Partial EpilepsyPhase 3FRANCENCT02076698
Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus in Epilepsy
A Phase 3 study testing AN-DBS and Usual treatment in people with Partial Epilepsy and Surgery, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 12 sites in France.
Trial summary
The main objective of the study is twofold: 1. Assess the clinical efficacy of DBS on epilepsy according to their number and severity at 1 year follow up. 2. Perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Partial Epilepsy, Surgery
- What is being tested?
- AN-DBS and Usual treatment
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2014to 10 Nov 2021
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with focal or multifocal epilepsy with or without secondary generalized seizure inoperable at the time of inclusion
- Failure of pharmacological therapies (pharmacoresistant epilepsy) for over 4 years (persistent seizures despite at least two anti-epileptic treatments used at the optimal dose for at least 2 years)
- Failure of vagus nerve stimulation, defined as the persistence of crises considered debilitating after 2 years of VNS's treatment
- VNS failure in a patient treated with VNS, for less than 2 years. with stop early due to the worsening crisis
- Intelligence quotient above 55
- Have the written consent of the legal representative for patients under guardianship and minors
Show all 9Show fewer
- Affiliation to the french social security system or equivalent
- People who signed the consent form
- Seizure frequency at least 4 crisis / month on average for at least 3 months, about 12 crisis in 3 months objectified by the neurologist during visit pre-inclusion, and confirmed by the neurologist after 3 months of Baseline during the inclusion visit
Who cannot join
- Patient with a generalized epilepsy Immediately
- Patient with a simple partial seizures (subjective manifestations only)
- Patient with a cons-indication for MRI, a serious intercurrent disease, a progressive brain tumor
- Patient with a suicide risk of in the six months preceding the inclusion visit (score ≥ 2 on item 10 of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale)
- Patient a surgical or anesthetic cons-indication
- Patient with anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment in the long term
Show all 10Show fewer
- Woman of childbearing potential without effective contraception, or pregnant or lactating
- People hospitalized without consent
- People deprived of freedom
- Patient currently participating in another clinical research, or who participated in a clinical study in the month preceding the pre-inclusion visit (except for any non-interventional research)
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
France12 sites
University Hospital of Pellegrin
Bordeaux
University Hospital of Grenoble Michallon
Grenoble, 38043
University Hospital
Lille
University Hospital of Pierre Wertheimer
Lyon
University Hospital of la Timone
Marseille
University Hospital of Gui de Chauliac
Montpellier
University Hospital
Nancy
University Hospital Pasteur
Nice
Sainte Anne Hospital
Paris
University Hospital of La Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris
University Hospital of Pontchaillou
Rennes
University Hospital of Rangueil
Toulouse
About this study
Official title: Clinical and Medico-economical Assessment of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for the Treatment of Pharmacoresistant Partial Epilepsy
The main objective of the study is twofold:
- Assess the clinical efficacy of DBS on epilepsy according to their number and severity at 1 year follow up.
- Perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years.
The study hypothesis is that thalamic DBS (neurostimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus) will decrease significantly, the frequency (potentially 50% reduction in severe crises) of the most severe seizures, in at least 50% of patients who have drug-resistant partial epilepsy; and should also improve significantly the quality of life through a gain of independence in activities of daily life, the possible recovery of functional abilities, recovery of social or professional activities.
- Conditions
- Partial Epilepsy, Surgery
- Being tested
- AN-DBS, Usual treatment
- Keywords
- Deep Brain Stimulation, Anterior Nucleus of thalamus, Treatment refractory, Pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy, vagus nerve stimulation therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Epilepsies, Partial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AN-DBSProcedure or surgery
Also called Deep Brain Stimulation
Electrode and one multichannel stimulator surgical time: 4 to 6 hours 3 visits of adjustment
Usual treatmentDrug
Also called Treatment of epilepsy including vagus nerve stimulation
usual treatment of epilepsy Vagus nerve stimulation: maintained
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AN-DBS | Experimental | Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the thalamus Receives: Procedure: AN-DBS |
| Usual treatment | Active comparator | Usual treatment of epilepsy including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Receives: Drug: Usual treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of effectiveness of thalamic DBS on seizures severity
The main objective of the study is twofold : to assess the effectiveness of DBS on seizures according to their severity at 1 year follow up and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Cost-utility analysis from the perspective of Medicare
Perform a cost-utility analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years.
