InfertilityNCT02024880
Comparison of Two Embryo Transfer Catheters in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
A study testing Protective catheter group and Conventional catheter group in people with Infertility, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment involves development of multiple follicles following ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer (ET). ET is the final and most crucial step of IVF treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 42 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Infertility
- What is being tested?
- Protective catheter group and Conventional catheter group
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2014to 30 Nov 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 42 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- ET in the fresh cycle (ii) Age <43 year (iii) Normal uterine cavity shown on ultrasound scanning
Who cannot join
- Three previous IVF cycles (ii) Natural IVF or IVM cycles (iii) Presence of hydrosalpinx on pelvic scanning (iv) Transfer of grade 5 embryos (v) Blastocyst transfer (vi) Use of donor oocytes (vii) Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and (viii) Previously joined in the same study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Single-blind Comparison of Two Embryo Transfer Catheters in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment involves development of multiple follicles following ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer (ET). ET is the final and most crucial step of IVF treatment.
The ET catheter has to pass through the endocervical canal to go into the uterine cavity through the internal os. The endocervical canal may be filled up with mucus or blood. Embryos trapped in the mucus or blood after the passage of the endocervical canal may not be able to implant into the endometrium. Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter is designed to allow the safe passage of embryos through cervical mucus and blood as its outer sheath protects the embryo through entry and then opens in petals to further advance the inner catheter and gently place the embryo.
The hypothesis of this study is that the pregnancy rate is significantly higher after ET using protective ET catheters.
Read the detailed description
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment involves development of multiple follicles following ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer (ET). Despite recent advances in ovarian stimulation, the method of assisted fertilization and improved culture conditions, the implantation potential of embryos remains around 20-25% for a long time.
ET is the final and most crucial step of IVF treatment and pregnancy rates after ET may be affected by various factors. In a Cochrane meta-analysis (Derks et al., 2009), no evidence of a benefit was found for performing ET with a full bladder, the removal of cervical mucus, and flushing the endocervical canal or the endometrial cavity. No data were found on changing the woman's position, the use of a tenaculum, the performance of a dummy transfer, and embryo afterloading. Other meta-analyses demonstrate that the use of soft ET catheters (Buckett, 2008) and transabdominal ultrasound guidance (Brown et al., 2010) lead to a higher chance of clinical pregnancy when compared with the use of stiff catheters and clinical touch respectively.
The ET catheter has to pass through the endocervical canal to go into the uterine cavity through the internal os. The endocervical canal may be filled up with mucus or blood. Embryos trapped in the mucus or blood after the passage of the endocervical canal may not be able to implant into the endometrium. Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter is designed to allow the safe passage of embryos through cervical mucus and blood as its outer sheath protects the embryo through entry and then opens in petals to further advance the inner catheter and gently place the embryo.
There is still no study comparing conventional and protective ET catheters in terms of the pregnancy rate of IVF treatment. The hypothesis of this study is that the pregnancy rate is significantly higher after ET using protective ET catheters.
Research plan Patients attending the Department for IVF-ET will be recruited if they fulfill the inclusion criteria and do not have the exclusion criteria. The FET treatment will be arranged as indicated.
On the day of ET, patients will be randomized according to a computer-generated randomization list in sealed envelopes into two groups: conventional and protective ET catheter groups. Conventional ET catheters will be used in the conventional ET catheter group while protective ET catheters will be used in the protective ET catheter group. Patients would be blinded to the group assigned although the clinical, nursing and laboratory staff will be aware of the type of catheters used.
A maximum of two good quality embryos are to be replaced. Patients are asked to keep a mildly full bladder so that the uterus can be visualized by abdominal sonogram during the procedure. A bivalve speculum is inserted into the vagina and the cervix is cleaned with warm saline and culture medium. The axis, degree of flexion and the configuration of the uterine cavity are determined by transabdominal ultrasound examination before the transfer. Under transabdominal ultrasound guidance, the outer catheter is inserted into the cervical canal 4 cm from the external os, with the tip just beyond the internal os. A malleable obturator is used if difficulty is encountered. The inner transfer catheter with the loaded embryo(s) is then inserted into the uterine cavity via the outer cannula. The aim is to put the tip of the inner catheter inside the uterine cavity 6 cm from the external os and care was taken not to advance the tip beyond 1 cm from the uterine fundus. The transfer volume is gently expelled by the technician. The catheters will be held in place for 30 seconds. Both the inner and outer catheters will be checked by the technician under the microscope to make sure that the embryos have been replaced.
