Type II DiabetesPhase 4NCT02015910
Januvia (Sitagliptin) in Healing Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers
A Phase 4 study testing Sitagliptin in people with Type II Diabetes, run by Georgetown University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare the rate of healing as well as percent of wounds healed in Type II diabetic patients with chronic foot ulcerations receiving sitagliptin versus placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Type II Diabetes
- What is being tested?
- Sitagliptin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2014to Jan 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female age >18
- Type II Diabetes with glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1C) of < 11
- Currently on an oral hyperglycemic medication other than sitagliptin
- A chronic wound defined as the lack of wound healing progress of <15% per week or 50% over a month period
- Ankle brachial index of > 0.80
- Wound located on the foot or ankle (Wagner Grade 1,2)
- Able to comply with the requirements of the research trial
Who cannot join
- Current use of dipeptidyl-peptidase four (DPP-4) inhibitor or glucagon like peptide one (GLP-1)agonist
- End stage renal disease
- Currently enrolled in another research trial that involves treatment of the wound
- Active infection of the wound
- Wound that probes to bone with osteomyelitis (Wagner Grade 3)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Medstar Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Januvia (Sitagliptin) in Healing Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers
The primary objective of this study is to compare the rate of healing as well as percent of wounds healed in Type II diabetic patients with chronic foot ulcerations receiving sitagliptin versus placebo.
The hypothesis for this study is that subjects receiving daily doses of sitagliptin in combination with their regular antihyperglycemic medications will result in increased healing rates as well as a greater number of healed wounds as compared to subjects receiving placebo and their regular antihyperglycemic medications.
Read the detailed description
Diabetes and diabetes related complications are a major cost burden on the healthcare system encompassing 1/5 of the overall healthcare dollars in the United States [1]. Much of the costs are related to the treatment of lower extremity wounds in the diabetic patient which accounts for 60% of all nontraumatic amputations that are performed [2]. Amputation is often preceded by a chronic ulceration. The incidence of diabetic ulcers is approximately 6% over a 3 year period [1]. Diabetic foot ulcerations are particularly challenging to heal due to a host of factors including vascular compromise, peripheral neuropathy, and begin prone to infection. Therefore, strategies to heal these wounds as quickly as possible are of paramount importance.
Current strategies for chronic wound healing are limited to topical ointments/therapies, allografts/xenografts with or without cell impregnation, dressings, and wound healing devices. None of these current modalities have been shown to be clearly more effective than another [3,4]. Currently, oral medications have not been examined for healing of these chronic ulcerations. Particularly, antihyperglycemic medications have not been studied specifically for the purpose of wound healing. Glucose control and wound healing have been shown to be related [5-7]. However, it is thought that wound healing as a result of tighter glucose control is merely a global effect rather than a direct result of the medications utilized with no evidence that indicates that a specific antihyperglycemic medication works better than another. Further, the mechanism of how and why this relationship exists is not well understood. Specifically, how the microenvironment of the wound as evidenced by changes in the biomarkers has not been delineated.
Januvia (sitagliptin) is an FDA approved antihyperglycemic drug that inhibits the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), which is an enzyme that is responsible for the breakdown of glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). By blocking this effect, GLP-1 and GIP stimulates the secretion of insulin and suppresses the release of glucagon thereby normalizing blood glucose. The unique properties of this drug decrease the likelihood of hypoglycemia. Therefore, this drug is often used in combination of other antihyperglycemic medications to produce a synergistic effect.
DPP4 is expressed on the membranes of a variety of cell types as well as in soluble form, and cleaves the two N-terminal amino acids, X-ala or X-pro, from a limited number of peptide substrates, usually resulting in their inactivation. A family of DPP4 inhibitors, gliptins, have been shown to preserve the full-length active forms of GLP1 and GIP in patients with type II diabetes, enhancing antihyperglycemic activity. In addition to GLP1 and GIP, important substrates of DPP4 essential for wound healing, and altered in diabetes, include SDF-1α/β (stromal cell derived factor 1), PYY (peptide YY), NPY (neuropeptide Y), GM-CSF (granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor), G-CSF (granulocyte colony stimulating factor), and IL3 (interleukin 3) [8-12]. SDF, PYY, and NPY are all important for angiogenesis, while GM-CSF, G-CSF, and IL3 are necessary for leukocyte proliferation and infiltration in the wound bed. The observation that DPP4 can cleave and inactive all of these signaling molecules in vivo suggest that modulation of DPP4 activity will have a direct effect on wound healing.
