Infection, Human Immunodeficiency VirusPhase 3NCT02105987
A Phase IIIb Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Switching to a Fixed-dose Combination of Abacavir/Dolutegravir/ Lamivudine From Current Antiretroviral Regimen
A Phase 3 study testing ABC/DTG/3TC FDC and Ongoing cART regimen in people with Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, run by ViiV Healthcare at 103 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
This study is a 48-week, Phase IIIb, randomly assigned, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter, parallel group, non-inferiority study. This study is designed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of switching to the Abacavir (ABC) 600 milligrams (mg)/Dolutegravir(DTG) 50 mg/Lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- What is being tested?
- ABC/DTG/3TC FDC and Ongoing cART regimen
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 555 participants
- Where
- 103 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Be able to understand and comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and restrictions;
- Be likely to complete the study as planned;
- Be considered appropriate candidates for participation in an investigative clinical trial with oral medication (e.g., no active substance abuse, acute major organ disease, or planned long-term work assignments out of the country, etc.).
- Signed and dated written informed consent is obtained from the subject or the subject's legal representative prior to screening
- HIV-1 infected men or women >=18 years of age;
- A female may be eligible to enter and participate in the study if she: a. Is of non-childbearing potential either defined as post-menopausal (12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea and >=45 years of age) or physically incapable of becoming pregnant with documented tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy or,
Show all 15Show fewer
- A female may be eligible to enter and participate in the study if she: b. Is of childbearing potential with a negative pregnancy test at both Screening and Day 1 and agrees to use one of the following methods of contraception to avoid pregnancy: Complete abstinence from intercourse from 2 weeks prior to administration of study drug, throughout the study, and for at least 2 weeks after discontinuation of all study drugs; Double barrier method (e.g., male condom/spermicide, male condom/diaphragm, diaphragm/spermicide); Any intrauterine device (IUD) with published data showing that the expected failure rate is <1% per year ; Male partner sterilization prior to the female subject's entry into the study and this male is the sole partner for that subject; Approved hormonal contraception for subjects randomly assigned to the ABC/DTG/3TC arm or approved hormonal contraception plus a barrier method for subjects assigned to continued antiretroviral therapy arm; Any other method with published data showing that the expected failure rate is <1% per year.
- Any contraception method must be used consistently, in accordance with the approved product label and for at least 2 weeks after discontinuation of study drug. A childbearing potential female subject who starts the study using complete abstinence as her contraceptive method and decides to become sexually active must use the double barrier method either as a bridge to an approved hormonal contraception (if possible) or as a method of choice to be maintained from that moment onwards.
- All subjects participating in the study should be counselled on safer sexual practices including the use of effective barrier methods (e.g., male condom/spermicide).
- Within the last year, 2 consecutive plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic acid (RNA) measurements <50 copies/millilitres (c/mL) and plasma HIV-1 RNA<50 c/mL at Screening (<75 b Deoxyribonucleic acid [bDNA] is considered equal to <50 c/mL); Subjects who present at initial screening with a viral load between 50 to 200 c/mL can be retested once within the screening period.
- Must be on current regimen (whether first or second line Combination antiretroviral therapy [cART]) for at least 6 months prior to Screening;
- Acceptable stable cART regimens prior to Screening include: • Boosted PI (or Atazanavir [ATV]) unboosted) + 2 NRTIs, NNRTI + 2 NRTIs, • INI + 2 NRTIs. For subjects on an INI, their INI at Screening must be RAL or Elvitegravir (EVG)
- Any switch to a second line regimen, defined as change of a single drug or multiple drugs simultaneously, must have occurred due to tolerability and/or safety concerns.
- Subject must have achieved plasma HIV-1 RNA level <50 c/mL within 6 months of start of initial cART regimen with no plasma HIV-1 RNA level >200 c/mL following initial suppression;
- Documentation that the subject is negative for the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B*5701 allele;
Who cannot join
- Exclusionary Medical Conditions
- Women who are breastfeeding;
- Any evidence of an active (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] Category C) disease. Exceptions include cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy and historic CD4+ cell counts of <200 cells/cubic millimeter (mm).
