Diabetes MellitusQoC RAMPNCT02034695
Evaluation of Quality of Care - Risk Assessment Management Programme, HA
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
Trial summary
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the major cause of morbidity and among the top 10 causes of deaths in Hong Kong in 2008 (Department of Health 2009). The Hospital Authority (HA) has initiated service improvement through introducing the risk assessment and management programme (RAMP) to improve the quality of care… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetes Mellitus
- How many people
- 2,496 participants
- Where
- 1 siteHong Kong
- Study dates
- Sep 2010to Apr 2017
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with DM who are mostly independent in their activities of daily living and being followed up at GOPC regularly will be recruited. All enrolled patients will undergo a comprehensive risk assessment and screening for complications, who will then be assigned to receive appropriate interventions and education from multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals according to their risk level. Low risk patients will continue with the usual GOPC follow up, medium risk patients will be given additional intervention by an advanced practice nurse (APN), and high risk patients will be given additional intervention by an APN and an associate consultant (AC) in family medicine (FM).
Who may be able to join
- Patients with DM who are mostly independent in their activities of daily living and being followed up at GOPC regularly will be recruited.
Who cannot join
- Patients will be excluded if they are unable to understand or communicate in Chinese language, or refuse to give consent.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the major cause of morbidity and among the top 10 causes of deaths in Hong Kong in 2008 (Department of Health 2009). The Hospital Authority (HA) has initiated service improvement through introducing the risk assessment and management programme (RAMP) to improve the quality of care (QOC) for DM patients in general outpatient clinics (GOPC). The evaluation on the QOC is an essential part of the programme in order to inform future policy. The Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care (FMPC) of the University of Hong Kong (HKU) has been appointed by the HA to carry out the evaluation of the QOC of the programme.
The Action Learning and Audit Spiral methodologies to measure whether the target standard of care intended by the RAMP programme is achieved. Each RAMP participating clinic and hospital will be invited to complete a structured evaluation questionnaire. The data of all patients who have enrolled into the RAMP for more than one year will be included in the evaluation on the process and outcomes of care.
Read more
One thousand two hundred and forty-eight age and disease matched control patients who have not been enrolled into the RAMP programme will be selected for the comparison in the outcomes of care. A hundred and thirty participants will be followed up by telephone to evaluate the effect of the programme in quality of life (QOL), patient enablement, and global rating of change in health condition at baseline and 6 months after enrolment. Data on the process of care will be retrieved from the HA medical records.
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are the proportion of participants who have received the criterion process of care, and achieved the target HbA1c and blood pressure levels.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics on proportions of centers or subjects meeting the QOC criteria will be calculated. The changes in the clinical and patient reported outcomes of RAMP subjects will be compared at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months will be compared by paired sample t-test. The clinical outcomes between RAMP subjects and control group will be compared by independent sample t-test or Chi-square test.
Results: The QOC of the RAMP programme will be determined. Areas of deficiency and possible areas for quality enhancement will be identified.
Conclusion: The results of this study will provide empirical evidence on whether the HA's RAMP programme can achieve improvement in QOC for DM patients. The information will be used to guide service planning and policy decision making.
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Diabetes mellitus
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RAMP and Non-RAMP | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The proportion of clinics that have satisfied each of the structure criteria
Interim analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to December, 2010; to December, 2011; to December, 2012; to December, 2013. Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to December, 2014.
Measured: Five years
The proportion of patients who have complied with the criterion process of care.
Interim analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to June, 2011; to December, 2011; to December, 2012; to December, 2013. Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to December, 2014.
Measured: Five years
The proportion of patients who have achieved a HbA1c level <7%.
Interim analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to June, 2011; to December, 2011; to December, 2012; to December, 2013. Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to December, 2014.
Measured: Five years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Clinical outcomes including, LDL, BP, body mass index (BMI), and cardiovascular complications.
Baseline and 12 months for each subject; the audit cycle will be repeated annually over a period of 5 years.
Measured: Five years
Patient reported outcomes (PRO) measured by the change in SF-12v2 scores, the PEI and GRS scores at 6 months.
Baseline and 6-month/12-month/24-month/36-month after the first administration of questionnaire.
