Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial InfectionsPhase 3NCT01984684
Delafloxacin vs Vancomycin and Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections
A Phase 3 study testing delafloxacin, vancomycin and aztreonam in people with Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections and Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections, run by Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. at 94 sites in 16 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Delafloxacin versus Vancomycin plus Aztreonam in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections, Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections
- What is being tested?
- delafloxacin, vancomycin and aztreonam
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 850 participants
- Where
- 94 sitesin 16 countries
- Study dates
- May 2014to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult (≥ 18 years of age) men or women with a diagnosis of ABSSSI (cellulitis/erysipelas, wound infection, major cutaneous abscess, or burn infection) with surrounding redness of a minimum surface area of 75 cm^2 and at least two signs of systemic infection
- In the opinion of the investigator, the subject must require and be a suitable candidate for IV antibiotic therapy, and the subject must be able and willing to comply with protocol requirements
Who cannot join
- A medical history of significant hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to quinolones, beta-lactams, vancomycin, or vancomycin derivatives according to the judgment of the investigator.
- Women who are pregnant or lactating.
- Any chronic or underlying skin condition at the site of infection that may complicate the assessment of response, including infection involving a prosthetic joint, human or animal bite, osteomyelitis, decubitus ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer, septic arthritis, mediastinitis, necrotizing fasciitis, anaerobic cellulitis, or synergistic necrotizing cellulitis, myositis, tendinitis, endocarditis, sustained shock, gangrene or gas gangrene; burns covering ≥10% of body surface area; severely compromised immune system, severely impaired arterial blood supply to an extremity with an ABSSSI, deep vein thrombosis or superficial thrombophlebitis, and requiring either an amputation or multiple debridement procedures.
- Receipt of systemic antibiotic therapy in the 14 days before enrollment unless 1 of the following was documented:
- Received ≥ 48 hours of antibiotic therapy for ABSSSI AND clinical progression is documented (i.e., not by patient history alone).
- Recently (within 14 days) completed a treatment course with an antibacterial drug for an infection other than ABSSSI and the drug does not have activity against bacterial pathogens that cause ABSSSI.
- Received only 1 dose of either a single, potentially effective, short-acting antimicrobial drug or drug regimen for ABSSSI.
- Any underlying disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the subject's ability to participate in the study including severe cardiac disease, known history of liver disease, end-stage renal disease, malignancy, psychiatric disorder, ongoing treatment for seizures or untreated history of seizures, or life expectancy of < 3 months.
Trial locations and contacts
94 sites in 16 countries.
94 sites in 16 countries
United States31 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Anaheim, California
Melinta 303 Study Site
Butte, Montana
Melinta 303 Study Site
Channelview, Texas, 77530
Melinta 303 Study Site
Chula Vista, California, 91911
Melinta 303 Study Site
Columbus, Georgia, 31904
Melinta 303 Study Site
Columbus, Ohio
Melinta 303 Study Site
DeLand, Florida
Melinta 303 Study Site
Eunice, Louisiana, 70535
Melinta 303 Study Site
Houston, Texas, 77024
Melinta 303 Study Site
Jackson, Tennessee
Melinta 303 Study Site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Melinta 303 Study Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89109
Melinta 303 Study Site
Lincoln, Nebraska
Melinta 303 Study Site
Long Beach, California
Melinta 303 Study Site
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55422
Melinta 303 Study Site
Mobile, Alabama, 36607
Melinta 303 Study Site
Modesto, California
Melinta 303 Study Site
Montgomery, Alabama
Melinta 303 Study Site
Oceanside, California, 92056
Melinta 303 Study Site
Orlando, Florida
Melinta 303 Study Site
Rapid City, South Dakota
Melinta 303 Study Site
San Antonio, Texas
Melinta 303 Study Site
San Diego, California, 92114
Melinta 303 Study Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31405
Melinta 303 Study Site
Smyrna, Tennessee
Melinta 303 Study Site
Somers Point, New Jersey, 08244
Melinta 303 Study Site
Springfield, Massachusetts
Melinta 303 Study Site
Stockton, California
Melinta 303 Study Site
Teaneck, New Jersey
Melinta 303 Study Site
Toledo, Ohio
Melinta 303 Study Site
Torrance, California, 90509
