AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 3ALEXNCT02075840

A Study Comparing Alectinib With Crizotinib in Treatment-Naive Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Participants

A Phase 3 study testing Alectinib and Crizotinib in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 97 sites in 29 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized, active controlled, multicenter phase III open-label study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alectinib compared with crizotinib treatment in participants with treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK-positive) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
What is being tested?
Alectinib and Crizotinib
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
303 participants
Where
97 sitesin 29 countries
Study dates
19 Aug 2014to 28 Apr 2025
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced or recurrent (Stage IIIB not amenable for multimodality treatment) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC that is ALK-positive as assessed by the Ventana immunohistochemistry (IHC) test
  • Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks
  • Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-2
  • Participants with no prior systemic treatment for advanced or recurrent (Stage IIIB not amenable for multimodality treatment) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC
  • Adequate renal, and hematologic function
  • Participants must have recovered from effects of any major surgery or significant traumatic injury at least 28 days before the first dose of study treatment
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Measurable disease by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (v1.1) prior to the administration of study treatment
  • Prior brain or leptomeningeal metastases allowed if asymptomatic (e.g., diagnosed incidentally at study baseline)
  • Negative pregnancy test for all females of child bearing potential
  • Use of highly effective contraception as defined by the study protocol

Who cannot join

  • Participants with a previous malignancy within the past 3 years
  • Any gastrointestinal (GI) disorder or liver disease
  • National cancer institute common terminology criteria for adverse events (NCI CTCAE) (version 4.0) Grade 3 or higher toxicities due to any prior therapy (e.g., radiotherapy) (excluding alopecia)
  • History of organ transplant
  • Co-administration of anti-cancer therapies other than those administered in this study
  • Participants with baseline QTc greater than (>) 470 milliseconds or symptomatic bradycardia
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Recipient of strong/potent cytochrome P4503A inhibitors or inducers within 14 days prior to the first dose until the end of study treatment
  • Recipient of any drug with potential QT interval prolonging effects within 14 days prior to the first dose for all participants and while on treatment through the end of the study for crizotinib-treated participants only
  • History of hypersensitivity to any of the additives in the alectinib and crizotinib drug formulation
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Any clinically significant disease or condition (or history of) that could interfere with, or for which the treatment might interfere with, the conduct of the study or the absorption of oral medications or that would, in the opinion of the principal investigator, pose an unacceptable risk to the participant in this study
  • Any psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol requirements and/or follow-up procedures; those conditions should be discussed with the participant before trial entry

Trial locations and contacts

97 sites in 29 countries.

97 sites in 29 countries

United States10 sites
  • University of Colorado Cancer Center

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • Dana Farber Can Ins

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02215

  • University of Miami-Deerfield Beach

    Deerfield Beach, Florida, 33442

  • Karmanos Cancer Institute

    Detroit, Michigan, 48201

  • University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • SCRI Oncology Partners

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37203

  • North Valley Hem Onc Med Grp

    Northridge, California, 91325

  • TMPN/ Cancer Care Associates

    Redondo Beach, California, 90277

  • Washington Uni School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

Other trials in United States

Italy9 sites
  • Irccs Ist. Tumori Giovanni Paolo Ii

    Bari, Apulia, 70124

  • Az Ospedaliera Nuovo Garibaldi Quartiere Nesima

    Catania, Sicily, 95122

  • Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int)

    Milan, Lombardy, 20133

  • Irccs Istituto Europeo Di Oncologia (IEO)

    Milan, Lombardy, 20141

  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga

    Orbassano, Piedmont, 10043

  • A.O. Universitaria Di Parma

    Parma, Emilia-Romagna, 43100

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Di Perugia Ospedale s. Maria Della Misericordia

