AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaNCT02069392

Nicotinic Enhancement of Cognitive Remediation Training in Schizophrenia

A study testing Cognitive remediation training and Nicotine polacrilex lozenge in people with Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Schizophrenia is marked by problems in attention, memory and problem solving. These deficits predict long-term functional outcome such as the ability to live independently and maintain employment, but they are not ameliorated by currently available medications. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia, Schizoaffective Disorder
What is being tested?
Cognitive remediation training and Nicotine polacrilex lozenge
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
31 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2015to Jun 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 18-60 years.
  • DSM diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.
  • Ability to give written informed consent.
  • Either currently smoking and not attempting to quit, or having smoked no more than 80 cigarettes, cigarillos or cigars in lifetime and not at all within the last year.
  • Normal or corrected to normal vision (at least 20/50).
  • Four weeks of stable pharmacological treatment (same psychiatric medication at same dose) and no foreseeable changes at enrollment.

Who cannot join

  • Alcohol or substance abuse or dependence other than nicotine within the last 12 months.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (resting systolic blood pressure above 150 or diastolic above 90 mm Hg).
  • History of myocardial infarction, heart failure, angina, stroke or severe arrhythmias.
  • ECG abnormalities.
  • History of neurological conditions such as stroke, seizures, dementia or organic brain syndrome.
  • Mental retardation.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Pregnant, verified by urine pregnancy test for females.
  • Breast-feeding.
  • Treated with benztropine currently or within the last four weeks.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Maryland Psychiatric Research Center

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21228

Other trials in United States

About this study

Schizophrenia is marked by problems in attention, memory and problem solving. These deficits predict long-term functional outcome such as the ability to live independently and maintain employment, but they are not ameliorated by currently available medications. Cognitive training improves these functions to some degree, but this approach is time- and resource-intensive. The current project aims at enhancing and accelerating the benefits that people with schizophrenia derive from cognitive training by administering nicotine during some of the training sessions. This would provide the proof of principle for a type of treatment intervention to improve cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.

The current project aims at determining whether the intermittent presence of nicotine during cognitive training exercises in people with schizophrenia will shorten the training period necessary to induce significant and clinically relevant improvement and enhance the improvement seen after a training period of specified length.

Read more

Hypothesis 1a: Nicotine administration during training will increase the size of all measured effects of the training intervention, and will accelerate the time course of performance enhancement on the MCCB and training exercise progression parameters.

Hypothesis 1b: The larger training effects in the Nicotine Group will persist beyond the end of the intervention.

Hypothesis 2a: Within-session progress on the training exercises will be larger in the presence of nicotine than in the presence of placebo.

Hypothesis 2b: These acute nicotine-induced performance elevations will persist beyond the presence of nicotine through subsequent non-drug training sessions, giving evidence of an acute facilitation of learning processes.

Being tested
Cognitive remediation training, Nicotine polacrilex lozenge
Keywords
schizophrenia, cognition, cognitive remediation, nicotine
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive remediation trainingBehavioural

    Also called Posit Science cognitive remediation training

  • Nicotine polacrilex lozengeDrug

    Also called Nicorette polacrilex lozenges, GlaxoSmithKline, 2 mg and 4 mg

    Of interest are the effects of nicotine on cognitive remediation training benefits.

Study groups in NCT02069392
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cognitive remediation training with nicotineActive comparatorParticipants will complete daily sessions of Posit Science cognitive remediation training for 10 weeks. Twice a week, participants will consume a 2 mg (for non-smokers) or 4 mg (for smokers) nicotine polacrilex lozenge prior to the training.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive remediation training; Drug: Nicotine polacrilex lozenge
Cognitive remediation training without nicotinePlacebo comparatorParticipants will complete daily Posit Science cognitive remediation training for 10 weeks. Twice a week, participants will consume a placebo lozenge prior to the training.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive remediation training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score

    The MCCB is an FDA-approved assessment tool for trials of cognition-enhancing treatments in people with schizophrenia. The MCCB is comprised of the following domains: 1) Speed of Processing; 2) Attention/Vigilance; 3) Working Memory; 4) Verbal Learning; 5) Visual Learning; 6) Reasoning and Problem Solving; and 7) Social Cognition. The composite score is standardized to a T-scale (mean=50, standard deviation=10) based on healthy control normative data. Better performance is reflected by higher scores.

    Measured: baseline (week 0), weeks 4 and 7 of intervention, end-of-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) Score

    Clinician-administered interview about daily life cognitive functioning. The CAI assesses 10 items related to working memory, attention/vigilance, learning/memory, problem solving, processing speed, and social cognition. The total score ranges from 1 (inability to maintain personal hygiene due to cognitive deficits) to 100 (superior cognitive functioning in a wide range of activities). A score of 55 corresponds to moderate cognitive symptoms, e.g. persistent problems paying attention or forgetting scheduled events.

    Measured: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

  2. Change in Abbreviated Schizophrenia Quality of Life Scale Score

    Semi-structured clinician interview measuring functional outcome and quality of life in people with schizophrenia. Includes subjective questions regarding life satisfaction and objective indicators of social and occupational role functioning during preceding 4 weeks. Seven items are scored on a 0 (severe impairment) to 6 (high functioning) scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 42, with larger values reflecting higher functioning.

    Measured: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

  3. UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA) Score

    Measures ability to perform real-life tasks by standardized role-play. Scores reflect percent correct, i.e. range from 0-100 with higher scores representing better performance.

    Measured: baseline (week 0) and post-intervention (week 10)

  4. Calgary Depression Scale Score

    Clinician scale developed to assess the level of depression in schizophrenia. 9 items assess symptoms of depression and overall rater impression on a scale from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).

    Measured: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

  5. Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) Score

    Clinician rating scale of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Within each of 5 domains, separate symptoms are rated from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). Total scores are the sum of 22 subscales and range from 0 to 110, with larger values reflecting higher negative symptoms.

    Measured: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

  6. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Score

    Clinician rating scale to measure psychotic symptoms. Each of 20 items is scored 1-7. Total scores are the sum of all items and range from 20 to 140, with larger values reflecting worse symptoms.

    Measured: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10)

  7. Training Exercise Parameters: Visual and Sound Sweeps

    Some of the Posit Science exercises provide an assessment tool of training progress on task parameters, which adjust continuously to keep performance at ~85% correct. Enhanced sensory processing speed and precision is considered the central building block of training benefits. Therefore, we analyzed the two exercises aimed at training these processes. Performance is quantified as stimulus presentation time in ms of visual or sound "sweeps", which the participant has to judge in terms of change across space or time. Smaller values reflect better performance. Visual and sound sweeps were averaged.

    Measured: baseline (week 0), post-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up

  8. Change in Working Memory Capacity

    Derived from a computerized change localization task. One to four colored squares are shown for 100 ms. After a delay, they reappear and the task is to click on the one square that has changed color (50% chance). Performance is expressed as the percentage of correct responses.

    Measured: baseline (week 1) and post-intervention (week 10)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Feb 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2017
  4. Study completionJun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
31 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02069392
Sponsor's protocol ID
HP-00058233
Other IDs
R21MH095824
Status last verified
Sep 2019
First submitted
5 Feb 2014
Last updated
12 Sep 2019
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive remediation training and Nicotine polacrilex lozenge in people with Schizophrenia and Schizoaffective Disorder, run by University of Maryland, Baltimore at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) Composite Score (time frame: baseline (week 0), weeks 4 and 7 of intervention, end-of-intervention (week 10), 4-week follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in