The prospect that a daily oral medication that improves overall glucose control of a diabetic patient as well as expediting the wound healing process is profound. This study explores this possibility.
This is a prospective, randomized study examining the ability of sitagliptin in expediting the wound healing process in the diabetic patient with a chronic foot wound. This is a single center study of 250 total subjects randomized into 2 arms. It is projected that this study will take 3 years to complete. The two arms will be 1) Januvia (sitagliptin) 100mg q day* and 2) placebo-control q day. Patients with Type II diabetes with a chronic foot ulcer will be enrolled into this study. Each subject will be randomized into one of the two arms and will participate in the study for a maximum of 16 weeks. At the end of 16 weeks subjects will be exited from the study. If at any time during the course of the study the wound heals, the subject will be exited from the study after a 2-week confirmatory visit.
*For moderate renal failure subjects, the sitagliptin dose will be adjusted to 50mg q day.
- Conditions
- Type II Diabetes
- Being tested
- Sitagliptin, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SitagliptinDrug
Also called Januvia
Comparison of Sitagliptin a dipeptidyl-peptidase four (DPP-4) inhibitor 100mg pill with placebo comparator
PlaceboDrug
Sugar pill manufactured to mimick Sitagliptin 100mg pill.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Januvia (Sitagliptin) | Experimental | Sitagliptin 100 mg a day for 12 weeks Receives: Drug: Sitagliptin |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Placebo Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Wounds Healed
Compare the rate of healing as well as percent of wounds healed in Type II diabetic patients with chronic foot ulcerations receiving sitagliptin versus placebo.
Measured: 12 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2014
- Primary completionJan 2015
- Study completionJan 2015
Why it stopped: Terminated by the sponsor due to slow enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Type II DiabetesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Georgetown UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Georgetown University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Paul J. Kim, DPM, Georgetown University
- Investigators
- Paul J Kim, DPM, Principal investigator, Georgetown University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02015910
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MISP-RC50959
- Status last verified
- Nov 2016
- First submitted
- 13 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 6 Jan 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data was not collected for use in future research and will not be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Jan 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Januvia (Sitagliptin) in Healing Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02015910
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MISP-RC50959
- Conditions
- Type II Diabetes
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Terminated by the sponsor due to slow enrollment
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Georgetown UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
- Study start
- Jan 2014
- Primary completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jan 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to compare the rate of healing as well as percent of wounds healed in Type II diabetic patients with chronic foot ulcerations receiving sitagliptin versus placebo.
The hypothesis for this study is that subjects receiving daily doses of sitagliptin in combination with their regular antihyperglycemic medications will result in increased healing rates as well as a greater number of healed wounds as compared to subjects receiving placebo and their regular antihyperglycemic medications.
Detailed description
Diabetes and diabetes related complications are a major cost burden on the healthcare system encompassing 1/5 of the overall healthcare dollars in the United States [1]. Much of the costs are related to the treatment of lower extremity wounds in the diabetic patient which accounts for 60% of all nontraumatic amputations that are performed [2]. Amputation is often preceded by a chronic ulceration. The incidence of diabetic ulcers is approximately 6% over a 3 year period [1]. Diabetic foot ulcerations are particularly challenging to heal due to a host of factors including vascular compromise, peripheral neuropathy, and begin prone to infection. Therefore, strategies to heal these wounds as quickly as possible are of paramount importance.
Current strategies for chronic wound healing are limited to topical ointments/therapies, allografts/xenografts with or without cell impregnation, dressings, and wound healing devices. None of these current modalities have been shown to be clearly more effective than another [3,4]. Currently, oral medications have not been examined for healing of these chronic ulcerations. Particularly, antihyperglycemic medications have not been studied specifically for the purpose of wound healing. Glucose control and wound healing have been shown to be related [5-7]. However, it is thought that wound healing as a result of tighter glucose control is merely a global effect rather than a direct result of the medications utilized with no evidence that indicates that a specific antihyperglycemic medication works better than another. Further, the mechanism of how and why this relationship exists is not well understood. Specifically, how the microenvironment of the wound as evidenced by changes in the biomarkers has not been delineated.