- Subjects with any degree of hepatic impairment;
- Subjects positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (+HBsAg) at Screening or with an anticipated need for hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy during the study;
- History or presence of allergy to the study drugs or their components or drugs of their class;
Show all 24Show fewer
- Ongoing malignancy other than cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma, basal cell carcinoma, or resected, non-invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; other localized malignancies require agreement between the investigator and the study medical monitor for inclusion of the subject;
- Subjects who, in the investigator's judgment, pose a significant suicidality risk. Recent history of suicidal behavior and/or suicidal ideation may be considered as evidence of serious suicide risk;
- Exclusionary Treatments Prior to Screening or Day 1
- Treatment with an HIV-1 immunotherapeutic vaccine within 90 days of Screening;
- Treatment with any of the following agents within 28 days of Screening: radiation therapy, cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, any immunomodulators that alter immune responses;
- Exposure to an experimental drug or experimental vaccine within either 28 days, 5 half-lives of the test agent, or twice the duration of the biological effect of the test agent, whichever is longer, prior to the first dose of study drug;
- A history of use of only mono or dual NRTI therapy prior to starting cART;
- Use of etravirine at time of switch;
- Use of DTG at time of switch;
- Subjects receiving any prohibited medication listed in the protocol and who are unwilling or unable to switch to an alternate medication
- Exclusionary Laboratory Values or Clinical Assessments at Screening
- Evidence of primary viral resistance based on the presence of any resistance-associated major PI or any NRTI, NNRTI, or INI mutation in any prior resistance genotype assay result;
- Any verified Grade 4 laboratory abnormality, with the exception of Grade 4 triglyceride abnormalities. A single repeat test is allowed during the screening period to verify a result;
- Any acute laboratory abnormality at Screening, which, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the subject's participation in the study of an investigational compound;
- Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >=5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), or ALT >=3 × ULN and bilirubin >=1.5 × ULN (with >35% direct bilirubin);
- Subject has CrCl of <50 mL/min using Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD);
- QTc (Bazett) >=450 msec or QTc (Bazett) >=480 msec for subjects with bundle branch block. The QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Bazett's formula (QTcB). The QTc should be based on a single QTc value electrocardiogram (ECG) obtained.
- Eligibility of subjects for study participation will be decided by the investigators after taking into consideration various country specific guidelines, and notwithstanding the above mentioned minimum inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Trial locations and contacts
103 sites in 3 countries.
103 sites in 3 countries
United States87 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Akron, Ohio, 44304
GSK Investigational Site
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18102
GSK Investigational Site
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
GSK Investigational Site
Annandale, Virginia, 22003
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30312
GSK Investigational Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30339
GSK Investigational Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30912-3130
GSK Investigational Site
Austin, Texas, 78705
GSK Investigational Site
Bakersfield, California, 93301
GSK Investigational Site
Bellaire, Texas, 77401
GSK Investigational Site
Berkley, Michigan, 48072
GSK Investigational Site
Beverly Hills, California, 90211
GSK Investigational Site
Buffalo, New York, 14215
GSK Investigational Site
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
GSK Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
GSK Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612-3833
GSK Investigational Site
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
GSK Investigational Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267-0405
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75208
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
GSK Investigational Site
Dallas, Texas, 75390-9113
GSK Investigational Site
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80205-5422
GSK Investigational Site
Denver, Colorado, 80209
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
GSK Investigational Site
Ft. Pierce, Florida, 34982
GSK Investigational Site
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
GSK Investigational Site
Hillsborough, New Jersey, 08844
GSK Investigational Site
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96813
GSK Investigational Site
Houston, Texas, 77098
GSK Investigational Site
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
GSK Investigational Site
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
GSK Investigational Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32209
GSK Investigational Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
GSK Investigational Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89031
GSK Investigational Site
Long Beach, California, 90813
GSK Investigational Site
Longview, Texas, 75605
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90028
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90033
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90035
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90036
GSK Investigational Site
Los Angeles, California, 90069
GSK Investigational Site
Lynchburg, Virginia, 24501
GSK Investigational Site
Manhasset, New York, 11030
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33133
GSK Investigational Site
Miami, Florida, 33136
GSK Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
GSK Investigational Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415
GSK Investigational Site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
GSK Investigational Site
New York, New York, 10001
GSK Investigational Site
Newark, New Jersey, 07102
GSK Investigational Site
Newport Beach, California, 92663
GSK Investigational Site
Norwalk, Connecticut, 06850
GSK Investigational Site
Oakland, California, 94602
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32803
GSK Investigational Site
Pensacola, Florida, 32504
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85012
GSK Investigational Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85015
GSK Investigational Site
