AzTrials
AzTrials

AstigmatismNCT01965288

Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism

A study testing comfilcon A and lotrafilcon B in people with Astigmatism, run by CooperVision, Inc. at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the Biofinity Toric (comfilcon A) contact lens, versus Air Optix for Astigmatism (lotrafilcon B) over 1 month of daily wear. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 40 years
Conditions the study is for
Astigmatism
What is being tested?
comfilcon A and lotrafilcon B
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Sep 2013to May 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • A person is eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she:
  • Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
  • Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
  • Is an adapted soft toric contact lens wearer
  • Has a contact lens spherical prescription between +6.00 to - 10.00 (inclusive)
  • Have no less than 0.75diopter (D) of astigmatism and no more than 2.25D in both eyes.
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Can achieve best corrected spectacle distance visual acuity of 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) or better in each eye.
  • Can achieve a distance visual acuity of 20/30 (0.18 logMAR) or better in each eye with the study contact lenses.
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
  • Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter.
  • Patient contact lens refraction should fit within the available parameters of the study lenses.
  • Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 5 days per week, > 8 hours/day assuming there are no contraindications for doing so).
  • Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

Who cannot join

  • A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
  • Has a contact lens prescription outside the range of the available parameters of the study lenses.
  • Has a spectacle cylinder less than -0.75D or more than -2.25 D of cylinder in either eye.
  • Has a history of not achieving comfortable contact lens wear (5 days per week; > 8 hours/day)
  • Has contact lens best corrected distance vision worse than 20/25 (0.10 logMAR) in either eye.
  • Presence of clinically significant (grade 2-4) anterior segment abnormalities
Show all 21Show fewer
  • Presence of ocular or systemic disease or need of medications which might interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Slit lamp findings that would contraindicate contact lens wear such as:
  • Pathological dry eye or associated findings
  • Pterygium, pinguecula, or corneal scars within the visual axis
  • Neovascularization > 0.75 mm in from of the limbus
  • Giant papillary conjunctivitis (GCP) worse than grade 1
  • Anterior uveitis or iritis (past or present)
  • Seborrheic eczema, Seborrheic conjunctivitis
  • History of corneal ulcers or fungal infections
  • Poor personal hygiene
  • Has a known history of corneal hypoesthesia (reduced corneal sensitivity)
  • Has aphakia, keratoconus or a highly irregular cornea.
  • Has Presbyopia or has dependence on spectacles for near work over the contact lenses.
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
  • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Optometry Research Group (GIO) - Optics Department, University of Valencia

    Valencia

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Single-Center Study Comparing the Clinical Performance of Biofinity Toric Versus Air Optix for Astigmatism Over 1 Month of Daily Wear.

The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of the Biofinity Toric (comfilcon A) contact lens, versus Air Optix for Astigmatism (lotrafilcon B) over 1 month of daily wear.

Read the detailed description

Single masked, open label, randomized, bilateral, crossover study design comparing comfilcon A against lotrafilcon B lenses over 1 month of daily wear for each study lens. Each subject will be randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.

Conditions
Astigmatism
Being tested
comfilcon A, lotrafilcon B
Medical subject headings
Astigmatism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • comfilcon ADevice

    Also called Biofinity Toric

    test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)

  • lotrafilcon BDevice

    Also called Air Optix

    test lens Pair(comfilcon A) or the control lens Pair(lotrafilcon B)

Study groups in NCT01965288
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
comfilcon AExperimentalEach subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
Receives: Device: comfilcon A; Device: lotrafilcon B
lotrafilcon BActive comparatorEach subject randomized to wear the test lens (comfilcon A) or the control lens (lotrafilcon B) for one month of daily wear before repeating the schedule for the second pair without a washout period.
Receives: Device: comfilcon A; Device: lotrafilcon B

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time

    Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction

    Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)

    Measured: Baseline

  3. Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day

    Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)

    Measured: Baseline

  4. Vision Stability Insertion, During Day, End Day

    Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Overall Sensation of Moistness

    Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)

    Measured: Baseline

  6. Overall Sensation of Smoothness

    Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average)

    Measured: Baseline

  7. Comfort Satisfaction

    Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Dryness Satisfaction

    Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: Baseline

  9. Handling Satisfaction

    Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: Baseline

  10. Lens Fit Satisfaction

    Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Vision Satisfaction

    Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: Baseline

  12. Overall Satisfaction

    Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at baseline for all habitual lenses. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: Baseline

  13. Comfort Upon Contact Lens Insertion

    Participant rating of comfort upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10=Can't Feel)

    Measured: Dispense

  14. Vision Satisfaction Upon Contact Lens Insertion

    Participant rating of vision satisfaction upon insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-10; 10= Very Satisfied)

    Measured: Dispense

  15. Vision Quality With Contact Lens Prescription

    Participant rating of Vision Quality with contact lens prescription. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)

    Measured: Dispense

  16. Vision Stability Upon Contact Lens Insertion

    Participant rating of vision stability on insertion. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)

    Measured: Dispense

  17. Visual Acuity logMAR

    Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at dispense for each lens. logMAR (VA).

    Measured: Dispense

  18. Centration

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Biomicroscopy; centered or slightly decentered)

    Measured: Dispense

  19. Corneal Coverage

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at dispense for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)

    Measured: Dispense

  20. Post Blink Movement

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at dispense for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)

    Measured: Dispense

  21. Lens Orientation Primary Gaze

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)

    Measured: Dispense

  22. Lens Marking Visibility

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at dispense for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)

    Measured: Dispense

  23. Lens Stability on Blink

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at dispense for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)

    Measured: Dispense

  24. Lens Stability 5-10 Min

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min)

    Measured: Dispense

  25. Lens Overall Stability

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at dispense for each lens. (Excellent or Good)

    Measured: Dispense

  26. Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at dispense for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)

    Measured: Dispense

  27. Overall Fit Acceptance

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at dispense for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

    Measured: Dispense

  28. Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time

    Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  29. Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time

    Participant rating of lens Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (The hours of average comfortable wearing time and average daily wearing time.)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  30. Participants Use of Rewetting Drops

    Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  31. Participants Use of Rewetting Drops

    Proportion of subjects using rewetting drops. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Yes, No)

    Measured: 4 Weeks

  32. Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction

    Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  33. Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability, Vision Satisfaction

    Participant rating of lens Comfort, Dryness, Handling, Lens Fit Stability and Vision Satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-10; Comfort, Lens Fit and Satisfaction / 0=very poor,10=excellent; Dryness / 0=very dry, 10=no dryness; Handling / 0=very difficult, 10=very easy for handling)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  34. Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night

    Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  35. Vision Quality Insertion, During Day, End Day, Night

    Participant rating of vision quality on insertion, during the day, end of day and night. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=extremely poor vision totally blurred, 100=excellent vision totally sharp)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  36. Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day

    Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  37. Vision Stability on Insertion, During Day, End Day

    Participant rating of vision stability on insertion, during the day, end of day. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (0-100; 0=totally unstable fluctuating/changing, 100=perfectly stable not fluctuating/changing)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  38. Overall Sensation of Moistness

    Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  39. Overall Sensation of Moistness

    Participant rating for overall sensation of moistness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  40. Overall Sensation of Smoothness

    Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  41. Overall Sensation of Smoothness

    Participant rating for overall sensation of smoothness. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (5-point Likert Scale; Excellent, Good, Average, Below Average, Poor)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  42. Comfort Satisfaction

    Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  43. Comfort Satisfaction

    Participant rating for comfort satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  44. Dryness Satisfaction

    Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  45. Dryness Satisfaction

    Participant rating for dryness satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  46. Handling Satisfaction

    Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  47. Handling Satisfaction

    Participant rating for handling satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  48. Vision Satisfaction

    Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  49. Vision Satisfaction

    Participant rating for vision satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  50. Lens Fit Satisfaction

    Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  51. Lens Fit Satisfaction

    Participant rating for lens fit satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  52. Overall Satisfaction

    Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  53. Overall Satisfaction

    Participant rating for overall satisfaction. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (4-point Likert Scale; Completely Satisfied, Somewhat Satisfied, Somewhat Dissatisfied, Completely Dissatisfied)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  54. Wavefront Aberrations Root Mean Square (RMS) (3mm)

    Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  55. Wavefront Aberrations RMS (3mm)

    Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (3mm), Scale in microns (µm).

