New York
Study site
Oceanside, California
Study site
Ogden, Utah
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska
Study site
Orange, California
Study site
Oregon, Ohio
Study site
Papillion, Nebraska
Study site
Pembroke Pines, Florida
Study site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Plano, Texas
Study site
Portland, Oregon
Study site
Redondo Beach, California
Study site
Richmond, Virginia
Study site
Roanoke, Virginia
Study site
Rochester, New York
Study site
Rockville, Maryland
Study site
Rome, Georgia
Study site
Round Rock, Texas
Study site
Salem, Virginia
Study site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Study site
San Antonio, Texas
Study site
San Diego, California
Study site
San Francisco, California
Study site
San Luis Obispo, California
Study site
Santa Ana, California
Study site
Santa Maria, California
Study site
Santa Monica, California
Study site
Scarborough, Maine
Study site
Scottsdale, Arizona
Study site
Seattle, Washington
Study site
Seneca, South Carolina
Study site
Southington, Connecticut
Study site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
Study site
Springfield, Oregon
Study site
St Louis, Missouri
Study site
Surprise, Arizona
Study site
Temple, Texas
Study site
The Bronx, New York
Study site
Thomasville, Georgia
Study site
Thornton, Colorado
Study site
Toledo, Ohio
Study site
Topeka, Kansas
Study site
Torrance, California
Study site
Trumbull, Connecticut
Study site
Tualatin, Oregon
Study site
Tucson, Arizona
Study site
Tyler, Texas
Study site
Urbana, Illinois
Study site
Vancouver, Washington
Study site
Waco, Texas
Study site
Wake Forest, North Carolina
Study site
Whittier, California
Study site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Study site
Woodbury, Minnesota
Study site
Worcester, Massachusetts
Study site
Wytheville, Virginia
United Kingdom21 sites
Study site
Aberdeen
Study site
Bangor
Study site
Birmingham
Study site
Boston
Study site
Bristol
Study site
Cardiff
Study site
Glasgow
Study site
Guildford
Study site
Harlow
Study site
Huddersfield
Study site
Lancaster
Study site
Leeds
Study site
London
Study site
Manchester
Study site
Metropolitan Borough of Wirral
Study site
Newcastle upon Tyne
Study site
Nottingham
Study site
Plymouth
Study site
Southampton
Study site
Sutton
Study site
Welwyn Garden City
Italy13 sites
Study site
Aviano
Study site
Bari
Study site
Bergamo
Study site
Brescia
Study site
Cremona
Study site
Florence
Study site
Genova
Study site
Lido di Camaiore
Study site
Milan
Study site
Naples
Study site
Pisa
Study site
Rimini
Study site
Roma
Belgium8 sites
Study site
Aalst
Study site
Bruges
Study site
Brussels
Study site
Edegem
Study site
Ghent
Study site
Gilly
Study site
Kortrijk
Study site
Leuven
Canada7 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta
Study site
Greenfield Park, Quebec
Study site
Laval, Quebec
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Oshawa, Ontario
Study site
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
Germany7 sites
Study site
Aschaffenburg
Study site
Berlin
Study site
Bochum
Study site
Cologne
Study site
Essen
Study site
Frankford
Study site
Velbert
Spain5 sites
Study site
Badajoz
Study site
Barcelona
Study site
Madrid
Study site
Málaga
Study site
Seville
Australia4 sites
Study site
Australian Capital Territory
Study site
New South Wales
Study site
South Australia
Study site
Victoria
New Zealand3 sites
Study site
Auckland
Study site
Christchurch
Study site
Hamilton
South Korea3 sites
Study site
Hwasun-gun
Study site
Seongnam-si
Study site
Seoul
Thailand3 sites
Study site
Patumwan
Study site
Ratchathewi
Study site
Seetatarom
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of the JAK1/2 Inhibitor, Ruxolitinib or Placebo in Combination With Capecitabine in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Who Have Failed or Are Intolerant to First-Line Chemotherapy (The JANUS 1 Study)
Determining the efficacy, based upon overall survival, of ruxolitinib added to capecitabine for the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Read the detailed description
This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study, in which approximately 310 participants with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have failed, or were intolerant to first-line chemotherapy, were to be randomized (1:1) to one of the following treatment groups:
- Treatment A (N = 155): Capecitabine + ruxolitinib
- Treatment B (N = 155): Capecitabine + placebo
Treatment consisted of repeating 21-day cycles. Capecitabine was self-administered for the first 14 days of each cycle, and ruxolitinib/placebo was self-administered daily for each cycle. Treatment for all participants continued as long as the regimen was tolerated, and the participant did not meet discontinuation criteria. Participants who discontinued study treatment before study termination were monitored for safety up to 30-35 days from the end of treatment. All participants were followed for survival until study termination or the safety follow-up visit.
