Parkinson DiseaseNCT02038959
Connect.Parkinson: Connecting Individuals With Parkinson Disease to Specialists in Their Homes
A study testing Virtual Visits in people with Parkinson Disease, run by University of Rochester at 20 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Connect.Parkinson is a randomized comparative effectiveness study, comparing usual care enhanced with educational materials to usual care, educational materials, and the delivery of specialty care via telemedicine into patient's homes. The study's specific aims are the following: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Parkinson Disease
- What is being tested?
- Virtual Visits
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Aug 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals with clinically diagnosed Idiopathic Parkinson disease in the judgment of the independent rater
- No better alternative explanation for the parkinsonism
- Access to a non-public, internet-enabled device (e.g., computer, tablet computer, smart phone) that has the capacity for web-based video conferencing
- Be physically located at time visits are conducted in a state where the participating physician is licensed to practice medicine
- Have a local care provider that the study team can contact
- Live at home, in a senior housing complex, or assisted living facility
Show all 9Show fewer
- Be fluent in English (all participating states) or Spanish (participants in Florida and Massachusetts only)
- Willing and able to provide informed consent
- Care partner (if applicable) must be able and willing to provide informed consent to participate if he or she so chooses.
Who cannot join
- Currently hospitalized
- Condition (e.g., prominent psychosis) that precludes study participation as identified by the medical professional (site investigator or nurse).
- Participation in another telemedicine study.
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 1 country.
20 sites in 1 country
United States20 sites
Georgia Regents University
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
University of Florida
Gainsville, Florida, 32610
Struthers Parkinson Center
Golden Valley, Minnesota, 55427
Baylor College of Medicine
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
Northshore Long Island Jewish - Feinstein Institute
Manhasset, New York, 11030
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
The Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
University of Rochester Medical Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94143
Northwest Neurological, PLLC
Spokane, Washington, 99202
The Parkinson's Institute and Clinical Center
Sunnyvale, California, 94083
About this study
Official title: Using Technology to Deliver Multi-disciplinary Care to Individuals With Parkinson Disease in Their Homes: the Connect.Parkinson Study
Connect.Parkinson is a randomized comparative effectiveness study, comparing usual care enhanced with educational materials to usual care, educational materials, and the delivery of specialty care via telemedicine into patient's homes. The study's specific aims are the following:
- To demonstrate the feasibility of using telemedicine to deliver specialty care into the homes of individuals with Parkinson disease who have limited access to care;
- To show that such an approach can improve quality of life;
- To establish that the telemedicine can enhance the quality of care; and
- To demonstrate that this remote approach to care saves time, reduces travel, and decreases care partner burden.
Read the detailed description
Connect.Parkinson is a national study examining the feasibility and effectiveness of using video calls to bring expert Parkinson disease care directly into patients' homes. Currently, access to care for Parkinson disease is limited by distance, disability, and the distribution of doctors. Approximately 200 individuals with Parkinson disease (who due to distance, disability, disparity, or doctor distribution have limited access to care) will be randomized to one of two arms in this comparative effectiveness study. The first (control) arm will be the individual's "usual care" supplemented by educational materials on their condition. This usual care may include care from a generalist, care from a neurologist, or in-person care from a Parkinson specialist. The care received by the control group will vary but will be an accurate reflection of usual care in this country. The second (intervention) arm will be usual care supplemented by educational materials and care from a Parkinson disease specialist delivered via web-based video conferencing into the patient's home. The participants will also be asked with they have a primary care partner, and care partners will be invited to enroll, for a total of approximately 400 participants.
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Being tested
- Virtual Visits
- Keywords
- Parkinson disease, Parkinson's, Parkinson's disease, telemedicine, virtual visits, video calls, video conferencing, virtual house calls
- Medical subject headings
- Parkinson Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Virtual VisitsOther
Also called Telemedicine, Teleneurology, Video call, Video conferencing
Virtual visits will be completed using HIPAA-compliant video conferencing software from SBR Health and Vidyo, designed specifically for use in the healthcare industry. The software is available for Windows and Mac OS, as well as iOS devices (iPad and iPhone).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care and Educational Materials | No intervention | Participants with Parkinson disease will receive educational materials from the National Parkinson Foundation, complete a baseline assessment survey and virtual visit with a physician independent rater, then continue with their usual care in their communities for the duration of the study. After 12 months, they will have another virtual study assessment with an independent rater, after which they will receive a free, one-time virtual consultation with a Parkinson disease specialist in their state. |
| Virtual Visits and Educational Materials | Experimental | Participants with Parkinson disease randomized to the virtual visit intervention will receive educational materials from the National Parkinson Foundation, complete a baseline assessment and virtual study assessment with a physician independent rater, and then receive four virtual care visits with a Parkinson disease specialist in their state. Specialists will provide recommendations for care to participants and their designated local health care provider. At 12 months, these individuals will again be assessed by the independent rater, who will be blind to treatment assignment. Receives: Other: Virtual Visits |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Feasibility of Virtual Visits for Parkinson Disease
Feasibility of virtual visits will be determined by the number of participants who complete at least one virtual visit successfully.