South Korea8 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Ansan, Gyeonggido
Melinta 303 Study Site
Daegu
Melinta 303 Study Site
Daejeon
Melinta 303 Study Site
Goyang, Gyeonggido
Melinta 303 Study Site
Gwangju
Melinta 303 Study Site
Incheon
Melinta 303 Study Site
Seoul
Melinta 303 Study Site
Wŏnju, Gang'weondo
Brazil7 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais
Melinta 303 Study Site
Campinas, São Paulo
Melinta 303 Study Site
Lavras, Minas Gerais
Melinta 303 Study Site
Passo Fundo, Rio Grande do Sul
Melinta 303 Study Site
Salvador, Estado de Bahia
Melinta 303 Study Site
São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo
Melinta 303 Study Site
São Paulo
Taiwan6 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Kaohsiung City
Melinta 303 Study Site
New Taipei City
Melinta 303 Study Site
Taichung
Melinta 303 Study Site
Tainan
Melinta 303 Study Site
Taipei
Melinta 303 Study Site
Zhonghe
Bulgaria5 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Pleven
Melinta 303 Study Site
Plovdiv
Melinta 303 Study Site
Rousse
Melinta 303 Study Site
Sofia
Melinta 303 Study Site
Varna
Hungary5 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Kaposvár
Melinta 303 Study Site
Kecskemét
Melinta 303 Study Site
Nyíregyháza
Melinta 303 Study Site
Szeged
Melinta 303 Study Site
Veszprém
Romania5 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Bucharest
Melinta 303 Study Site
Cluj-Napoca, Cluj
Melinta 303 Study Site
Craiova, Dolj
Melinta 303 Study Site
Târgu Mureş
Melinta 303 Study Site
Timișoara, Timiș County
Argentina4 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Córdoba
Melinta 303 Study Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires
Melinta 303 Study Site
Rosario, Santa Fe Province
Melinta 303 Study Site
Santa Fe
Estonia4 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Kohtla-Järve
Melinta 303 Study Site
Tallinn
Melinta 303 Study Site
Tartu
Melinta 303 Study Site
Võru
Georgia4 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Batumi
Melinta 303 Study Site
Kutaisi
Melinta 303 Study Site
Tbilisi
Melinta 303 Study Site
Zugdidi
Latvia4 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Daugavpils
Melinta 303 Study Site
Liepāja
Melinta 303 Study Site
Rēzekne
Melinta 303 Study Site
Riga
Peru4 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Cusco
Melinta 303 Study Site
Lima
Melinta 303 Study Site
Loreto
Melinta 303 Study Site
Trujillo, La Libertad
Mexico2 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Guadalajara, Jalisco
Melinta 303 Study Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León
Slovakia2 sites
Melinta 303 Study Site
Banská Bystrica
Melinta 303 Study Site
Prešov
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy + Safety of IV + Oral Delafloxacin Compared With Vancomycin + Aztreonam in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Delafloxacin versus Vancomycin plus Aztreonam in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine if delafloxacin, an investigational drug, is safe and effective in the treatment of skin and nearby tissue infections compared with a combination of other antibiotics, vancomycin and aztreonam.
- Conditions
- Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections, Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections
- Being tested
- delafloxacin, vancomycin, aztreonam
- Keywords
- Bacterial skin infection, infection, skin, delafloxacin, vancomycin, aztreonam, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria, bacterial infection, Anti-Infective Agents
- Medical subject headings
- Soft Tissue Infections, Skin Diseases, Bacterial, Infections, Bacterial Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
delafloxacinDrug
Also called RX-3341
vancomycinDrug
aztreonamDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Delafloxacin | Experimental | Delafloxacin 300 mg IV Q12H for 6 doses, then Delafloxacin 450 mg oral tablet Q12H for a minimum of 10 up to a maximum of 28 doses total Receives: Drug: delafloxacin |
| Vancomycin plus Aztreonam | Active comparator | Vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV plus two grams Aztreonam every 12 hours for a minimum of 10 up to a maximum of 28 doses total (Aztreonam was discontinued as soon as possible if a gram-negative organism was not identified in baseline cultures) Receives: Drug: vancomycin; Drug: aztreonam |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Objective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge.
A patient was considered a responder if s/he had a ≥20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI, as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge and had none of the reasons for clinical failure; a patient was considered a non-responder (failure) if s/he had <20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge, or had major intervention such as another antibiotic or surgical intervention or died within 74 hours after initiation of study drug.
