Ulcerative ColitisPhase 3HICKORYNCT02100696
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etrolizumab in Participants With Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Been Previously Exposed to Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Inhibitors
A Phase 3 study testing Etrozulimab in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 184 sites in 24 countries.
Trial summary
This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study will investigate the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab during induction and maintenance of remission compared with placebo in the treatment of participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who have been previously exposed to… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis
- What is being tested?
- Etrozulimab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 609 participants
- Where
- 184 sitesin 24 countries
- Study dates
- 21 May 2014to 16 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of UC established at least 3 months prior to Day 1
- Moderately to severely active UC as determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) assessment
- Treatment within 5 years prior to screening with one or two induction regimens that contain TNF inhibitors (including TNF inhibitor biosimilars)
- Washout of anti-TNF therapy for at least 8 weeks preceding Day 1
- Background regimen for UC may include oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), oral corticosteroids, budesonide, probiotics, azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), or methotrexate (MTX) if doses have been stable during the screening period
- Use of highly effective contraception as defined by the protocol
- Must have received a colonoscopy within the past year or be willing to undergo a colonoscopy in lieu of a flexible sigmoidoscopy at screening
Who cannot join
- A history of or current conditions and diseases affecting the digestive tract, such as indeterminate colitis, suspicion of ischemic colitis, radiation colitis, or microscopic colitis, Crohn's disease, fistulas or abdominal abscesses, colonic mucosal dysplasia, intestinal obstruction, toxic megacolon, or unremoved adenomatous colonic polyps
- Prior or planned surgery for UC
- Past or present ileostomy or colostomy
- Any prior treatment with etrolizumab or other anti-integrin agents (including natalizumab, vedolizumab, and efalizumab)
- Any prior treatment with anti-adhesion molecules (e.g. anti-MAdCAM-1)
- Any prior treatment with rituximab
Show all 14Show fewer
- Any treatment with tofacitinib during screening
- Congenital or acquired immune deficiency, chronic hepatitis B or C infection, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, or history of tuberculosis (active or latent)
- Evidence of or treatment for Clostridium difficile or clinically significant cytomegalovirus (CMV) colitis within 60 days prior to Day 1
- Evidence of or treatment for other intestinal pathogens within 30 days prior to Day 1
- History of recurrent opportunistic infections and/or severe disseminated viral infections
- History of organ transplant
- Any major episode of infection requiring treatment with intravenous (IV) antibiotics within 8 weeks prior to screening or oral antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Received a live attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to Day 1
Trial locations and contacts
184 sites in 24 countries.
184 sites in 24 countries
United States38 sites
University of Michigan; Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Gastroenterology Associates, LLC
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Washington Gastroenterology
Bellevue, Washington, 98004
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital; Crohn's & Colitis Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599
Northwestern University Feinberg School Of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Consultants for Clinical Research Inc.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
UC Health, LLC.
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Ericksen Research and Development
Clinton, Utah, 84015
Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology Associates
Denver, Colorado, 80222
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202
Clinica Peruano Americana S.A.
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Kansas City Research Institute, LLC
Kansas City, Missouri, 64131
University of California San Diego Medical Center
La Jolla, California, 92093-5354
Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology Associates, P.L.L.C.; Gastroenterology
Lakewood, Colorado, 80215
Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Gastrointestinal Specialists of Georgia, PC
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Gastroenterology Center of the Midsouth, P.C.
Memphis, Tennessee, 38120
Great Lakes Gastroenterology Research, LLC
Mentor, Ohio, 44060
FQL Research, LLC
Miramar, Florida, 33025
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10021
Digestive and Liver Disease Specialists, Ltd.
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Southwest Gastroenterology
Oak Lawn, Illinois, 60453
Center For Digestive Health
Orlando, Florida, 32803
Internal Medicine Specialists
Orlando, Florida, 32806
McGuire Research Institute; Gastroenterology
Richmond, Virginia, 23249
University of Utah School of Medicine
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132
Clinical Applications Laboratories, Inc.
