Geographic AtrophyPhase 2BEACONNCT02087085
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Brimonidine Intravitreal Implant in Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration
A Phase 2 study testing 400 µg Brimonidine Implant in people with Geographic Atrophy and Macular Degeneration, run by Allergan at 41 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
This study will assess the safety and efficacy of the brimonidine intravitreal implant in participants with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 55 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Geographic Atrophy, Macular Degeneration
- What is being tested?
- 400 µg Brimonidine Implant
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 310 participants
- Where
- 41 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- 9 May 2014to 30 Mar 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 55 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye
- Visual acuity better than or equal to 20/125 Snellen equivalent in the study eye and 20/200 Snellen equivalent in the fellow eye.
Who cannot join
- Cataract surgery or Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) in the study eye in the last 3 months
- Infections in either eye in the last 3 months
Trial locations and contacts
41 sites in 6 countries.
41 sites in 6 countries
United States23 sites
Retina Research Institute of Texas
Abilene, Texas, 79606
Texas Retina Associates
Arlington, Texas, 76012
"Austin Retina Associates "
Austin, Texas, 78705
Charlotte Eye Ear Nose & Throat Associates, PA
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28210
Retina Consultants of Southern Colorado, PC
Colorado Springs, Colorado, 80909
Retina Foundation of the Southwest
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Georgia Retina
Decatur, Georgia, 30030
Oregon Retina, LLP
Eugene, Oregon, 97401
"National Ophthalmic Research Institute Retina Consultants of Southwest Florida"
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912
Raj K. Maturi, MD
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46290
University of California, San Diego, Jacobs Retina Center, Shiley Eye Center
La Jolla, California, 92037
Valley Retina Institute
McAllen, Texas, 78503
Northern California Retina Vitreous Associates
Mountain View, California, 94040
Retina Specialty Institute
Pensacola, Florida, 32503
Mid Atlantic Retina, Wills Eye Retina Surgeons
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107
Retinal Consultants of Arizona, Ltd., Retinal Research Institute
Phoenix, Arizona, 85014
Associated Retina Consultants
Phoenix, Arizona, 85020
Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Retina Associates of Western New York
Rochester, New York, 14620
Retina Vitreous Associates of Florida
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33711
Southern Vitreoretinal Associates, PL
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308
Strategic Clinical Research Group, LLC
Willow Park, Texas, 76087
Center for Retina and Macular Disease
Winter Haven, Florida, 33880
Italy7 sites
Università di Cagliari (presidio San Giovanni di Dio)
Bologna, 40138
Università di Cagliari (presidio San Giovanni di Dio)
Cagliari, 09124
Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
Milan, 20122
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, 20132
"Dir IV Clinica Oculistica di Milano, Ospedale Generale ""Luigi Sacco"" "
Milan, 20157
Universita degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze
Padova, 35128
Universita degli Studi di Torino
Torino, 10122
United Kingdom5 sites
Clinical Research Unit, Level2, Bristol Eye Hospital, Lower Maudlin Street
Bristol, BS1 2LX
Frimley Park Hospital, Eye clinical trials Unit, Department of Opthalmology
Camberley, GU16 7UJ
Moorfields Eye Hospital
London, EC1V 2PD
Macular Unit, Hospital of St Cross
Rugby, CV22 5PX
Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Eye Department
Sheffield, S10 2JF
Australia2 sites
Center for Eye Research Australia
Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Lions Eye Institute, University of Western Australia
Nedlands, 6009
France2 sites
Service d'Ophtalmologie
Bordeaux, 33076
"Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Creteil "
Créteil, 94000
Germany2 sites
"Universitat Bonn, Abteilung fur Augenheilkunde "
Bonn, 53127
STZ Eyetrial
Tübingen, 72076
About this study
Official title: Safety and Efficacy of Brimonidine Posterior Segment Drug Delivery System in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration
This study will assess the safety and efficacy of the brimonidine intravitreal implant in participants with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration.
- Conditions
- Geographic Atrophy, Macular Degeneration
- Being tested
- 400 µg Brimonidine Implant, Sham
- Medical subject headings
- Geographic Atrophy, Macular Degeneration
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
400 µg Brimonidine ImplantDrug
Also called AGN-190342
400 µg brimonidine implant in the study eye using Brimo DDS® applicator on Day 1, and every 3 months through Month 21.
