Ventilator-associated PneumoniaPhase 2VAPNCT02077920
Methods of Chlorhexidine Cleansing to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
A Phase 2 study testing Chlorhexidine, 0.9% sodium chloride injection and Endotracheal tube in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, and is associated with longer hospital stay, increased treatment costs, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality . Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
- What is being tested?
- Chlorhexidine, 0.9% sodium chloride injection and Endotracheal tube
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 192 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Aug 2019
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients who are scheduled for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Who cannot join
- Patients who underwent endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy before study enrollment.
- Patients who underwent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation within 30 days before study enrollment.
- Patients who require cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
- Patients with a history of emesis and aspiration before endotracheal intubation.
- Patients who are judged unsuitable for enrollment by clinicians.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
Shenyang, Liaoning, 110000
About this study
Official title: Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia by Oropharyngeal and Subglottic Decontamination Via Bronchoscopy
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, and is associated with longer hospital stay, increased treatment costs, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality . VAP is reported to occur in 8%-67% of mechanically ventilated patients (20%-28% in most reports) and has a mortality rate of 24%-50%, which is 2-3 times the mortality rate of mechanically ventilated patients without VAP. In patients infected by multi-resistant bacteria, the mortality rate may be as high as 76%. The diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of VAP are therefore important. Strategies for preventing VAP are crucial for reducing medical costs and increasing survival rates in critically ill patients. These strategies mainly involve a semi-reclining position with the head of the bed raised to at least 30°-45°, oral care, suctioning of subglottic secretions, selective decontamination of the digestive tract, proper hand washing, avoidance or reduction of proton pump inhibitors, avoidance of excessive sedation, and control of plasma glucose levels.
At our center, VAP is mainly caused by bacterial colonization of the upper respiratory tract via aspiration. This study will compare four interventions including oropharyngeal decontamination and subglottic suctioning by bronchoscopy, with the aim of developing a prevention strategy to minimize the development of VAP during mechanical ventilation.
Read the detailed description
Patients will be assessed as follows:
CABDC ABBAA BCDDA CCCDB CACBA BBABC BAAAD DCDAC CDBAA DACDD AAACB CDBCB ACCDB BBAAD BCACC DDBCA ADCAD DABCD CBAAB DDDCD AABAB ACBCD BCCBA ADCDB CBCAB CDDCA CDDDD ABCDA ABDCB CBADD ADDBA BBCCD ABBBD DCDAC BBCCB DADBB CDBDA DBBAC AC
Adverse Events:
Adverse events that occur after endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, oral cleansing with chlorhexidine, and suctioning of oropharyngeal secretions by bronchoscopy will be recorded. All adverse events including laboratory abnormalities will be recorded, even if they are thought to be unrelated to medical interventions. The severity of adverse events and any correlations with experimental drugs will be carefully recorded on the case report form.
The relationships between adverse events and drug resistance will be categorized as certainly relevant, probably relevant, possibly relevant, possibly irrelevant, or certainly irrelevant. The proportions of adverse events that are categorized as certainly relevant, probably relevant, and possibly relevant will be calculated. Severe adverse events will be recorded in a table and reported to the director of the unit and the sponsor within 24 hours.
Severity Assessment:
The severity of adverse events will be categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. A mild adverse event is defined as an event with signs and symptoms that are easy to tolerate such as nausea, vomiting, or transient localized pain. A moderate adverse event is defined as an event resulting in persistent pain. A severe adverse event is defined as an event resulting in prolonged hospitalization, disability, reduced ability to work, risk of death, or congenital malformation.
The outcomes of all adverse events will be recorded. Patients who withdraw from the trial because of adverse events will be followed up until complete resolution of the events. The investigators will judge whether the adverse events are related to the administration of experimental drugs, and will record the justification for each decision.
Data Management:
Completed case report forms will be collected by the clinical coordinator and the data will be entered into the database. After checking for accuracy, the data will be locked. After unblinding, the data will be categorized according to the four groups of patients.
Statistical Analysis:
Numerical data will be described as percentages, and measurement data as mean ± standard deviation. Abnormally distributed data will be described as median and interquartile range (25th-75th percentile).
Comparisons of Baseline Data:
Numerical data will be compared between groups using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Measurement data with normal distributions will be analyzed by single- or multi-factor analysis of variance. Data with high heterogeneity will be compared using a non-parametric test such as Tamhane's T2 test. Measurement data with non-normal distributions will be compared using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. Groups will be compared at baseline and at different time points after enrollment.
Comparisons of Efficacy:
Analgesic and sedative effects will be compared among groups using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. For factors showing significant differences among groups, pairwise comparisons will be analyzed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Mean values will be compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test.
