CommunicationSTRIVESNCT02065206
Spreading Teen-Recorded Inspirational Videos to Engage Schoolmates
An observational study of Communication, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
While few students may consider a career in research at baseline, receiving information from peers via online social networks represents a potential way of reaching underserved minority students. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Communication
- How many people
- 554 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2014to Aug 2019
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 17 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: All subjects enrolled will be under 18 years of age. Subjects 18 and over will not be enrolled. The subjects for this study include two populations of students age 15-17: (1) Collegiate Scholars members to participate in focus groups and (2) feedback group recruited by students involved in TEACH research to view the social media campaign.
Who may be able to join
- To be eligible to participate in this study, the subjects must be between the ages of 15-17 years old. The focus group participants will be recruited from the Collegiate Scholars Program which is a pipeline program for Chicago Public School students.
- The feedback group will be recruited by friends involved in the Teach Research study. They must be named by one of their friends participating in Teach Research.
Who cannot join
- Participants 18 years or older as well as wards of the state will be excluded from the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
About this study
While few students may consider a career in research at baseline, receiving information from peers via online social networks represents a potential way of reaching underserved minority students.
This study addresses a critical problem in the process to diversify the pipeline of clinical researchers - how to cultivate baseline interest in research among high achieving youth before they participate in pipeline programs. We will seek to challenge existing paradigms of studying effectiveness of interventions to promote entry of minority youth into clinical research careers through testing a novel social media campaign that aims to increase interest in research careers among schoolmates of students in a pipeline program. We are testing the use of of peer-created and inspired videos about career choice as a novel way to develop messages that have potential to influence teens.
Should this research program be successful, it will yield valuable insights for researchers and educators who are attempting to train minority students about the importance of involving youth in creating materials to recruit and retain minorities into pipeline programs and educational programs targeted towards clinical research.
Read the detailed description
Despite several decades of effort that have produced meaningful insights into factors affecting the entry of minority students into careers in health research, there is still a great need to further promote entry of minority students into health research. Research we have done building on broader research on how minority youth select careers has shown that when minority students are interested in career in health research, a dedicated program with realistic career experiences and multi-tiered mentors can increase knowledge, attitudes and behaviors needed for a career in health research. However, we found that such programs are much less effective if students do not enter them with a pre-existing interest in careers in health research. Unfortunately, very little is known about how to increase the interest in careers in health research. Research is badly needed on interventions that can "prime the pump" for pipeline programs by increasing the number of minority students with interest in careers in health research.
Studies from adolescent health education suggest that messages that have the potential to change people's attitudes and behaviors often originate from a trusted peer. A peer messenger is often more easily able to relate to an individual and understand the unique pressures that an individual may face in changing their behavior. This is especially true in teens, who are more likely to value the opinion of and seek to emulate their peers compared to adults. While peer pressure is often cast as a negative phenomenon among teens, the use of positive modes of peer pressure to change behavior among teens is gaining in popularity. For example, positive peer pressure has been used in many youth-to-youth messaging campaigns related to difficult to change behaviors such as alcohol and drug abuse or safe sex.
Peer online social networks may be a potential way to increase interest in careers in health research among underrepresented minority students. The explosion of social media and smartphones has facilitated the creation of social networks online, a well-documented way for teenagers to interact with each other and to obtain information. According to the Pew Internet Project, nearly three quarters of online teens and an equal number of young adults use social network sites. Moreover, roughly 85% of teens who use social networks are active participants in the site, and engage in activities such as posting comments on a friend's profile page, or underneath a friend's picture. Nearly 40% of teens report sharing content online that they created personally. The use of self-created videos has exploded with the creation of popular media-sharing websites, such as YouTube and roughly one third of teens report sharing videos.