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Being tested
- Ruxolitinib, Placebo, Capecitabine
- Keywords
- Metastatic pancreatic cancer, Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma that is recurrent
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RuxolitinibDrug
Also called Jakafi ®, Jakavi ®
5 mg tablets to be administered by mouth twice daily (BID)
PlaceboDrug
5 mg tablets to be administered by mouth twice daily (BID)
CapecitabineDrug
150 and 500 mg tablets to be administered by mouth twice daily (BID)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib plus capecitabine | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Ruxolitinib; Drug: Capecitabine |
| Placebo plus capecitabine | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo; Drug: Capecitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival is reported here based on the number of deaths from randomization up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Measured: Randomization until death due to any cause; up to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Progressive Disease (PD) is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.
Measured: Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression determined by investigator assessment of objective radiographic disease assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1, or death due to any cause if sooner. Progressive Disease (PD) is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1 at least a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions, unequivocal progression of non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions.
Measured: Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Objective response rate determined by radiographic disease assessments per RECIST (v1.1), by investigator assessment and was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) at any post baseline visit. Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST) for target lesions and assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) : Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions with no worsening of non-target lesions and no new lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Measured: Baseline through end of study; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Duration of Response
Duration of overall response was defined as the time in months from Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST v1.1) until the first date Progressive Disease (PD) was objectively documented or until the date of death.
Measured: Baseline through end of study; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
A treatment-emergent AE was defined as an event occurring after exposure to at least 1 dose of study drug (ruxolitinib or placebo). A treatment-related AE was defined as an event with a definite, probable, or possible causality to study medication. A serious AE is an event resulting in death, hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or is life threatening, a congenital anomaly/birth defect or requires medical or surgical intervention to prevent 1 of the outcomes above. The intensity of an AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03: Grade 1 (Mild); Grade 2 (Moderate); Grade 3 (Severe); Grade 4 (life-threatening).
Measured: Baseline through approximately 30 days post treatment discontinuation; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionFeb 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Why it stopped: The study was terminated early based on the results of the planned interim analysis.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pancreatic CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Incyte CorporationThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 321 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Fitzroy Dawkins, M.D., Study director, Incyte Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02117479
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- INCB 18424-362
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 16 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Hurwitz H, Van Cutsem E, Bendell J, Hidalgo M, Li CP, Salvo MG, Macarulla T, Sahai V, Sama A, Greeno E, Yu KH, Verslype C, Dawkins F, Walker C, Clark J, O'Reilly EM. Ruxolitinib + capecitabine in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer after disease progression/intolerance to first-line therapy: JANUS 1 and 2 randomized phase III studies. Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug;36(4):683-695. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0580-2. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
PubMed 29508247
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study of the JAK1/2 Inhibitor, Ruxolitinib or Placebo in Combination With Capecitabine in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Who Have Failed or Are Intolerant to First-Line Chemotherapy (The JANUS 1 Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02117479
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INCB 18424-362
- Conditions
- Pancreatic Cancer
- Keywords
- Metastatic pancreatic cancer, Metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma that is recurrent
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was terminated early based on the results of the planned interim analysis.