Data Processing:
All statistical analyses will be performed using SAS software. Two-sided P values will be calculated. For Fisher's exact test, the P value will be calculated directly. A value of P <0.05 is considered significant, and P <0.01 is considered highly significant.
Quality Assurance:
This study will have one principal investigator, one research investigator, and four other investigators. The clinical protocol will be strictly implemented. An independent inspector will be appointed to monitor the clinical trial.
Quality Control of the Parameters Measured:
The parameters recorded will be measured according to standard operating and quality control procedures, using standard national units of measurement. Test report forms will be fully completed including the date, parameters tested, test results, and normal ranges.
Ethical Standards:
The investigators or investigator-authorized personnel will explain the benefits and risks of participating in the clinical trial to each patient, or to the patient's legal representative. Written informed consent will be obtained prior to study entry (before performance of tests and administration of drugs). The original consent forms will be stored by the investigators.
Data Retention:
The investigators will be responsible for maintaining the database and keeping the data locked for future analysis. In accordance with the principles of good clinical practice in China, the data will be kept for at least 5 years.
- Conditions
- Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
- Being tested
- Chlorhexidine, 0.9% sodium chloride injection, Endotracheal tube, Fiber bronchoscope
- Keywords
- Ventilator-associated pneumonia VAP, Chlorhexidine, Oropharyngeal decontamination, Subglottic secretion drainage
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ChlorhexidineDrug
SFDA Approval No. H21020748; Jinzhou Jiu Tai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China
Drug administration and preparation:
- Drug administration: oropharyngeal rinsing and suctioning of subglottic secretions
- Drug preparation: 0.12% chlorhexidine solution prepared with distilled water that has been sterilized by autoclaving
0.9% sodium chloride injectionDrug
SFDA Approval No. H20045252; Shenyang Zhiying Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China
Endotracheal tubeDevice
Type 5-10115; size 7.0 mm, 7.5 mm, or 8.0 mm; purchased from Teleflex Medical (USA).
Fiber bronchoscopeDevice
For suctioning of subglottic secretions. BF-P30 (Olympus, Japan); BF-1T20 (Olympus, Japan); or FB-18BS (Pentax, Japan).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine before intubation | Experimental | Group A: Oropharyngeal decontamination with chlorhexidine before intubation, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed before endotracheal intubation, and every 6 hours after intubation. Receives: Drug: Chlorhexidine; Device: Endotracheal tube |
| Chlorhexidine after intubation | Experimental | Group B: Oropharyngeal decontamination with chlorhexidine after intubation, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed every 6 hours after endotracheal intubation. Receives: Drug: Chlorhexidine; Device: Endotracheal tube |
| Subglottic secretion drainage | Experimental | Group C: Suctioning of subglottic secretions, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed before endotracheal intubation and every 6 hours after intubation, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided suctioning of subglottic secretions will be performed at 10:00 a.m. every day. The procedure will be as follows:
1. Routine cleaning of the bronchoscope.
2. Oral or nasal insertion of the bronchoscope (according to the decision of the attending physician based on the patient's condition). Rinsing of the subglottic region with 5-20 mL of chlorhexidine solution followed by suctioning. The rinsing procedure will be repeated 3-5 times.
3. Routine cleaning of the bronchoscope. The patient will be monitored during all procedures. Receives: Drug: Chlorhexidine; Device: Fiber bronchoscope |
| 0.9% sodium chloride injection | Experimental | Group D: 0.9% sodium chloride injection, n=48. After endotracheal intubation, oral cleansing with normal saline will be performed every 6 hours. Receives: Drug: 0.9% sodium chloride injection; Device: Endotracheal tube |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Percentage of patients who develop VAP after endotracheal intubation
Measured: an expected average of 30 days
Secondary outcomes (5)
Length of stay
Number of days of hospitalization
Measured: Until discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days
Length of intensive care unit stay
Number of days in the intensive care unit
Measured: an expected average of 30 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Influence of interventions on the duration of mechanical ventilation.
Measured: Until the last day of mouthpiece ventilation, an expected average of 30 days
Hospital costs
Total costs incurred during hospitalization.
Measured: During entire hospitalization, an expected average of 30 days
30-day mortality
Percentage of patients who die.