Measured: 2 years
Comparison of the improvement of quality of life and overall neuropsychological impact
Compare the improvement of quality of life and overall neuropsychological impact at 1 and 2 years.
Measured: 2 years
Comparison the adverse effects (including depression)
Compare the adverse events (special focus on depression) at 1 and 2 years.
Measured: 2 years
Impact of th new therapeutic strategy on the hospital budget
Determine the impact on the hospital budget for the introduction of this therapeutic strategy.
Measured: 2 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Study start16 Jun 2014
- Primary completion10 Nov 2021
- Study completion10 Nov 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Partial EpilepsyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GrenobleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stephan CHABARDES, MDPHD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Grenoble
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02076698
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1317 FRANCE
- Acronym
- FRANCE
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 29 Mar 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Chabardes S, Kahane P, Minotti L, Koudsie A, Hirsch E, Benabid AL. Deep brain stimulation in epilepsy with particular reference to the subthalamic nucleus. Epileptic Disord. 2002 Dec;4 Suppl 3:S83-93.
PubMed 12495878Chabardes S, Minotti L, Chassagnon S, Piallat B, Torres N, Seigneuret E, Vercueil L, Carron R, Hirsch E, Kahane P, Benabid AL. [Basal ganglia deep-brain stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: review and current data]. Neurochirurgie. 2008 May;54(3):436-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2008.02.039. Epub 2008 May 2. French.
PubMed 18452956Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry T, Gross R, Oommen K, Osorio I, Nazzaro J, Labar D, Kaplitt M, Sperling M, Sandok E, Neal J, Handforth A, Stern J, DeSalles A, Chung S, Shetter A, Bergen D, Bakay R, Henderson J, French J, Baltuch G, Rosenfeld W, Youkilis A, Marks W, Garcia P, Barbaro N, Fountain N, Bazil C, Goodman R, McKhann G, Babu Krishnamurthy K, Papavassiliou S, Epstein C, Pollard J, Tonder L, Grebin J, Coffey R, Graves N; SANTE Study Group. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):899-908. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
PubMed 20331461Lim SN, Lee ST, Tsai YT, Chen IA, Tu PH, Chen JL, Chang HW, Su YC, Wu T. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for intractable epilepsy: a long-term follow-up study. Epilepsia. 2007 Feb;48(2):342-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00898.x.
PubMed 17295629
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Mar 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Medico-economical Assessment of Deep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for the Treatment of Pharmacoresistant Partial Epilepsy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02076698
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FRANCE / 1317 FRANCE
- Conditions
- Partial Epilepsy, Surgery
- Keywords
- Deep Brain Stimulation, Anterior Nucleus of thalamus, Treatment refractory, Pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy, vagus nerve stimulation therapy
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Nov 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Nov 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main objective of the study is twofold:
- Assess the clinical efficacy of DBS on epilepsy according to their number and severity at 1 year follow up.
- Perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years.
