Symptomatic Aortic StenosisPorticoALTEUNCT02088021
Assessment of the St. Jude Medical PorticoTM Re-sheathable Aortic Valve System - Alternative Access
A study testing Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve in people with Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis, run by Abbott Medical Devices.
Trial summary
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the use of the Portico ALC Delivery System to place a transcatheter aortic valve through an alternative access site, specifically subclavian/axillary or TAo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
- What is being tested?
- Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subject has provided written informed consent.
- Subject is 65 years of age or older at the time of index procedure, and/or has comorbidities that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or the Subject Selection Committee, preclude surgical valve replacement.
- Subject's aortic annulus diameter meets the range indicated in the Instructions for Use as measured by multislice CT conducted within 120 days prior to the index procedure.
- Subject has senile degenerative aortic stenosis with echocardiography within 30 days of index procedure as defined by at least 1 of the following:
- derived mean gradient greater than 40 mmHg, OR
- jet velocity greater than 4.0 m/s, OR
Show all 11Show fewer
- aortic valve area of less than 0.8 cm2, OR
- aortic valve area index less than or equal to 0.6 cm2/m2.
- Subject has symptomatic aortic stenosis as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Classification of II, III, or IV.
- Subject is deemed high operable risk and delivery route is suitable for TAVI per the medical opinion of the Subject Selection Committee.
- Subject's predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk is less than 50% at 30 days post index procedure.
Who cannot join
- Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with all study-required follow-up evaluations.
- Subject has a documented history of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (less than or equal to 180 days) prior to the index procedure.
- Subject has carotid artery disease requiring intervention.
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days prior to patient providing consent (defined as: ST Segment Elevation as evidenced on 12 Lead ECG).
- Subject has a native aortic valve that is congenitally unicuspid, bicuspid, quadricuspid or non-calcified as seen by echocardiography.
- Subject has mitral valvular regurgitation greater than grade III.
Show all 66Show fewer
- Subject has moderate or severe mitral stenosis.
- Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic cardiac device, valve, or prosthetic ring in any position.
- Subject refuses any blood product transfusion.
- Subject refuses surgical valve replacement.
- Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 20%.
- Subject has documented, untreated symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization.
- Subject has had a percutaneous interventional or other invasive cardiovascular or peripheral vascular procedure less than or equal to 14 days of index procedure.
- Subject has severe basal septal hypertrophy that would interfere with transcatheter aortic valve placement.
- Subject has a history of, or is currently diagnosed with endocarditis.
- There is imaging evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation.
- Subject is considered hemodynamically unstable (requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance).
- Subject is in acute pulmonary edema or requiring intravenous diuretic therapy to stabilize heart failure.
- Subject with significant pulmonary disease as determined and documented by the Investigator.
- Subject has significant chronic steroid use as determined and documented by the Investigator.
- Subject has a documented hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication.
- Subject has renal insufficiency as evidenced by a serum creatinine greater than 3.0 mg/dL (265.5 µmol/L) or end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
- Subject has morbid obesity defined as a BMI greater than or equal to 40.
- Subject has ongoing infection or sepsis.
- Subject has blood dyscrasias (eg, leukopenia, acute anemia, thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis, or coagulopathy).
- Subject has a current autoimmune disease that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or the Subject Selection Committee, precludes the subject from study participation.
- Significant ascending aortic disease documented by diameter greater than 40mm.
- Subject has an active peptic ulcer or has had gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 90 days prior to the index procedure.
- Subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study.
- Subject requires emergency surgery for any reason.
- Subject has a life expectancy less than 12 months.
- Subject has other medical, social or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or the Subject Selection Committee, preclude the subject from study participation.
- Subject is diagnosed with dementia or admitted to a chronic care facility which would fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits.
- Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with all study-required follow-up evaluations.
- Subject has a documented history of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (less than or equal to 180 days) prior to the index procedure.
- Subject has carotid artery disease requiring intervention.
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days prior to patient providing consent (defined as: ST Segment Elevation as evidenced on 12 Lead ECG).
- Subject has a native aortic valve that is congenitally unicuspid, bicuspid, quadricuspid or non-calcified as seen by echocardiography.
- Subject has mitral valvular regurgitation greater than grade III.
- Subject has moderate or severe mitral stenosis.
- Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic cardiac device, valve, or prosthetic ring in any position.
- Subject refuses any blood product transfusion.
- Subject refuses surgical valve replacement.
- Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 20%.
- Subject has documented, untreated symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) requiring revascularization.
- Cardiovascular or peripheral vascular procedure less than or equal to 14 days of index procedure.
- Subject has severe basal septal hypertrophy that would interfere with transcatheter aortic valve placement.
- Subject has a history of, or is currently diagnosed with endocarditis.
- There is imaging evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation.
- Subject is considered hemodynamically unstable (requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance).
- Subject is in acute pulmonary edema or requiring intravenous diuretic therapy to stabilize heart failure.
- Subject with significant pulmonary disease as determined and documented by the Investigator.
- Subject has significant chronic steroid use as determined and documented by the Investigator.
- Subject has a documented hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication.
- Subject has renal insufficiency as evidenced by a serum creatinine greater than 3.0 mg/dL (265.5 µmol/L) or end-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
- Subject has morbid obesity defined as a BMI greater than or equal to 40.
