Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructivePhase 3NCT02105961
Efficacy and Safety of Mepolizumab as an Add-on Treatment in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
A Phase 3 study testing Mepolizumab in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 169 sites in 15 countries.
Trial summary
This is a multi-centered, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, trial evaluating 2 doses of mepolizumab against placebo given every 4 weeks through subcutaneous (SC) injection. In severe COPD subjects, sputum eosinophils levels are elevated to similar levels as those seen in severe asthmatics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- What is being tested?
- Mepolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 674 participants
- Where
- 169 sitesin 15 countries
- Study dates
- 24 Apr 2014to 16 Jan 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- COPD diagnosis: Subjects with a clinically documented history of COPD for at least 1 year in accordance with the following definition by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society
- Severity of COPD: Subjects must present with the following: a measured pre and post-salbutamol Forced expiratory volume in one second/ Forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio of <0.70 at Visit 1 to confirm the diagnosis of COPD; a measured post-salbutamol FEV1> 20 percent and <=80 percent of predicted normal values calculated using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III reference equations at Visit 1
- History of exacerbations: A well documented history (e.g., medical record verification) in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 of ; at least two moderate COPD exacerbations. Moderate is defined as the use of systemic corticosteroids (intramuscular (IM), intravenous, or oral) and/or treatment with antibiotics or; at least one severe COPD exacerbation. Severe is defined as having required hospitalization. Note: At least one exacerbation must have occurred while the subject was taking Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long acting beta2-agonist (LABA) plus long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). Prior use of antibiotics alone does not qualify as a moderate exacerbation unless the use was specifically for the treatment of worsening symptoms of COPD.
- Concomitant COPD therapy: A well documented requirement for optimized standard of care background therapy that includes Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus 2 additional COPD medications (i.e., triple therapy) for the 12 months prior to Visit 1 and meets the following criteria: Immediately prior to Visit 1, minimum of 3 months of use of an; Inhaled corticosteroid at a dose >= 500 micrograms (mcg)/day fluticasone propionate dose equivalent plus; LABA and LAMA.
- For subjects who are not continually maintained on ICS plus LABA plus LAMA for the entire 12 months prior to Visit 1 use of following is allowed (but not in the 3 months immediately prior to Visit 1); inhaled corticosteroid at a dose >=500 mcg/day fluticasone propionate dose equivalent plus; a LABA or a LAMA and; use of at least one other class of COPD medication (i.e., phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitors, methylxanthines, or a combination of short acting beta2-agonist and short acting muscarinic antagonist).
- Informed Consent: Able to give written informed consent prior to participation in the study, which will include the ability to comply with the requirements and restrictions listed in the consent form. Subjects must be able to read, comprehend, and write at a level sufficient to complete study related materials.
Show all 10Show fewer
- Gender: Male or Eligible Female; To be eligible for entry into the study females of child bearing potential must commit to consistent and correct use of an acceptable method of birth control from the time of consent, for the duration of the trial, and for 4 months after last study drug administration.
- Age: At least 40 years of age at Visit 1
- Smoking status: Subject with confirmed COPD are eligible to participate independent of their smoking status and smoking history, i.e. current smokers, never smokers or ex-smokers can be enrolled into the study. Current smokers are defined as those with a history of cigarette smoking of >=10 pack-years [number of pack years = (number of cigarettes per day / 20) x number of years smoked (e.g., 20 cigarettes per day for 10 years, or 10 cigarettes per day for 20 years)]. Former smokers are defined as those who meet the definition of a current smoker but have stopped smoking for at least 6 months prior to Visit 1. Never smokers are those that do not meet the definition of a current or former smoker.
- French subjects: In France, a subject will be eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to or a beneficiary of a social security category.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with Asthma: Current and Former Smokers: Subjects with a current diagnosis of asthma (those with a prior history are eligible if they meet inclusion criteria for a current diagnosis of COPD); Never-Smokers: Subjects with any history of asthma.
