AzTrials
AzTrials

PneumoniaPhase 4NCT02079701

Effectiveness of the Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine in Military Recruits

A Phase 4 study testing 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in people with Pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Disease, run by Naval Health Research Center at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective is to determine the clinical benefit of employing the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine among US military trainees. Secondary objectives include: determining the etiology of clinical pneumonia among U.S. military trainees; comparing the serotype distribution of S. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pneumonia, Acute Respiratory Disease
What is being tested?
23-valent pneumococcal vaccine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
152,723 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2000to Jun 2007
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • basic training recruits at 5 recruit training centers (in South Carolina, Missouri, Illinois, and California) were invited to participate during their first week of training from Oct 2000 through Jun 2003

Who cannot join

  • positive pregnancy results
  • having previously received the a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine during the previous 5 years or
  • having a medical condition that either required or precluded pneumococcal vaccination

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Army Recruit Training Center

    Fort Jackson, South Carolina

  • Army Recruit Training Center

    Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri

  • Naval Recruit Training Center

    Great Lakes, Illinois

  • Marine Recruit Training Center

    Parris Island, South Carolina

  • Marine Recruit Training Center

    San Diego, California

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Effectiveness Trial of the 23-Valent Pneumococcal Vaccine Among Military Trainees At Increased Risk of Respiratory Disease

The primary objective is to determine the clinical benefit of employing the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine among US military trainees. Secondary objectives include:

  • determining the etiology of clinical pneumonia among U.S. military trainees;
  • comparing the serotype distribution of S. pneumoniae (Sp) isolates recovered from vaccinated and nonvaccinated trainees diagnosed with pneumonia; and
  • comparing days lost from training due to pneumonia or acute respiratory disease for vaccinated and nonvaccinated subjects.
Read the detailed description

Study participants. Given their documented high rates of respiratory illness, US military trainees were selected for participation. A sample size of 166,744 person-years was calculated based on the following assumptions: 12% attrition from military training, clinical pneumonia attack rate of 11 cases per 1000 person-years, 20% of captured pneumonias caused by Sp, 90% of captured Sp pneumonias caused by a vaccine-covered Sp strain, and 70% vaccine efficacy.

Enrollment and follow-up. This study was approved by multiple Department of Defense (DoD) institutional review boards. Using an informed consent process, basic training recruits at 5 recruit training centers (in South Carolina, Missouri, Illinois, and California) were invited to participate during their first week of training. Pregnancy screening was performed on all women, and those with positive results were not enrolled. Exclusion criteria included having previously received the a 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine during the previous 5 years or having a medical condition that either required or precluded pneumococcal vaccination. Study participants completed a study questionnaire and were administered a pre-packaged, blinded, and randomized injection containing either the 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine (Wyeth Pharmaceuticals or Merck \& Company, Inc.) or saline in a 1:1 ratio. Study injections were administered at the same time as other recruit in-processing vaccinations, which may have included vaccines against polio, measles-mumps-rubella, varicella, tetanus-diphtheria, hepatitis A virus, hepatitis B virus, meningococcal disease (A/C/Y/W135), and influenza. At the end of recruit training, a questionnaire was administered to capture symptoms and signs of illnesses which might have been missed captured by the active and passive surveillance.

As enrollment continued for more than two years, the person-year contributions of those first enrolled were greater than those enrolled near the trial's end. The original planned surveillance period was 1.7 years. This was later extended to 6.7 years from enrollment of the first participant, for continued monitoring of impact in this large double-blinded trial.

Specimen collection. During the active surveillance period, study participants with suspect pneumonia were identified by the attending physician. Study personnel obtained three throat swabs, blood cultures (aerobic and anaerobic), sputum sample (if producible), and acute serum samples from participants. Attempts were made to also capture a convalescent serum sample 2 weeks after the acute presentation on all radiographically-confirmed pneumonia cases. These attempts were not always successful. Barriers included: trainee discharge from military service, difficulty in obtaining access to the recruits when they were in field exercises, and recruits graduating and moving to new duty stations.