    Perugia, Umbria, 06156

  • Ospedale Provinciale Santa Maria Delle Croci

    Ravenna, Emilia-Romagna, 48100

  • Policlinico Umberto i di Roma

    Rome, Lazio, 00161

Other trials in Italy

South Korea6 sites
  • National Cancer Center

    Gyeonggi-do, 10408

  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital

    Gyeonggi-do, 13620

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, 03080

  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System

    Seoul, 03722

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 06351

Other trials in South Korea

Australia5 sites
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital

    Adelaide, South Australia, 5011

  • Kinghorn Cancer Centre

    Darlinghurst, New South Wales, 2010

  • Royal North Shore Hospital

    St Leonards, New South Wales, 2065

  • Monash Health Translational Precinct

    Victoria, Victoria, 3168

  • Calvary Mater Newcastle

    Waratah, New South Wales, 2298

Other trials in Australia

Hong Kong5 sites
  • Tuen Mun Hospital

    Hong Kong, 852

  • Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital

    Hong Kong, DUMMY_VALUE

  • Princess Margaret Hospital

    Hong Kong, DUMMY_VALUE

  • Queen Mary Hospital

    Hong Kong, DUMMY_VALUE

  • Prince of Wales Hosp

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

Spain5 sites
  • Hospital General Univ. de Alicante

    Alicante, 3010

  • Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08035

  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol

    Barcelona, 08916

  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro

    Madrid, 28222

  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio

    Seville, 41013

Other trials in Spain

Thailand5 sites
  • National Cancer Inst.

    Bangkok, 10400

  • Chiang Rai Prachanukroh Hospital

    Chiang Rai, 57000

  • Khonkaen Hospital

    Khonkaen, 40000

  • King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

    Patumwan, 10330

  • Songklanagarind Hospital

    Songkhla, 90110

Other trials in Thailand

Canada4 sites
  • Cross Cancer Institute

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1Z2

  • Saskatoon Cancer Centre

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 4H4

  • Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Mount Sinai Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5

Other trials in Canada

France4 sites
  • Chu Grenoble - Hopital Albert Michallon

    Grenoble, 38043

  • CHRU de Lille

    Lille, 59037

  • Centre Leon Berard

    Lyon, 69373

  • Hopital Haut Leveque

    Pessac, 33604

Other trials in France

Poland4 sites
  • Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne

    Gda?sk, 80-214

  • Ms Clinsearch Specjalistyczny Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej

    Lublin, 20-064

  • Warminsko-Mazurskie Centrum Chorób P?uc w Olsztynie

    Olsztyn, 10-357

  • Centrum Onkologii - Inst.Im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie

    Warsaw, 02-781

Other trials in Poland

Russia4 sites
  • Moscow City Oncology Hospital #62

    Moscovskaya Oblast, Moscow Oblast, 143423

  • N.N.Burdenko Main Military Clinical Hospital

    Moscow, 105229

  • SPb City Clin Onc Dsp

    Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, 197022

  • Scientific Research Oncology Institute named after N.N. Petrov

    Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, 197758

Other trials in Russia

Switzerland4 sites
  • Universitaetsspital Basel

    Basel, 4031

  • Inselspital Bern

    Bern, 3010

  • CHUV

    Lausanne, 1011

  • UniversitätsSpital Zürich

    Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

Taiwan4 sites
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital

    Taichung, 40705

  • National Cheng Kung Univ Hosp

    Tainan, 00704

  • National Taiwan University Hospital

    Taipei, 00100

  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital

    Taipei, 00112

Other trials in Taiwan

Turkey (Türkiye)4 sites
  • Baskent University Adana Dr. Turgut Noyan Practice and Research Hospital

    Adana, 01250

  • Ankara University Medical Faculty

    Ankara, 06100

  • Trakya University Medical Faculty Research And Practice Hospital Medical Oncology Department

    Edirne, 22770

  • Inonu University Medical Faculty Turgut Ozal Medical Center Medical Oncology Department

    Malatya, 44280

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Portugal3 sites
  • CHUC - Unidade de Pneumologia Oncológica

    Coimbra, 3000-075

  • IPO de Lisboa

    Lisbon, 1099-023

  • IPO do Porto

    Porto, 4200-072

Other trials in Portugal

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital

    Birmingham, B9 5SS

  • University College London Hospital

    London, NW1 - 2PG

  • Guys & St Thomas Hospital

    London, SE1 9RT

Other trials in United Kingdom

China2 sites
  • Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center

    Guangzhou, 510060

  • Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital

    Shanghai, 200433

Other trials in China

Israel2 sites
  • Rambam Medical Center

    Haifa, 4959381

  • Meir Medical Center

    Kfar Saba, 44281

Other trials in Israel

Serbia2 sites
  • Clinical Center of Serbia

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Institute for pulmonary diseases of Vojvodina