The luteal phase support will be used if needed and antenatal management is as usual, if pregnant.
Sample size estimation The ongoing pregnancy rate of IVF-ET in 2010 was about 30.0%. Assuming a 10% increase following use of protective ET catheters as significant, 356 patients in each arm was required at a power of 80% and a significance level of 5% (Sigmastat, Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA, USA). A total of 720 patients will be recruited into the study.
Interim analysis will be performed after recruitment of every 100 subjects.
- Conditions
- Infertility
- Being tested
- Protective catheter group, Conventional catheter group
- Keywords
- in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, transfer catheter
- Medical subject headings
- Infertility
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Protective catheter groupDevice
Also called Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter
The tip of this catheter is protected on insertion of the catheter.
Conventional catheter groupDevice
Also called Sydney IVF catheters
A standard embryo catheter
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Protective catheter group | Experimental | Protective catheter group uses Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter from Cook. Receives: Device: Protective catheter group |
| Conventional catheter group | Active comparator | Conventional catheter group uses Sydney IVF catheter from Cook. Receives: Device: Conventional catheter group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
ongoing pregnancy rate
Pelvic ultrasound showed intrauterine pregnancy with fetal pulsation
Measured: 10 weeks of gestation
Secondary outcomes (1)
Clinical pregnancy rate
Pelvic ultrasound should an intrauterine sac with crown rump length corresponding to 6 weeks
Measured: 6 weeks of gestation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jan 2014
- Primary completion30 Nov 2020
- Study completion30 Nov 2020
Why it stopped: The ET catheters were outdated.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for InfertilityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Hong KongThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong Kong
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ernest HY Ng, MD, Principal investigator, The University of Hong Kong
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02024880
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HKUQMHCARE002
- Status last verified
- Jul 2020
- First submitted
- 27 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 29 Apr 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Apr 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Single-blind Comparison of Two Embryo Transfer Catheters in Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02024880
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HKUQMHCARE002
- Conditions
- Infertility
- Keywords
- in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, transfer catheter
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The ET catheters were outdated.
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Hong KongUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment involves development of multiple follicles following ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer (ET). ET is the final and most crucial step of IVF treatment.
The ET catheter has to pass through the endocervical canal to go into the uterine cavity through the internal os. The endocervical canal may be filled up with mucus or blood. Embryos trapped in the mucus or blood after the passage of the endocervical canal may not be able to implant into the endometrium. Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter is designed to allow the safe passage of embryos through cervical mucus and blood as its outer sheath protects the embryo through entry and then opens in petals to further advance the inner catheter and gently place the embryo.
The hypothesis of this study is that the pregnancy rate is significantly higher after ET using protective ET catheters.
Detailed description
In-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment involves development of multiple follicles following ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer (ET). Despite recent advances in ovarian stimulation, the method of assisted fertilization and improved culture conditions, the implantation potential of embryos remains around 20-25% for a long time.
ET is the final and most crucial step of IVF treatment and pregnancy rates after ET may be affected by various factors. In a Cochrane meta-analysis (Derks et al., 2009), no evidence of a benefit was found for performing ET with a full bladder, the removal of cervical mucus, and flushing the endocervical canal or the endometrial cavity. No data were found on changing the woman's position, the use of a tenaculum, the performance of a dummy transfer, and embryo afterloading. Other meta-analyses demonstrate that the use of soft ET catheters (Buckett, 2008) and transabdominal ultrasound guidance (Brown et al., 2010) lead to a higher chance of clinical pregnancy when compared with the use of stiff catheters and clinical touch respectively.
The ET catheter has to pass through the endocervical canal to go into the uterine cavity through the internal os. The endocervical canal may be filled up with mucus or blood. Embryos trapped in the mucus or blood after the passage of the endocervical canal may not be able to implant into the endometrium. Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter is designed to allow the safe passage of embryos through cervical mucus and blood as its outer sheath protects the embryo through entry and then opens in petals to further advance the inner catheter and gently place the embryo.