Laboratory methods. Specimens collected from study participants were examined using classic, molecular, and serologic laboratory methods at the Naval Health Research Center (NHRC) Respiratory Disease Laboratory, a College of American Pathologist (CAP) accredited laboratory.

NHRC isolated adenovirus, influenza, parainfluenza, and respiratory syncytial virus from pharyngeal swabs using fluorescent antibody antigen tests. Adenovirus and influenza isolates were typed using standard viral identification techniques.

Sputum specimens were inoculated for Sp culture using standard techniques. When Sp species were identified, capsular serotyping was performed, and standard antimicrobial sensitivities were assessed. Paired acute and convalescent sera were assessed for IgM and IgG titers to pneumolysin. Sera were tested with an enzyme immunoassay using a procedure such as described by Kalin, M, et al.

For Chlamydophila pneumoniae polymerase chain reaction (PCR) study, throat swabs were collected from patients diagnosed with pneumonia, immediately placed in Chlamydia transport media, and transported on ice. The throat swabs were used in a direct PCR method, such as the procedure described by Campbell et al. Amplification products were analyzed by electrophoresis through a 1.5% agarose gel by standard methods. Sample preparation, PCR amplification, and analysis of amplification products were performed in separate rooms.

To assess M. pneumoniae, a throat swab was collected and immediately placed into 2.0 ml of M. pneumoniae transport media (SP-4 broth). Culturing, sub-culturing, and molecular testing was performed as per previously published protocols.

Capturing disease outcomes. Outcome measures included any cause pneumonia, any cause respiratory disease, recruit training clinical pneumonia (radiographically-confirmed during the recruit training period), or days lost from training. Active surveillance was conducted for radiographically-confirmed pneumonias only during the recruit training period (Marines-12 weeks, Navy-8 weeks, Army-9 weeks). Passive electronic monitoring of health care encounters for outcomes other than recruit training clinical pneumonia took place during recruit training and at the subsequent duty stations using the DoD comprehensive electronic databases of outpatient healthcare encounters (SADR), inpatient encounters (SIDR), and encounters at civilian facilities billed to the DoD (HCSR). ICD-9-CM codes 480 through -486 and 487 were monitored for these outcomes throughout the entire study period. Meningitis cases (ICD-9-CM codes 320 through -320.2, 320.9, and 322.9) were also captured through these electronic databases.

Statistical analysis. After descriptive investigation of population characteristics, univariate analyses were performed to assess the significance of associations between demographic variables with acute respiratory infection, pneumonia, and radiographically-confirmed pneumonia.

Active surveillance time was calculated from the participant's enrollment date to the projected completion of training, or diagnosis with radiographically-confirmed pneumonia. Passive surveillance was calculated from the date of enrollment to June 01 2007, diagnosis with pneumonia or acute respiratory infection, or separation from active duty service, whichever occurred first.

Using regression diagnostics, collinearity among variables was investigated. Cox's proportional hazard time-to-event modeling was used to evaluate outcomes among study participants, while adjusting for differences in population characteristics between treatment arms and accounting for different enrollment dates and active and passive surveillance periods. The saturated Cox regression model was reduced by a manual backward stepwise elimination approach removing those variables that were insignificant at α = 0.05 level and not confounding the other measures of association. Additionally, cumulative probabilities of outcomes from enrollments through end of follow-up periods were graphed. Statistical modeling to produce adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was performed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software (Version 9.0, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

Crude vaccine effectiveness measures for each outcome were calculated for all participants and for each branch of service using a 1-relative risk x 100% estimate.

Days lost from training were estimated using a survey administered at the end of training to a convenience sample of 71,692 study participants. Differences between treatment arms were evaluated using ANOVA.

Being tested
23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, Placebo
Keywords
pneumonia, pneumococcus, vaccine, 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, military recruits
Medical subject headings
Pneumonia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 23-valent pneumococcal vaccineBiological

    Also called Pnu-Imune, Pneumovax 23

    randomization, based upon a random-number (block design) double-blind enrollment sequence. 1:1 ratio.