Measured: 48 to 72 hrs after starting treatment
Secondary outcomes (2)
Investigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)
A patient was considered a Cure if all baseline signs and symptoms of ABSSSI had resolved; if some symptoms remained, but the patient was improved to the extent that no additional antibiotic treatment was necessary, the response was Improved. A patient was considered a Failure for any of the following reasons: nonstudy antibacterial drug therapy was required because of lack of efficacy after at least 4 doses of study drug or for a treatment-related AE; study antibacterial drug therapy was required for longer than 28 doses; and/or unplanned surgical intervention was needed after study entry except for limited bedside debridement and standard wound care. Improved and Indeterminate responses were considered failures in the primary analysis.
A sensitivity analysis was also performed, in which the assigned responses were Success (Cure + Improved) or Failure (Failure + Indeterminate/Missing).
Measured: Study Day 14 ± 1
Investigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up Visit
A patient was considered a Cure if all baseline signs and symptoms of ABSSSI had resolved; if some symptoms remained, but the patient was improved to the extent that no additional antibiotic treatment was necessary, the response was Improved. A patient was considered a Failure for any of the following reasons: nonstudy antibacterial drug therapy was required because of lack of efficacy after at least 4 doses of study drug or for a treatment-related AE; study antibacterial drug therapy was required for longer than 28 doses; and/or unplanned surgical intervention was needed after study entry except for limited bedside debridement and standard wound care. Improved and Indeterminate responses were considered failures in the primary analysis.
A sensitivity analysis was also performed, in which the assigned responses were Success (Cure + Improved) or Failure (Failure + Indeterminate/Missing).
Measured: Study Day 21 to 28
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2014
- Primary completionDec 2015
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial InfectionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 850 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Sue K Cammarata, MD, Study director, Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01984684
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RX-3341-303
- Status last verified
- Nov 2017
- First submitted
- 8 Nov 2013
- Last updated
- 17 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lodise T, Corey R, Hooper D, Cammarata S. Safety of Delafloxacin: Focus on Adverse Events of Special Interest. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 10;5(10):ofy220. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy220. eCollection 2018 Oct.
PubMed 30349845O'Riordan W, McManus A, Teras J, Poromanski I, Cruz-Saldariagga M, Quintas M, Lawrence L, Liang S, Cammarata S; PROCEED Study Group. A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):657-666. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy165.
PubMed 29518178McCurdy S, Lawrence L, Quintas M, Woosley L, Flamm R, Tseng C, Cammarata S. In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin and Microbiological Response against Fluoroquinolone-Susceptible and Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Two Phase 3 Studies of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9):e00772-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00772-17. Print 2017 Sep.
PubMed 28630189
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Active Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy + Safety of IV + Oral Delafloxacin Compared With Vancomycin + Aztreonam in Patients With Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01984684
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RX-3341-303
- Conditions
- Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections, Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections
- Keywords
- Bacterial skin infection, infection, skin, delafloxacin, vancomycin, aztreonam, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteria, bacterial infection
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 850 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- May 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Aug 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of Delafloxacin versus Vancomycin plus Aztreonam in the treatment of patients with acute bacterial skin and soft tissue infections.
Detailed description
The purpose of this study is to determine if delafloxacin, an investigational drug, is safe and effective in the treatment of skin and nearby tissue infections compared with a combination of other antibiotics, vancomycin and aztreonam.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Delafloxacin | Experimental | Drug: delafloxacinDelafloxacin 300 mg IV Q12H for 6 doses, then Delafloxacin 450 mg oral tablet Q12H for a minimum of 10 up to a maximum of 28 doses total |
| Vancomycin plus Aztreonam | Active comparator | Drug: vancomycin, Drug: aztreonamVancomycin 15 mg/kg IV plus two grams Aztreonam every 12 hours for a minimum of 10 up to a maximum of 28 doses total (Aztreonam was discontinued as soon as possible if a gram-negative organism was not identified in baseline cultures) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult (≥ 18 years of age) men or women with a diagnosis of ABSSSI (cellulitis/erysipelas, wound infection, major cutaneous abscess, or burn infection) with surrounding redness of a minimum surface area of 75 cm^2 and at least two signs of systemic infection
- In the opinion of the investigator, the subject must require and be a suitable candidate for IV antibiotic therapy, and the subject must be able and willing to comply with protocol requirements
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- A medical history of significant hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to quinolones, beta-lactams, vancomycin, or vancomycin derivatives according to the judgment of the investigator.