Interestingly, there is reason to believe that online social networking interventions that aim to boost career interests would be more effective for underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as teens from low income families than for whites. First, data suggests that online social network use is higher among teens from low-income families (those earning less than $30,000 annually) than in teens from wealthier households (80% vs. 70%). Moreover, minority families are more likely to access the internet remotely through mobile devices such as cell phones than whites. Together, this data highlights the enormous potential for online social media interventions to influence career interest and engagement in minority youth.
One promising solution to increase interest in clinical research careers among high achieving youth at a time when career decision making is easily influenced is through the spreading video messages crafted by youth for youth through social media. Therefore, the specific aims of this proposal are the following:
Specific Aim 1: To engage high achieving minority youth enrolled in an intensive pipeline clinical research program in performing focus groups and surveys of their peers to characterize what types of messages would be most likely to motivate their peers to consider a career in clinical research
Specific Aim 2: To engage high-achieving minority youth participating in a pipeline clinical research program in a social media campaign in which they will create a short video to promote interest in clinical research careers and spread it to their schoolmates
Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the reach of social media campaign led by students in a pipeline clinical research program to spread a video they create to improve interest in clinical research careers
Specific Aim 4: To evaluate the effects of a student-led social media campaign on interest in a clinical research career among the schoolmates of students in a pipeline clinical research program
- Conditions
- Communication
- Keywords
- Focus groups, Underrepresented Minorities, Social Media, Clinical Research Careers
- Medical subject headings
- Communication
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Measuring Interest in Clinical Research Careers Among Feedback Group Participants
Measured: Every year for four years
Secondary outcomes (1)
Focus Groups
Characterize what type of messages would be most likely to motivate peers to consider a career in clinical research.
Measured: Every year for four years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionAug 2019
- Study completionAug 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CommunicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 554 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Vineet M Arora, MD, MAPP, Principal investigator, University of Chicago
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02065206
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 13-0848
- Other IDs
- 1R01GM107721-01
- Acronym
- STRIVES
- Status last verified
- May 2021
- First submitted
- 14 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 1 Jun 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jun 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Spreading Teen-Recorded Inspirational Videos to Engage Schoolmates
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02065206
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- STRIVES / 13-0848
- Conditions
- Communication
- Keywords
- Focus groups, Underrepresented Minorities, Social Media, Clinical Research Careers
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 554 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS)
- Study start
- May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
While few students may consider a career in research at baseline, receiving information from peers via online social networks represents a potential way of reaching underserved minority students.
This study addresses a critical problem in the process to diversify the pipeline of clinical researchers - how to cultivate baseline interest in research among high achieving youth before they participate in pipeline programs. We will seek to challenge existing paradigms of studying effectiveness of interventions to promote entry of minority youth into clinical research careers through testing a novel social media campaign that aims to increase interest in research careers among schoolmates of students in a pipeline program. We are testing the use of of peer-created and inspired videos about career choice as a novel way to develop messages that have potential to influence teens.
Should this research program be successful, it will yield valuable insights for researchers and educators who are attempting to train minority students about the importance of involving youth in creating materials to recruit and retain minorities into pipeline programs and educational programs targeted towards clinical research.
Detailed description
Despite several decades of effort that have produced meaningful insights into factors affecting the entry of minority students into careers in health research, there is still a great need to further promote entry of minority students into health research. Research we have done building on broader research on how minority youth select careers has shown that when minority students are interested in career in health research, a dedicated program with realistic career experiences and multi-tiered mentors can increase knowledge, attitudes and behaviors needed for a career in health research. However, we found that such programs are much less effective if students do not enter them with a pre-existing interest in careers in health research. Unfortunately, very little is known about how to increase the interest in careers in health research. Research is badly needed on interventions that can "prime the pump" for pipeline programs by increasing the number of minority students with interest in careers in health research.