The study hypothesis is that thalamic DBS (neurostimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus) will decrease significantly, the frequency (potentially 50% reduction in severe crises) of the most severe seizures, in at least 50% of patients who have drug-resistant partial epilepsy; and should also improve significantly the quality of life through a gain of independence in activities of daily life, the possible recovery of functional abilities, recovery of social or professional activities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AN-DBS | Experimental | Procedure: AN-DBSDeep Brain Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the thalamus |
| Usual treatment | Active comparator | Drug: Usual treatmentUsual treatment of epilepsy including vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patient with focal or multifocal epilepsy with or without secondary generalized seizure inoperable at the time of inclusion
- Failure of pharmacological therapies (pharmacoresistant epilepsy) for over 4 years (persistent seizures despite at least two anti-epileptic treatments used at the optimal dose for at least 2 years)
- Failure of vagus nerve stimulation, defined as the persistence of crises considered debilitating after 2 years of VNS's treatment
- VNS failure in a patient treated with VNS, for less than 2 years. with stop early due to the worsening crisis
- Intelligence quotient above 55
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patient with a generalized epilepsy Immediately
- Patient with a simple partial seizures (subjective manifestations only)
- Patient with a cons-indication for MRI, a serious intercurrent disease, a progressive brain tumor
- Patient with a suicide risk of in the six months preceding the inclusion visit (score ≥ 2 on item 10 of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale)
- Patient a surgical or anesthetic cons-indication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AN-DBSAlso: Deep Brain StimulationElectrode and one multichannel stimulator surgical time: 4 to 6 hours 3 visits of adjustment | Procedure or surgery | AN-DBS |
| Usual treatmentAlso: Treatment of epilepsy including vagus nerve stimulationusual treatment of epilepsy Vagus nerve stimulation: maintained | Drug | Usual treatment |
Primary outcome
Assessment of effectiveness of thalamic DBS on seizures severity
Time frame: 2 years
The main objective of the study is twofold : to assess the effectiveness of DBS on seizures according to their severity at 1 year follow up and to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of Medicare at 1 and 2 years.
4 secondary outcomes
Cost-utility analysis from the perspective of Medicare
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison of the improvement of quality of life and overall neuropsychological impact
Time frame: 2 years
Comparison the adverse effects (including depression)
Time frame: 2 years
Impact of th new therapeutic strategy on the hospital budget
Time frame: 2 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Mar 2022.
- Background: PubMed 12495878Chabardes S, Kahane P, Minotti L, Koudsie A, Hirsch E, Benabid AL. Deep brain stimulation in epilepsy with particular reference to the subthalamic nucleus. Epileptic Disord. 2002 Dec;4 Suppl 3:S83-93.
- Background: PubMed 18452956Chabardes S, Minotti L, Chassagnon S, Piallat B, Torres N, Seigneuret E, Vercueil L, Carron R, Hirsch E, Kahane P, Benabid AL. [Basal ganglia deep-brain stimulation for treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy: review and current data]. Neurochirurgie. 2008 May;54(3):436-40. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2008.02.039. Epub 2008 May 2. French.
- Background: PubMed 20331461Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry T, Gross R, Oommen K, Osorio I, Nazzaro J, Labar D, Kaplitt M, Sperling M, Sandok E, Neal J, Handforth A, Stern J, DeSalles A, Chung S, Shetter A, Bergen D, Bakay R, Henderson J, French J, Baltuch G, Rosenfeld W, Youkilis A, Marks W, Garcia P, Barbaro N, Fountain N, Bazil C, Goodman R, McKhann G, Babu Krishnamurthy K, Papavassiliou S, Epstein C, Pollard J, Tonder L, Grebin J, Coffey R, Graves N; SANTE Study Group. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010 May;51(5):899-908. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02536.x. Epub 2010 Mar 17.
- Background: PubMed 17295629Lim SN, Lee ST, Tsai YT, Chen IA, Tu PH, Chen JL, Chang HW, Su YC, Wu T. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus for intractable epilepsy: a long-term follow-up study. Epilepsia. 2007 Feb;48(2):342-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00898.x.
Related trials for Partial Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
RecruitingPhase 3
Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of RAP-219 in Adult Participants With Focal Seizures FOCUS-1
Focal Seizure, Epilepsy
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate XEN1101 as Adjunctive Therapy in Focal Epilepsy
Focal Epilepsy
Not yet recruiting
Electrophysiological Dose-Response to Anterior Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy
Drug Resistant Epilepsy, Focal Epilepsy
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
An Open-label Study of XEN1101 in Epilepsy
Focal Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic Seizures
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stephan CHABARDES, MDPHD principal investigator
University Hospital, Grenoble
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing AN-DBS and Usual treatment in people with Partial Epilepsy and Surgery, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 12 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of effectiveness of thalamic DBS on seizures severity (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02076698, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Mar 2022.