Post-ERCP Acute PancreatitisINDIEHNCT02116309
Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin and Papillary Spray of Epinephrine Versus Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
A study testing Rectal Indomethacin and Epinephrine in people with Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis, run by Johns Hopkins University at 4 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This research is being done to see if using a combination of rectal indomethacin and epinephrine spray during endoscopy, can prevent pancreatitis that may occur after ERCP (a type of gastrointestinal endoscopy). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
- What is being tested?
- Rectal Indomethacin and Epinephrine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 948 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Aug 2014to 2 Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Major inclusion criteria (If patients meet at least 1 of the criteria):
- History of PEP
- Pancreatic sphincterotomy
- Pre-cut sphincterotomy
- Difficult cannulation (>5 attempts / 10 minutes to cannulate)
- Failed cannulation
Show all 14Show fewer
- Pneumatic dilation of an intact sphincter
- Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction of Type I or Type II
- Minor inclusion criteria (If patients meet at least 2 of the criteria):
- Age < 50 \& Female gender
- History of acute pancreatitis (at least 2 episodes)
- >/= 3 pancreatic injections (with at least 1 injection in tail)
- Pancreatic acinarization
- Pancreatic Brush Cytology
Who cannot join
- Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study
- Age < 18 years
- Intrauterine pregnancy
- Breastfeeding mother
- Standard contraindications to ERCP
- Allergy / hypersensitivity to aspirin or NSAIDs or epinephrine
Show all 17Show fewer
- Chronic renal disease (Cr > 1.4)
- Active or recent (within 4 weeks) gastrointestinal hemorrhage
- Acute pancreatitis (lipase peak) within 72 hours
- Known chronic calcific pancreatitis
- Pancreatic head mass
- Receiving pancreatic duct stent placement for any indication
- Procedure performed on major papilla/ventral pancreatic duct in patients with pancreas divisum
- ERCP for pancreatic/biliary stent removal or exchange without anticipated pancreatogram
- Subject with prior biliary sphincterotomy now scheduled for repeat biliary therapy without anticipated pancreatogram
- Anticipated inability to follow protocol
- Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction of Type III
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 2 countries.
4 sites in 2 countries
India3 sites
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research
Chandigarh, 160012
Asian Institute of gastroenterology
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500082
Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals
Kolkata, West Bengal, 700054
United States1 site
Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin and Papillary Spray of Epinephrine Versus Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High Risk Patients
This research is being done to see if using a combination of rectal indomethacin and epinephrine spray during endoscopy, can prevent pancreatitis that may occur after ERCP (a type of gastrointestinal endoscopy).
Read the detailed description
Background: Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with an estimated incidence of 3-7% among average risk patients and 15-20% among patients at high risk for developing PEP. Around 500,000 - 700,000 ERCPs are performed annually in U.S. Even with a modest incidence of 5%, PEP results in approximately $150 million in healthcare costs in the US alone.
A recent landmark controlled trial demonstrated the superiority of rectal nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug - NSAIDs (indomethacin) over placebo in preventing PEP among patients at high risk for PEP. Also, epinephrine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla was shown to reduce the incidence of PEP in multiple studies. Our group performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) which simultaneously compared 16 drugs evaluated in 99 randomized controlled trials with 25,313 patients, to determine their relative efficacy using direct and indirect comparisons. Interestingly, the NMA ranked epinephrine as the best performing drug, followed by rectal NSAIDs and nafamostat.
Indomethacin acts on pancreatic inflammation while epinephrine sprayed on duodenal papilla keeps the pancreatic duct open by reducing papillary edema. The use of these drugs in combination may potentially synergistically reduce or further reduce the incidence of PEP.
Hypothesis: A combination of papillary spray of epinephrine and rectal indomethacin is superior to the use of rectal indomethacin alone, for PEP prophylaxis among patients at high risk for PEP.
Sample size justification: Based on the information from earlier controlled trials, the Investigators assume that PEP incidence will be 10% in the rectal NSAID arm (Group A) and it will be reduced to 5% by the additional use of papillary spray of epinephrine (Group B). Therefore, a total of 474 patients in each arm, or 948 patients in total, will be required to see a 50% difference between the groups with a power of 0.8 and two sided alpha of 0.05.
Recruitment and Consenting: Patients scheduled to undergo ERCP will be screened for patient based inclusion / exclusion criteria and will be consented, in the private waiting area of the endoscopy units.