Measured: An expected average of 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionJun 2019
- Study completionAug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ventilator-associated PneumoniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 192 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhuang Ma, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
- Investigators
- Zhuang Ma, Ph.D., Principal investigator, The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02077920
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GHS-RCU-001
- Acronym
- VAP
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 27 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 14 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia by Oropharyngeal and Subglottic Decontamination Via Bronchoscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02077920
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VAP / GHS-RCU-001
- Conditions
- Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
- Keywords
- Ventilator-associated pneumonia VAP, Chlorhexidine, Oropharyngeal decontamination, Subglottic secretion drainage
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 192 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- General Hospital of Shenyang Military RegionUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is common in patients receiving mechanical ventilation, and is associated with longer hospital stay, increased treatment costs, and higher rates of morbidity and mortality . VAP is reported to occur in 8%-67% of mechanically ventilated patients (20%-28% in most reports) and has a mortality rate of 24%-50%, which is 2-3 times the mortality rate of mechanically ventilated patients without VAP. In patients infected by multi-resistant bacteria, the mortality rate may be as high as 76%. The diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of VAP are therefore important. Strategies for preventing VAP are crucial for reducing medical costs and increasing survival rates in critically ill patients. These strategies mainly involve a semi-reclining position with the head of the bed raised to at least 30°-45°, oral care, suctioning of subglottic secretions, selective decontamination of the digestive tract, proper hand washing, avoidance or reduction of proton pump inhibitors, avoidance of excessive sedation, and control of plasma glucose levels.
At our center, VAP is mainly caused by bacterial colonization of the upper respiratory tract via aspiration. This study will compare four interventions including oropharyngeal decontamination and subglottic suctioning by bronchoscopy, with the aim of developing a prevention strategy to minimize the development of VAP during mechanical ventilation.
Detailed description
Patients will be assessed as follows:
CABDC ABBAA BCDDA CCCDB CACBA BBABC BAAAD DCDAC CDBAA DACDD AAACB CDBCB ACCDB BBAAD BCACC DDBCA ADCAD DABCD CBAAB DDDCD AABAB ACBCD BCCBA ADCDB CBCAB CDDCA CDDDD ABCDA ABDCB CBADD ADDBA BBCCD ABBBD DCDAC BBCCB DADBB CDBDA DBBAC AC
Adverse Events:
Adverse events that occur after endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation, oral cleansing with chlorhexidine, and suctioning of oropharyngeal secretions by bronchoscopy will be recorded. All adverse events including laboratory abnormalities will be recorded, even if they are thought to be unrelated to medical interventions. The severity of adverse events and any correlations with experimental drugs will be carefully recorded on the case report form.
The relationships between adverse events and drug resistance will be categorized as certainly relevant, probably relevant, possibly relevant, possibly irrelevant, or certainly irrelevant. The proportions of adverse events that are categorized as certainly relevant, probably relevant, and possibly relevant will be calculated. Severe adverse events will be recorded in a table and reported to the director of the unit and the sponsor within 24 hours.
Severity Assessment:
The severity of adverse events will be categorized as mild, moderate, or severe. A mild adverse event is defined as an event with signs and symptoms that are easy to tolerate such as nausea, vomiting, or transient localized pain. A moderate adverse event is defined as an event resulting in persistent pain. A severe adverse event is defined as an event resulting in prolonged hospitalization, disability, reduced ability to work, risk of death, or congenital malformation.
The outcomes of all adverse events will be recorded. Patients who withdraw from the trial because of adverse events will be followed up until complete resolution of the events. The investigators will judge whether the adverse events are related to the administration of experimental drugs, and will record the justification for each decision.
Data Management:
Completed case report forms will be collected by the clinical coordinator and the data will be entered into the database. After checking for accuracy, the data will be locked. After unblinding, the data will be categorized according to the four groups of patients.
Statistical Analysis:
Numerical data will be described as percentages, and measurement data as mean ± standard deviation. Abnormally distributed data will be described as median and interquartile range (25th-75th percentile).
Comparisons of Baseline Data:
Numerical data will be compared between groups using the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Measurement data with normal distributions will be analyzed by single- or multi-factor analysis of variance. Data with high heterogeneity will be compared using a non-parametric test such as Tamhane's T2 test. Measurement data with non-normal distributions will be compared using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test or the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. Groups will be compared at baseline and at different time points after enrollment.
Comparisons of Efficacy:
Analgesic and sedative effects will be compared among groups using the Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test. For factors showing significant differences among groups, pairwise comparisons will be analyzed using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test. Mean values will be compared between groups using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel chi-square test.
Data Processing:
All statistical analyses will be performed using SAS software. Two-sided P values will be calculated. For Fisher's exact test, the P value will be calculated directly. A value of P <0.05 is considered significant, and P <0.01 is considered highly significant.
Quality Assurance:
This study will have one principal investigator, one research investigator, and four other investigators. The clinical protocol will be strictly implemented. An independent inspector will be appointed to monitor the clinical trial.
Quality Control of the Parameters Measured:
The parameters recorded will be measured according to standard operating and quality control procedures, using standard national units of measurement. Test report forms will be fully completed including the date, parameters tested, test results, and normal ranges.