- Other respiratory disorders: The investigator must judge that COPD is the primary diagnosis accounting for the clinical manifestations of the lung disease. Subjects with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD are excluded. Also, excluded are subjects with active tuberculosis, lung cancer, bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, lung fibrosis, primary pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases or other active pulmonary diseases. Subjects are also excluded if maintenance use of bi-level positive airway pressure is required for the treatment of respiratory disorder.
- COPD stability: Subjects with pneumonia, exacerbation, lower respiratory infection within the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
- Lung resection: Subjects with lung volume reduction surgery within the 12 months prior to Visit 1.
- Pulmonary rehabilitation program: Participation in the acute phase of a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Subjects who are in the maintenance phase of a pulmonary rehabilitation program are not excluded.
- Oxygen: Subjects receiving treatment with oxygen more than 4.0 liters/minute (L/min). While breathing supplemental oxygen, subjects should demonstrate an oxyhemoglobin saturation greater than or equal to 89 percent.
Show all 33Show fewer
- 12-lead Electrocardiography (ECG) finding: An abnormal and significant ECG finding from the 12-lead ECG conducted at Visit 1, if considered to be clinically significant by the Investigator. 12-lead ECGs will be over-read by a centralized independent cardiologist to assist in consistent evaluation of subject eligibility. Results from the 12-lead ECG over-read must be received prior to assessing eligibility at Visit 2.
- Unstable or life threatening cardiac disease: Subjects with any of the following would be excluded: Myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the last 6 months ; Unstable or life threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention in the last 3 months ; New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV Heart failure
- Other diseases/abnormalities: Subjects with (historical or) current evidence of clinically significant, neurological, psychiatric, renal, hepatic, immunological, endocrine (including uncontrolled diabetes or thyroid disease) or haematological abnormalities that are uncontrolled. Significant is defined as any disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, would put the safety of the subject at risk through participation, or which would affect the efficacy or safety analysis if the disease/condition exacerbated during the study.
- Eosinophilic disease: Subjects with other conditions that could lead to elevated eosinophils such as Hypereosinophilic syndromes including Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (EGPA, also known as Churg-Strauss Syndrome), or Eosinophilic Esophagitis.
- Parasitic infection: Subjects with a pre-existing helminthes infestation within 6 months prior to Visit 1 are also excluded.
- Malignancy: A current malignancy or previous history of cancer in remission for less than 12 months prior to Visit 1 (Subjects that had localized carcinoma of the skin or cervix which was resected for cure will not be excluded). South Korea subjects with a diagnosis of malignancy within 5 years of Visit 1 are excluded.
- Immunodeficiency: A known immunodeficiency (e.g. human immunodeficiency virus HIV), other than that explained by the use of corticosteroids taken for COPD.
- Liver disease: Unstable liver disease (as defined by the presence of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminaemia, esophageal or gastric varices, or persistent jaundice), cirrhosis, and known biliary abnormalities (with the exception of Gilbert's syndrome or asymptomatic gallstones). Chronic stable hepatitis B and C are acceptable if subject otherwise meets entry criteria (e.g., presence of hepatitis B surface antigen or positive hepatitis C test result within 3 months of screening)
- Monoclonal antibodies: Subjects who have received any monoclonal antibody within 5 half-lives of Visit 1.
- Investigational medications: Subjects who have received an investigational drug within 30 days of Visit 1, or within 5 drug half-lives of the investigational drug, whichever is longer (this also includes investigational formulations of a marketed product).
- Hypersensitivity: Subjects with a known allergy or intolerance to another monoclonal antibody or biologic including history of anaphylaxis to another biologic
- Inability to read: In the opinion of the investigator, any subject who is unable to read and/or would not be able to complete study related materials.
- Non-compliance: Subjects at risk of non-compliance, or unable to comply with the study procedures. Any infirmity, disability, or geographic location that would limit compliance for scheduled visits.
- Questionable validity of consent: Subjects with a history of psychiatric disease, intellectual deficiency, poor motivation or other conditions that will limit the validity of informed consent to participate in the study.