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15212
GSK Investigational Site
Sacramento, California, 95825
GSK Investigational Site
San Diego, California, 92103
GSK Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, 94109
GSK Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, 94115
GSK Investigational Site
San Francisco, California, 94118
GSK Investigational Site
San Leandro, California, 94577
GSK Investigational Site
Santa Fe, New Mexico, 87505
GSK Investigational Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
GSK Investigational Site
Seattle, Washington, 98104
GSK Investigational Site
Springfield, Massachusetts, 01105
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63108
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
GSK Investigational Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63139
GSK Investigational Site
Tampa, Florida, 33614
GSK Investigational Site
The Bronx, New York, 10467
GSK Investigational Site
Torrance, California, 90502
GSK Investigational Site
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74127
GSK Investigational Site
Valhalla, New York, 10595
GSK Investigational Site
Vero Beach, Florida, 32960-6571
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20009
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20036
GSK Investigational Site
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20037
GSK Investigational Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Canada12 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Calgary, Alberta, T2R 0X7
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4P9
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 5B1
GSK Investigational Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1T1
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4T 3A7
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1K2
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2
GSK Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2C7
GSK Investigational Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2T1
GSK Investigational Site
Victoria, British Columbia, V8W 1M8
GSK Investigational Site
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9
Puerto Rico4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ponce, Puerto Rico, 00717-1567
GSK Investigational Site
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, 00935
GSK Investigational Site
San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00936-8344
GSK Investigational Site
San Juan, 00909
About this study
Official title: 201147: a Phase IIIb, Randomized, Open-label Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Switching to a Fixed-dose Combination of Abacavir/Dolutegravir/ Lamivudine From Current Antiretroviral Regimen Compared With Continuation of the Current Antiretroviral Regimen in HIV-1 Infected Adults Who Are Virologically Suppressed, The STRIIVING Study.
This study is a 48-week, Phase IIIb, randomly assigned, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter, parallel group, non-inferiority study. This study is designed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of switching to the Abacavir (ABC) 600 milligrams (mg)/Dolutegravir(DTG) 50 mg/Lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with continuing the subject's current suppressive regimen through 24 weeks. The study will be conducted in approximately 538 Human Immunodeficiency Virus -1 (HIV-1) infected individuals who are on stable suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) with 2 Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus either a protease inhibitor (PI), an non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or an integrase inhibitor (INI). Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned 1:1 to continue their current regimen (approximately 269 subjects) or be switched to ABC/DTG/3TC FDC (approximately 269 subjects) once daily for 24 weeks. At Week 24, individuals originally randomly assigned to continue their current regimen will switch to ABC/DTG/3TC FDC and be followed for an additional 24 weeks. Individuals initially randomly assigned to ABC/DTG/3TC FDC will continue on that treatment arm for an additional 24 weeks. A pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy will be conducted at a small number of sites (approximately 10) to evaluate predose DTG concentrations as well as residual drug concentrations of efavirenz (EFV), nevaripine (NVP), amprenavir (APV) and tipranavir (TPV) in a subgroup of subjects who switch from EFV, NVP, fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) or tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r).
- Conditions
- Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- Being tested
- ABC/DTG/3TC FDC, Ongoing cART regimen
- Keywords
- Abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine, Fixed-dose combination, Once daily, Trii, Single-tablet regimen
- Medical subject headings
- Infections, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ABC/DTG/3TC FDCDrug
Purple, oval, biconvex tablets containing 702 mg Abacavir sulphate which is equivalent to 600 mg ABC, 52.62 mg Dolutegravir sodium which is equivalent to 50 mg Dolutegravir free acid and 300 mg 3TC
Ongoing cART regimenDrug
Stable cART regimens including boosted PI (or ATV unboosted) + 2 NRTIs; NNRTI + 2 NRTIs, or INI (RAL or EVG)+ 2 NRTIs
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ABC/DTG/3TC | Experimental | Subject will take ABC 600 mg/DTG 50 mg/3TC 300 mg FDC once daily in the morning or the evening, at approximately the same time each day for 24 weeks. After Week 24, subjects will continue on this treatment arm for an additional 24 weeks. Receives: Drug: ABC/DTG/3TC FDC |
| Comparator | Active comparator | Subjects will continue on their current Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimen for 24 weeks. At Week 24, subjects will switch to ABC/DTG/3TC FDC for an additional 24 weeks. Receives: Drug: Ongoing cART regimen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 24 Using the Snapshot Algorithm
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot (Missing, Switch or Discontinuation = Failure) algorithm is intended to be primarily a virologic assessment of the endpoint, and as such follows a "virology first" hierarchy. Virologic Success (e.g., <50 c/mL) or virologic failure within an analysis window is typically determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA measurement in that window and in the treatment phase of interest (e.g., Week 24 snapshot outcomes of the early switch phase will not use HIV-1 RNA data from the late switch phase, even if such data is within the Week 24 analysis window). A virologic failure occurs when a participant changes to their ART regimen (e.g., addition of other ARTs to the study-specified regimens, or switches in components of the current ART regimen).