San Diego, California, 92103
Precision Research Institute, LLC
San Diego, California, 92114
University of California at San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94115
Louisiana Research Center, LLC
Shreveport, Louisiana
Atlanta Gastroenterology Specialists, PC
Suwanee, Georgia, 30024
Cotton-O'Neil Clinical Research Center, Digestive Health
Topeka, Kansas, 66606
Center for Digestive Health
Troy, Michigan, 48098
Tyler Research Institute, LLC
Tyler, Texas, 75701
Shafran Gastroenterology Center
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
Germany14 sites
Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin - Campus Charite Mitte
Berlin, 10117
DRK Kliniken Berlin Westend
Berlin, 14050
Universitaetsklinikum Erlangen
Erlangen, 91054
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitaet
Frankfurt, 60590
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg; Innere Medizin I; Hämatologie, Onkologie und Stammzelltransplantation
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Universitaetsklinikum Halle (Saale)
Halle, 06120
Hamburgisches Forschungsinstitut fuer CED
Hamburg, 20148
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Gastroenterologie Eppendorfer Baum
Hamburg, 20249
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover; Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie
Hanover, 30625
Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel
Kiel, 24116
Klinikum Mannheim GmbH Universitätsklinikum
Mannheim, 68167
Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Münster, 48149
Universitaetsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, 89081
Hungary12 sites
Bekes Megyei Kozponti Korhaz Dr. Rethy Pal Tagkorhaza
Békéscsaba, 5600
Obudai Egeszsegugyi Centrum Kft.
Budapest, 1036
Semmelweis Egyetem
Budapest, 1083
Eszak-Kozep-budai Centrum, Uj Szent Janos Korhaz es Szakrendelo
Budapest, 1125
Pannonia Maganorvosi Centrum
Budapest, 1135
Magyar Honvedseg Egeszsegugyi Kozpont; Fázis I-es Klinikai Farmakológiai Vizsgálóhely
Budapest, H-1077
Debreceni Egyetem
Debrecen, 4032
Markhot Ferenc Oktato Korhaz es Rendelointezet
Eger, 3300
Petz Aladar Megyei Oktato Korhaz
Győr, 9024
Borsod-Abauj-Zemplen Megyei Korhaz es Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz; II. Belgyogyaszat
Miskolc, 3526
Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem
Pécs, 7624
Fejer Megyei Szent Gyorgy Egyetemi Oktato Korhaz
Székesfehérvár, 8000
France11 sites
CHU Amiens - Hopital Sud; Pharmacie - Secteur des Essais cliniques
Amiens Cedex01, 80054
Hôpital Beaujon
Clichy, 92110
Hopital Claude Huriez - CHU Lille
Lille, 59037
Hôpital Nord - CHU Marseille; Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Marseille, 13915
CHU Nice - Hopital de l'Archet 2
Nice, 06202
Hôpital Saint-Louis
Paris, 75475
Groupe Hospitalier Sud - Hôpital Haut-Lévêque - USN
Pessac, 33604
CHU Saint Etienne - Hôpital Nord
Saint-Etienne, 42055
Höpital Hautepierre; Pediatrie1
Strasbourg, 67098
CHU de Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
Toulouse, 31059
Hôpital de Brabois Adultes
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54511
Italy11 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
Florence, Tuscany, 50141
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Fatebenefratelli (Presidio Ospedale Sacco)
Milan, Lombardy
A.O.U. Policlinico di Modena
Modena, Emilia-Romagna, 40124
Azienda Ospedaliera Di Padova
Padova, Veneto, 35128
Ospedale di Circolo; Neuropsichiatria Infantile
Rho, Lombardy, 20017
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Policlinico Tor Vergata
Rome, Lazio, 00133
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
Rome, Lazio, 00152
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Rome, Lazio, 00168
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
Rozzano (MI), Lombardy, 20089
I.R.C.C.S Policlinico San Donato
San Donato Milanese (MI), Lombardy, 20097
Canada10 sites
University of Calgary; Heritage Medical Research Clinic
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6
Zeidler Ledcor Centre - University of Alberta; Division of Gasroenterology
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2X8