- Women who are pregnant or lactating.
- Any chronic or underlying skin condition at the site of infection that may complicate the assessment of response, including infection involving a prosthetic joint, human or animal bite, osteomyelitis, decubitus ulcer, diabetic foot ulcer, septic arthritis, mediastinitis, necrotizing fasciitis, anaerobic cellulitis, or synergistic necrotizing cellulitis, myositis, tendinitis, endocarditis, sustained shock, gangrene or gas gangrene; burns covering ≥10% of body surface area; severely compromised immune system, severely impaired arterial blood supply to an extremity with an ABSSSI, deep vein thrombosis or superficial thrombophlebitis, and requiring either an amputation or multiple debridement procedures.
- Receipt of systemic antibiotic therapy in the 14 days before enrollment unless 1 of the following was documented:
- Any underlying disease that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the subject's ability to participate in the study including severe cardiac disease, known history of liver disease, end-stage renal disease, malignancy, psychiatric disorder, ongoing treatment for seizures or untreated history of seizures, or life expectancy of < 3 months.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| delafloxacinAlso: RX-3341 | Drug | Delafloxacin |
| vancomycin | Drug | Vancomycin plus Aztreonam |
| aztreonam | Drug | Vancomycin plus Aztreonam |
Primary outcome
Objective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge.
Time frame: 48 to 72 hrs after starting treatment
A patient was considered a responder if s/he had a ≥20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI, as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge and had none of the reasons for clinical failure; a patient was considered a non-responder (failure) if s/he had <20% reduction in size of the area of erythema associated with the baseline ABSSSI as determined by digital planimetry of the leading edge, or had major intervention such as another antibiotic or surgical intervention or died within 74 hours after initiation of study drug.
2 secondary outcomes
Investigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Follow up Visit (European Medicines Agency [EMA] Primary Endpoint)
Time frame: Study Day 14 ± 1
Investigator-assessed Response of Signs and Symptoms of Infection at the Late Follow-up Visit
Time frame: Study Day 21 to 28
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Nov 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30349845Lodise T, Corey R, Hooper D, Cammarata S. Safety of Delafloxacin: Focus on Adverse Events of Special Interest. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Sep 10;5(10):ofy220. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy220. eCollection 2018 Oct.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29518178O'Riordan W, McManus A, Teras J, Poromanski I, Cruz-Saldariagga M, Quintas M, Lawrence L, Liang S, Cammarata S; PROCEED Study Group. A Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Delafloxacin With Vancomycin Plus Aztreonam for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections: A Phase 3, Multinational, Double-Blind, Randomized Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2018 Aug 16;67(5):657-666. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy165.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28630189McCurdy S, Lawrence L, Quintas M, Woosley L, Flamm R, Tseng C, Cammarata S. In Vitro Activity of Delafloxacin and Microbiological Response against Fluoroquinolone-Susceptible and Nonsusceptible Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Two Phase 3 Studies of Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017 Aug 24;61(9):e00772-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00772-17. Print 2017 Sep.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Investigate Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Subcutaneous Anifrolumab in Pediatric Participants 5 to < 18 Years of Age With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Siplizumab in the Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa.
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Enrolling by invitationPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Long-term Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of Subcutaneous Sonelokimab in Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
An Open-label, Single-arm Study to Evaluate Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Subcutaneous Sonelokimab in Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa (VELA-TEEN)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study to Assess Disease Activity and Safety of Subcutaneous Lutikizumab (ABT-981) in Adult Participants With Moderate to Severe Hidradenitis Suppurativa Who Have Failed Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Therapy and Who Are Naïve to Biologic Therapy
Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sue K Cammarata, MD study director
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.
94 sites in 16 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing delafloxacin, vancomycin and aztreonam in people with Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Bacterial Infections and Skin Structures and Soft Tissue Infections, run by Melinta Therapeutics, Inc. at 94 sites in 16 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 94 sites in United States, South Korea, Brazil, Taiwan, Bulgaria and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Aug 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Objective Response of ≥20% Reduction in Lesion Erythema Area Compared to Baseline at 48 to 72 Hours After Initiation of Treatment as Determined by Digital Measurements of the Leading Edge. (time frame: 48 to 72 hrs after starting treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01984684, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2017.