Measured: One year
Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life Measured by Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39
Assessed as the change in quality of life, measured by the Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality over the last month. Assesses how often patients experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions. Assesses impact of Parkinson's Disease (PD) on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. The score ranges from 0-100 with lower scores reflecting better quality of life.
Measured: Baseline to One year
Secondary outcomes (9)
Change in EQ-5D Index Value
EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a standardized instrument for measuring generic health status. Health status is measured in terms of five dimensions (5D); mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The scale ranges from 11111 to 55555 with higher numbers indicating worse health status. The five-digit descriptors are converted to EQ-5D Index Values, which range from -0.109 (corresponding to 55555, the worst possible health) to 1.000 (corresponding to 11111, the best possible health).
Measured: baseline to one year
Change in Montreal Cognition Assessment
We will assess changes in cognition from baseline to the end of the study using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), administered remotely. The scale ranges from 0-30 with higher numbers indicating better cognition.
Measured: baseline to one year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IA
Parkinson disease clinical characteristics will be assessed by a physician independent rater, blinded to treatment group, at baseline and at the conclusion of the study, using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Part I concerns nonmotor experiences of daily living. The scale ranges from 0 to 24 with higher numbers indicated more severe disease.
Measured: baseline to one year
Change in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care
We will assess change in the perceived quality of care using the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Each scale is scored by averaging the items completed within that scale, and the overall PACIC is scored by averaging scores across all 20 items. The scale ranges from 1-5 with higher scores indicating better care by the health team.
Measured: baseline to one year
Minutes Spend on Last Parkinson's Disease Provider Visit
Measured: One year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IB
Parkinson disease clinical characteristics will be assessed by a physician independent rater, blinded to treatment group, at baseline and at the conclusion of the study, using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Part I concerns nonmotor experiences of daily living. The scale ranges from 0 to 52 with higher numbers indicated more severe disease.
Measured: baseline to one year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part 2
Parkinson disease clinical characteristics will be assessed by a physician independent rater, blinded to treatment group, at baseline and at the conclusion of the study, using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Part II concerns motor experiences of daily living. The scale ranges from 0 to 52 with higher numbers indicated more severe disease.
Measured: baseline to one year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part 3
Parkinson disease clinical characteristics will be assessed by a physician independent rater, blinded to treatment group, at baseline and at the conclusion of the study, using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Part III is retained as the motor examination. The scale ranges from 0 to 108 with higher numbers indicated more severe disease.
Measured: baseline to one year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part 4
Parkinson disease clinical characteristics will be assessed by a physician independent rater, blinded to treatment group, at baseline and at the conclusion of the study, using the Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS). Part IV concerns motor complications. The scale ranges from 0 to 24 with higher numbers indicated more severe disease.
Measured: baseline to one year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionAug 2016
- Study completionAug 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Parkinson DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of RochesterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rochester
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Parkinson Foundation
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ray Dorsey, University of Rochester
- Investigators
- E. Ray Dorsey, MD, MBA, Principal investigator, University of Rochester
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02038959
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AD-12-11-4701
- Status last verified
- Dec 2016
- First submitted
- 8 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Dorsey ER, Venkataraman V, Grana MJ, Bull MT, George BP, Boyd CM, Beck CA, Rajan B, Seidmann A, Biglan KM. Randomized controlled clinical trial of "virtual house calls" for Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013 May;70(5):565-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.123.
PubMed 23479138Grana MJ, Bull MT, Venkataraman V, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM. Web-based clinical assessments for Parkinson's disease: reliable and feasible. Mov Disord. 2012 Sep 15;27(11):1466. doi: 10.1002/mds.25121. Epub 2012 Sep 18. No abstract available.