  • PlaceboBiological

Study groups in NCT02079701
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
23-valent pneumococcal vaccineExperimentalsingle dose, 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine, 0.5ml, intramuscular (IM)
Receives: Biological: 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine
placeboPlacebo comparator0.5 ml injectible saline, IM
Receives: Biological: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Radiologically confirmed all-cause pneumonia

    During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), study participants with suspect pneumonia were identified by the attending physician. Study staff followed up on the results of chest xray to identify all radiographically-confirmed pneumonia cases.

    Measured: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization

  2. Acute respiratory disease

    Passive electronic monitoring of health care encounters for outcomes other than recruit training clinical and radiographically-confirmed pneumonia took place during recruit training and at the subsequent duty stations using the DoD comprehensive electronic databases of outpatient healthcare encounters (SADR), inpatient encounters (SIDR), and encounters at civilian facilities billed to the DoD (HCSR). ICD-9-CM codes 480 through -486 and 487 were monitored for these outcomes throughout the entire study period.

    Measured: Participants will be followed as long on active duty, up to June 2007, which is up to 6.7 years, depending upon when they entered the study

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Etiology of radiographically-confirmed pneumonias

    During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), those with radiographically-confirmed pneumonia will be sampled for etiologic agent as comprehensively described in the study design section.

    Measured: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization

  2. Serotype distribution of S. pneumoniae isolates recovered from participants with pneumonia

    During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), those with radiographically-confirmed pneumonia will be sampled for etiologic agent and any S.p. isolates identified to serotype as comprehensively described in the study design section.

    Measured: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization

  3. Days lost from recruit training

    During the active surveillance period while participants are still in recruit training(variable time frame depending on which Service), participants will be monitored for days lost from training as comprehensively described in the study design section.

    Measured: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2000
  3. Primary completionJun 2003
  4. Study completionJun 2007

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
152,723 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02079701
Sponsor's protocol ID
DAMD17-00-2-0013
Status last verified
Mar 2014
First submitted
3 Mar 2014
Last updated
6 Mar 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Plouffe JF, Breiman RF, Facklam RR. Bacteremia with Streptococcus pneumoniae. Implications for therapy and prevention. Franklin County Pneumonia Study Group. JAMA. 1996 Jan 17;275(3):194-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.275.3.194.

    PubMed 8604171
  • Gray GC, Mitchell BS, Tueller JE, Cross ER, Amundson DE. Pneumonia hospitalizations in the US Navy and Marine Corps: rates and risk factors for 6,522 admissions, 1981-1991. Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Apr 15;139(8):793-802. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117076.

    PubMed 8178792
  • McMillan A, Pattman RS. Evaluation of urethral culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the routine investigation of men attending a STD clinic. Br J Vener Dis. 1979 Aug;55(4):271-3. doi: 10.1136/sti.55.4.271.

    PubMed 114197
  • Gray GC, Callahan JD, Hawksworth AW, Fisher CA, Gaydos JC. Respiratory diseases among U.S. military personnel: countering emerging threats. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999 May-Jun;5(3):379-85. doi: 10.3201/eid0503.990308.

    PubMed 10341174
  • Fine MJ, Smith MA, Carson CA, Meffe F, Sankey SS, Weissfeld LA, Detsky AS, Kapoor WN. Efficacy of pneumococcal vaccination in adults. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Dec 12-26;154(23):2666-77. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1994.00420230051007.

    PubMed 7993150
  • Russell KL, Baker CI, Hansen C, Poland GA, Ryan MA, Merrill MM, Gray GC. Lack of effectiveness of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in reducing all-cause pneumonias among healthy young military recruits: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine. 2015 Feb 25;33(9):1182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.12.058. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

    PubMed 25579777

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing 23-valent pneumococcal vaccine in people with Pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Disease, run by Naval Health Research Center at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Radiologically confirmed all-cause pneumonia (time frame: During the 12 weeks (Marines), 8 weeks (Navy), and 9 weeks (Army) period while in recruit training after immunization). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02079701, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in