Measured: Week 24
Secondary outcomes (23)
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) Cell Counts at Week 24
Change from Baseline in CD4+ cell counts were assessed at Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24. No imputation for missing data or premature discontinuation was performed and the observed values were used. Baseline value is defined as the last pre-treatment value observed. Change from Baseline was calculated as the observed value minus the Baseline value. The Week 24 data were summarized.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants in the Virologic Non-response Category From the Snapshot Analysis at Week 24
Virologic non-responders were defined as the participants with a viral load >=50 c/mL in the Week 24 analysis window. Virologic non-response includes participants who had HIV-1 RNA >=50 c/mL, who discontinued for lack of efficacy, who discontinued for other reasons while not suppressed, data in window but not <50 c/mL, and who changed ART regimen at Week 24. Difference is calculated as the proportion on ABC/DTG/3TC - proportion on current ART regimen.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Participants With Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to 24 Weeks
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, based on medical or scientific judgment and all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia. The DAIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric AEs was utilized for AE reporting. The DAIDS estimates the severity grade as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (potentially life threatening) for each parameter.
Measured: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Chemistry Toxicities up to 24 Weeks
The number of participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent chemistry toxicities for each grade were summarized by parameter. A toxicity is considered emergent if it develops or increases in intensity from Baseline. For participants who were originally randomized to current ART regimen on Day 1 and then switched to ABC/DTG/3TC on Week 24, Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value from the early switch phase and maximum post-Baseline emergent during the late switch phase was determined relative to this Baseline. The DAIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric AEs was utilized for AE reporting. The DAIDS defined the severity grade as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (potentially life threatening) for each parameter.
Measured: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities up to 24 Weeks
The number of participants with maximum post-Baseline emergent hematology toxicities for each grade were summarized by parameter. A toxicity is considered emergent if it develops or increases in intensity from Baseline. For participants who were originally randomized to current ART regimen on Day 1 and then switched to ABC/DTG/3TC on Week 24, Baseline is defined as the last non-missing value from the early switch phase and maximum post-Baseline emergent during the late switch phase was determined relative to this Baseline. The DAIDS table for grading the severity of adult and pediatric AEs was utilized for AE reporting. The DAIDS defined the severity grade as Grade 1 (mild), Grade 2 (moderate), Grade 3 (severe) and Grade 4 (potentially life threatening) for each parameter.
Measured: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Withdrawal Over 24 Weeks
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, based on medical or scientific judgment and all events of possible drug-induced liver injury with hyperbilirubinemia.
Measured: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids (Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, and Triglycerides) at Week 24
Change from Baseline for each fasting lipid parameters included cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each parameter at Week 24 in each arm calculated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes the following covariates: treatment, original ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART 3rd agent, use of lipid modifying agent and Baseline lipid level. Difference is calculated as ABC/DTG/3TC - Current ART regimen. For fasting lipid assessments, an overnight fast is preferred; however, a minimum of a 6-hour fast was acceptable for participants with afternoon appointments.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids (Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio) at Week 24
Change from Baseline for fasting lipid parameter total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol ratio. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline at Week 24 in each arm calculated from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model which includes the following covariates: treatment, original ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART 3rd agent, use of lipid modifying agent and Baseline lipid level. Difference is calculated as ABC/DTG/3TC - Current ART regimen. For fasting lipid assessments, an overnight fast is preferred; however, a minimum of a 6-hour fast was acceptable for participants with afternoon appointments.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction at Week 4 and Week 24
The HIV treatment satisfaction questionnaire (TSQ) is a 10 item self-reported scale. Individual item scores range from 6 (very satisfied) to 0 (very dissatisfied). The treatment satisfaction total score (range 0-60) is the sum of all the 10 individual items. The general satisfaction/Clinical subscale (range 0-30) is the sum of the 5 clinical items and the lifestyle/ease subscale (range 0-30) is the sum of the remaining 5 lifestyle items. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) were used for the analysis. If a participant had a missing value at Week 24, his previous non-missing available value while on the same treatment was carried forward (ie the Week 4 or withdrawal value is used in the Week 24 summary for participants in the ABC/DTG3TC with missing Week 24 value). Data were analyzed using an ANCOVA model with factors including treatment, Baseline score and stratification factor. Treatment group difference (ABC/DTG/3TC-cART) estimate and 95% CI were presented.