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Gastroenterology Research
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
Hotel Dieu de Levis
Lévis, Quebec, G6V 3Z1
Hôpital Maisonneuve - Rosemont
Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4
Taunton Health Centre
Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 7K4
Mount Sinai Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
Toronto Liver Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M6H 3M1
Pacific Gastroenterology Associates
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 2K5
Toronto Digestive Disease Associates
Vaughan, Ontario, L4L 4Y7
Poland10 sites
Nasz Lekarz Osrodek Badan Klinicznych
Bydgoszcz, 85-312
Nzoz All-Medicus
Katowice, 40-660
Gabinet Lekarski, Bartosz Korczowski
Rzeszów, 35-302
Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej SONOMED
Szczecin, 70-351
Centrum Zdrowia MDM
Warsaw, 00-631
Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy
Warsaw, 02-781
Nzoz Vivamed
Warsaw, 03-580
PlanetMed
Wroclaw, 52-210
LexMedica Osrodek Badan Klinicznych
Wroclaw, 53-114
EuroMediCare Szpital Specjalistyczny z Przychodnią we Wrocławiu
Wroclaw, 54-144
United Kingdom10 sites
Addenbrooke's Hospital
Cambridge, CB2 0QQ
Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital (Wonford)
Exeter, EX2 5DW
The Royal London Hospital
London, E1 2ES
University College London Hospital
London, NW1 - 2PG
St Thomas Hospital
London, SE1 7EH
King's College London
London, SE5 9NU
Fairfield General Hospital
Manchester, M8 5RB
Royal Victoria Infirmary
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP
Nottingham University Hospitals; QMC Campus
Nottingham, NG7 2UH
Southampton General Hospital
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Brazil9 sites
Hospital Felicio Rocho
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, 30110-068
UNESP - Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Estadual Paulista - Campus Botucatu
Botucatu, São Paulo, 18618-970
CAEP - Centro Avancado de Estudos e Pesquisas Ltda.
Campinas, São Paulo, 13087-567
Centro Digestivo de Curitiba
Curitiba, Paraná, 80430-160
Instituto Goiano de Gastroenterologia e Endoscopia Digestiva Ltda
Goiânia, Goiás, 74535-170
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-001
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre X
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul
Hospital Universitario Clementino Fraga Filho - UFRJ
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, 21941-913
Hospital Estadual Mario Covas
Santo André, São Paulo, 09190-610
Australia8 sites
St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
Fitzroy, Victoria, 3065
Footscray Hospital; Gastroenterology
Footscray, Victoria, 3011
Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
Herston, Queensland, 4029
Launceston General Hospital; Gastroenterology Research
Launceston, Tasmania, 7250
St Frances Xavier Cabrini Hospital
Malvern, Victoria, 3144
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Murdoch, Western Australia, 6150
Mater Adult Hospital
South Brisbane, Queensland, 4101
Princess Alexandra Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, 4102
Belgium8 sites
Imeldaziekenhuis
Bonheiden, 2820
CHU St Pierre (St Pierre)
Brussels, 1000
UZ Brussel
Brussels, 1090
UZ Gent
Ghent, 9000
AZ Sint Elisabeth Herentals
Herentals, 2200
UZ Leuven; Neurology
Leuven, 3000
CHU de Liège; Tour de Pathologie
Liège, 4000
AZ Delta (Stedelijk Ziekenhuis)
Roeselare, 8800
South Korea8 sites
Kyungpook National University Hospital; Opthalmology
Daegu, 700-721
Korea University Ansan Hospital
Gyeonggi-do, 15355
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si, 13605
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, 03080
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University
Seoul, 03722
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06531
Asan Medical Center.
Seoul, 138-736
The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital
Suwon, 442-723
Czechia6 sites
Fakultni nemocnice Brno; Interni kardiologicka klinika
Brno, 625 00
Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK, s.r.o.
Hradec Králové, 500 12
Pardubicka krajska nemocnice, a.s.
Pardubice, 532 03
ISCARE a.s.