    Kamenitz, 21204

Other trials in Serbia

Singapore2 sites
  • National University Hospital

    Singapore, 119228

  • National Cancer Centre

    Singapore, 169610

Other trials in Singapore

Ukraine2 sites
  • Kyiv Regional Oncological Dispensary

    Kyiv, 04107

  • Lviv State Oncology Regional Treatment and Diagnostic Centre

    Lviv, 79031

Other trials in Ukraine

Bosnia and Herzegovina1 site
  • University Clinical Center Sarajevo

    Sarajevo, 71000

Other trials in Bosnia and Herzegovina

Brazil1 site
  • Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo - ICESP

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246-000

Other trials in Brazil

Chile1 site
  • Centro Internacional de Estudios Clínicos (CIEC)

    Santiago, 8420383

Other trials in Chile

Costa Rica1 site
  • Clinica CIMCA

    San José, DUMMY_VALUE

Other trials in Costa Rica

Egypt1 site
  • Kasr Eieny Uni Hospital

    Cairo, 11555

Other trials in Egypt

Guatemala1 site
  • Grupo Angeles

    Guatemala City, 01015

Other trials in Guatemala

Mexico1 site
  • Instituto Nacional De Enfermedades Respiratorias

    Mexico City, Mexico CITY (federal District), 14080

Other trials in Mexico

New Zealand1 site
  • Uni of Auckland

    Auckland, DUMMY_VALUE

Other trials in New Zealand

About this study

Official title: Randomized, Multicenter, Phase III, Open-Label Study of Alectinib Versus Crizotinib in Treatment-Naive Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

This randomized, active controlled, multicenter phase III open-label study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alectinib compared with crizotinib treatment in participants with treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK-positive) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either alectinib, 600 milligrams (mg) orally twice daily (BID), or crizotinib, 250 mg orally BID. Participants will receive treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The study is expected to last approximately 144 months.

Being tested
Alectinib, Crizotinib
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AlectinibDrug

    Also called RO5424802

    Participants will receive alectinib 600 mg orally (four 150 mg capsules) BID from Visit 0 (baseline) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death.

  • CrizotinibDrug

    Participants will receive crizotinib 250 mg capsules orally BID from Visit 0 (baseline) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death.

Study groups in NCT02075840
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AlectinibExperimentalParticipants will receive alectinib from Visit 0 (baseline) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death.
Receives: Drug: Alectinib
CrizotinibActive comparatorParticipants will receive crizotinib from Visit 0 (baseline) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or death.
Receives: Drug: Crizotinib

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment

    PFS was assessed as time to disease progression or death whichever occurred first by investigator assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) Criteria. As per RECIST v1.1, disease progression is a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 millimeter (mm) and the appearance of new lesions.

    Measured: Randomization to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

  2. Percentage of Participants With PFS Event by Investigator Assessment

    PFS was assessed percentage of participants with disease progression or death whichever occurred first by investigator assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) Criteria. As per RECIST v1.1, disease progression is a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 millimeter (mm) and the appearance of new lesions.

    Measured: Randomization to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

Secondary outcomes (26)
  1. PFS Independent Review Committee (IRC)-Assessed

    PFS was assessed as time to disease progression or death whichever occurred first by IRC assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) Criteria. As per RECIST v1.1, disease progression is a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 mm and the appearance of new lesions.

    Measured: Randomization to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

  2. Percentage of Participants With PFS Event by IRC

    PFS was assessed as percentage of participants with disease progression or death whichever occurred first by IRC assessment using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1) Criteria. As per RECIST v1.1, disease progression is a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, an increase in size of measurable lesions by at least 5 mm and the appearance of new lesions.

    Measured: Randomization to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

  3. Percentage of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Progression as Determined by IRC Using RECIST V1.1 Criteria

    CNS progression was assessed as percentage of participants with an event defined as time from randomization until first radiographic evidence of CNS progression by IRC. The risk for a CNS progression without a prior non-CNS progression with alectinib compared with crizotinib.