Measured: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Week 24
Renal markers included creatinine and summarized based on an observed case (OC) data set at Week 24. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each biomarker at Week 24 in each arm calculated from an ANCOVA analysis of covariance model including the following covariates: treatment, original ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, and Baseline biomarker level. Differences are calculated as ABC/DTG/3TC - Current ART regimen.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI Equation at Week 24
Renal markers included GFR from creatinine adjusted using chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and summarized based on an OC data set at Week 24. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each biomarker at Week 24 in each arm calculated from an ANCOVA analysis of covariance model including the following covariates: treatment, original ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, and Baseline biomarker level. Differences are calculated as ABC/DTG/3TC - Current ART regimen.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using MDRD Enzymatic Equation at Week 24
Renal markers included GFR from creatinine adjusted using modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) enzymatic equation and summarized based on an OC data set at Week 24. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each biomarker at Week 24 in each arm calculated from an ANCOVA analysis of covariance model including the following covariates: treatment, original ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, and Baseline biomarker level. Differences are calculated as ABC/DTG/3TC - Current ART regimen.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Urea at Week 24
Renal markers included urea and summarized based on an OC data set at Week 24. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each biomarker at Week 24 in each arm calculated from an ANCOVA analysis of covariance model including the following covariates: treatment, original ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, and Baseline biomarker level. Differences are calculated as ABC/DTG/3TC - Current ART regimen.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 24
Renal markers included urine albumin/creatinine ratioand summarized based on an OC data set at Week 24. Adjusted mean is the estimated mean change from Baseline in each biomarker at Week 24 in each arm calculated from an ANCOVA analysis of covariance model including the following covariates: treatment, original ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, and Baseline biomarker level. Differences are calculated as ABC/DTG/3TC - Current ART regimen.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Marker Analytes at Week 24
Outcome Measure Description: Bone biomarkers analytes include bone specific alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, procollagen 1 n-terminal propeptide, type I collagen c-telopeptides and were analyzed based on log transformed data. Estimates were from an ANCOVA model adjusting for ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, age, sex (male or female), body mass index (BMI) (<25 kilogram per meter [kg/m] or >=25 kg/m), smoking status (never smoked or former smoker or current smoker), Baseline vitamin D (no vitamin D use at Baseline or vitamin D use at Baseline), and Baseline biomarker level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analytes at Week 24
Cardiovascular biomarkers were analyzed based on log transformed data. Estimates were from an ANCOVA model adjusting for ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, sex, race (white, black or African American, Other), and Baseline biomarker level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, C-reactive Protein at Week 24
Cardiovascular biomarkers were analyzed based on log transformed data. Estimates were from an ANCOVA model adjusting for ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, sex, race (white, black or African American, Other), and Baseline biomarker level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, D-Dimer at Week 24
Cardiovascular biomarkers were analyzed based on log transformed data. Estimates were from an ANCOVA model adjusting for ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, sex, race (white, black or African American, Other), and Baseline biomarker level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, Homostat Model Assess of Insulin Resistance at Week 24
Cardiovascular biomarkers were analyzed based on log transformed data. Estimates were from an ANCOVA model adjusting for ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, sex, race (white, black or african american, other), and Baseline biomarker level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, Insulin at Week 24
Cardiovascular biomarkers were analyzed based on log transformed data. Estimates were from an ANCOVA model adjusting for ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, sex, race (white, black or african american, other), and Baseline biomarker level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, Soluble CD163 at Week 24
Cardiovascular biomarkers were analyzed based on log transformed data. Estimates were from an ANCOVA model adjusting for ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, sex, race (white, black or african american, other), and Baseline biomarker level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, Glucose at Week 24
Cardiovascular biomarkers were analyzed based on log transformed data. Estimates were from an ANCOVA model adjusting for ART third agent class, interaction of treatment and original ART third agent class, sex, race (white, black or african american, other), and Baseline biomarker level.