Measured: Five years
Service utilization outcomes measured by GOPC consultation, SOPC consultation, A&E and hospital attendance rates in the past 12 months.
Baseline and 12 months for each subject; the audit cycle will be repeated annually over a period of 5 years.
Measured: Five years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2010
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionApr 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,496 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Professor Cindy L.K. Lam, The University of Hong Kong
- Investigators
- Cindy L.K. Lam, MD, Study chair, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong KongColman S.C. Fung, MBBS, Principal investigator, Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculity of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02034695
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HKCTR-1186
- Acronym
- QoC RAMP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Fung CS, Chin WY, Dai DS, Kwok RL, Tsui EL, Wan YF, Wong W, Wong CK, Fong DY, Lam CL. Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-116.
PubMed 23216708Jiao FF, Fung CS, Wong CK, Wan YF, Dai D, Kwok R, Lam CL. Effects of the Multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Program for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM) on biomedical outcomes, observed cardiovascular events and cardiovascular risks in primary care: a longitudinal comparative study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Aug 21;13:127. doi: 10.1186/s12933-014-0127-6.
PubMed 25142791Jiao F, Fung CS, Wan YF, McGhee SM, Wong CK, Dai D, Kwok R, Lam CL. Long-term effects of the multidisciplinary risk assessment and management program for patients with diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM): a population-based cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Aug 14;14:105. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0267-3.
PubMed 26268736Jiao F, Fung CS, Wan YF, McGhee SM, Wong CK, Dai D, Kwok R, Lam CL. Effectiveness of the multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Program for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM) for diabetic microvascular complications: A population-based cohort study. Diabetes Metab. 2016 Dec;42(6):424-432. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
PubMed 27568125Wan EY, Fung CS, Wong CK, Choi EP, Jiao FF, Chan AK, Chan KH, Lam CL. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme-diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM) on patient-reported outcomes. Endocrine. 2017 Feb;55(2):416-426. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1124-1. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
PubMed 27699706Fung CS, Wan EY, Jiao F, Lam CL. Five-year change of clinical and complications profile of diabetic patients under primary care: a population-based longitudinal study on 127,977 diabetic patients. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015 Sep 17;7:79. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0072-x. eCollection 2015.
PubMed 26388950
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Quality of Care - Risk Assessment Management Programme, HA
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02034695
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QoC RAMP / HKCTR-1186
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Keywords
- Diabetes mellitus
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,496 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hospital Authority, Hong Kong
- Study start
- Sep 2010
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the major cause of morbidity and among the top 10 causes of deaths in Hong Kong in 2008 (Department of Health 2009). The Hospital Authority (HA) has initiated service improvement through introducing the risk assessment and management programme (RAMP) to improve the quality of care (QOC) for DM patients in general outpatient clinics (GOPC). The evaluation on the QOC is an essential part of the programme in order to inform future policy. The Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care (FMPC) of the University of Hong Kong (HKU) has been appointed by the HA to carry out the evaluation of the QOC of the programme.
The Action Learning and Audit Spiral methodologies to measure whether the target standard of care intended by the RAMP programme is achieved. Each RAMP participating clinic and hospital will be invited to complete a structured evaluation questionnaire. The data of all patients who have enrolled into the RAMP for more than one year will be included in the evaluation on the process and outcomes of care.
One thousand two hundred and forty-eight age and disease matched control patients who have not been enrolled into the RAMP programme will be selected for the comparison in the outcomes of care. A hundred and thirty participants will be followed up by telephone to evaluate the effect of the programme in quality of life (QOL), patient enablement, and global rating of change in health condition at baseline and 6 months after enrolment. Data on the process of care will be retrieved from the HA medical records.
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes are the proportion of participants who have received the criterion process of care, and achieved the target HbA1c and blood pressure levels.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics on proportions of centers or subjects meeting the QOC criteria will be calculated. The changes in the clinical and patient reported outcomes of RAMP subjects will be compared at 12, 24, 36 and 48 months will be compared by paired sample t-test. The clinical outcomes between RAMP subjects and control group will be compared by independent sample t-test or Chi-square test.
Results: The QOC of the RAMP programme will be determined. Areas of deficiency and possible areas for quality enhancement will be identified.