    Measured: Randomization to CNS PD as first occurrence of disease progression (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

  4. Percentage of Participants With Central Nervous System (CNS) Progression as Determined by IRC Using Revised Assessment in Neuro Oncology (RANO) Criteria

    CNS progression was assessed as percentage of participants with event defined as time from randomization until first radiographic evidence of CNS progression by IRC. The risk for a CNS progression without a prior non-CNS progression with alectinib compared with crizotinib.

    Measured: Randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression in the CNS (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

  5. Percentage of Participants With Objective Response Rate (ORR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) as Determined by The Investigators According to RECIST V1.1 Criteria

    ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who attained CR or PR. As per RECIST v1.1, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm, PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Measured: Randomization to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

  6. Duration of Response (DOR) According to RECIST V1.1 Criteria as Assessed by the Investigators

    DOR was defined as the time from when response (CR or PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. DOR was evaluated for participants who had a best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR.

    Measured: First occurrence of objective response to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to approximately 10 years)

  7. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.

    Measured: From randomization until death (up to 10.5 years)

  8. Percentage of Participants With OS Event

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.

    Measured: From randomization until death (up to 10.5 years)

  9. Percentage of Participants With CNS ORR of CR or PR IRC-assessed According to RECIST v1.1 Criteria

    CNS ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who attained CR or PR and had measurable/non-measurable CNS lesions at baseline. As per RECIST v1.1, CR: Disappearance of all target lesions and any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm, PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.

    Measured: Randomization to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

  10. CNS DOR IRC-assessed According to RECIST v1.1 Criteria

    CNS DOR was defined as the time from when response (CR or PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. DOR was evaluated for participants who had a best overall response (BOR) of CR or PR.

    Measured: First occurrence of CNS objective response to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)

  11. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

    An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

    Measured: Baseline up to approximately 10 years

  12. Area Under The Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Alectinib

    Measured: Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib) (baseline), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose at Visit 0 (first dosing day) and Week 4; Pre-dose (within 2 hours) at Week 8, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death/withdrawal (up to 33 months)

  13. Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Alectinib

    Measured: Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose at baseline and Week 4; Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib) at Week 8, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death/withdrawal from study (up to 33 months)

  14. Time to Reach Cmax (Tmax) of Alectinib

    Measured: Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose at baseline and Week 4; Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib) at Week 8, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death/withdrawal from study (up to 33 months)

  15. AUC of Alectinib Metabolite

    Measured: Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib) (baseline), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose at Visit 0 (first dosing day) and Week 4; Pre-dose (within 2 hours) at Week 8, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death/withdrawal (up to 33 months)

  16. Cmax of Alectinib Metabolite

    Measured: Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose at baseline and Week 4; Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib) at Week 8, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death/withdrawal from study (up to 33 months)

  17. Tmax of Alectinib Metabolite

    Measured: Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose at baseline and Week 4; Pre-dose (within 2 hours before alectinib) at Week 8, then every 8 weeks until disease progression or death/withdrawal from study (up to 33 months)

  18. Time to Deterioration by European Organization for The Research And Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality Of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (C30)

    The EORTC QLQ-30 module generated one multiple-item scale score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, pain in other parts, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in global health status or function is defined as a >or=10-point decrease from baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial >or=10-point decrease from baseline followed by death within 5 weeks from the last assessment.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

  19. Percentage of Participants With Deterioration by EORTC Quality Of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (C30)

    The EORTC QLQ-30 module generated one multiple-item scale score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, pain in other parts, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in global health status or function is defined as a >or=10-point decrease from baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial >or=10-point decrease from baseline followed by death within 5 weeks from the last assessment.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

  20. Time to Deterioration by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 (LC13)

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 module generated one multiple-item scale score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, pain in other parts, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in lung cancer symptoms is defined as a >or=10-point increase from baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial >or=10-point increase above baseline followed by death within 5 weeks from the last assessment.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

  21. Percentage of Participants With Deterioration by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Lung Cancer Module 13 (LC13)

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 module generated one multiple-item scale score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, pain in other parts, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning. Confirmed clinically meaningful deterioration in lung cancer symptoms is defined as a >or=10-point increase from baseline in a symptom score that must be held for at least two consecutive assessments or an initial >or=10-point increase above baseline followed by death within 5 weeks from the last assessment.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

