AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory FailureFELLOWNCT02051816

Facilitating EndotracheaL Intubation by Laryngoscopy Technique and Apneic Oxygenation Within the Intensive Care Unit: The FELLOW Study

A study testing Video Laryngoscopy, Apneic Oxygenation and Direct Laryngoscopy in people with Respiratory Failure, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Respiratory failure requiring endotracheal intubation occurs in as many as 40% of critically ill patients. Procedural complications including failed attempts at intubation, esophageal intubation, arterial oxygen desaturation, aspiration, hypotension, cardiac arrest, and death are common in this setting. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Failure
What is being tested?
Video Laryngoscopy, Apneic Oxygenation and Direct Laryngoscopy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Feb 2014to Feb 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults
  • Medical ICU Patients
  • Require endotracheal intubation
  • Endotracheal intubation to be performed by Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine Fellow
  • Sedation and/or neuromuscular blockade is planned for the procedure

Who cannot join

  • Operators other than Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine Fellows
  • The operator predetermines that the patient requires specific intubating equipment or oxygenation technique will be required for the safe performance of the procedure

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Facilitating EndotracheaL Intubation by Laryngoscopy Technique and Apneic Oxygenation Within the Intensive Care Unit

Respiratory failure requiring endotracheal intubation occurs in as many as 40% of critically ill patients. Procedural complications including failed attempts at intubation, esophageal intubation, arterial oxygen desaturation, aspiration, hypotension, cardiac arrest, and death are common in this setting. While there are many important components of successful airway management in critical illness, the maintenance of adequate arterial hemoglobin saturation from procedure initiation until endotracheal tube placement is paramount as desaturation is the most common factor associated with peri-intubation cardiac arrest and death. Interventions that either shorten the duration of time required for tube placement or prolong the period before desaturation may be effective in improving outcome. The high rate of complications and the lack of existing evidence regarding the efficacy of current airway management techniques in shortening the time to airway establishment or prolonging the time to desaturation mandates further investigation. The primary hypothesis is that video laryngoscopy will be superior to direct laryngoscopy in successful first attempt at endotracheal intubation (defined by confirmed placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea during first laryngoscopy attempt) of medical ICU patients by Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine fellows after controlling for the operator's past number of procedures with the equipment used. Also, the investigators hypothesize that the provision of apneic oxygenation during the endotracheal intubation procedure (defined as a nasal cannula with 15 liters per minute of oxygen flow placed prior to sedation or neuromuscular blockade and maintained until after completion of the procedure) will result in a higher arterial oxygen saturation nadir (defined as lowest noninvasive oxygenation saturation value observed between the administration of sedation and/or neuromuscular blockade and 2 minutes after successfully secured airway or death) compared to no apneic oxygenation.

Being tested
Video Laryngoscopy, Apneic Oxygenation, Direct Laryngoscopy, No Apneic Oxygenation
Keywords
Endotracheal Intubation, Apneic Oxygenation, Respiratory failure
Medical subject headings
Respiratory Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Video LaryngoscopyDevice

  • Apneic OxygenationDevice

  • Direct LaryngoscopyDevice

  • No Apneic OxygenationDevice

Study groups in NCT02051816
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VL and AOActive comparatorVideo laryngoscopy and apneic oxygenation
Receives: Device: Apneic Oxygenation; Device: No Apneic Oxygenation
DL and AOActive comparatorDirect Laryngoscopy and apneic oxygenation
Receives: Device: Apneic Oxygenation; Device: No Apneic Oxygenation
VL and no AOActive comparatorVideo Laryngoscopy and no apneic oxygenation
Receives: Device: Video Laryngoscopy; Device: Direct Laryngoscopy
DL and no AOActive comparatorDirect Laryngoscopy and no apneic oxygenation
Receives: Device: Video Laryngoscopy; Device: Direct Laryngoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Successful First Attempt at Endotracheal Intubation (Defined by Confirmed Placement of an Endotracheal Tube in the Trachea During First Laryngoscopy Attempt) After Controlling for the Operator's Past Number of Procedures With the Equipment Used.

    The primary outcome for the video laryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy arm of the study will be the successful first attempt at endotracheal intubation (defined by confirmed placement of an endotracheal tube in the trachea during first laryngoscopy attempt) after controlling for the operator's past number of procedures with the equipment used.

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. Arterial Oxygen Saturation Nadir (Defined as Lowest Noninvasive Oxygenation Saturation Value Observed Between the Administration of Sedation and/or Neuromuscular Blockade and 2 Minutes After Successfully Secured Airway or Death).

    The primary outcome for the apneic oxygenation arm of the study is arterial oxygen saturation nadir (defined as lowest noninvasive oxygenation saturation value observed between the administration of sedation and/or neuromuscular blockade and 2 minutes after successfully secured airway or death).

    Measured: 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Procedure-related Mortality

    Death within 1 hour of beginning the procedure

    Measured: 1 hour

  2. ICU-mortality

    Death from any cause in the ICU and at anytime after the procedure

    Measured: 28 days

  3. Adjusted Lowest Arterial Oxygen Saturation During Procedure

    Arterial oxygen saturation nadir (defined as lowest noninvasive oxygenation saturation value observed between the administration of sedation and/or neuromuscular blockade and 2 minutes after successfully secured airway or death) adjusted for arterial oxygen saturation at the time of administering intubation drugs.

    Measured: 1 hour

  4. Ventilator-free Days

    Number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation after endotracheal intubation

    Measured: 28 days

  5. Number of Esophageal Intubations Per Group

    Number of esophageal intubations Per Study Group

    Measured: 1 hour

  6. Grade View of the Glottis

    Best Cormack-Lehane grade view of the glottis (grade 1-4) on first laryngoscopy attempt. Higher grades on the 1-4 scale indicate worse glottic views.

    Measured: 1 hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2014
  3. Primary completionFeb 2015
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02051816
Sponsor's protocol ID
131966
Acronym
FELLOW
Status last verified
Apr 2017
First submitted
27 Jan 2014
Last updated
24 May 2017
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Semler MW, Janz DR, Lentz RJ, Matthews DT, Norman BC, Assad TR, Keriwala RD, Ferrell BA, Noto MJ, McKown AC, Kocurek EG, Warren MA, Huerta LE, Rice TW; FELLOW Investigators; Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Randomized Trial of Apneic Oxygenation during Endotracheal Intubation of the Critically Ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):273-80. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201507-1294OC.

    PubMed 26426458

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Video Laryngoscopy, Apneic Oxygenation and Direct Laryngoscopy in people with Respiratory Failure, run by Vanderbilt University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 May 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Successful First Attempt at Endotracheal Intubation (Defined by Confirmed Placement of an Endotracheal Tube in the Trachea During First Laryngoscopy Attempt) After Controlling for the Operator's Past Number of Procedures With the Equipment Used. (time frame: 1 hour). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02051816, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 May 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in