- Drug or alcohol abuse: A known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse within 2 years prior to Visit 1.
- Previous participation: Subjects who have previously participated in any study of mepolizumab.
- Affiliation with Investigator Site: Is an investigator, sub-investigator, study coordinator, employee of a participating investigator or study site, or immediate family member of the aforementioned that is involved in this study.
- Randomization Criteria
- In order to be randomized to study drug the subject must meet the following randomization criteria at Visit 2:
- Blood eosinophils: Documented elevated peripheral blood eosinophil count of >=300 cells/microliter within the past 12 months prior to Visit 1; OR A peripheral baseline blood eosinophil count of >=150 cells/microliter from haematology conducted at Visit 1
- Electronic Diary Compliance: Compliance with completion of the eDiary defined as completion of all questions on 5 or more days out of the 7 days immediately preceding Visit 2.
- 12-lead ECG: No evidence of an abnormal and significant ECG finding from the 12-lead ECG conducted at Visit 1 as indicated on the over-read provided by the centralized independent cardiologist. Subjects with a QT interval corrected with Fridericia's formulas (QTcF)>=450 msec are not eligible. For subjects with a QRS interval >=120msec, those with QTcF>=480 msec are not eligible. Specific ECG findings that preclude subject eligibility are listed in the protocol.
- Abnormal chest X-ray (or Computerized Tomography [CT] scan): No chest X-ray (or CT scan) that reveals evidence of clinically significant abnormalities not believed to be due to the presence of COPD. If a chest X-ray or CT scan is not available within 6 months prior to Visit 1, then a chest X-ray must be taken at Visit 1 and the results reviewed prior to randomization. For sites in Germany: If a chest X-ray (or CT scan) within 6 months prior to Screening (Visit 1) is not available, the subject will not be eligible for the study.
- Laboratory abnormality: No evidence of clinically significant abnormality in the haematological, biochemical, or urinalysis screen at Visit 1, as judged by the investigator.
- Hepatitis B: Subjects who are HBsAg positive or HBcAb positive must not have a HBV DNA level >=2000 International Units (IU)/millilitre (mL).
- Liver function test: Subjects must meet the following based on results from sample taken at Visit 1: Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <2x ULN (upper limit of normal); Alkaline Phosphatase (Alk Phos) <=2x ULN; Bilirubin <=1.5x ULN (isolated bilirubin>1.5x ULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin <35 percent)
- Pregnancy: No subjects who are pregnant or breastfeeding. Subjects should not be enrolled if they plan to become pregnant during the time of study participation.
Trial locations and contacts
169 sites in 15 countries.
169 sites in 15 countries
United States35 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Adairsville, Georgia, 30103
GSK Investigational Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87108
GSK Investigational Site
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
GSK Investigational Site
Bowling Green, Kentucky, 42101
GSK Investigational Site
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33436
GSK Investigational Site
Broomfield, Colorado, 80023
GSK Investigational Site
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406-7108
GSK Investigational Site
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
GSK Investigational Site
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, 83814
GSK Investigational Site
Columbus, Ohio, 43213
GSK Investigational Site
DeLand, Florida, 32720
GSK Investigational Site
Duluth, Georgia, 30096
GSK Investigational Site
Easley, South Carolina, 29640
GSK Investigational Site
Edgewater, Florida, 32132
GSK Investigational Site
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
GSK Investigational Site
Gainesville, Florida, 32608
GSK Investigational Site
Gastonia, North Carolina, 28054
GSK Investigational Site
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
GSK Investigational Site
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
GSK Investigational Site
Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078
GSK Investigational Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
GSK Investigational Site
Morgantown, West Virginia, 26505
GSK Investigational Site
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
GSK Investigational Site
Oaks, Pennsylvania, 19456
GSK Investigational Site
Orlando, Florida, 32825
GSK Investigational Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
GSK Investigational Site
Portland, Oregon, 97220