Randomization procedures and delivery of drugs: During ERCP performed according to standard clinical care, if the endoscopist determines that the patient meets the criteria for 'high-risk', the study coordinator will randomize the patient to either group A or B in a 1:1 fashion using a web-based central randomization system. Randomization will be stratified by each center and a randomly varying block size will be used. The patients will be randomized to either Group A - Patients will receive 20 ml of normal saline sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin OR Group B - Patients will receive 20 ml of 0.02% epinephrine sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin.
Statistical Plan: For the statistical analysis of primary end point, the difference in proportion of PEP among the two groups will be calculated by stratifying the site and by combining patients from all sites, as separate analyses. A two sided p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The severity of PEP, mortality and other complications related to PEP will also be compared among the two groups. The data on the risk factors of PEP, incidence of PEP will be used for the development of PEP risk
Data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) charter: An Independent DSMB, clinical trial monitor (safety officer) will be formed consisting of five endoscopists from India and U.S., with expertise in biostatistics and clinical trial methodology. DSMB will review study related documentation including and not limited to, protocol, standard operating procedures, consent form, data entry forms; monitor study performance, will ensure adherence to good clinical practice guidelines and regulatory requirements; and will make appropriate recommendations to the investigators. All adverse events, will be reported to the safety officer by the study coordinators at each center. Blinded interim analysis will be performed at 33% and 66% of the sample size. If the PEP incidence or complication rate is >25% in any of the treatment groups, DSMB will break randomization code and will terminate the study. During interim analysis, if a statistically significant difference is found between the two groups (p<0.001), the study will be terminated for ethical considerations.
- Conditions
- Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
- Being tested
- Rectal Indomethacin, Epinephrine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rectal IndomethacinDrug
Also called Indocin, NSAIDs
EpinephrineDrug
Also called Adrenaline
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal Indomethacin only | Active comparator | Patients in this group will receive 20 ml of normal saline sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin. Receives: Drug: Rectal Indomethacin |
| Rectal Indomethacin plus papillary spray of Epinephrine | Active comparator | Patients in this group will receive 20 ml of 0.02% epinephrine sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin. Receives: Drug: Rectal Indomethacin; Drug: Epinephrine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Patients Who Developed Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
The primary outcome variable of interest is the incidence of post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) as defined by the consensus guidelines as 1) New or increased abdominal pain that is clinically consistent with a syndrome of acute pancreatitis and 2) amylase or lipase ≥ 3x the upper limit of normal 24 hours after the procedure and 3) Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for at least 2 days.
Measured: 24 hours after ERCP
Secondary outcomes (1)
Number of Patients Who Developed Severe Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Severity of PEP defined using the consensus grading as Mild PEP that results in hospitalization (or prolongation of existing hospitalization) for ≤3 days. Moderate PEP will be defined as PEP that results in hospitalization (or prolongation of existing hospitalization) for 4-10 days. Severe PEP will be defined as PEP that results in hospitalization (or prolongation of existing hospitalization) for > 10 days, or leads to the development of pancreatic necrosis or pseudocyst, or requires additional endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical intervention.
Measured: up to 30 days after ERCP
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2014
- Primary completion2 Dec 2016
- Study completion2 Dec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Post-ERCP Acute PancreatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Johns Hopkins UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 948 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, Kolkata
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vikesh K Singh, M.D., M.Sc., Principal investigator, Johns Hopkins University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02116309
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB00034715
- Other IDs
- IRB00034715
- Acronym
- INDIEH
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 14 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 1 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, Hayward RA, Romagnuolo J, Elta GH, Sherman S, Waljee AK, Repaka A, Atkinson MR, Cote GA, Kwon RS, McHenry L, Piraka CR, Wamsteker EJ, Watkins JL, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Turner SM, Nicholson S, Fogel EL; U.S. Cooperative for Outcomes Research in Endoscopy (USCORE). A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1414-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111103.
PubMed 22494121Akshintala VS, Hutfless SM, Colantuoni E, Kim KJ, Khashab MA, Li T, Elmunzer BJ, Puhan MA, Sinha A, Kamal A, Lennon AM, Okolo PI, Palakurthy MK, Kalloo AN, Singh VK. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: pharmacological prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Dec;38(11-12):1325-37. doi: 10.1111/apt.12534. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
PubMed 24138390Xu LH, Qian JB, Gu LG, Qiu JW, Ge ZM, Lu F, Wang YM, Li YM, Lu HS. Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by epinephrine sprayed on the papilla. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jul;26(7):1139-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06718.x.