- Subject has ongoing infection or sepsis.
- Subject has blood dyscrasias (eg, leukopenia, acute anemia, thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis, or coagulopathy).
- Significant ascending aortic disease documented by diameter greater than 40mm.
- Subject has an active peptic ulcer or has had gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 90 days prior to the index procedure.
- Subject is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study.
- Subject requires emergency surgery for any reason.
- Subject has a life expectancy less than 12 months.
- Subject has other medical, social or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or the Subject Selection Committee, preclude the subject from study participation.
- Subject is diagnosed with dementia or admitted to a chronic care facility which would fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits.
- Subject has a documented allergy to contrast media, nitinol alloys, porcine tissue, or bovine tissue.
About this study
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the use of the Portico ALC Delivery System to place a transcatheter aortic valve through an alternative access site, specifically subclavian/axillary or TAo.
- Conditions
- Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
- Being tested
- Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Portico Transcatheter Aortic ValveDevice
Placement of the SJM Portico aortic valve with a ALC delivery system
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation | Experimental | Placement of the SJM Portico aortic valve with a ALC delivery system Receives: Device: Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Major Vascular Complications related to the Portico ALC Delivery System
Measured: 30 day post procedure
All cause mortality
Measured: 30 day post procedure
Secondary outcomes (3)
Event Rates
Event rates as described by VARC-2
"Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document European Heart Journal (2012) 33, 2403-2418."
Measured: 30 days post procedure
Functional improvement from baseline
Functional improvement from baseline as compared to 30 days by:
- NYHA Functional Classification
- Six Minute Walk Test
- Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Measured: 30 days post procedure
Acute device success
Acute device success defined as:
- Ability of the Portico ALC Delivery System to successfully deliver, deploy, and resheath (if necessary) a transcatheter aortic valve
- Absence of procedural mortality
- Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
- Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve, as defined by:
- mean aortic valve gradient <20 mmHg or peak velocity <3 m/s, and
- no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation
Measured: 12 months post procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionFeb 2015 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Business decision
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Symptomatic Aortic StenosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Abbott Medical DevicesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical Devices
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Axel Linke, Prof Dr. med, Principal investigator, Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02088021
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CL07045
- Acronym
- PorticoALTEU
- Status last verified
- Feb 2019
- First submitted
- 4 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 4 Feb 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Feb 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of the St. Jude Medical PorticoTM Re-sheathable Aortic Valve System - Alternative Access
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02088021
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PorticoALTEU / CL07045
- Conditions
- Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Business decision
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Abbott Medical DevicesIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this clinical investigation is to evaluate the use of the Portico ALC Delivery System to place a transcatheter aortic valve through an alternative access site, specifically subclavian/axillary or TAo.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation | Experimental | Device: Portico Transcatheter Aortic ValvePlacement of the SJM Portico aortic valve with a ALC delivery system |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Subject has provided written informed consent.
- Subject is 65 years of age or older at the time of index procedure, and/or has comorbidities that, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator or the Subject Selection Committee, preclude surgical valve replacement.
- Subject's aortic annulus diameter meets the range indicated in the Instructions for Use as measured by multislice CT conducted within 120 days prior to the index procedure.
- Subject has senile degenerative aortic stenosis with echocardiography within 30 days of index procedure as defined by at least 1 of the following:
- Subject has symptomatic aortic stenosis as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Classification of II, III, or IV.
Key exclusion criteria (66 listed)
- Subject is unwilling or unable to comply with all study-required follow-up evaluations.
- Subject has a documented history of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months (less than or equal to 180 days) prior to the index procedure.
- Subject has carotid artery disease requiring intervention.
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days prior to patient providing consent (defined as: ST Segment Elevation as evidenced on 12 Lead ECG).
- Subject has a native aortic valve that is congenitally unicuspid, bicuspid, quadricuspid or non-calcified as seen by echocardiography.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Portico Transcatheter Aortic ValvePlacement of the SJM Portico aortic valve with a ALC delivery system | Device | Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation |
Primary outcome
Major Vascular Complications related to the Portico ALC Delivery System
Time frame: 30 day post procedure
All cause mortality
Time frame: 30 day post procedure
3 secondary outcomes
Event Rates
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Functional improvement from baseline
Time frame: 30 days post procedure
Acute device success
Time frame: 12 months post procedure
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Feb 2019.
Related trials for Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis
Recruiting
Exercise and Diet Supplements for Older Patients Undergoing TAVI: the IRON-TAVI Trial
Aortic Stenosis Disease, Aortic Stenosis Symptomatic
RecruitingPhase 2
A Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Ninerafaxstat in Patients With Symptomatic Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Non-obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn More About How Well Aficamten Works in Japanese Participants With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
RecruitingObservational study
PERFECT - Portuguese Evolut Registry Studying the Outcomes of Medtronic Evolut™ FX+ TAVI System by Evaluating an Optimal Care Pathway for TAVI
Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis (Defined as New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class ≥ II)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2/3
Open-label Extension Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety and Tolerability of Aficamten in Adults With HCM
Symptomatic Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Axel Linke, Prof Dr. med principal investigator
Heart Center Leipzig - University Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Portico Transcatheter Aortic Valve in people with Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis, run by Abbott Medical Devices.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 66 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Major Vascular Complications related to the Portico ALC Delivery System (time frame: 30 day post procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2019.