- Enrolment
- 321 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Incyte CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 11 Jul 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Determining the efficacy, based upon overall survival, of ruxolitinib added to capecitabine for the treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer.
Detailed description
This was a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study, in which approximately 310 participants with advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas who have failed, or were intolerant to first-line chemotherapy, were to be randomized (1:1) to one of the following treatment groups:
- Treatment A (N = 155): Capecitabine + ruxolitinib
- Treatment B (N = 155): Capecitabine + placebo
Treatment consisted of repeating 21-day cycles. Capecitabine was self-administered for the first 14 days of each cycle, and ruxolitinib/placebo was self-administered daily for each cycle. Treatment for all participants continued as long as the regimen was tolerated, and the participant did not meet discontinuation criteria. Participants who discontinued study treatment before study termination were monitored for safety up to 30-35 days from the end of treatment. All participants were followed for survival until study termination or the safety follow-up visit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ruxolitinib plus capecitabine | Experimental | Drug: Ruxolitinib, Drug: Capecitabine |
| Placebo plus capecitabine | Active comparator | Drug: Placebo, Drug: Capecitabine |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
- Advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas that is inoperable or metastatic.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 to 2
- Received 1 prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic disease (not including neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy).
- ≥ 2 weeks elapsed from the completion of previous treatment regimen and participants must have recovered or be at a new stable baseline from any related toxicities.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Received more than 1 prior regimen for advanced or metastatic disease.
- Ongoing radiation therapy, radiation therapy administered within 30 days of enrollment.
- Concurrent anticancer therapy (eg, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgery, immunotherapy, biologic therapy, hormonal therapy, investigational therapy, or tumor embolization).
- Prior severe reaction to fluoropyrimidines, known dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency (DPD), or other known hypersensitivity to active substances, including fluorouracil (5-FU), or ruxolitinib, or any of their excipients.
- Prior treatment with a JAK inhibitor for any indication.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RuxolitinibAlso: Jakafi ®, Jakavi ®5 mg tablets to be administered by mouth twice daily (BID) | Drug | Ruxolitinib plus capecitabine |
| Placebo5 mg tablets to be administered by mouth twice daily (BID) | Drug | Placebo plus capecitabine |
| Capecitabine150 and 500 mg tablets to be administered by mouth twice daily (BID) | Drug | Placebo plus capecitabine, Ruxolitinib plus capecitabine |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Randomization until death due to any cause; up to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Overall survival is reported here based on the number of deaths from randomization up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
5 secondary outcomes
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Randomization to disease progression, or death due to any cause if sooner; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Baseline through end of study; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Duration of Response
Time frame: Baseline through end of study; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Baseline through approximately 30 days post treatment discontinuation; up to 6-months or to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29508247Hurwitz H, Van Cutsem E, Bendell J, Hidalgo M, Li CP, Salvo MG, Macarulla T, Sahai V, Sama A, Greeno E, Yu KH, Verslype C, Dawkins F, Walker C, Clark J, O'Reilly EM. Ruxolitinib + capecitabine in advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer after disease progression/intolerance to first-line therapy: JANUS 1 and 2 randomized phase III studies. Invest New Drugs. 2018 Aug;36(4):683-695. doi: 10.1007/s10637-018-0580-2. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
Related trials for Pancreatic Cancer
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1
Modified FOLFIRINOX and Pentamidine in Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
RecruitingPhase 3
Atebimetinib + GnP as a First Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatic Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
RecruitingPhase 3
Lanreotide Versus Placebo Before Surgery to Prevent a Surgical Complication Called a Pancreatic Fistula
Pancreatic Carcinoma, Pancreatic Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Fitzroy Dawkins, M.D. study director
Incyte Corporation
230 sites in 12 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ruxolitinib and Capecitabine in people with Pancreatic Cancer, run by Incyte Corporation at 230 sites in 12 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 230 sites in United States, United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium, Canada and 7 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) (time frame: Randomization until death due to any cause; up to the data cutoff 11FEB2016.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02117479, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2019.