PubMed 21392105Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Shimeno N, Uchida K, Nishio A, Okazaki K. Epinephrine sprayed on the papilla for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(1):71-5. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2272-8. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
PubMed 19159075Kamal A, Akshintala VS, Talukdar R, Goenka MK, Kochhar R, Lakhtakia S, Ramchandani MK, Sinha S, Goud R, Rai VK, Tandan M, Gupta R, Elmunzer BJ, Ngamruengphong S, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Reddy DN, Singh VK. A Randomized Trial of Topical Epinephrine and Rectal Indomethacin for Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in High-Risk Patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;114(2):339-347. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000049.
PubMed 30730860
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial of Rectal Indomethacin and Papillary Spray of Epinephrine Versus Rectal Indomethacin to Prevent Post-ERCP Pancreatitis in High Risk Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02116309
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INDIEH / IRB00034715
- Conditions
- Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 948 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Johns Hopkins UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, Apollo Gleneagles Hospitals, Kolkata
- Study start
- Aug 2014
- Primary completion
- 2 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 2 Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Nov 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This research is being done to see if using a combination of rectal indomethacin and epinephrine spray during endoscopy, can prevent pancreatitis that may occur after ERCP (a type of gastrointestinal endoscopy).
Detailed description
Background: Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with an estimated incidence of 3-7% among average risk patients and 15-20% among patients at high risk for developing PEP. Around 500,000 - 700,000 ERCPs are performed annually in U.S. Even with a modest incidence of 5%, PEP results in approximately $150 million in healthcare costs in the US alone.
A recent landmark controlled trial demonstrated the superiority of rectal nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug - NSAIDs (indomethacin) over placebo in preventing PEP among patients at high risk for PEP. Also, epinephrine sprayed on the major duodenal papilla was shown to reduce the incidence of PEP in multiple studies. Our group performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) which simultaneously compared 16 drugs evaluated in 99 randomized controlled trials with 25,313 patients, to determine their relative efficacy using direct and indirect comparisons. Interestingly, the NMA ranked epinephrine as the best performing drug, followed by rectal NSAIDs and nafamostat.
Indomethacin acts on pancreatic inflammation while epinephrine sprayed on duodenal papilla keeps the pancreatic duct open by reducing papillary edema. The use of these drugs in combination may potentially synergistically reduce or further reduce the incidence of PEP.
Hypothesis: A combination of papillary spray of epinephrine and rectal indomethacin is superior to the use of rectal indomethacin alone, for PEP prophylaxis among patients at high risk for PEP.
Sample size justification: Based on the information from earlier controlled trials, the Investigators assume that PEP incidence will be 10% in the rectal NSAID arm (Group A) and it will be reduced to 5% by the additional use of papillary spray of epinephrine (Group B). Therefore, a total of 474 patients in each arm, or 948 patients in total, will be required to see a 50% difference between the groups with a power of 0.8 and two sided alpha of 0.05.
Recruitment and Consenting: Patients scheduled to undergo ERCP will be screened for patient based inclusion / exclusion criteria and will be consented, in the private waiting area of the endoscopy units.
Randomization procedures and delivery of drugs: During ERCP performed according to standard clinical care, if the endoscopist determines that the patient meets the criteria for 'high-risk', the study coordinator will randomize the patient to either group A or B in a 1:1 fashion using a web-based central randomization system. Randomization will be stratified by each center and a randomly varying block size will be used. The patients will be randomized to either Group A - Patients will receive 20 ml of normal saline sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin OR Group B - Patients will receive 20 ml of 0.02% epinephrine sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin.