Measured: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants With Incidence of Genotypic and Phenotypic Resistance Meeting Confirmed Virologic Withdrawal Criteria Over 24 Weeks
Genotypic and phenotypic testing was conducted for participants who met the confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria, i.e., confirmed HIV-1 RNA >=400 c/mL any time after Day 1. The sample from the "suspected virologic withdrawal criterion" visit was tested for HIV-1 PRO and RT genotype and phenotype and HIV-1 integrase genotype and phenotype (i.e., the first of the two consecutive results >=400 c/mL). At the time of the data cut-off for this Week 24 analysis, no participants met the confirmed virologic withdrawal criteria over 24 weeks; therefore, the virologic analyses were not assessed.
Measured: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Infection, Human Immunodeficiency VirusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by ViiV HealthcareThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 555 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ViiV Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PPD Development, LP, GlaxoSmithKline
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, ViiV Healthcare
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02105987
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 201147
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 4 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Trottier B, Lake JE, Logue K, Brinson C, Santiago L, Brennan C, Koteff JA, Wynne B, Hopking J, Granier C, Aboud M. Dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine versus current ART in virally suppressed patients (STRIIVING): a 48-week, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label, Phase IIIb study. Antivir Ther. 2017;22(4):295-305. doi: 10.3851/IMP3166. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
PubMed 28401876
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- 201147: a Phase IIIb, Randomized, Open-label Study of the Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of Switching to a Fixed-dose Combination of Abacavir/Dolutegravir/ Lamivudine From Current Antiretroviral Regimen Compared With Continuation of the Current Antiretroviral Regimen in HIV-1 Infected Adults Who Are Virologically Suppressed, The STRIIVING Study.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02105987
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 201147
- Conditions
- Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
- Keywords
- Abacavir/dolutegravir/lamivudine, Fixed-dose combination, Once daily, Trii, Single-tablet regimen
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 555 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- ViiV HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- PPD Development, LP, GlaxoSmithKline
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is a 48-week, Phase IIIb, randomly assigned, open-label, active-controlled, multicenter, parallel group, non-inferiority study. This study is designed to demonstrate the non-inferior antiviral activity of switching to the Abacavir (ABC) 600 milligrams (mg)/Dolutegravir(DTG) 50 mg/Lamivudine (3TC) 300 mg fixed-dose combination (FDC) compared with continuing the subject's current suppressive regimen through 24 weeks. The study will be conducted in approximately 538 Human Immunodeficiency Virus -1 (HIV-1) infected individuals who are on stable suppressive combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) with 2 Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus either a protease inhibitor (PI), an non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), or an integrase inhibitor (INI). Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned 1:1 to continue their current regimen (approximately 269 subjects) or be switched to ABC/DTG/3TC FDC (approximately 269 subjects) once daily for 24 weeks. At Week 24, individuals originally randomly assigned to continue their current regimen will switch to ABC/DTG/3TC FDC and be followed for an additional 24 weeks. Individuals initially randomly assigned to ABC/DTG/3TC FDC will continue on that treatment arm for an additional 24 weeks. A pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy will be conducted at a small number of sites (approximately 10) to evaluate predose DTG concentrations as well as residual drug concentrations of efavirenz (EFV), nevaripine (NVP), amprenavir (APV) and tipranavir (TPV) in a subgroup of subjects who switch from EFV, NVP, fosamprenavir/ritonavir (FPV/r) or tipranavir/ritonavir (TPV/r).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ABC/DTG/3TC | Experimental | Drug: ABC/DTG/3TC FDCSubject will take ABC 600 mg/DTG 50 mg/3TC 300 mg FDC once daily in the morning or the evening, at approximately the same time each day for 24 weeks. After Week 24, subjects will continue on this treatment arm for an additional 24 weeks. |
| Comparator | Active comparator | Drug: Ongoing cART regimenSubjects will continue on their current Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) regimen for 24 weeks. At Week 24, subjects will switch to ABC/DTG/3TC FDC for an additional 24 weeks. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Be able to understand and comply with protocol requirements, instructions, and restrictions;
- Be likely to complete the study as planned;
- Be considered appropriate candidates for participation in an investigative clinical trial with oral medication (e.g., no active substance abuse, acute major organ disease, or planned long-term work assignments out of the country, etc.).