Conclusion: The results of this study will provide empirical evidence on whether the HA's RAMP programme can achieve improvement in QOC for DM patients. The information will be used to guide service planning and policy decision making.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RAMP and Non-RAMP | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with DM who are mostly independent in their activities of daily living and being followed up at GOPC regularly will be recruited. All enrolled patients will undergo a comprehensive risk assessment and screening for complications, who will then be assigned to receive appropriate interventions and education from multi-disciplinary healthcare professionals according to their risk level. Low risk patients will continue with the usual GOPC follow up, medium risk patients will be given additional intervention by an advanced practice nurse (APN), and high risk patients will be given additional intervention by an APN and an associate consultant (AC) in family medicine (FM).
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients with DM who are mostly independent in their activities of daily living and being followed up at GOPC regularly will be recruited.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients will be excluded if they are unable to understand or communicate in Chinese language, or refuse to give consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The proportion of clinics that have satisfied each of the structure criteria
Time frame: Five years
Interim analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to December, 2010; to December, 2011; to December, 2012; to December, 2013. Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to December, 2014.
The proportion of patients who have complied with the criterion process of care.
Time frame: Five years
Interim analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to June, 2011; to December, 2011; to December, 2012; to December, 2013. Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to December, 2014.
The proportion of patients who have achieved a HbA1c level <7%.
Time frame: Five years
Interim analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to June, 2011; to December, 2011; to December, 2012; to December, 2013. Final analysis will evaluate the period from August, 2009 to December, 2014.
3 secondary outcomes
Clinical outcomes including, LDL, BP, body mass index (BMI), and cardiovascular complications.
Time frame: Five years
Patient reported outcomes (PRO) measured by the change in SF-12v2 scores, the PEI and GRS scores at 6 months.
Time frame: Five years
Service utilization outcomes measured by GOPC consultation, SOPC consultation, A&E and hospital attendance rates in the past 12 months.
Time frame: Five years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2017.
- Results publication: PubMed 23216708Fung CS, Chin WY, Dai DS, Kwok RL, Tsui EL, Wan YF, Wong W, Wong CK, Fong DY, Lam CL. Evaluation of the quality of care of a multi-disciplinary risk factor assessment and management programme (RAMP) for diabetic patients. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Dec 5;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-116.
- Results publication: PubMed 25142791Jiao FF, Fung CS, Wong CK, Wan YF, Dai D, Kwok R, Lam CL. Effects of the Multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Program for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM) on biomedical outcomes, observed cardiovascular events and cardiovascular risks in primary care: a longitudinal comparative study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014 Aug 21;13:127. doi: 10.1186/s12933-014-0127-6.
- Results publication: PubMed 26268736Jiao F, Fung CS, Wan YF, McGhee SM, Wong CK, Dai D, Kwok R, Lam CL. Long-term effects of the multidisciplinary risk assessment and management program for patients with diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM): a population-based cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2015 Aug 14;14:105. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0267-3.
- Results publication: PubMed 27568125Jiao F, Fung CS, Wan YF, McGhee SM, Wong CK, Dai D, Kwok R, Lam CL. Effectiveness of the multidisciplinary Risk Assessment and Management Program for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus (RAMP-DM) for diabetic microvascular complications: A population-based cohort study. Diabetes Metab. 2016 Dec;42(6):424-432. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
- Results publication: PubMed 27699706Wan EY, Fung CS, Wong CK, Choi EP, Jiao FF, Chan AK, Chan KH, Lam CL. Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary risk assessment and management programme-diabetes mellitus (RAMP-DM) on patient-reported outcomes. Endocrine. 2017 Feb;55(2):416-426. doi: 10.1007/s12020-016-1124-1. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26388950Fung CS, Wan EY, Jiao F, Lam CL. Five-year change of clinical and complications profile of diabetic patients under primary care: a population-based longitudinal study on 127,977 diabetic patients. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2015 Sep 17;7:79. doi: 10.1186/s13098-015-0072-x. eCollection 2015.
Related trials for Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Cindy L.K. Lam, MD study chair
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
Colman S.C. Fung, MBBS principal investigator
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Faculity of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Diabetes Mellitus, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The proportion of clinics that have satisfied each of the structure criteria (time frame: Five years). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02034695, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2017.