AzTrials
AzTrials

Inherited Mitochondrial Disease, Including Leigh SyndromePhase 2MITO-001NCT02023866

Open-Label, Dose-Escalating Study Assessing Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, of RP103 in Mitochondrial Disease

A Phase 2 study testing Cysteamine Bitartrate in people with Inherited Mitochondrial Disease, Including Leigh Syndrome, run by Amgen at 5 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of cysteamine bitartrate delayed-release capsules (RP103) administered at a target maintenance dose of 1.3 g/m²/day in two divided doses, every 12 hours, for up to 6 months in patients with inherited mitochondrial disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 6 to 17 years
What is being tested?
Cysteamine Bitartrate
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
36 participants
Where
5 sitesUnited States
Study dates
May 2014to Oct 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 6 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 6 years and < 18 years
  • Body weight ≥ 5 kg
  • Documented (genetically confirmed known mutation, i.e. no variants of uncertain significance) diagnosis of inherited mitochondrial disease other than Friedreich's ataxia (FRDA)
  • Moderate disease severity based on Newcastle Pediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) score, with a score between 15 to 45 inclusive [Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) subjects are exempt of this inclusion criteria], if approved by the sponsor.
  • For patients regularly taking dietary supplements such as creatinine, alpha-lipoic acid, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), vitamin B, carnitine, etc. they have to have been taking them for at least 3 months pre-study and will agree to keep these the same throughout the study (from the Screening Visit to Study Exit)
  • With respect to concomitant medications, the subject must:
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Be willing to abstain from initiating dietary supplements and non-prescribed medications, except as allowed by the Investigator, throughout the study (from the Screening Visit to Study Exit);
  • Be on a stable dose of medications prescribed for seizure management and prevention. Stable dose in this context means unchanged for at least 30 days prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Willing and able to comply with study drug dosing requirements, i.e. ingest the RP103 capsules intact, or sprinkled in liquid or soft food, or using a g-tube
  • Sexually active female subjects of childbearing potential (i.e., not surgically sterile [tubal ligation, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy]) must agree to utilize two of the following acceptable forms of contraception throughout the study (from the Screening Visit to Study Exit):
  • Hormonal contraception: birth control pills, injection, patch, vaginal ring or implant;
  • Condom or diaphragm, with spermicide;
  • Intrauterine device (IUD)
  • Sterile male partner (vasectomy performed at least 6 months prior to the study).
  • Subjects's legally authorized representative must provide written informed consent; Subject must provide assent, if required by local/institutional requirements
  • Have mitochondrial myopathy as evidenced by one or more of the following criteria:
  • Weakness consistent with myopathy (e.g. accompanied by muscle wasting and/or absence of neuropathy) on physical exam
  • OR documented myopathy on the basis of muscle biopsy consistent with mitochondrial myopathy disease
  • OR weakness and/or progressive exercise intolerance (in which modest exercise typically provokes heaviness, weakness, aching of active muscles, or tachycardia). Weakness should be due to myopathy and not neuropathy or other causes as deemed by investigator

Who cannot join

  • Documented diagnosis of concurrent inborn errors of metabolism
  • Non-elective hospitalization related to mitochondrial disease or direct complication of disease within 60 days prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Platelet count, lymphocyte count or hemoglobin below the lower limit of normal (LLN) at the Screening Visit
  • Hepatic insufficiency with liver enzyme tests (alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase [AST] or alanine aminotransferase [ALT]) greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) at the Screening Visit
  • Bilirubin > 1.2 g/dL at the Screening Visit
  • Inability to complete the elements of the study, e.g., coma, hemodynamic instability or requiring continuous ventilator support.
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Malabsorption requiring total parenteral nutrition (TPN), chronic diarrhea, bouts of pseudo obstruction
  • Severe end-organ hypo-perfusion syndrome secondary to cardiac failure resulting in lactic acidosis
  • Patients with suspected elevated intracranial pressure, pseudotumor cerebri (PTC) and/or papilledema
  • Severe gastrointestinal disease including gastroparesis
  • History of angina, myocardial infarction, or cardiac surgery within 2 years prior to the Screening Visit
  • Any clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG), including dysrhythmia, or clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding not already listed above at the Screening Visit
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse
  • History of pancreatitis
  • Participated in an investigational drug trial within 30 days or, within 90 days for a biologic, device, or surgical treatment, for inherited mitochondrial diseases prior to the Screening Visit
  • Known or suspected hypersensitivity to cysteamine and penicillamine
  • Female subjects who are nursing, planning a pregnancy, known or suspected to be pregnant, or with a positive serum pregnancy test at the Screening Visit
  • Subject's who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are not able or willing to comply with the protocol.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