Studies from adolescent health education suggest that messages that have the potential to change people's attitudes and behaviors often originate from a trusted peer. A peer messenger is often more easily able to relate to an individual and understand the unique pressures that an individual may face in changing their behavior. This is especially true in teens, who are more likely to value the opinion of and seek to emulate their peers compared to adults. While peer pressure is often cast as a negative phenomenon among teens, the use of positive modes of peer pressure to change behavior among teens is gaining in popularity. For example, positive peer pressure has been used in many youth-to-youth messaging campaigns related to difficult to change behaviors such as alcohol and drug abuse or safe sex.
Peer online social networks may be a potential way to increase interest in careers in health research among underrepresented minority students. The explosion of social media and smartphones has facilitated the creation of social networks online, a well-documented way for teenagers to interact with each other and to obtain information. According to the Pew Internet Project, nearly three quarters of online teens and an equal number of young adults use social network sites. Moreover, roughly 85% of teens who use social networks are active participants in the site, and engage in activities such as posting comments on a friend's profile page, or underneath a friend's picture. Nearly 40% of teens report sharing content online that they created personally. The use of self-created videos has exploded with the creation of popular media-sharing websites, such as YouTube and roughly one third of teens report sharing videos.
Interestingly, there is reason to believe that online social networking interventions that aim to boost career interests would be more effective for underrepresented racial and ethnic groups as well as teens from low income families than for whites. First, data suggests that online social network use is higher among teens from low-income families (those earning less than $30,000 annually) than in teens from wealthier households (80% vs. 70%). Moreover, minority families are more likely to access the internet remotely through mobile devices such as cell phones than whites. Together, this data highlights the enormous potential for online social media interventions to influence career interest and engagement in minority youth.
One promising solution to increase interest in clinical research careers among high achieving youth at a time when career decision making is easily influenced is through the spreading video messages crafted by youth for youth through social media. Therefore, the specific aims of this proposal are the following:
Specific Aim 1: To engage high achieving minority youth enrolled in an intensive pipeline clinical research program in performing focus groups and surveys of their peers to characterize what types of messages would be most likely to motivate their peers to consider a career in clinical research
Specific Aim 2: To engage high-achieving minority youth participating in a pipeline clinical research program in a social media campaign in which they will create a short video to promote interest in clinical research careers and spread it to their schoolmates
Specific Aim 3: To evaluate the reach of social media campaign led by students in a pipeline clinical research program to spread a video they create to improve interest in clinical research careers
Specific Aim 4: To evaluate the effects of a student-led social media campaign on interest in a clinical research career among the schoolmates of students in a pipeline clinical research program
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- All subjects enrolled will be under 18 years of age. Subjects 18 and over will not be enrolled. The subjects for this study include two populations of students age 15-17: (1) Collegiate Scholars members to participate in focus groups and (2) feedback group recruited by students involved in TEACH research to view the social media campaign.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- To be eligible to participate in this study, the subjects must be between the ages of 15-17 years old. The focus group participants will be recruited from the Collegiate Scholars Program which is a pipeline program for Chicago Public School students.
- The feedback group will be recruited by friends involved in the Teach Research study. They must be named by one of their friends participating in Teach Research.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Participants 18 years or older as well as wards of the state will be excluded from the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Measuring Interest in Clinical Research Careers Among Feedback Group Participants
Time frame: Every year for four years
1 secondary outcome
Focus Groups
Time frame: Every year for four years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jun 2021.
Related trials for Communication
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Not yet recruiting
Study of Psychoeducation and Reading for Kids (SPARK)
Reading Difficulties, Behavioral Problems
Recruiting
Assessment of Communication Interventions on Vaccination Knowledge and Acceptance
Vaccination Knowledge and Acceptance, Informed Vaccine-decision Making
Enrolling by invitation
Brain Stimulation Paired With Structured Reading Instruction in Children With Dyslexia
Dyslexia, Reading Disability
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Vineet M Arora, MD, MAPP principal investigator
University of Chicago
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Communication, run by University of Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jun 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Measuring Interest in Clinical Research Careers Among Feedback Group Participants (time frame: Every year for four years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jun 2021.