Prague, 170 04
Nemocnice Na Bulovce
Prague, 180 01
Krajska zdravotni, a.s. - Masarykova nemocnice v Usti nad Labem, o.z., Ocni oddeleni
Ústí nad Labem, 401 13
Spain6 sites
Fundacion Hospital de Alcorcon; Servicio de Digestivo
Alcorcón, Madrid, 28922
Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr Josep Trueta
Girona, 17007
Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada
Madrid, 28942
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet
Zaragoza, 50009
Israel5 sites
Shaare Zedek Medical Center
Jerusalem, 9103102
Hadassah University Hospital - Ein Kerem; Neurosurgery
Jerusalem, 9112001
Rabin Medical Center-Beilinson Campus; Gaucher Clinic, Genetics Institute
Petach Tiqwa, 49100
Kaplan Medical Center
Rehovot, 7610001
Assaf Harofeh
Rishon LeZiyyon, 7505001
Netherlands4 sites
Amsterdam UMC, Locatie VUMC; Neurology
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Amsterdam UMC Location AMC
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ
Rijnstate; Internal Medicine Department
Arnhem, 6815 AD
Radboudumc
NL -nijmegen, 6525 GA
Austria3 sites
Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörtersee; Acute geriatric care
Klagenfurt, 9020
LKH - Universitätsklinikum der PMU Salzburg
Salzburg, 5020
Medizinische Universität Wien
Vienna, 1090
Switzerland3 sites
Inselspital-Universitaetsspital Bern; Institut fuer Spitalpharmazie
Bern, 3010
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc; Nephrology
Bern, 3012
Crohn-Colitis Zentrum Bern - Gemeinschaftspraxis Balsiger, Seibold und Partner
Bern, 3012
Denmark2 sites
Ålborg Universitets Hospital; Gastromedicinsk
Aalborg, 9000
Rigshospitalet; Medicinsk gastroenterologisk klinik
København Ø, 2100
Lithuania2 sites
Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health. Sciences Kaunas Clinics
Kaunas, 50009
Vilnius University Hospital Santariskiu Clinic Public Insti
Vilnius, 08661
Greece1 site
Anticancer Hospital of Thessaliniki " Theagenio"
Thessaloniki, 54007
Mexico1 site
Centro Regiomontano de Estudios Clínicos Roma S.C.
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64610
About this study
Official title: Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etrolizumab During Induction and Maintenance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Been Previously Exposed to TNF Inhibitors
This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study will investigate the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab during induction and maintenance of remission compared with placebo in the treatment of participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who have been previously exposed to TNF inhibitors.
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Being tested
- Etrozulimab, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EtrozulimabDrug
Also called PRO145223, RO5490261, RG7413
Participants will receive 105 mg etrolizumab administered by SC injection Q4W.
PlaceboDrug
Participants will receive placebo (matched with etrolizumab) administered by SC injection Q4W.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction (OLI) Phase) | Experimental | Participants assigned to this arm will receive treatment with open-label etrolizumab 105 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 14 weeks during the induction phase. Receives: Drug: Etrozulimab |
| Cohort 2: Placebo (Double-Blind Induction Phase) | Placebo comparator | Participants randomized to this arm will receive treatment with double-blind placebo SC injection Q4W for 14 weeks during the induction phase. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase) | Experimental | Participants randomized to this arm will receive treatment with double-blind etrolizumab 105 mg SC injection Q4W for 14 weeks during the induction phase. Receives: Drug: Etrozulimab |
| Placebo Responders: Placebo (Maintenance Phase) | Placebo comparator | Participants who received placebo during the induction phase, Cohort 2: Placebo (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieve a clinical response with placebo at Week 14 will continue to receive blinded placebo from Week 16 up to Week 66 during the maintenance phase. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Etrolizumab Responders: Placebo (Maintenance Phase) | Placebo comparator | Participants who received etrolizumab during the induction phase, Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction Phase) and Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieved a clinical response at Week 14 will be re-randomized by Week 16 for the double-blind maintenance phase. Clinical responders re-randomized to this arm will receive placebo SC injection Q4W from Week 16 up to Week 66. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Etrolizumab Responders: Etrolizumab (Maintenance Phase) | Experimental | Participants who received etrolizumab during the induction phase, Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction Phase) and Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieved a clinical response at Week 14 will be re-randomized by Week 16 for the double-blind maintenance phase. Clinical responders re-randomized to this arm will receive etrolizumab 105 mg SC injection Q4W from Week 16 up to Week 66. Receives: Drug: Etrozulimab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS)
The Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (≤)2 with individual subscores ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
Measured: Week 14
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved a Clinical Response at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (≤)2 with individual subscores ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Response is MCS with ≥3-point decrease and 30% reduction from baseline as well as ≥1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1.
Measured: Week 66
Secondary outcomes (31)
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Clinical Remission is MCS ≤2 with individual subscores ≤1.
Measured: Week 14
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (≤)2 with individual subscores ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Response is MCS with ≥3-point decrease and 30% reduction from baseline as well as ≥1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1.
Measured: Week 14
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Endoscopic Appearance of the Mucosa at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Improvement in endoscopic appearance of the mucosa is Endoscopy subscore ≤1.
Measured: Baseline and Week 14
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Endoscopic Remission is Endoscopy subscore = 0.
