AzTrials
AzTrials

Needlestick InjuriesNCT02107729

The Importance of Needle Gauge for Pain During Injection of Local Anaesthetic

A study testing Large needle gauge lidocaine injection, Normal needle gauge lidocaine injection and Small needle gauge lidocaine injection in people with Needlestick Injuries, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Norway.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will investigate the influence of needle gauge on pain during injection of local anaesthetic. Healthy volunteers will be recruited, who will each receive three injections with either 21G, 23G or 27G subcutaneously on the abdomen. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Needlestick Injuries
What is being tested?
Large needle gauge lidocaine injection, Normal needle gauge lidocaine injection and Small needle gauge lidocaine injection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
1 siteNorway
Study dates
Feb 2014to Jun 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-65 years

Who cannot join

  • Kidney, heart or liver disease
  • Eczema or psoriasis on injection site
  • Neuropathy
  • Regular use of painkillers
  • Hypersensitivity of Lidocaine
  • Pregnancy
  • Diabetes

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Norway1 site
  • Department of Neuroscience, NTNU

    Trondheim

Other trials in Norway

About this study

This study will investigate the influence of needle gauge on pain during injection of local anaesthetic. Healthy volunteers will be recruited, who will each receive three injections with either 21G, 23G or 27G subcutaneously on the abdomen. After each injection, the participants will be asked to evaluate the pain on a Visual analog scale (0-100 mm). It is anticipated that the pain will decrease with decreasing thickness of the needle. The aim of this study is to find a simple method for pain reduction that can be used in clinical practice.

Being tested
Large needle gauge lidocaine injection, Normal needle gauge lidocaine injection, Small needle gauge lidocaine injection
Keywords
Injections, Pain, Healthy volunteers, Lidocaine
Medical subject headings
Needlestick Injuries, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Large needle gauge lidocaine injectionProcedure or surgery

    21 G

  • Normal needle gauge lidocaine injectionProcedure or surgery

    23 G

  • Small needle gauge lidocaine injectionProcedure or surgery

    27 G

Study groups in NCT02107729
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Needle gauge smallExperimentalinjection needle 23 G
Receives: Procedure: Large needle gauge lidocaine injection; Procedure: Normal needle gauge lidocaine injection; Procedure: Small needle gauge lidocaine injection
Needle gauge normalExperimentalinjection needle 25 G
Receives: Procedure: Large needle gauge lidocaine injection; Procedure: Normal needle gauge lidocaine injection; Procedure: Small needle gauge lidocaine injection
Needle gauge largeExperimentalinjection needle 27 G
Receives: Procedure: Large needle gauge lidocaine injection; Procedure: Normal needle gauge lidocaine injection; Procedure: Small needle gauge lidocaine injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pain

    1. Visual analog scale
    2. Questionnaire

    Measured: 60 seconds

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2014
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02107729
Sponsor's protocol ID
2013/2297B
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
4 Apr 2014
Last updated
29 Jul 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Wago KJ, Skarsvag TI, Lundbom JS, Tangen LF, Ballo S, Hjelseng T, Finsen V. The importance of needle gauge for pain during injection of lidocaine. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2016;50(2):115-8. doi: 10.3109/2000656X.2015.1111223. Epub 2015 Nov 23.

    PubMed 26595751

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Large needle gauge lidocaine injection, Normal needle gauge lidocaine injection and Small needle gauge lidocaine injection in people with Needlestick Injuries, run by Norwegian University of Science and Technology at 1 site in Norway.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pain (time frame: 60 seconds). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02107729, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in