GSK Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23225
GSK Investigational Site
Richmond, Virginia, 23249
GSK Investigational Site
Riverside, California, 92506
GSK Investigational Site
Rock Hill, South Carolina, 29732
GSK Investigational Site
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33704
GSK Investigational Site
Stamford, Connecticut, 06902
GSK Investigational Site
Upland, California, 91786
GSK Investigational Site
Woodstock, Georgia, 30189
Japan32 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Ehime, 791-0281
GSK Investigational Site
Fukui, 910-1193
GSK Investigational Site
Fukuoka, 811-1394
GSK Investigational Site
Fukushima, 960-1295
GSK Investigational Site
Gifu, 509-6134
GSK Investigational Site
Hiroshima, 722-8503
GSK Investigational Site
Hiroshima, 734-8530
GSK Investigational Site
Hokkaido, 053-8506
GSK Investigational Site
Hyōgo, 650-0047
GSK Investigational Site
Kagawa, 762-8550
GSK Investigational Site
Kanagawa, 227-8501
GSK Investigational Site
Kumamoto, 861-1196
GSK Investigational Site
Mie, 515-8544
GSK Investigational Site
Miyagi, 980-8574
GSK Investigational Site
Miyagi, 983-8520
GSK Investigational Site
Miyagi, 986-8522
GSK Investigational Site
Ōita, 876-0813
GSK Investigational Site
Okayama, 702-8055
GSK Investigational Site
Okayama, 711-0921
GSK Investigational Site
Okinawa, 901-2121
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 573-0153
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 589-8511
GSK Investigational Site
Osaka, 591-8555
GSK Investigational Site
Shimane, 693-8501
GSK Investigational Site
Shizuoka, 436-0022
GSK Investigational Site
Shizuoka, 438-8550
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 103-0027
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 104-8560
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 136-0075
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 142-8666
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 152-0021
GSK Investigational Site
Tokyo, 204-8585
Germany15 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 10717
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12157
GSK Investigational Site
Berlin, 12203
GSK Investigational Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60389
GSK Investigational Site
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60596
GSK Investigational Site
Hamburg, 22299
GSK Investigational Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30173
GSK Investigational Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04357
GSK Investigational Site
Lübeck, Schleswig-Holstein, 23552
GSK Investigational Site
Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, 39112
GSK Investigational Site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131
GSK Investigational Site
Neu-Isenburg, Hesse, 63263
GSK Investigational Site
Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg, 15562
GSK Investigational Site
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70378
South Korea14 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Anyang-Si Gyeonggi-do, 431-070
GSK Investigational Site
Bucheon City, Gyenggi-do, 420-767
GSK Investigational Site
Busan, 602-715
GSK Investigational Site
Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do, 361-711
GSK Investigational Site
Daegu, 705-703
GSK Investigational Site
Incheon, 403-720
GSK Investigational Site
Jeonju, 561-712
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 120-752
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 130-709
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 130-872
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 138-736
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul, 140-743
GSK Investigational Site
Seoul
GSK Investigational Site
Wonju-si, Kanwon-do, 220-701
Netherlands10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
's-Hertogenbosch, 5223 GZ
GSK Investigational Site
Almelo, 7609 PP
GSK Investigational Site
Breda, 4818 CK
GSK Investigational Site
Groningen, 9713 GZ
GSK Investigational Site
Hoofddorp, 2134 TM
GSK Investigational Site
Horn, 6085 NM
GSK Investigational Site
Leiden, 2333 ZA
GSK Investigational Site
Sittard-geleen, 6162 BG
GSK Investigational Site
Utrecht, 3584 CX
GSK Investigational Site
Zutphen, 7207 AE
Romania10 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 020125
GSK Investigational Site
Bucharest, 050159
GSK Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca, 400371
GSK Investigational Site
Codlea, 505100
GSK Investigational Site
Craiova, 200642
GSK Investigational Site
Focşani, 620043
GSK Investigational Site
Iași, 700115
GSK Investigational Site
Piteşti, 110084
GSK Investigational Site
Ploieşti, 100024
GSK Investigational Site
Timișoara, 300310
Argentina9 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, B8000AAK