Measured: Week 14
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Histologic Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the Nancy Histological Index
Nancy Histological Index (NHI) is a 5-level classification ranging from grade 0 (No histologically significant disease) to grade 4 (severely active disease). Histologic remission is defined as a Nancy Histological Index of 0 or 1.
Measured: Week 14
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MCS Rectal Bleed Subscore
Rectal bleeding data were collected via the participant's diaries and each day a participant provided a score from 0 to 3 according to the following definitions: 0 = no blood in the stool; 1 = streaks of blood with stool less than half the time; 2 = obvious blood with stool most of the time; 3 = blood alone passed. The Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) rectal bleeding subscore was calculated as the worst value of three days of daily diary scores closest to anchor dates at baseline and post-baseline. The data was considered non-parametric and was reported using RANK analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Participants were stratified by concomitant treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressants at randomization and disease activity measured during screening (MCS ≤9/MCS ≥10); the model adjusted for these stratification factors along with the baseline rectal bleeding (RB) subscore.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MCS Stool Frequency Subscore
Stool frequency data were collected via the participant's diaries and each day a participant provided a score from 0 to 3 according to the following definitions: 0 = normal number of stools; 1 = 1 to 2 more stools than normal; 2 = 3 to 4 more stools than normal; 3 = 5 or more stools than normal. The Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) stool frequency subscore was calculated as the average of three days daily diary scores closest to anchor dates at baseline and post-baseline. The data was considered non-parametric and was reported using RANK analysis of covariance (ANCOVA). Participants were stratified by concomitant treatment with corticosteroids or immunosuppressants at randomization and disease activity measured during screening (MCS ≤9/MCS ≥10); the model adjusted for these stratification factors along with the baseline stool frequency (SF) subscore.
Measured: Baseline and Week 6
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in UC Bowel Movement Signs and Symptoms, as Assessed by the Ulcerative Colitis Patient-Reported Outcome Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS) Questionnaire
The UC-PRO questionnaire is collected in the e-diary and completed by participants for at least 9-12 consecutive days prior to a study visit. The UC-PRO is being reported in three domains; two domains are key endpoints and reported as UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS). The bowel domain score ranges from 0-27, with a higher score indicating a worse disease state.
Measured: Baseline and Week 14
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in UC Functional Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
The UC-PRO questionnaire is collected in the e-diary and completed by participants for at least 9-12 consecutive days prior to a study visit. The UC-PRO is being reported in three domains; two domains are key endpoints and reported as UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS). The functional (abdominal symptoms) domain score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a worse disease state.
Measured: Baseline and Week 14
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in Health-Related Quality of Life, as Assessed by the Overall Score of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)
The IBDQ score is a Total Score summed up from across all 32 questions on the questionnaire. The Total Score range is from 32 to 224 with higher scores representing a better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 14
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (≤)2 with individual subscores ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Remission is MCS ≤2 with individual subscores ≤1.
Measured: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (≤)2 with individual subscores ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Remission is MCS ≤2 with individual subscores ≤1.
Measured: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (≤)2 with individual subscores ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
Measured: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Endoscopic Appearance of the Mucosa at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Improvement in endoscopic appearance of the mucosa is Endoscopy subscore ≤1.
Measured: Baseline and Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Histologic Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the Nancy Histological Index
Nancy Histological Index (NHI) is a 5-level classification ranging from grade 0 (No histologically significant disease) to grade 4 (severely active disease). Histologic remission is defined as a Nancy Histological Index of 0 or 1.
Measured: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Endoscopic Remission is Endoscopy subscore = 0.
Measured: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Were Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline, as Determined by the MCS
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Corticosteroid-Free analysis was conducted only on a subgroup of participants who were randomized into the maintenance phase and receiving Corticosteroids (CS) at baseline. Participants were defined as being off CS if they had no record of taking CS on the date that was 24 weeks prior to Week 66.
Measured: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Were Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline, as Determined by the MCS
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Corticosteroid-Free analysis was conducted only on a subgroup of participants who were randomized into the maintenance phase and receiving Corticosteroids (CS) at baseline. Participants were defined as being off CS if they had no record of taking CS on the date that was 24 weeks prior to Week 66.