Statistical Plan: For the statistical analysis of primary end point, the difference in proportion of PEP among the two groups will be calculated by stratifying the site and by combining patients from all sites, as separate analyses. A two sided p-value of <0.05 will be considered statistically significant. The severity of PEP, mortality and other complications related to PEP will also be compared among the two groups. The data on the risk factors of PEP, incidence of PEP will be used for the development of PEP risk
Data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) charter: An Independent DSMB, clinical trial monitor (safety officer) will be formed consisting of five endoscopists from India and U.S., with expertise in biostatistics and clinical trial methodology. DSMB will review study related documentation including and not limited to, protocol, standard operating procedures, consent form, data entry forms; monitor study performance, will ensure adherence to good clinical practice guidelines and regulatory requirements; and will make appropriate recommendations to the investigators. All adverse events, will be reported to the safety officer by the study coordinators at each center. Blinded interim analysis will be performed at 33% and 66% of the sample size. If the PEP incidence or complication rate is >25% in any of the treatment groups, DSMB will break randomization code and will terminate the study. During interim analysis, if a statistically significant difference is found between the two groups (p<0.001), the study will be terminated for ethical considerations.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal Indomethacin only | Active comparator | Drug: Rectal IndomethacinPatients in this group will receive 20 ml of normal saline sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin. |
| Rectal Indomethacin plus papillary spray of Epinephrine | Active comparator | Drug: Rectal Indomethacin, Drug: EpinephrinePatients in this group will receive 20 ml of 0.02% epinephrine sprayed on the duodenal papilla and surrounding regions of edema, over a period of 1 minute using any ERCP cannulation catheter, at the end of procedure, just before the withdrawal of endoscope; followed by 100 mg of rectal indomethacin. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Major inclusion criteria (If patients meet at least 1 of the criteria):
- Minor inclusion criteria (If patients meet at least 2 of the criteria):
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study
- Age < 18 years
- Intrauterine pregnancy
- Breastfeeding mother
- Standard contraindications to ERCP
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rectal IndomethacinAlso: Indocin, NSAIDs | Drug | Rectal Indomethacin only, Rectal Indomethacin plus papillary spray of Epinephrine |
| EpinephrineAlso: Adrenaline | Drug | Rectal Indomethacin plus papillary spray of Epinephrine |
Primary outcome
Number of Patients Who Developed Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Time frame: 24 hours after ERCP
The primary outcome variable of interest is the incidence of post ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) as defined by the consensus guidelines as 1) New or increased abdominal pain that is clinically consistent with a syndrome of acute pancreatitis and 2) amylase or lipase ≥ 3x the upper limit of normal 24 hours after the procedure and 3) Hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization for at least 2 days.
1 secondary outcome
Number of Patients Who Developed Severe Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Time frame: up to 30 days after ERCP
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Nov 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 22494121Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA, Chak A, Mosler P, Higgins PD, Hayward RA, Romagnuolo J, Elta GH, Sherman S, Waljee AK, Repaka A, Atkinson MR, Cote GA, Kwon RS, McHenry L, Piraka CR, Wamsteker EJ, Watkins JL, Korsnes SJ, Schmidt SE, Turner SM, Nicholson S, Fogel EL; U.S. Cooperative for Outcomes Research in Endoscopy (USCORE). A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Apr 12;366(15):1414-22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1111103.
- Background: PubMed 24138390Akshintala VS, Hutfless SM, Colantuoni E, Kim KJ, Khashab MA, Li T, Elmunzer BJ, Puhan MA, Sinha A, Kamal A, Lennon AM, Okolo PI, Palakurthy MK, Kalloo AN, Singh VK. Systematic review with network meta-analysis: pharmacological prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Dec;38(11-12):1325-37. doi: 10.1111/apt.12534. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
- Background: PubMed 21392105Xu LH, Qian JB, Gu LG, Qiu JW, Ge ZM, Lu F, Wang YM, Li YM, Lu HS. Prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by epinephrine sprayed on the papilla. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jul;26(7):1139-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06718.x.
- Background: PubMed 19159075Matsushita M, Takakuwa H, Shimeno N, Uchida K, Nishio A, Okazaki K. Epinephrine sprayed on the papilla for prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(1):71-5. doi: 10.1007/s00535-008-2272-8. Epub 2009 Jan 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30730860Kamal A, Akshintala VS, Talukdar R, Goenka MK, Kochhar R, Lakhtakia S, Ramchandani MK, Sinha S, Goud R, Rai VK, Tandan M, Gupta R, Elmunzer BJ, Ngamruengphong S, Kumbhari V, Khashab MA, Kalloo AN, Reddy DN, Singh VK. A Randomized Trial of Topical Epinephrine and Rectal Indomethacin for Preventing Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis in High-Risk Patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2019 Feb;114(2):339-347. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000049.
Related trials for Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
Not yet recruiting
Cold Water Papillary Irrigation Plus Rectal NSAIDs vs Rectal NSAIDs Alone for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (COLD)
Post ERCP Pancreatitis, Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
Not yet recruiting
Prophylactic Sphincterotomy in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Patients Unfit for Surgery
Acute Biliary Pancreatitis
Recruiting
Cold and NSAID Trial for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis, Acute
RecruitingObservational study
An European Multi-centre Cohort Study for Unravelling Pharmacokinetic and Genetic Factors Underlying Post-ERCP Pancreatitis
Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Indomethacin for Biliary ERCP Patients
Pancreatitis Biliary, Pancreatitis Acute Biliary
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vikesh K Singh, M.D., M.Sc. principal investigator
Johns Hopkins University
4 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rectal Indomethacin and Epinephrine in people with Post-ERCP Acute Pancreatitis, run by Johns Hopkins University at 4 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in India, United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Patients Who Developed Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (time frame: 24 hours after ERCP). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02116309, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Nov 2017.