AzTrials
AzTrials

To Evaluate Clinical Results, Insulin Resistance and Inflammatory Response to Trauma in Morbidly Obese PatientsNCT02113995

Clinical Evaluation, Organic Response in Obesity Patients Subjected to Vertical Videolaparoscopy Gastroplasty With or Without Perioperative Cares Recommended by the Acerto Project. Randomized Study.

A study testing ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care in people with To Evaluate Clinical Results, Insulin Resistance and Inflammatory Response to Trauma in Morbidly Obese Patients, run by Cuiaba University at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background To evaluate clinical results, insulin resistance and inflammatory response to trauma in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Sleeve gastrectomy who received either traditional preoperative care or treatment following the ACERTO protocol. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years
What is being tested?
ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
20 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Apr 2012to Oct 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Inclusion Criteria: We included patients who are between 18 and 45 years of age, from both sexes, with an initial BMI (Body Mass Index) which is equal to or greater than 40 kg/m2, candidates for the sleeve surgery procedure through laparoscopy.

-

Exclusion Criteria: We excluded the patients who didn't follow the fasting protocol and also those whose laboratory exams were lost.

-

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • ACERTO protocol

    Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, 78000000

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Clinical Evaluation, Organic Response in Obesity Patients Subjected to Vertical Videolaparoscopy Gastroplasty With or Without Perioperative Cares Recommended by the Acerto Project.

Background To evaluate clinical results, insulin resistance and inflammatory response to trauma in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Sleeve gastrectomy who received either traditional preoperative care or treatment following the ACERTO protocol.

Read the detailed description

Methods The population of the study consisted of morbidly obese patients, who were operated on with the Sleeve procedure, from Cuiaba, MT, between April and October 2012. We studied the inflammatory response and insulin resistance by measuring levels of glucose, insulin, Homa IR, reactive C protein, albumin, pre-albumin, alpha 1 acid glicoprotein, interleukin 6 and glycosylated hemoglobin. We also studied hydration, nausea and vomiting, hypertension, and length of hospital stay.

Being tested
ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care
Keywords
Obesity, Morbid, Insulin Resistance, Acute-Phase Reaction, Gastroplasty, Length of Stay, Protocols, Randomized Controlled Trial.
Medical subject headings
Insulin Resistance, Obesity, Morbid, Acute-Phase Reaction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ACERTO protocol vs Traditional careOther

    Three sample blood collections were performed, being one in the anesthesic induction and the others in the next 24 to 48 hours. The blood was sent to the laboratory for dosages of glucose, insulin, C-reactive protein, albumin, prealbumin, alpha 1 acid glycoprotein and interleukin 6. During the anesthesic induction we also collected blood for analize glycosylated hemoglobin.

Study groups in NCT02113995
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ACERTOActive comparatorPatients received 400 ml of a beverage containing water and 50 g of maltodextrin 6 hours before the operation. They received orally extra 200 ml of this beverage containing water and 25 g of maltodextrin 3 hours before the operation. Regarding the intravenous fluids, they received 1 to 1.5 liter of crystalloid fluids (ringer lactate) in the intraoperative. In the immediate postoperative they were programmed to receive 2 liters of crystalloid fluids (ringer lactate) and 1 to 2 liters in the first day of the postoperative period. The venous hydration was suspended as soon as they started to drink liquids. Prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting with dexamethasone 8 mg at the beginning of the anesthesia and ondansetron 4-8 mg after the surgery. In the postoperative period we utilized analgesics such as dipyrone and ketorolac and, if necessary, low doses of morphine and antiemetics like ondansetron.
Receives: Other: ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care
Traditional careActive comparatorThe analgesia in the postoperative period of the group control was performed with dipyrone, tramadol hydrochloride, and morphine. The prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting with dexamethasone 8 mg in the beginning of the anesthesia and the metoclopramide at the end of the surgery. During the anesthetic induction antibiotic prophylaxis (cefazolin 3 grams/day for 2 days) was administrated. The control group were submitted to the protocol of traditional fasting with at least 8 hours. Patients in this group received 1 to 2 liters of crystalloid fluid (ringer lactate) in the intraoperative, and they received 3 to 4 liters of crystalloid fluids (ringer lactate, saline 0.9% and/or dextrose 5%). In the immediate postoperative, 2 to 3 liters in the first day of postoperative and, finally, 1 to 2 liters in the second day of the postoperative.
Receives: Other: ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. ACERTO protocol

    To evaluate clinical results, insulin resistance and inflammatory response to trauma in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic Sleeve gastrectomy who received either traditional preoperative care or treatment following the ACERTO protocol.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2012
  4. Study completionOct 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
20 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02113995
Sponsor's protocol ID
018/CEP-UNIC/2011.
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
12 Apr 2014
Last updated
15 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ACERTO protocol vs Traditional care in people with To Evaluate Clinical Results, Insulin Resistance and Inflammatory Response to Trauma in Morbidly Obese Patients, run by Cuiaba University at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

ACERTO protocol (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in