PubMed 22991090Abdolahi A, Scoglio N, Killoran A, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM. Potential reliability and validity of a modified version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale that could be administered remotely. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Feb;19(2):218-21. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
PubMed 23102808Willis AW, Schootman M, Tran R, Kung N, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist-associated reduction in PD-related hospitalizations and health care expenditures. Neurology. 2012 Oct 23;79(17):1774-80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182703f92. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
PubMed 23054239Willis AW, Schootman M, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist care in Parkinson disease: a utilization, outcomes, and survival study. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):851-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c9123. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
PubMed 21832214Venkataraman V, Donohue SJ, Biglan KM, Wicks P, Dorsey ER. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A case series. Neurol Clin Pract. 2014 Apr;4(2):146-152. doi: 10.1212/01.CPJ.0000437937.63347.5a.
PubMed 24790799Achey MA, Beck CA, Beran DB, Boyd CM, Schmidt PN, Willis AW, Riggare SS, Simone RB, Biglan KM, Dorsey ER. Virtual house calls for Parkinson disease (Connect.Parkinson): study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Nov 27;15:465. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-465.
PubMed 25431346Achey MA, Beck CA, Beran DB, Boyd CM, Schmidt PN, Willis AW, Riggare SS, Simone RB, Biglan KM, Dorsey ER. Erratum To: Virtual house calls for Parkinson disease (Connect.Parkinson): study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Jan 5;17:7. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0984-7. No abstract available.
PubMed 26733455Dorsey ER, Achey MA, Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM, Boyd CM, Schmidt PN, Simone R, Willis AW, Galifianakis NB, Katz M, Tanner CM, Dodenhoff K, Ziman N, Aldred J, Carter J, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Spindler M, Mari Z, Morgan JC, McLane D, Hickey P, Gauger L, Richard IH, Bull MT, Mejia NI, Bwala G, Nance M, Shih L, Anderson L, Singer C, Zadikoff C, Okon N, Feigin A, Ayan J, Vaughan C, Pahwa R, Cooper J, Webb S, Dhall R, Hassan A, Weis D, DeMello S, Riggare SS, Wicks P, Smith J, Keenan HT, Korn R, Schwarz H, Sharma S, Stevenson EA, Zhu W. National Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual House Calls for People with Parkinson's Disease: Interest and Barriers. Telemed J E Health. 2016 Jul;22(7):590-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0191. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
PubMed 26886406Daschle T, Dorsey ER. The return of the house call. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 21;162(8):587-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-2769. No abstract available.
PubMed 25894028Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):154-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1601705. No abstract available.
PubMed 27410924Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM, Boyd CM, Dorsey ER, Schmidt PN, Simone R, Willis AW, Galifianakis NB, Katz M, Tanner CM, Dodenhoff K, Aldred J, Carter J, Fraser A, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Spindler M, Reichwein S, Mari Z, Dunlop B, Morgan JC, McLane D, Hickey P, Gauger L, Richard IH, Mejia NI, Bwala G, Nance M, Shih LC, Singer C, Vargas-Parra S, Zadikoff C, Okon N, Feigin A, Ayan J, Vaughan C, Pahwa R, Dhall R, Hassan A, DeMello S, Riggare SS, Wicks P, Achey MA, Elson MJ, Goldenthal S, Keenan HT, Korn R, Schwarz H, Sharma S, Stevenson EA, Zhu W; Connect.Parkinson Investigators. National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017 Sep 12;89(11):1152-1161. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
PubMed 28814455
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Using Technology to Deliver Multi-disciplinary Care to Individuals With Parkinson Disease in Their Homes: the Connect.Parkinson Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02038959
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AD-12-11-4701
- Conditions
- Parkinson Disease
- Keywords
- Parkinson disease, Parkinson's, Parkinson's disease, telemedicine, virtual visits, video calls, video conferencing, virtual house calls
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of RochesterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, National Parkinson Foundation
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Connect.Parkinson is a randomized comparative effectiveness study, comparing usual care enhanced with educational materials to usual care, educational materials, and the delivery of specialty care via telemedicine into patient's homes. The study's specific aims are the following:
- To demonstrate the feasibility of using telemedicine to deliver specialty care into the homes of individuals with Parkinson disease who have limited access to care;
- To show that such an approach can improve quality of life;
- To establish that the telemedicine can enhance the quality of care; and
- To demonstrate that this remote approach to care saves time, reduces travel, and decreases care partner burden.