GSK Investigational Site
Berazategui, 1886
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1121ABE
GSK Investigational Site
Buenos Aires, C1425BEN
GSK Investigational Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1414AIF
GSK Investigational Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires, 1900
GSK Investigational Site
Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, 7600
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, 5500
GSK Investigational Site
Mendoza, M5500CCG
Ukraine8 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49051
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61035
GSK Investigational Site
Kharkiv, 61124
GSK Investigational Site
Kiev, 03680
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 03038
GSK Investigational Site
Kyiv, 03680
GSK Investigational Site
Mykolayiv, 54003
GSK Investigational Site
Vinnytsia, 21018
Chile7 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 7500692
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 7860406
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago, Región Metro de Santiago, 8242238
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago, 7500698
GSK Investigational Site
Santiago, 8380453
GSK Investigational Site
Talca, Maule Region, 3460001
GSK Investigational Site
Valparaíso, Valparaiso, 2341131
Canada6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Burlington, Ontario, L7N 3V2
GSK Investigational Site
Saint-Charles-Borromée, Quebec, J6E 2B4
GSK Investigational Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 3A9
GSK Investigational Site
Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8T 7A1
GSK Investigational Site
Truro, Nova Scotia, B2N 1L2
GSK Investigational Site
Windsor, Ontario, N8X 5A6
United Kingdom6 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Bradford, BD9 6RJ
GSK Investigational Site
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
GSK Investigational Site
Oxford, OX3 7LE
GSK Investigational Site
Plymouth, PL6 8DH
GSK Investigational Site
Sheffield, S5 7AU
GSK Investigational Site
Stevenage, SG1 4AB
Slovakia5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Humenné, 066 01
GSK Investigational Site
Poprad, 058 01
GSK Investigational Site
Šaľa, 927 01
GSK Investigational Site
Spišská Nová Ves, 052 01
GSK Investigational Site
Vráble, 952 01
Taiwan5 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Kaohsiung City, 824
GSK Investigational Site
Taichung, 404
GSK Investigational Site
Taipei, 220
GSK Investigational Site
Taipei
GSK Investigational Site
Tau-Yuan County, 333
Denmark4 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Aarhus C, 8000
GSK Investigational Site
Hvidovre, 2650
GSK Investigational Site
København NV, 2400
GSK Investigational Site
Odense C, 5000
Australia3 sites
GSK Investigational Site
Coffs Harbour, New South Wales, 2450
GSK Investigational Site
Maroubra, New South Wales, 2035
GSK Investigational Site
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
About this study
Official title: Study MEA117113: Mepolizumab vs. Placebo as Add-on Treatment for Frequently Exacerbating COPD Patients Characterized by Eosinophil Level
This is a multi-centered, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, trial evaluating 2 doses of mepolizumab against placebo given every 4 weeks through subcutaneous (SC) injection. In severe COPD subjects, sputum eosinophils levels are elevated to similar levels as those seen in severe asthmatics. It is hypothesized that the reduction of eosinophils with mepolizumab in COPD subjects would translate into a reduction of COPD exacerbations. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab, in subjects who are at or above the baseline blood eosinophil count of at least 150 cells/microliters who exacerbate despite regular use of maximal tolerated therapy, appropriate for severe COPD subjects, in the 12 months prior to study start. In total, 660 subjects will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive mepolizumab 300 mg, mepolizumab 100mg, or placebo administered SC. The total duration of subject participation will be approximately 62 weeks, consisting of a 1 to 2 week screening period, 52-week treatment period and 8-week follow-up period.
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Being tested
- Mepolizumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, exacerbations, SB240563, mepolizumab, eosinophils
- Medical subject headings
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MepolizumabDrug
Humanised IgG antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks, provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vial. Vial to be reconstituted with Sterile Water for Injection, just prior to use.