Januvia (sitagliptin) is an FDA approved antihyperglycemic drug that inhibits the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), which is an enzyme that is responsible for the breakdown of glucagon-like peptide (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). By blocking this effect, GLP-1 and GIP stimulates the secretion of insulin and suppresses the release of glucagon thereby normalizing blood glucose. The unique properties of this drug decrease the likelihood of hypoglycemia. Therefore, this drug is often used in combination of other antihyperglycemic medications to produce a synergistic effect.
DPP4 is expressed on the membranes of a variety of cell types as well as in soluble form, and cleaves the two N-terminal amino acids, X-ala or X-pro, from a limited number of peptide substrates, usually resulting in their inactivation. A family of DPP4 inhibitors, gliptins, have been shown to preserve the full-length active forms of GLP1 and GIP in patients with type II diabetes, enhancing antihyperglycemic activity. In addition to GLP1 and GIP, important substrates of DPP4 essential for wound healing, and altered in diabetes, include SDF-1α/β (stromal cell derived factor 1), PYY (peptide YY), NPY (neuropeptide Y), GM-CSF (granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor), G-CSF (granulocyte colony stimulating factor), and IL3 (interleukin 3) [8-12]. SDF, PYY, and NPY are all important for angiogenesis, while GM-CSF, G-CSF, and IL3 are necessary for leukocyte proliferation and infiltration in the wound bed. The observation that DPP4 can cleave and inactive all of these signaling molecules in vivo suggest that modulation of DPP4 activity will have a direct effect on wound healing.
The prospect that a daily oral medication that improves overall glucose control of a diabetic patient as well as expediting the wound healing process is profound. This study explores this possibility.
This is a prospective, randomized study examining the ability of sitagliptin in expediting the wound healing process in the diabetic patient with a chronic foot wound. This is a single center study of 250 total subjects randomized into 2 arms. It is projected that this study will take 3 years to complete. The two arms will be 1) Januvia (sitagliptin) 100mg q day* and 2) placebo-control q day. Patients with Type II diabetes with a chronic foot ulcer will be enrolled into this study. Each subject will be randomized into one of the two arms and will participate in the study for a maximum of 16 weeks. At the end of 16 weeks subjects will be exited from the study. If at any time during the course of the study the wound heals, the subject will be exited from the study after a 2-week confirmatory visit.
*For moderate renal failure subjects, the sitagliptin dose will be adjusted to 50mg q day.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Januvia (Sitagliptin) | Experimental | Drug: SitagliptinSitagliptin 100 mg a day for 12 weeks |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboPlacebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Male or female age >18
- Type II Diabetes with glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1C) of < 11
- Currently on an oral hyperglycemic medication other than sitagliptin
- A chronic wound defined as the lack of wound healing progress of <15% per week or 50% over a month period
- Ankle brachial index of > 0.80
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Current use of dipeptidyl-peptidase four (DPP-4) inhibitor or glucagon like peptide one (GLP-1)agonist
- End stage renal disease
- Currently enrolled in another research trial that involves treatment of the wound
- Active infection of the wound
- Wound that probes to bone with osteomyelitis (Wagner Grade 3)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SitagliptinAlso: JanuviaComparison of Sitagliptin a dipeptidyl-peptidase four (DPP-4) inhibitor 100mg pill with placebo comparator | Drug | Januvia (Sitagliptin) |
| PlaceboSugar pill manufactured to mimick Sitagliptin 100mg pill. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Percent Wounds Healed
Time frame: 12 weeks
Compare the rate of healing as well as percent of wounds healed in Type II diabetic patients with chronic foot ulcerations receiving sitagliptin versus placebo.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Jan 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data was not collected for use in future research and will not be shared.
Related trials for Type II Diabetes
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly SHR-3167 Compared With Once-Daily Insulin Glargine in Adults With Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes
Type 2 Diabetes
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) in Obese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2D), Obesity (BMI>30)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul J Kim, DPM principal investigator
Georgetown University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Sitagliptin in people with Type II Diabetes, run by Georgetown University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Jan 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jan 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Wounds Healed (time frame: 12 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Jan 2017.