PONVPhase 3NCT01991821
European Phase III Study of APD421 in PONV
A Phase 3 study testing APD421 in people with PONV, run by Acacia Pharma Ltd at 2 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
A comparison of the efficacy of APD421 and placebo in the prevention of PONV in patients at moderate-to-high risk of PONV. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- PONV
- What is being tested?
- APD421
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 368 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to Jan 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
- Patients undergoing elective surgery (open or laparoscopic technique) under general anaesthesia, expected to last at least one hour from induction of anaesthesia to wound closure and expected to require at least one overnight stay in hospital
Who cannot join
- Patients scheduled for outpatient/day case surgery
- Patients scheduled to undergo intra-thoracic, transplant or central nervous system surgery
- Patients scheduled to receive only a local anaesthetic/regional neuraxial (intrathecal or epidural) block
- Patients who are expected to remain ventilated for a period after surgery
- Patients who are expected to need a naso- or orogastric tube in situ after surgery is completed
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 2 countries.
2 sites in 2 countries
About this study
Official title: Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of APD421 (Amisulpride for IV Injection) as Prophylaxis Against Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting
A comparison of the efficacy of APD421 and placebo in the prevention of PONV in patients at moderate-to-high risk of PONV.
- Conditions
- PONV
- Being tested
- APD421, Placebo
- Medical subject headings
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
APD421Drug
PlaceboDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| APD421 | Experimental | IV APD421 single dose Receives: Drug: APD421 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | IV placebo single dose Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Complete Response (no Emesis, Significant Nausea or Rescue Medication)
The primary efficacy analysis was a comparison of the incidence of Complete Response (absence of PONV1) in the 0-24-hour period after surgery, between the active treatment group and the placebo group using Pearson square test with Yates's continuity correction at a two-sided significance level of 5%.
Measured: 24 hours after end of surgery
Secondary outcomes (6)
Complete Response (no Emesis or Rescue Medication)
Measured: 24 hrs after end of surgery
Total Response (no Emesis, Nausea or Rescue Medication)
Measured: 24 hrs after end of surgery
Incidence of Emesis (Vomiting/Retching)
An assessment of a participant experiencing an episode of emesis (vomiting/ retching) or received anti-emetic rescue medication during the 24hours after the completion of the surgery
Measured: 24 hours after end of surgeryry
Incidence of Nausea
Count of patients experiencing an episode of nausea scored ≥ 1 of 0-10 verbal response scale during the 24 hours period after the completion of surgery
Measured: 24 hours after end of surgery
Incidence of Significant Nausea
Count of participants with nausea score ≥ 4 on 0-10 verbal response scale
Measured: 24 hours after end of surgery
Use of Rescue Medication
Measured: 24 hours after end of surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionJan 2014
- Study completionJan 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PONVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 368 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Acacia Pharma Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pierre Diemunsch, MD, Principal investigator, Hôpital de Hautepierre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01991821
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DP10014
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 11 Nov 2013
- Last updated
- 20 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Study of APD421 (Amisulpride for IV Injection) as Prophylaxis Against Post-operative Nausea and Vomiting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01991821
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DP10014
- Conditions
- PONV
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 368 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Acacia Pharma LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2013
- Primary completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 25 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 2 Aug 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A comparison of the efficacy of APD421 and placebo in the prevention of PONV in patients at moderate-to-high risk of PONV.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| APD421 | Experimental | Drug: APD421IV APD421 single dose |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboIV placebo single dose |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
- Patients undergoing elective surgery (open or laparoscopic technique) under general anaesthesia, expected to last at least one hour from induction of anaesthesia to wound closure and expected to require at least one overnight stay in hospital
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients scheduled for outpatient/day case surgery
- Patients scheduled to undergo intra-thoracic, transplant or central nervous system surgery
- Patients scheduled to receive only a local anaesthetic/regional neuraxial (intrathecal or epidural) block
- Patients who are expected to remain ventilated for a period after surgery
- Patients who are expected to need a naso- or orogastric tube in situ after surgery is completed
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| APD421 | Drug | APD421 |
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Complete Response (no Emesis, Significant Nausea or Rescue Medication)
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
The primary efficacy analysis was a comparison of the incidence of Complete Response (absence of PONV1) in the 0-24-hour period after surgery, between the active treatment group and the placebo group using Pearson square test with Yates's continuity correction at a two-sided significance level of 5%.
6 secondary outcomes
Complete Response (no Emesis or Rescue Medication)
Time frame: 24 hrs after end of surgery
Total Response (no Emesis, Nausea or Rescue Medication)
Time frame: 24 hrs after end of surgery
Incidence of Emesis (Vomiting/Retching)
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgeryry
Incidence of Nausea
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
Incidence of Significant Nausea
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
Use of Rescue Medication
Time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Aug 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for PONV
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Volume and PONV in Pediatric Appendectomy Cases
Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Not yet recruiting
Amisulpride Injection for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
PONV
Not yet recruiting
Binaural Beats and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Active, not recruiting
Advancing Strategies to Optimize the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting (ASPIRE-PONV) Trial
Postoperative Nausea, Postoperative Vomiting
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Different Anesthetic Sedatives on PONV in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pierre Diemunsch, MD principal investigator
Hôpital de Hautepierre
2 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing APD421 in people with PONV, run by Acacia Pharma Ltd at 2 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in France, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 2 Aug 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Complete Response (no Emesis, Significant Nausea or Rescue Medication) (time frame: 24 hours after end of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2019.