PlaceboDrug
Sterile 0.9percent sodium chloride solution
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Each subject will receive 100 mg mepolizumab SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) along with their baseline standard of care COPD medication Receives: Drug: Mepolizumab |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Each subject will receive 300 mg mepolizumab SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) along with their baseline standard of care COPD medication Receives: Drug: Mepolizumab |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Each subject will receive placebo (0.9percent sodium chloride) SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) their baseline standard of care COPD medication Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Moderate or Severe Exacerbations
Moderate exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require in-patient hospitalization (>=24 hours) or result in death. Moderate and severe exacerbations occurring from the start of investigational product (IP) up to the Week 52 visit, including exacerbations reported after early discontinuation from IP by participants who remained in the study, were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed on the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment).
Measured: From randomization to Week 52
Secondary outcomes (4)
Time to First Moderate/Severe Exacerbation
Kaplan Meier estimates of the probability of a moderate or severe exacerbation are expressed as the percentage of participants with an exacerbation over time (by Week 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 52). Analysis of time to first moderate/severe exacerbation was performed on the mITT population and included exacerbations reported on-treatment and those reported after early discontinuation from IP by participants who remained in the study.
Measured: From randomization to Week 52
Rate of COPD Exacerbations Requiring Emergency Department (ED) Visits and/or Hospitalizations (Hosp)
COPD exacerbations requiring an ED visit and/or hosp occurring from the start of IP up to the Week 52 visit, including exacerbations reported after early discontinuation from IP by participants who remained in the study, were included in the analysis. This analysis was performed on the mITT population.
Measured: From randomization to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Total St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score
The SGRQ for COPD is a 40-item questionnaire derived from the original SGRQ , designed to measure health impairment by addressing the frequency of respiratory symptoms and current state of the participant. SGRQ Total Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse health-related quality of life and reductions indicating improvement. The Baseline value will be the last measurement collected prior to the first dose of investigational product.Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Mean change from Baseline in SGRQ score at Week 52 has been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score
The CAT is an 8-item questionnaire developed for use in routine clinical practice to measure the health status of participants with COPD. Each question is assessed on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (no impairment) to 5 (maximum impairment) with the CAT score ranging from 0-40. Higher scores indicate greater disease impact with reductions indicating improvement. The Baseline value will be the last measurement collected prior to the first dose of investigational product. Change from Baseline is calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value. Mean change from Baseline in CAT score at Week 52 has been presented.
Measured: Baseline and Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study start24 Apr 2014
- Primary completion16 Jan 2017
- Study completion16 Jan 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 674 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02105961
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 117113
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 16 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Publications
Pavord ID, Chapman KR, Bafadhel M, Sciurba FC, Bradford ES, Schweiker Harris S, Mayer B, Rubin DB, Yancey SW, Paggiaro P. Mepolizumab for Eosinophil-Associated COPD: Analysis of METREX and METREO. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jun 16;16:1755-1770. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S294333. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34163157Condreay LD, Gao C, Bradford E, Yancey SW, Ghosh S. No genetic associations with mepolizumab efficacy in COPD with peripheral blood eosinophilia. Respir Med. 2019 Aug;155:26-28. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
PubMed 31295674Roger JH, Bratton DJ, Mayer B, Abellan JJ, Keene ON. Treatment policy estimands for recurrent event data using data collected after cessation of randomised treatment. Pharm Stat. 2019 Jan;18(1):85-95. doi: 10.1002/pst.1910. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
PubMed 30406948Pavord ID, Chanez P, Criner GJ, Kerstjens HAM, Korn S, Lugogo N, Martinot JB, Sagara H, Albers FC, Bradford ES, Harris SS, Mayer B, Rubin DB, Yancey SW, Sciurba FC. Mepolizumab for Eosinophilic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 26;377(17):1613-1629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708208. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
PubMed 28893134
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study MEA117113: Mepolizumab vs. Placebo as Add-on Treatment for Frequently Exacerbating COPD Patients Characterized by Eosinophil Level
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02105961