There is still no study comparing conventional and protective ET catheters in terms of the pregnancy rate of IVF treatment. The hypothesis of this study is that the pregnancy rate is significantly higher after ET using protective ET catheters.
Research plan Patients attending the Department for IVF-ET will be recruited if they fulfill the inclusion criteria and do not have the exclusion criteria. The FET treatment will be arranged as indicated.
On the day of ET, patients will be randomized according to a computer-generated randomization list in sealed envelopes into two groups: conventional and protective ET catheter groups. Conventional ET catheters will be used in the conventional ET catheter group while protective ET catheters will be used in the protective ET catheter group. Patients would be blinded to the group assigned although the clinical, nursing and laboratory staff will be aware of the type of catheters used.
A maximum of two good quality embryos are to be replaced. Patients are asked to keep a mildly full bladder so that the uterus can be visualized by abdominal sonogram during the procedure. A bivalve speculum is inserted into the vagina and the cervix is cleaned with warm saline and culture medium. The axis, degree of flexion and the configuration of the uterine cavity are determined by transabdominal ultrasound examination before the transfer. Under transabdominal ultrasound guidance, the outer catheter is inserted into the cervical canal 4 cm from the external os, with the tip just beyond the internal os. A malleable obturator is used if difficulty is encountered. The inner transfer catheter with the loaded embryo(s) is then inserted into the uterine cavity via the outer cannula. The aim is to put the tip of the inner catheter inside the uterine cavity 6 cm from the external os and care was taken not to advance the tip beyond 1 cm from the uterine fundus. The transfer volume is gently expelled by the technician. The catheters will be held in place for 30 seconds. Both the inner and outer catheters will be checked by the technician under the microscope to make sure that the embryos have been replaced.
The luteal phase support will be used if needed and antenatal management is as usual, if pregnant.
Sample size estimation The ongoing pregnancy rate of IVF-ET in 2010 was about 30.0%. Assuming a 10% increase following use of protective ET catheters as significant, 356 patients in each arm was required at a power of 80% and a significance level of 5% (Sigmastat, Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA, USA). A total of 720 patients will be recruited into the study.
Interim analysis will be performed after recruitment of every 100 subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Protective catheter group | Experimental | Device: Protective catheter groupProtective catheter group uses Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheter from Cook. |
| Conventional catheter group | Active comparator | Device: Conventional catheter groupConventional catheter group uses Sydney IVF catheter from Cook. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 42 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- ET in the fresh cycle (ii) Age <43 year (iii) Normal uterine cavity shown on ultrasound scanning
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Three previous IVF cycles (ii) Natural IVF or IVM cycles (iii) Presence of hydrosalpinx on pelvic scanning (iv) Transfer of grade 5 embryos (v) Blastocyst transfer (vi) Use of donor oocytes (vii) Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and (viii) Previously joined in the same study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Protective catheter groupAlso: Guardia™ Pro Protective ET catheterThe tip of this catheter is protected on insertion of the catheter. | Device | Protective catheter group |
| Conventional catheter groupAlso: Sydney IVF cathetersA standard embryo catheter | Device | Conventional catheter group |
Primary outcome
ongoing pregnancy rate
Time frame: 10 weeks of gestation
Pelvic ultrasound showed intrauterine pregnancy with fetal pulsation
1 secondary outcome
Clinical pregnancy rate
Time frame: 6 weeks of gestation
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The ET catheters were outdated.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Apr 2021.
Related trials for Infertility
RecruitingObservational study
International Pilot Study for Dual Non-invasive Assesment of Embryo Development
Infertility
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Retrieval of Sperm From Men With Azoospermia Using Ultrasound-guided Rete Testis Aspiration
Azoospermia, Nonobstructive, Infertility, Male
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
RecruitingObservational study
Impact of Infertility on the Sexual Sphere in Couples Undergoing Assisted Reproduction
Sexual Health Quality of Life, Infertile Patients
RecruitingObservational study
Pilot Study of Discarded Blastocysts
Infertility (IVF Patients)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ernest HY Ng, MD principal investigator
The University of Hong Kong
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Protective catheter group and Conventional catheter group in people with Infertility, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The ET catheters were outdated.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
ongoing pregnancy rate (time frame: 10 weeks of gestation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Apr 2021.