ShamOther
Sham treatment with needleless applicator (no implant) to the study eye on Day 1, and every 3 months through Month 21.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 400 µg Brimonidine Implant | Experimental | 400 µg brimonidine implant in the study eye, administered by intravitreal injections using the Brimonidine Drug Delivery System (Brimo DDS®) applicator every 3 months from Baseline (Day 1) through Month 21. Receives: Drug: 400 µg Brimonidine Implant |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Sham treatment (control) in the study eye, administered by intravitreal injections using a needleless drug delivery system (DDS) applicator every 3 months from Baseline (Day 1) through Month 21. Receives: Other: Sham |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area of the Study Eye as Assessed by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Month 24
GA lesion area was measured in mm^2 by FAF in the study eye and was quantified by the central reading center. The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard Best Correct Visual Acuity (BCVA). If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analysis.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Standard Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score as Assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart at Month 24
BCVA was measured using an eye chart (ETDRS) and was reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard BCVA. If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. MMRM was used for analysis.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24
Change From Baseline in Low Luminance BCVA Score as Assessed by ETDRS Chart at Month 24
Low Luminance BCVA was measured by placing a 2.0 log unit neutral density filter over the best correction for that eye and having the participant read the normally illuminated ETDRS chart and was reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity). The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard BCVA. If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement and a negative change from baseline indicates a worsening. MMRM was used for analysis.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study start9 May 2014
- Primary completion30 Mar 2018
- Study completion30 Mar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Geographic AtrophyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 310 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Allergan
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Claire Winterson, Study director, Allergan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02087085
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 190342-038
- Other IDs
- 2013-003320-36
- Acronym
- BEACON
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 12 Mar 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Miere A, Capuano V, Kessler A, Zambrowski O, Jung C, Colantuono D, Pallone C, Semoun O, Petit E, Souied E. Deep learning-based classification of retinal atrophy using fundus autofluorescence imaging. Comput Biol Med. 2021 Mar;130:104198. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104198. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
PubMed 33383315Kuppermann BD, Patel SS, Boyer DS, Augustin AJ, Freeman WR, Kerr KJ, Guo Q, Schneider S, Lopez FJ; Brimo DDS Gen 1 Study Group. PHASE 2 STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BRIMONIDINE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM (BRIMO DDS) GENERATION 1 IN PATIENTS WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina. 2021 Jan 1;41(1):144-155. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002789.
PubMed 32134802
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy of Brimonidine Posterior Segment Drug Delivery System in Patients With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02087085
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BEACON / 190342-038
- Conditions
- Geographic Atrophy, Macular Degeneration
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Terminated
- Enrolment
- 310 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AllerganIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 9 May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study will assess the safety and efficacy of the brimonidine intravitreal implant in participants with geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 400 µg Brimonidine Implant | Experimental | Drug: 400 µg Brimonidine Implant400 µg brimonidine implant in the study eye, administered by intravitreal injections using the Brimonidine Drug Delivery System (Brimo DDS®) applicator every 3 months from Baseline (Day 1) through Month 21. |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Other: ShamSham treatment (control) in the study eye, administered by intravitreal injections using a needleless drug delivery system (DDS) applicator every 3 months from Baseline (Day 1) through Month 21. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 55 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Geographic atrophy due to age-related macular degeneration in the study eye
- Visual acuity better than or equal to 20/125 Snellen equivalent in the study eye and 20/200 Snellen equivalent in the fellow eye.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Cataract surgery or Laser-Assisted in situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) in the study eye in the last 3 months
- Infections in either eye in the last 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 400 µg Brimonidine ImplantAlso: AGN-190342400 µg brimonidine implant in the study eye using Brimo DDS® applicator on Day 1, and every 3 months through Month 21. | Drug | 400 µg Brimonidine Implant |
| ShamSham treatment with needleless applicator (no implant) to the study eye on Day 1, and every 3 months through Month 21. | Other | Sham |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area of the Study Eye as Assessed by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24
GA lesion area was measured in mm^2 by FAF in the study eye and was quantified by the central reading center. The study eye was defined as the eye that met inclusion/exclusion criteria with the worst standard Best Correct Visual Acuity (BCVA). If the BCVA in both eyes was similar the right eye was selected as the study eye. A positive change from baseline indicates an increase in size of GA lesion area (worsening; disease progression). Mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) was used for analysis.
2 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Standard Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Score as Assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Chart at Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24
Change From Baseline in Low Luminance BCVA Score as Assessed by ETDRS Chart at Month 24
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33383315Miere A, Capuano V, Kessler A, Zambrowski O, Jung C, Colantuono D, Pallone C, Semoun O, Petit E, Souied E. Deep learning-based classification of retinal atrophy using fundus autofluorescence imaging. Comput Biol Med. 2021 Mar;130:104198. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104198. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32134802Kuppermann BD, Patel SS, Boyer DS, Augustin AJ, Freeman WR, Kerr KJ, Guo Q, Schneider S, Lopez FJ; Brimo DDS Gen 1 Study Group. PHASE 2 STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF BRIMONIDINE DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEM (BRIMO DDS) GENERATION 1 IN PATIENTS WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPHY SECONDARY TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION. Retina. 2021 Jan 1;41(1):144-155. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002789.
Related trials for Geographic Atrophy
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase 1/2 Study of VOY-101 in Patients With Advanced Non-Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Autologous Transplantation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium for Geographic Atrophy Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Geographic Atrophy
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Investigating Subcutaneously Administered Pozelimab in Combination With Cemdisiran or Cemdisiran Alone in Adult Participants With Geographic Atrophy
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD), Geographic Atrophy (GA)
RecruitingPhase 1
Phase 1 Study of C.001 in Retinal Degeneration
Geographic Atrophy, Stargardt Disease
RecruitingPhase 2/3
A Long-term Extension Study of JNJ-81201887 (AAVCAGsCD59) Parent Studies in Participants With Geographic Atrophy (GA) Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Geographic Atrophy, Macular Degeneration
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Claire Winterson study director
Allergan
41 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing 400 µg Brimonidine Implant in people with Geographic Atrophy and Macular Degeneration, run by Allergan at 41 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 41 sites in United States, Italy, United Kingdom, Australia, France and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Geographic Atrophy (GA) Lesion Area of the Study Eye as Assessed by Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at Month 24 (time frame: Baseline (Day 1) to Month 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02087085, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2019.