Measured: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in UC Bowel Movement Signs and Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
The UC-PRO questionnaire is collected in the e-diary and completed by participants for at least 9-12 consecutive days prior to a study visit. The UC-PRO is being reported in three domains; two domains are key endpoints and reported as UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS). The bowel domain score ranges from 0-27, with a higher score indicating a worse disease state.
Measured: Baseline and Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in UC Functional Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
The UC-PRO questionnaire is collected in the e-diary and completed by participants for at least 9-12 consecutive days prior to a study visit. The UC-PRO is being reported in three domains; two domains are key endpoints and reported as UC-PRO Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS). The functional (abdominal symptoms) domain score ranges from 0-12, with a higher score indicating a worse disease state.
Measured: Baseline and Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in Health-Related Quality of Life, as Assessed by the Overall Score of the IBDQ
The IBDQ is used to assess participant's health-related quality of life (QOL). The IBDQ score is a Total Score summed up from across all 32 questions on the questionnaire. The Total Score range is from 32 to 224 with higher scores representing a better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline and Week 66
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event by Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
All Adverse Events (AEs) were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Any AE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Grade 5 = death related to AE. Not all grades are appropriate for all AEs; some AEs have fewer than 5 options. The terms "severe" and "serious" are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each AE. Multiple occurrences of AEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Serious Infection-Related Adverse Events
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Infection-Related Adverse Events
All Adverse Events (AEs) were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Any AE not specifically listed was assessed per the following 5 grades: Grade 1 = mild; asymptomatic or mild symptoms; clinical or diagnostic observations only; or intervention not indicated. Grade 2 = moderate; minimal, local, or non-invasive intervention indicated; or limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily living. Grade 3 = severe or medically significant, but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; or limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = life-threatening consequences or urgent intervention indicated. Not all grades are appropriate for all AEs; some AEs have fewer than 5 options. The terms "severe" and "serious" are not synonymous and are independently assessed for each AE. Multiple occurrences of AEs were counted only once per participant at the highest (worst) grade.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reaction-Related Adverse Events
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reaction-Related Adverse Events
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Malignancies
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies to Etrolizumab at Baseline and During the Study
A tiered strategy was used to detect and characterize etrolizumab antibodies within this clinical study. When determining post baseline incidence, participants were considered to be ADA positive if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline but developed an ADA response following etrolizumab drug exposure (treatment-induced ADA response), or if they were ADA positive at baseline and the titer of one or more post baseline samples was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment-enhanced ADA response). Participants were considered to be ADA negative if they were ADA negative or had missing data at baseline and all post baseline samples were negative, or if they were ADA positive at baseline but did not have any post baseline samples with a titer that was at least 0.60 titer unit greater than the titer of the baseline sample (treatment unaffected).
Measured: Pre-dose at Baseline, Weeks 4, 14, 24, 44, and 66, and Early Termination/End of Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 78)
Etrolizumab Serum Trough Concentration (for Arms/Timepoints Above LLOQ)
As per Protocol, the timepoints for each arm where more than a third of the samples were above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ), full summary statistics (Mean and Standard Deviation) were reported. For timepoints below the LLOQ, only the Median and Max were reported as a separate outcome measure below.
Measured: Pre-dose (0 hour) at Baseline and Weeks 14, 24, 44 and 66
Etrolizumab Serum Trough Concentration (for Arms/Timepoints Below LLOQ)
As per Protocol, the timepoints for each arm where more than a third of the samples were below the LLOQ only the Median and Max were reported.
Measured: Weeks 44 and 66
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study start21 May 2014
- Primary completion16 Apr 2020
- Study completion16 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ulcerative ColitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 609 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02100696
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GA28950
- Other IDs
- 2013-004278-88
- Acronym
- HICKORY
- Status last verified
- Jul 2021
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 13 Aug 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Li Y, Li J, Rothenberg ME, Rhee H, Zhang J, Lin S, Park KT. Impact of missing patient report outcomes in clinical trials for ulcerative colitis: Should we always assume treatment failure? Crohns Colitis 360. 2026 Feb 26;8(1):otag015. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otag015. eCollection 2026 Jan.