United States5 sites
  • Akron Children's Hospital

    Akron, Ohio, 44308

  • Baylor College of Medicine

    Houston, Texas, 77030

  • University of Utah, Division of Medical Genetics

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • University of California at San Diego (UCSD)

    San Diego, California, 92093-0935

  • Stanford University

    Stanford, California, 94305

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Open-Label, Dose-Escalating Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release Capsules (RP103) for Treatment of Children With Inherited Mitochondrial Disease

To evaluate safety, tolerability and efficacy of cysteamine bitartrate delayed-release capsules (RP103) administered at a target maintenance dose of 1.3 g/m²/day in two divided doses, every 12 hours, for up to 6 months in patients with inherited mitochondrial disease.

Read the detailed description

This is an open-label, dose-escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability, efficacy, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cysteamine bitartrate delayed-release capsules (RP103) for treatment of children with inherited mitochondrial disease.

Prior to treatment, patients will undergo a Screening Visit. If eligible, each participant will return for the Day 1 study visit and begin dosing. Every 2 weeks over the subsequent 8 weeks, participants will alternate between returning to the clinic for detailed assessments (Weeks 4 and 8) and receiving a telephone call from the Investigator team to assess safety and RP103 dose (Weeks 2 and 6) and the potential need for an immediate unscheduled study visit. Thereafter, participants will continue to return to the clinic every 4 weeks for detailed assessments at Weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24 (the Study Exit visit).

The Study Exit visit will occur at Week 24, and participants will be offered the opportunity to continue on to an extension study (RP103-MITO-002 [NCT02473445]) until results of the present study are known.

Study with completed results acquired from Horizon in 2024.

Being tested
Cysteamine Bitartrate
Keywords
Leigh Syndrome, Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy, myoclonic epilepsy, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, Kearn-Sayre syndrome, POLG-related disorders, Neurogastrointestinal encephalopathy
Medical subject headings
Leigh Disease, Optic Atrophy, Hereditary, Leber, Epilepsies, Myoclonic, Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathies, Ophthalmoplegia, Chronic Progressive External

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cysteamine BitartrateDrug

    Also called RP103

    Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-release capsules

Study groups in NCT02023866
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cysteamine Bitartrate Delayed-releaseExperimentalCysteamine bitartrate delayed-release capsules were administered twice daily following a dose-escalation design with a progressive weekly dose increase over the first 6 weeks. The starting dose was 0.2 g/m²/day, up to a maximum dose of 1.3 g/m²/day. Participants remained on their highest tolerated dose until Week 24.
Receives: Drug: Cysteamine Bitartrate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IV

    The NPMDS evaluates the progression of mitochondrial disease in pediatric patients in 4 domains:

    I - Current Function (vision, hearing, communication, feeding, and mobility) with scores ranging from 0 to 21; II -System Specific Involvement (seizures, encephalopathy, bleeding diathesis or coagulation defects, gastrointestinal, endocrine, respiratory, cardiovascular, renal, liver, and blood) with scores ranging from 0 to 30.

    III - Current Clinical Assessment (growth and development over past 6 months, vision, strabismus and eye movement, myopathy, ataxia, pyramidal, extrapyramidal, and neuropathy) with scores ranging from 0 to 28; and IV - Quality of Life with scores ranging from 0 to 25. For sections I-III, higher scores reflect more severe disease. For Section IV, a higher score reflects a lower quality of life.

    Measured: Baseline through Week 24

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Change From Baseline in Glutathione

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  2. Change From Baseline in Glutathione Disulfide

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Lactic Acid

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  4. Change From Baseline in 6 Minute Walk Test

    The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: Myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit.

    Myopathy was assessed using the 6 minute walk test, which measures the distance walked in a 6 minute walk test.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Jamar Dynamometer Hand Strength

    The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit.