  22. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 Score

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire consisted of 30 questions generating five functional scores (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); a global health status/global quality of life scale score; three symptom scale scores (fatigue, pain, and nausea and vomiting); and six stand alone one-item scores that capture additional symptoms (dyspnea, appetite loss, sleep disturbance, constipation, and diarrhea) and perceived financial burden. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

  23. HRQoL by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire LC13 Score Coughing

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 module generated one multiple-item scale score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, pain in other parts, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

  24. HRQoL by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire LC13 Score Dyspnoea

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 module generated one multiple-item scale score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, pain in other parts, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

  25. HRQoL by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire LC13 Score Pain in Chest

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 module generated one multiple-item scale score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, pain in other parts, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

  26. HRQoL by EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire LC13 Score Pain in Arm and Shoulder

    The EORTC QLQ-LC13 module generated one multiple-item scale score assessing dyspnea and a series of single item scores assessing chest pain, arm/shoulder pain, pain in other parts, coughing, sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, alopecia, and hemoptysis. All the scales and single-item scores were linearly transformed so that each score ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score on the global health and functioning subscales is indicative of better functioning.

    Measured: Baseline, every 4 weeks until disease progression (up to 33 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start19 Aug 2014
  3. Primary completion9 Feb 2017
  4. Study completion28 Apr 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
303 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02075840
Sponsor's protocol ID
BO28984
Other IDs
2013-004133-33
Acronym
ALEX
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
27 Feb 2014
Last updated
29 May 2026
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Sikkema BJ, Baart SJ, Paats MS, Smit EF, Schols AMWJ, Mathijssen RHJ, van Rossum EFC, Dingemans AC. Body Weight Gain Associated With Alectinib in Patients With ALK+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Pooled Analysis of Individual Patient Data From Four Prospective Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb 20;43(6):641-650. doi: 10.1200/JCO-24-01579. Epub 2024 Dec 11.

    PubMed 39661917
  • Dziadziuszko R, Peters S, Mok T, Camidge DR, Gadgeel SM, Ou SI, Konopa K, Noe J, Nowicka M, Bordogna W, Morcos PN, Smoljanovic V, Shaw AT. Circulating Cell-free DNA as a Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Advanced ALK+ Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Global Phase III ALEX Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 May 2;28(9):1800-1808. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-2840.

    PubMed 35275991
  • Mok T, Camidge DR, Gadgeel SM, Rosell R, Dziadziuszko R, Kim DW, Perol M, Ou SI, Ahn JS, Shaw AT, Bordogna W, Smoljanovic V, Hilton M, Ruf T, Noe J, Peters S. Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study. Ann Oncol. 2020 Aug;31(8):1056-1064. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.478. Epub 2020 May 11.

    PubMed 32418886
  • Gadgeel S, Peters S, Mok T, Shaw AT, Kim DW, Ou SI, Perol M, Wrona A, Novello S, Rosell R, Zeaiter A, Liu T, Nuesch E, Balas B, Camidge DR. Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study. Ann Oncol. 2018 Nov 1;29(11):2214-2222. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy405.

    PubMed 30215676
  • Burudpakdee C, Wong W, Seetasith A, Corvino FA, Yeh W, Gubens M. Economic impact of preventing brain metastases with alectinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2018 May;119:103-111. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

    PubMed 29656744
  • Peters S, Camidge DR, Shaw AT, Gadgeel S, Ahn JS, Kim DW, Ou SI, Perol M, Dziadziuszko R, Rosell R, Zeaiter A, Mitry E, Golding S, Balas B, Noe J, Morcos PN, Mok T; ALEX Trial Investigators. Alectinib versus Crizotinib in Untreated ALK-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 31;377(9):829-838. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1704795. Epub 2017 Jun 6.

    PubMed 28586279
  • Gainor JF, Shaw AT. J-ALEX: alectinib versus crizotinib in ALK-positive lung cancer. Lancet. 2017 Jul 1;390(10089):3-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31074-7. Epub 2017 May 10. No abstract available.

    PubMed 28501139

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Alectinib and Crizotinib in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 97 sites in 29 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 97 sites in United States, Italy, South Korea, Australia, Hong Kong and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Mar 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progression-Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment (time frame: Randomization to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first (assessed every 8 weeks up to 33 months)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02075840, which also lists 7 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
ALEX Clinical Trial NCT02075840 | AzTrials