- Signed and dated written informed consent is obtained from the subject or the subject's legal representative prior to screening
- HIV-1 infected men or women >=18 years of age;
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Exclusionary Medical Conditions
- Women who are breastfeeding;
- Any evidence of an active (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC] Category C) disease. Exceptions include cutaneous Kaposi's sarcoma not requiring systemic therapy and historic CD4+ cell counts of <200 cells/cubic millimeter (mm).
- Subjects with any degree of hepatic impairment;
- Subjects positive for hepatitis B virus surface antigen (+HBsAg) at Screening or with an anticipated need for hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy during the study;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ABC/DTG/3TC FDCPurple, oval, biconvex tablets containing 702 mg Abacavir sulphate which is equivalent to 600 mg ABC, 52.62 mg Dolutegravir sodium which is equivalent to 50 mg Dolutegravir free acid and 300 mg 3TC | Drug | ABC/DTG/3TC |
| Ongoing cART regimenStable cART regimens including boosted PI (or ATV unboosted) + 2 NRTIs; NNRTI + 2 NRTIs, or INI (RAL or EVG)+ 2 NRTIs | Drug | Comparator |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 24 Using the Snapshot Algorithm
Time frame: Week 24
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) snapshot (Missing, Switch or Discontinuation = Failure) algorithm is intended to be primarily a virologic assessment of the endpoint, and as such follows a "virology first" hierarchy. Virologic Success (e.g., <50 c/mL) or virologic failure within an analysis window is typically determined by the last available HIV-1 RNA measurement in that window and in the treatment phase of interest (e.g., Week 24 snapshot outcomes of the early switch phase will not use HIV-1 RNA data from the late switch phase, even if such data is within the Week 24 analysis window). A virologic failure occurs when a participant changes to their ART regimen (e.g., addition of other ARTs to the study-specified regimens, or switches in components of the current ART regimen).
23 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Cluster of Differentiation 4+ (CD4+) Cell Counts at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants in the Virologic Non-response Category From the Snapshot Analysis at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Participants With Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) up to 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Chemistry Toxicities up to 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With Maximum Post-Baseline Emergent Hematology Toxicities up to 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Number of Participants With AEs Leading to Withdrawal Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids (Cholesterol, LDL Cholesterol, HDL Cholesterol, and Triglycerides) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Fasting Lipids (Total Cholesterol/HDL Cholesterol Ratio) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Treatment Satisfaction at Week 4 and Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 4 and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Creatinine at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) From Creatinine Adjusted Using CKD-EPI Equation at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in GFR From Creatinine Adjusted Using MDRD Enzymatic Equation at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Urea at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Change From Baseline in Urine Albumin/Creatinine Ratio at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Marker Analytes at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analytes at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, C-reactive Protein at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, D-Dimer at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, Homostat Model Assess of Insulin Resistance at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, Insulin at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, Soluble CD163 at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Cardiovascular Marker Analyte, Glucose at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline and Week 24
Number of Participants With Incidence of Genotypic and Phenotypic Resistance Meeting Confirmed Virologic Withdrawal Criteria Over 24 Weeks
Time frame: Baseline and up to 24 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28401876Trottier B, Lake JE, Logue K, Brinson C, Santiago L, Brennan C, Koteff JA, Wynne B, Hopking J, Granier C, Aboud M. Dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine versus current ART in virally suppressed patients (STRIIVING): a 48-week, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label, Phase IIIb study. Antivir Ther. 2017;22(4):295-305. doi: 10.3851/IMP3166. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
Related trials for Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Enrolling by invitation
Promoting Aging and Thriving With HIV
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Geriatric
RecruitingObservational study
Cohort of Women Living With HIV-1 and Receiving Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Pregnancy
Not yet recruiting
HIV/STI/HCV Testing and Overdose Prevention Among Survivors of Sex Trafficking
HIV Testing, STI
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
ViiV Healthcare
103 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ABC/DTG/3TC FDC and Ongoing cART regimen in people with Infection, Human Immunodeficiency Virus, run by ViiV Healthcare at 103 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 15 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 103 sites in United States, Canada, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Plasma HIV-1 Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) <50 Copies Per Milliliter (c/mL) at Week 24 Using the Snapshot Algorithm (time frame: Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02105987, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Jan 2017.