Detailed description
Connect.Parkinson is a national study examining the feasibility and effectiveness of using video calls to bring expert Parkinson disease care directly into patients' homes. Currently, access to care for Parkinson disease is limited by distance, disability, and the distribution of doctors. Approximately 200 individuals with Parkinson disease (who due to distance, disability, disparity, or doctor distribution have limited access to care) will be randomized to one of two arms in this comparative effectiveness study. The first (control) arm will be the individual's "usual care" supplemented by educational materials on their condition. This usual care may include care from a generalist, care from a neurologist, or in-person care from a Parkinson specialist. The care received by the control group will vary but will be an accurate reflection of usual care in this country. The second (intervention) arm will be usual care supplemented by educational materials and care from a Parkinson disease specialist delivered via web-based video conferencing into the patient's home. The participants will also be asked with they have a primary care partner, and care partners will be invited to enroll, for a total of approximately 400 participants.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care and Educational Materials | No intervention | –Participants with Parkinson disease will receive educational materials from the National Parkinson Foundation, complete a baseline assessment survey and virtual visit with a physician independent rater, then continue with their usual care in their communities for the duration of the study. After 12 months, they will have another virtual study assessment with an independent rater, after which they will receive a free, one-time virtual consultation with a Parkinson disease specialist in their state. |
| Virtual Visits and Educational Materials | Experimental | Other: Virtual VisitsParticipants with Parkinson disease randomized to the virtual visit intervention will receive educational materials from the National Parkinson Foundation, complete a baseline assessment and virtual study assessment with a physician independent rater, and then receive four virtual care visits with a Parkinson disease specialist in their state. Specialists will provide recommendations for care to participants and their designated local health care provider. At 12 months, these individuals will again be assessed by the independent rater, who will be blind to treatment assignment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Individuals with clinically diagnosed Idiopathic Parkinson disease in the judgment of the independent rater
- No better alternative explanation for the parkinsonism
- Access to a non-public, internet-enabled device (e.g., computer, tablet computer, smart phone) that has the capacity for web-based video conferencing
- Be physically located at time visits are conducted in a state where the participating physician is licensed to practice medicine
- Have a local care provider that the study team can contact
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Currently hospitalized
- Condition (e.g., prominent psychosis) that precludes study participation as identified by the medical professional (site investigator or nurse).
- Participation in another telemedicine study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Virtual VisitsAlso: Telemedicine, Teleneurology, Video call, Video conferencingVirtual visits will be completed using HIPAA-compliant video conferencing software from SBR Health and Vidyo, designed specifically for use in the healthcare industry. The software is available for Windows and Mac OS, as well as iOS devices (iPad and iPhone). | Other | Virtual Visits and Educational Materials |
Primary outcome
Feasibility of Virtual Visits for Parkinson Disease
Time frame: One year
Feasibility of virtual visits will be determined by the number of participants who complete at least one virtual visit successfully.
Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life Measured by Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39
Time frame: Baseline to One year
Assessed as the change in quality of life, measured by the Parkinson Disease Questionnaire 39 (PDQ-39). The PDQ-39 is a 39-item self-report questionnaire, which assesses Parkinson's disease-specific health related quality over the last month. Assesses how often patients experience difficulties across the 8 quality of life dimensions. Assesses impact of Parkinson's Disease (PD) on specific dimensions of functioning and well-being. The score ranges from 0-100 with lower scores reflecting better quality of life.
9 secondary outcomes
Change in EQ-5D Index Value
Time frame: baseline to one year
Change in Montreal Cognition Assessment
Time frame: baseline to one year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IA
Time frame: baseline to one year
Change in Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care
Time frame: baseline to one year
Minutes Spend on Last Parkinson's Disease Provider Visit
Time frame: One year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part IB
Time frame: baseline to one year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part 2
Time frame: baseline to one year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part 3
Time frame: baseline to one year
Change in Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part 4
Time frame: baseline to one year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 23479138Dorsey ER, Venkataraman V, Grana MJ, Bull MT, George BP, Boyd CM, Beck CA, Rajan B, Seidmann A, Biglan KM. Randomized controlled clinical trial of "virtual house calls" for Parkinson disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013 May;70(5):565-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.123.
- Background: PubMed 22991090Grana MJ, Bull MT, Venkataraman V, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM. Web-based clinical assessments for Parkinson's disease: reliable and feasible. Mov Disord. 2012 Sep 15;27(11):1466. doi: 10.1002/mds.25121. Epub 2012 Sep 18. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 23102808Abdolahi A, Scoglio N, Killoran A, Dorsey ER, Biglan KM. Potential reliability and validity of a modified version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale that could be administered remotely. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013 Feb;19(2):218-21. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 23054239Willis AW, Schootman M, Tran R, Kung N, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist-associated reduction in PD-related hospitalizations and health care expenditures. Neurology. 2012 Oct 23;79(17):1774-80. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182703f92. Epub 2012 Oct 10.