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 117113
- Conditions
- Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
- Keywords
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, exacerbations, SB240563, mepolizumab, eosinophils
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 674 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 Apr 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Jan 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Jan 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 7 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Apr 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a multi-centered, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, trial evaluating 2 doses of mepolizumab against placebo given every 4 weeks through subcutaneous (SC) injection. In severe COPD subjects, sputum eosinophils levels are elevated to similar levels as those seen in severe asthmatics. It is hypothesized that the reduction of eosinophils with mepolizumab in COPD subjects would translate into a reduction of COPD exacerbations. The study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab, in subjects who are at or above the baseline blood eosinophil count of at least 150 cells/microliters who exacerbate despite regular use of maximal tolerated therapy, appropriate for severe COPD subjects, in the 12 months prior to study start. In total, 660 subjects will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive mepolizumab 300 mg, mepolizumab 100mg, or placebo administered SC. The total duration of subject participation will be approximately 62 weeks, consisting of a 1 to 2 week screening period, 52-week treatment period and 8-week follow-up period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Drug: MepolizumabEach subject will receive 100 mg mepolizumab SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) along with their baseline standard of care COPD medication |
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Drug: MepolizumabEach subject will receive 300 mg mepolizumab SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) along with their baseline standard of care COPD medication |
| Arm 3 | Experimental | Drug: PlaceboEach subject will receive placebo (0.9percent sodium chloride) SC injection every 4 weeks (13 administrations during 52 week treatment period) their baseline standard of care COPD medication |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- COPD diagnosis: Subjects with a clinically documented history of COPD for at least 1 year in accordance with the following definition by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society
- Severity of COPD: Subjects must present with the following: a measured pre and post-salbutamol Forced expiratory volume in one second/ Forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) ratio of <0.70 at Visit 1 to confirm the diagnosis of COPD; a measured post-salbutamol FEV1> 20 percent and <=80 percent of predicted normal values calculated using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) III reference equations at Visit 1
- History of exacerbations: A well documented history (e.g., medical record verification) in the 12 months prior to Visit 1 of ; at least two moderate COPD exacerbations. Moderate is defined as the use of systemic corticosteroids (intramuscular (IM), intravenous, or oral) and/or treatment with antibiotics or; at least one severe COPD exacerbation. Severe is defined as having required hospitalization. Note: At least one exacerbation must have occurred while the subject was taking Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus long acting beta2-agonist (LABA) plus long acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA). Prior use of antibiotics alone does not qualify as a moderate exacerbation unless the use was specifically for the treatment of worsening symptoms of COPD.
- Concomitant COPD therapy: A well documented requirement for optimized standard of care background therapy that includes Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus 2 additional COPD medications (i.e., triple therapy) for the 12 months prior to Visit 1 and meets the following criteria: Immediately prior to Visit 1, minimum of 3 months of use of an; Inhaled corticosteroid at a dose >= 500 micrograms (mcg)/day fluticasone propionate dose equivalent plus; LABA and LAMA.
- For subjects who are not continually maintained on ICS plus LABA plus LAMA for the entire 12 months prior to Visit 1 use of following is allowed (but not in the 3 months immediately prior to Visit 1); inhaled corticosteroid at a dose >=500 mcg/day fluticasone propionate dose equivalent plus; a LABA or a LAMA and; use of at least one other class of COPD medication (i.e., phosphodiesterase-4-inhibitors, methylxanthines, or a combination of short acting beta2-agonist and short acting muscarinic antagonist).
Key exclusion criteria (33 listed)
- Subjects with Asthma: Current and Former Smokers: Subjects with a current diagnosis of asthma (those with a prior history are eligible if they meet inclusion criteria for a current diagnosis of COPD); Never-Smokers: Subjects with any history of asthma.
- Other respiratory disorders: The investigator must judge that COPD is the primary diagnosis accounting for the clinical manifestations of the lung disease. Subjects with alpha1-antitrypsin deficiency as the underlying cause of COPD are excluded. Also, excluded are subjects with active tuberculosis, lung cancer, bronchiectasis, sarcoidosis, lung fibrosis, primary pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung diseases or other active pulmonary diseases. Subjects are also excluded if maintenance use of bi-level positive airway pressure is required for the treatment of respiratory disorder.