Ethical Standards:
The investigators or investigator-authorized personnel will explain the benefits and risks of participating in the clinical trial to each patient, or to the patient's legal representative. Written informed consent will be obtained prior to study entry (before performance of tests and administration of drugs). The original consent forms will be stored by the investigators.
Data Retention:
The investigators will be responsible for maintaining the database and keeping the data locked for future analysis. In accordance with the principles of good clinical practice in China, the data will be kept for at least 5 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Chlorhexidine before intubation | Experimental | Drug: Chlorhexidine, Device: Endotracheal tubeGroup A: Oropharyngeal decontamination with chlorhexidine before intubation, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed before endotracheal intubation, and every 6 hours after intubation. |
| Chlorhexidine after intubation | Experimental | Drug: Chlorhexidine, Device: Endotracheal tubeGroup B: Oropharyngeal decontamination with chlorhexidine after intubation, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed every 6 hours after endotracheal intubation. |
| Subglottic secretion drainage | Experimental | Drug: Chlorhexidine, Device: Fiber bronchoscopeGroup C: Suctioning of subglottic secretions, n=48. Oral cleansing with chlorhexidine will be performed before endotracheal intubation and every 6 hours after intubation, and fiberoptic bronchoscopy-guided suctioning of subglottic secretions will be performed at 10:00 a.m. every day. The procedure will be as follows: 1. Routine cleaning of the bronchoscope. 2. Oral or nasal insertion of the bronchoscope (according to the decision of the attending physician based on the patient's condition). Rinsing of the subglottic region with 5-20 mL of chlorhexidine solution followed by suctioning. The rinsing procedure will be repeated 3-5 times. 3. Routine cleaning of the bronchoscope. The patient will be monitored during all procedures. |
| 0.9% sodium chloride injection | Experimental | Drug: 0.9% sodium chloride injection, Device: Endotracheal tubeGroup D: 0.9% sodium chloride injection, n=48. After endotracheal intubation, oral cleansing with normal saline will be performed every 6 hours. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients who are scheduled for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients who underwent endotracheal intubation or tracheotomy before study enrollment.
- Patients who underwent endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation within 30 days before study enrollment.
- Patients who require cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
- Patients with a history of emesis and aspiration before endotracheal intubation.
- Patients who are judged unsuitable for enrollment by clinicians.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ChlorhexidineSFDA Approval No. H21020748; Jinzhou Jiu Tai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China Drug administration and preparation: * Drug administration: oropharyngeal rinsing and suctioning of subglottic secretions * Drug preparation: 0.12% chlorhexidine solution prepared with distilled water that has been sterilized by autoclaving | Drug | Chlorhexidine after intubation, Chlorhexidine before intubation, Subglottic secretion drainage |
| 0.9% sodium chloride injectionSFDA Approval No. H20045252; Shenyang Zhiying Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Liaoning, China | Drug | 0.9% sodium chloride injection |
| Endotracheal tubeType 5-10115; size 7.0 mm, 7.5 mm, or 8.0 mm; purchased from Teleflex Medical (USA). | Device | 0.9% sodium chloride injection, Chlorhexidine after intubation, Chlorhexidine before intubation |
| Fiber bronchoscopeFor suctioning of subglottic secretions. BF-P30 (Olympus, Japan); BF-1T20 (Olympus, Japan); or FB-18BS (Pentax, Japan). | Device | Subglottic secretion drainage |
Primary outcome
The incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Time frame: an expected average of 30 days
Percentage of patients who develop VAP after endotracheal intubation
5 secondary outcomes
Length of stay
Time frame: Until discharge from hospital, an expected average of 30 days
Length of intensive care unit stay
Time frame: an expected average of 30 days
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time frame: Until the last day of mouthpiece ventilation, an expected average of 30 days
Hospital costs
Time frame: During entire hospitalization, an expected average of 30 days
30-day mortality
Time frame: An expected average of 30 days
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Aug 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Traditional Chinese Medicine in Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Pneumonia
Multi Drug Resistant Infections, Pneumnia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Early Identification of Pathogens in Children With Respiratory Tract Infection by Mechanical Ventilation Using mNGS
VAP - Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
RecruitingPhase 4
EaRly impAct theraPy With Ceftazidime-avibactam Via rapID Diagnostics
Blood Stream Infections, Ventilator Associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruiting
Mobile-Based Microlearning for Improving ICU Nurses' Adherence to Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Prevention Protocols
Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Cefepime-Zidebactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam With or Without Colistin for Hospital-Acquired or Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia
Hospital Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (HABP), Ventilator Associated Bacterial Pneumonia (VABP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Zhuang Ma, Ph.D. principal investigator
The General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Chlorhexidine, 0.9% sodium chloride injection and Endotracheal tube in people with Ventilator-associated Pneumonia, run by General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The incidence of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia (time frame: an expected average of 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Aug 2019.