    Myopathy was assessed using standard grip strength evaluation, which measures hand strength in both hands using a Jamar dynamometer.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  6. Change From Baseline in Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale Total Score

    The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit.

    Dystonia symptoms were assessed using the Barry-Albright Dystonia Scale for Dystonia. Participants were assessed for dystonia in each of the following regions: eyes, mouth, neck, trunk, and each upper and lower extremity (8 body regions) on a scale from 0 (absent) to 4 (severe symptoms). The individual scores were summed to calculate the total score which ranges from 0 (dystonia absent) to 32 (severe dystonia).

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  7. Change From Baseline in Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale

    The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit.

    Ataxia was assessed using the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS). FARS comprises a functional ataxia staging score of overall mobility (score 0 to 6), an assessment of the activities of daily living (ADL) (score 0 to 36) and a neurological assessment (score from 0 to 117) which is composed of bulbar (score 0-11), upper limb (score 0- 36) and lower limb (score 0-16), peripheral nerve (score 0-26) and upright stability/gait (score 0-28). The scores were summed to calculate the total score which ranges from 0 to 159. A higher score indicates a greater level of disability.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  8. Change From Baseline in Gross Motor Function

    The investigator selected the two most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms selected for each participant were then assessed at each subsequent study visit.

    Retarded motor development was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM)-88 which consists of 88 items scored on a scale of 0 to 3:

    0: Does not initiate the task;

    1. Initiates the task (completes < 10%);
    2. Partially completes the task (10 to 99%);
    3. Completes the task (100%).

    The 88 items are grouped into five dimensions: 1) lying and rolling, 2) sitting, 3) crawling and kneeling, 4) standing, and 5) walking, running and jumping. Scores are expressed as a percentage of the maximum score for that dimension. The total score is the average of the 5 the percentage scores where higher scores indicate better performance.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Modified Lansky Play Performance Scale

    The investigator selected the 2 most preeminent symptoms for each participant during the screening visit from the following: myopathy, dystonia, ataxia, retarded motor development, reduced activities of daily living, and vision. The 2 symptoms were assessed at each subsequent study visit.

    Reduced activities of daily living was assessed using the modified Lansky Play Performance Scale, completed by parents based on their child's activity in the past week, where 100=fully active; 90=minor restrictions in strenuous physical activity; 80=active, gets tired more quickly; 70=greater restriction of play, less time spent in play activity; 60=up and around, active play minimal; quieter activities; 50=lying around much of the day; no active playing, all quiet play and activities; 40=mainly in bed; quiet activities; 30=bedbound; needs assistance even for quiet play; 20=sleeps often; play limited to very passive activities; 10=doesn't play or get out of bed; 5=unresponsive 0=dead

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Dec 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2014
  3. Primary completionOct 2016
  4. Study completionOct 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
36 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02023866
Sponsor's protocol ID
RP103-MITO-001
Acronym
MITO-001
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
17 Dec 2013
Last updated
27 Dec 2024
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Bousquet M, Gibrat C, Ouellet M, Rouillard C, Calon F, Cicchetti F. Cystamine metabolism and brain transport properties: clinical implications for neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurochem. 2010 Sep;114(6):1651-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06874.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

    PubMed 20569301
  • Salmi H, Leonard JV, Rahman S, Lapatto R. Plasma thiol status is altered in children with mitochondrial diseases. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2012 Apr;72(2):152-7. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2011.646299. Epub 2012 Jan 2.

    PubMed 22208644
  • Maher P, Lewerenz J, Lozano C, Torres JL. A novel approach to enhancing cellular glutathione levels. J Neurochem. 2008 Nov;107(3):690-700. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05620.x. Epub 2008 Aug 12.

    PubMed 18702664
  • Mancuso M, Orsucci D, Logerfo A, Rocchi A, Petrozzi L, Nesti C, Galetta F, Santoro G, Murri L, Siciliano G. Oxidative stress biomarkers in mitochondrial myopathies, basally and after cysteine donor supplementation. J Neurol. 2010 May;257(5):774-81. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-5409-7. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

    PubMed 19960200

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Cysteamine Bitartrate in people with Inherited Mitochondrial Disease, Including Leigh Syndrome, run by Amgen at 5 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Newcastle Paediatric Mitochondrial Disease Scale (NPMDS) Sections I-IV (time frame: Baseline through Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02023866, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Dec 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in