- COPD stability: Subjects with pneumonia, exacerbation, lower respiratory infection within the 4 weeks prior to Visit 1.
- Lung resection: Subjects with lung volume reduction surgery within the 12 months prior to Visit 1.
- Pulmonary rehabilitation program: Participation in the acute phase of a pulmonary rehabilitation program within 4 weeks prior to Visit 1. Subjects who are in the maintenance phase of a pulmonary rehabilitation program are not excluded.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MepolizumabHumanised IgG antibody (IgG1, kappa) with human heavy and light chain frameworks, provided as a lyophilised cake in sterile vial. Vial to be reconstituted with Sterile Water for Injection, just prior to use. | Drug | Arm 1, Arm 2 |
| PlaceboSterile 0.9percent sodium chloride solution | Drug | Arm 3 |
Primary outcome
Rate of Moderate or Severe Exacerbations
Time frame: From randomization to Week 52
Moderate exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Severe exacerbations are defined as clinically significant exacerbations that require in-patient hospitalization (>=24 hours) or result in death. Moderate and severe exacerbations occurring from the start of investigational product (IP) up to the Week 52 visit, including exacerbations reported after early discontinuation from IP by participants who remained in the study, were included in the analysis. The analysis was performed on the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) Population (all randomized participants who received at least one dose of study treatment).
4 secondary outcomes
Time to First Moderate/Severe Exacerbation
Time frame: From randomization to Week 52
Rate of COPD Exacerbations Requiring Emergency Department (ED) Visits and/or Hospitalizations (Hosp)
Time frame: From randomization to Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean Total St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Change From Baseline in Mean COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score
Time frame: Baseline and Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Aug 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34163157Pavord ID, Chapman KR, Bafadhel M, Sciurba FC, Bradford ES, Schweiker Harris S, Mayer B, Rubin DB, Yancey SW, Paggiaro P. Mepolizumab for Eosinophil-Associated COPD: Analysis of METREX and METREO. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2021 Jun 16;16:1755-1770. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S294333. eCollection 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31295674Condreay LD, Gao C, Bradford E, Yancey SW, Ghosh S. No genetic associations with mepolizumab efficacy in COPD with peripheral blood eosinophilia. Respir Med. 2019 Aug;155:26-28. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.07.004. Epub 2019 Jul 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30406948Roger JH, Bratton DJ, Mayer B, Abellan JJ, Keene ON. Treatment policy estimands for recurrent event data using data collected after cessation of randomised treatment. Pharm Stat. 2019 Jan;18(1):85-95. doi: 10.1002/pst.1910. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28893134Pavord ID, Chanez P, Criner GJ, Kerstjens HAM, Korn S, Lugogo N, Martinot JB, Sagara H, Albers FC, Bradford ES, Harris SS, Mayer B, Rubin DB, Yancey SW, Sciurba FC. Mepolizumab for Eosinophilic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 26;377(17):1613-1629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708208. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
- IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
Related trials for Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
Active, not recruiting
Symptoms and Functions in Patients With COPD and Chronic Bronchitis Switching From CIG to THS
COPD, Smoking
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting
The Aim of the Study is to Decipher the Alterations in Signalling Pathways of Skeletal Muscle Stem Cells (Satellite Cells (SCs)) in Individuals With COPD, as Well as to Examine the Effect of Exercise Training on SCs.
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), Sarcopenia in Elderly
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of Treprostinil Administered Via Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of Belumosudil Compared With Best Available Therapy in Participants Aged 12 Years or Older With Chronic Graft-versus-host Disease
Chronic Graft Versus Host Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
169 sites in 15 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Mepolizumab in people with Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 169 sites in 15 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 33 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 169 sites in United States, Japan, Germany, South Korea, Netherlands and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Apr 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Moderate or Severe Exacerbations (time frame: From randomization to Week 52). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02105961, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Aug 2018.