AzTrials
AzTrials

Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7NCT02079662

The Role of Lifestyle Factors in Breast Cancer-Related Outcomes

A study testing Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention, Best Practice and Cognitive Intervention in people with Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7 and Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v6 and v7, run by M.D. Anderson Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized clinical trial studies an integrative oncology (making changes in lifestyle and behavior) program in improving cancer-related outcomes in patients with stage II or III breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention, Best Practice and Cognitive Intervention
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
110 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Jun 2013to 31 Dec 2030
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Women with stage II or III breast cancer that will be scheduled to undergo a 4 to 6-week course of radiotherapy
  • Participants must be able to read, write, and speak English
  • Participants must be oriented to person, place, and time
  • Participants must also meet at least two of the following criteria related to lifestyle: 1) consume less than 3 servings of fruit and vegetable/day; 2) engage in less than 75 minutes moderate/vigorous activity per week, defined as anything that causes small increases in breathing or heart rate for a sustained amount of time (e.g., brisk walking, bicycling); and 3) engage in a mind-body practice less than 4 times a month
  • Participants must have a body mass index (BMI) of 24.45 or higher as assessed in the medical record

Who cannot join

  • Patients with a recurrent breast cancer diagnosis
  • Patients with another primary cancer diagnosis within 5 years of consent, not including non-melanoma skin cancers
  • Patients who have any major psychiatric diagnoses or thought disorder (e.g. schizophrenia, bi-polar disorder, dementia)
  • Patients with communication barriers (e.g., hard of hearing)
  • Patients with extreme mobility issues (e.g. unable to get in and out of a chair unassisted)
  • Patients with poorly or uncontrolled diabetes in the opinion of the physician(s)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • M D Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Integrative Oncology Program in Improving Cancer-Related Outcomes in Patients With Stage II or III Breast Cancer Undergoing Radiation Therapy

This randomized clinical trial studies an integrative oncology (making changes in lifestyle and behavior) program in improving cancer-related outcomes in patients with stage II or III breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy. An integrative oncology program consisting of dietary recommendations, physical activity, stress management, social support, and control of environmental contaminants may modify cancer-related biological processes, influence long-term treatment results, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Determine whether the Integrative Oncology group (IO) has increased disease-free survival (time to recurrence) than the standard of care control group (SC).

II. Compare group differences over time in biological pathways including: immune function, endocrine function, insulin and glucose metabolism, cancer-related pathways (from peripheral blood), antioxidant capacity, and nutrient levels.

III. Examine group differences in overall survival. IV. Compare group differences over time in dietary patterns and fitness levels. V. Determine whether the IO group has improved patient reported outcomes including fatigue, sleep disturbances, radiotherapy toxicity (dermatitis, skin ulceration, pruritis, etc.), gut microbiome, other aspects of Quality of Life (QOL), mental health, social support, and measures of positive growth.

VI. Compare group differences over time in heart rate variability. VII. Determine cost-effectiveness analysis and work and/or home productivity.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

  1. Compare group differences over time in healthy breast tissue biomarkers acquired from fine needle aspirations.

II. Compare group differences in spouse or caregiver work productivity.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients undergo up to 7 different IO intervention sessions per week during their 6-week course of radiotherapy for between 1 and 3 hours each session, in addition to, up to 6 aerobic training sessions per week and one grocery store trip during the course of the program. IO intervention programs consist of nutritional coaching, behavioral therapy, yoga and meditation practice, resistance training, and a weekly meal sharing and cooking class. Patients then have weekly meetings with the study psychologist on the computer for 6 months, followed by a monthly meeting on the computer from 6-12 months, and 2 hour meetings at all follow-up appointments during the first year after radiotherapy.

ARM II: Patients undergo standard of care.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 6 and 12 months and then annually for up to 4 years.

Being tested
Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention, Best Practice, Cognitive Intervention, Computer-Assisted Intervention, Counseling
Medical subject headings
Breast Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Behavioral, Psychological or Informational InterventionOther

    Undergo IO intervention

  • Best PracticeOther

    Also called standard of care, standard therapy

    Undergo standard of care

  • Cognitive InterventionOther

    Undergo IO intervention

  • Computer-Assisted InterventionOther

    Undergo IO intervention

  • CounselingOther

    Also called Counseling Intervention

    Undergo counseling

  • Exercise InterventionBehavioural

    Undergo IO intervention

  • Laboratory Biomarker AnalysisOther

    Correlative studies

  • Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther

    Also called Quality of Life Assessment

    Ancillary studies

  • Questionnaire AdministrationOther

    Ancillary studies

Study groups in NCT02079662
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm I (IO interventions)ExperimentalPatients undergo up to 7 different IO intervention sessions per week during their 6-week course of radiotherapy for between 1 and 3 hours each session, in addition to, up to 6 aerobic training sessions per week and one grocery store trip during the course of the program. IO intervention programs consist of nutritional coaching, behavioral therapy, yoga and meditation practice, resistance training, and a weekly meal sharing and cooking class. Patients then have weekly meetings with the study psychologist on the computer for 6 months, followed by a monthly meeting on the computer from 6-12 months, and 2 hour meetings at all follow-up appointments during the first year after radiotherapy.
Receives: Other: Behavioral, Psychological or Informational Intervention; Other: Cognitive Intervention; Other: Computer-Assisted Intervention; Other: Counseling; Behavioral: Exercise Intervention; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration
Arm II (standard of care)Active comparatorPatients undergo standard of care.
Receives: Other: Best Practice; Other: Laboratory Biomarker Analysis; Other: Quality-of-Life Assessment; Other: Questionnaire Administration

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease-free survival (DFS)

    Will analyze DFS, using a multivariate comparison of DFS for each group using a Cox proportional hazards analysis. Will consider the following as potential covariates in the analysis (tumor and nodal status, menopausal status at diagnosis, tumor factors, treatment regimen, etc). Will obtain estimates for hazards ratios and 95% confidence intervals for the effect of the study arm and each covariate.

    Measured: Up to 5 years

  2. Changes in biological pathways

    Will use generalized linear mixed model regression (GLMM). Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years

  3. Changes in dietary patterns

    Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years

  4. Changes in fitness levels

    Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years

  5. Changes in heart rate variability

    Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years

  6. Changes in quality of life (including fatigue and sleep disturbances)

    Will use GLMM. Separate sets of analyses will be conducted for each criterion variable. To select the best method for modeling the repeated measures, will use the methods of Wolfinger and statistics such as Akaike's and Schwarz's information criteria. Will also use either t tests or Wilcoxon two-sample tests to analyze these data, depending on their distributions.

    Measured: Baseline to 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start13 Jun 2013
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
110 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02079662
Sponsor's protocol ID
2012-0112
Other IDs
NCI-2014-02449, 2012-0112
Status last verified
Jun 2026
First submitted
4 Mar 2014
Last updated
11 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in