PubMed 41841037Peyrin-Biroulet L, Hart A, Bossuyt P, Long M, Allez M, Juillerat P, Armuzzi A, Loftus EV Jr, Ostad-Saffari E, Scalori A, Oh YS, Tole S, Chai A, Pulley J, Lacey S, Sandborn WJ; HICKORY Study Group. Etrolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis in patients previously treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (HICKORY): a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;7(2):128-140. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00298-3. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
PubMed 34798039Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, Tyrrell H, Hassanali A, Lacey S, Tole S, Tatro AR; Etrolizumab Global Steering Committee. Etrolizumab for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: An Overview of the Phase 3 Clinical Program. Adv Ther. 2020 Jul;37(7):3417-3431. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01366-2. Epub 2020 May 22.
PubMed 32445184
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Aug 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Etrolizumab During Induction and Maintenance in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis Who Have Been Previously Exposed to TNF Inhibitors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02100696
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HICKORY / GA28950
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 609 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jun 2021
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study will investigate the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab during induction and maintenance of remission compared with placebo in the treatment of participants with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) who have been previously exposed to TNF inhibitors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction (OLI) Phase) | Experimental | Drug: EtrozulimabParticipants assigned to this arm will receive treatment with open-label etrolizumab 105 milligrams (mg) subcutaneous (SC) injection once every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 14 weeks during the induction phase. |
| Cohort 2: Placebo (Double-Blind Induction Phase) | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants randomized to this arm will receive treatment with double-blind placebo SC injection Q4W for 14 weeks during the induction phase. |
| Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase) | Experimental | Drug: EtrozulimabParticipants randomized to this arm will receive treatment with double-blind etrolizumab 105 mg SC injection Q4W for 14 weeks during the induction phase. |
| Placebo Responders: Placebo (Maintenance Phase) | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants who received placebo during the induction phase, Cohort 2: Placebo (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieve a clinical response with placebo at Week 14 will continue to receive blinded placebo from Week 16 up to Week 66 during the maintenance phase. |
| Etrolizumab Responders: Placebo (Maintenance Phase) | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboParticipants who received etrolizumab during the induction phase, Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction Phase) and Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieved a clinical response at Week 14 will be re-randomized by Week 16 for the double-blind maintenance phase. Clinical responders re-randomized to this arm will receive placebo SC injection Q4W from Week 16 up to Week 66. |
| Etrolizumab Responders: Etrolizumab (Maintenance Phase) | Experimental | Drug: EtrozulimabParticipants who received etrolizumab during the induction phase, Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction Phase) and Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase), and achieved a clinical response at Week 14 will be re-randomized by Week 16 for the double-blind maintenance phase. Clinical responders re-randomized to this arm will receive etrolizumab 105 mg SC injection Q4W from Week 16 up to Week 66. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosis of UC established at least 3 months prior to Day 1
- Moderately to severely active UC as determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) assessment
- Treatment within 5 years prior to screening with one or two induction regimens that contain TNF inhibitors (including TNF inhibitor biosimilars)
- Washout of anti-TNF therapy for at least 8 weeks preceding Day 1
- Background regimen for UC may include oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA), oral corticosteroids, budesonide, probiotics, azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP), or methotrexate (MTX) if doses have been stable during the screening period
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- A history of or current conditions and diseases affecting the digestive tract, such as indeterminate colitis, suspicion of ischemic colitis, radiation colitis, or microscopic colitis, Crohn's disease, fistulas or abdominal abscesses, colonic mucosal dysplasia, intestinal obstruction, toxic megacolon, or unremoved adenomatous colonic polyps
- Prior or planned surgery for UC
- Past or present ileostomy or colostomy
- Any prior treatment with etrolizumab or other anti-integrin agents (including natalizumab, vedolizumab, and efalizumab)
- Any prior treatment with anti-adhesion molecules (e.g. anti-MAdCAM-1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EtrozulimabAlso: PRO145223, RO5490261, RG7413Participants will receive 105 mg etrolizumab administered by SC injection Q4W. | Drug | Cohort 1: Etrolizumab (Open-Label Induction (OLI) Phase), Cohort 2: Etrolizumab (Double-Blind Induction Phase), Etrolizumab Responders: Etrolizumab (Maintenance Phase) |
| PlaceboParticipants will receive placebo (matched with etrolizumab) administered by SC injection Q4W. | Drug | Cohort 2: Placebo (Double-Blind Induction Phase), Etrolizumab Responders: Placebo (Maintenance Phase), Placebo Responders: Placebo (Maintenance Phase) |
Primary outcome
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS)
Time frame: Week 14
The Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (≤)2 with individual subscores ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0.