- Background: PubMed 21832214Willis AW, Schootman M, Evanoff BA, Perlmutter JS, Racette BA. Neurologist care in Parkinson disease: a utilization, outcomes, and survival study. Neurology. 2011 Aug 30;77(9):851-7. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822c9123. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 24790799Venkataraman V, Donohue SJ, Biglan KM, Wicks P, Dorsey ER. Virtual visits for Parkinson disease: A case series. Neurol Clin Pract. 2014 Apr;4(2):146-152. doi: 10.1212/01.CPJ.0000437937.63347.5a.
- Background: PubMed 25431346Achey MA, Beck CA, Beran DB, Boyd CM, Schmidt PN, Willis AW, Riggare SS, Simone RB, Biglan KM, Dorsey ER. Virtual house calls for Parkinson disease (Connect.Parkinson): study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Nov 27;15:465. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-465.
- Background: PubMed 26733455Achey MA, Beck CA, Beran DB, Boyd CM, Schmidt PN, Willis AW, Riggare SS, Simone RB, Biglan KM, Dorsey ER. Erratum To: Virtual house calls for Parkinson disease (Connect.Parkinson): study protocol for a randomized, controlled trial. Trials. 2016 Jan 5;17:7. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0984-7. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 26886406Dorsey ER, Achey MA, Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM, Boyd CM, Schmidt PN, Simone R, Willis AW, Galifianakis NB, Katz M, Tanner CM, Dodenhoff K, Ziman N, Aldred J, Carter J, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Spindler M, Mari Z, Morgan JC, McLane D, Hickey P, Gauger L, Richard IH, Bull MT, Mejia NI, Bwala G, Nance M, Shih L, Anderson L, Singer C, Zadikoff C, Okon N, Feigin A, Ayan J, Vaughan C, Pahwa R, Cooper J, Webb S, Dhall R, Hassan A, Weis D, DeMello S, Riggare SS, Wicks P, Smith J, Keenan HT, Korn R, Schwarz H, Sharma S, Stevenson EA, Zhu W. National Randomized Controlled Trial of Virtual House Calls for People with Parkinson's Disease: Interest and Barriers. Telemed J E Health. 2016 Jul;22(7):590-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2015.0191. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 25894028Daschle T, Dorsey ER. The return of the house call. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 21;162(8):587-8. doi: 10.7326/M14-2769. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 27410924Dorsey ER, Topol EJ. State of Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 14;375(2):154-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1601705. No abstract available.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28814455Beck CA, Beran DB, Biglan KM, Boyd CM, Dorsey ER, Schmidt PN, Simone R, Willis AW, Galifianakis NB, Katz M, Tanner CM, Dodenhoff K, Aldred J, Carter J, Fraser A, Jimenez-Shahed J, Hunter C, Spindler M, Reichwein S, Mari Z, Dunlop B, Morgan JC, McLane D, Hickey P, Gauger L, Richard IH, Mejia NI, Bwala G, Nance M, Shih LC, Singer C, Vargas-Parra S, Zadikoff C, Okon N, Feigin A, Ayan J, Vaughan C, Pahwa R, Dhall R, Hassan A, DeMello S, Riggare SS, Wicks P, Achey MA, Elson MJ, Goldenthal S, Keenan HT, Korn R, Schwarz H, Sharma S, Stevenson EA, Zhu W; Connect.Parkinson Investigators. National randomized controlled trial of virtual house calls for Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017 Sep 12;89(11):1152-1161. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004357. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
Related trials for Parkinson Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Early Molecular Biomarkers for Differentiating Parkinsonian Syndromes
PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder), Atypical Parkinsonism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Study of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (MK-2870) in Combination With Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) as First-line Maintenance Treatment of Cervical Cancer (MK-2870-036/TroFuse-036/GOG-3123/ENGOT-cx22)
Cervical Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Clinical Safety and Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells-derived Exosomes in Patients With Parkinson's Disease
Parkinson Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Adaptive DBS to Offset STN Dysregulation During Exercise in PD
Parkinson Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
E. Ray Dorsey, MD, MBA principal investigator
University of Rochester
20 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Virtual Visits in people with Parkinson Disease, run by University of Rochester at 20 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Feasibility of Virtual Visits for Parkinson Disease (time frame: One year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02038959, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2017.