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved a Clinical Response at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Time frame: Week 66
The MCS ranges from 0 to 12 and is a composite of 4 assessments (each rated from 0-3): stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy, and physician's global assessment. Higher scores represent greater disease severity. Remission was defined as MCS less than or equal to (≤)2 with individual subscores ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0. Clinical Response is MCS with ≥3-point decrease and 30% reduction from baseline as well as ≥1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or an absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1.
31 secondary outcomes
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Time frame: Week 14
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Time frame: Week 14
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Endoscopic Appearance of the Mucosa at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
Time frame: Baseline and Week 14
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
Time frame: Week 14
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Histologic Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the Nancy Histological Index
Time frame: Week 14
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MCS Rectal Bleed Subscore
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 6 in MCS Stool Frequency Subscore
Time frame: Baseline and Week 6
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in UC Bowel Movement Signs and Symptoms, as Assessed by the Ulcerative Colitis Patient-Reported Outcome Signs and Symptoms (UC-PRO/SS) Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 14
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in UC Functional Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 14
Induction Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 14 in Health-Related Quality of Life, as Assessed by the Overall Score of the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ)
Time frame: Baseline and Week 14
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Clinical Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Time frame: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS
Time frame: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Had Achieved Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the MCS
Time frame: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Improvement From Baseline in Endoscopic Appearance of the Mucosa at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
Time frame: Baseline and Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Histologic Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the Nancy Histological Index
Time frame: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 66, as Determined by the MCS Endoscopic Subscore
Time frame: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Were Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline, as Determined by the MCS
Time frame: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid-Free Remission at Week 66 Among Participants Who Were Receiving Corticosteroids at Baseline, as Determined by the MCS
Time frame: Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in UC Bowel Movement Signs and Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in UC Functional Symptoms, as Assessed by the UC-PRO/SS Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline and Week 66
Maintenance Phase: Change From Baseline to Week 66 in Health-Related Quality of Life, as Assessed by the Overall Score of the IBDQ
Time frame: Baseline and Week 66
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event by Severity, According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Serious Infection-Related Adverse Events
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Infection-Related Adverse Events
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reaction-Related Adverse Events
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Hypersensitivity Reaction-Related Adverse Events
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Malignancies
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 78
Number of Participants With Anti-Therapeutic Antibodies to Etrolizumab at Baseline and During the Study
Time frame: Pre-dose at Baseline, Weeks 4, 14, 24, 44, and 66, and Early Termination/End of Safety Follow-Up (up to Week 78)
Etrolizumab Serum Trough Concentration (for Arms/Timepoints Above LLOQ)
Time frame: Pre-dose (0 hour) at Baseline and Weeks 14, 24, 44 and 66
Etrolizumab Serum Trough Concentration (for Arms/Timepoints Below LLOQ)
Time frame: Weeks 44 and 66
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Aug 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41841037Li Y, Li J, Rothenberg ME, Rhee H, Zhang J, Lin S, Park KT. Impact of missing patient report outcomes in clinical trials for ulcerative colitis: Should we always assume treatment failure? Crohns Colitis 360. 2026 Feb 26;8(1):otag015. doi: 10.1093/crocol/otag015. eCollection 2026 Jan.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34798039Peyrin-Biroulet L, Hart A, Bossuyt P, Long M, Allez M, Juillerat P, Armuzzi A, Loftus EV Jr, Ostad-Saffari E, Scalori A, Oh YS, Tole S, Chai A, Pulley J, Lacey S, Sandborn WJ; HICKORY Study Group. Etrolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis in patients previously treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (HICKORY): a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;7(2):128-140. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00298-3. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32445184Sandborn WJ, Vermeire S, Tyrrell H, Hassanali A, Lacey S, Tole S, Tatro AR; Etrolizumab Global Steering Committee. Etrolizumab for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease: An Overview of the Phase 3 Clinical Program. Adv Ther. 2020 Jul;37(7):3417-3431. doi: 10.1007/s12325-020-01366-2. Epub 2020 May 22.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
184 sites in 24 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Etrozulimab in people with Ulcerative Colitis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 184 sites in 24 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 184 sites in United States, Germany, Hungary, France, Italy and 19 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jun 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Induction Phase: Percentage of Participants With Remission at Week 14, as Determined by the Mayo Clinic Score (MCS) (time frame: Week 14). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02100696, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2021.