    Measured: 4 Weeks

  56. Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)

    Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  57. Wavefront Aberrations RMS (5mm)

    Assessment of wavefront aberrations. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Wavefront measurement (5 mm), Scale in microns (µm).

    Measured: 4 Weeks

  58. Visual Acuity logMAR

    Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA).

    Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)

    Measured: 2 Weeks

  59. Visual Acuity logMAR

    Assessment of monocular and binocular high and low contrast visual acuity (VA). Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. logMAR (VA).

    Monocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (MHCVA), Monocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (MLCVA), Binocular High Contrast Visual Acuity (BHCVA), Binocular Low Contrast Visual Acuity (BLCVA)

    Measured: 4 Weeks

  60. Lens Orientation Primary Gaze

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  61. Lens Orientation Primary Gaze

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens orientation in primary position of gaze. Assessed at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Degree of mislocation relative to lens axis mark.)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  62. Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  63. Rotational Recovery 30/45 Deg

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational recovery to original position. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. Assessed in degree of mislocation relative to original position after manual temporal rotation. (30 deg/10 blinks, 45 deg/60 sec)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  64. Lens Surface Deposits

    Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 2 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  65. Lens Surface Deposits

    Assessment of lens front surface deposits. Collected at 4 weeks wear for each lens. (Front surface deposits observed, 0-4, 0=clean, 4=deposits ≥0.5)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  66. Centration

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  67. Centration

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for centration. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Proportion of contact lenses fitted where centration was centered or slightly decentered. (Biomicroscopy)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  68. Corneal Coverage

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 2 weks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  69. Corneal Coverage

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for corneal coverage. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Corneal coverage assessed in primary gaze: (yes=full corneal coverage at all times, no=incomplete corneal coverage)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  70. Post Blink Movement

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  71. Post Blink Movement

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for post blink movement. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (0-4, 0.5 increments; 0=Insufficient, unacceptable movement, 4= Excessive, unacceptable movement)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  72. Lens Marking Visibility

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  73. Lens Marking Visibility

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens marking visibility. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (1-3, 1=excellent, 2=average, 3=poor)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  74. Lens Stability on Blink

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  75. Lens Stability on Blink

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens rotational stability on blink. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (No rotation and 5-10 degrees rotation from axis location mark)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  76. Lens Stability 5-10 Min

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.

    Measured: 2 weeks

  77. Lens Stability 5-10 Min

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for lens to stabilize in 5-10 min. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Varied less than 5 degrees from lens marking location between 5-10 min.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  78. Overall Stability

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.

    Measured: 2 weeks

  79. Overall Stability

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens stability. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. (Excellent or Good.

    Measured: 4 weeks

  80. Overall Fit Acceptance

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 2 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  81. Overall Fit Acceptance

    Assessment of Lens Fit Performance for overall lens fit acceptance. Collected at 4 weeks for each lens. Rated perfect or not perfect based on lens fit alone. (0-4; 0=should not be worn, 3=not perfect but OK to dispense, 4=perfect)

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (28)
  1. Limbal Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Limbal Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  3. Limbal Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  4. Bulbar Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Bulbar Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  6. Bulbar Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  7. Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: Baseline

  8. Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  9. Lower Palpebral Hyperaemia

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  10. Corneal Stromal Haze

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: Baseline

  11. Corneal Stromal Haze

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  12. Corneal Stromal Haze

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  13. Corneal Neovascularization

    Investigators' objective assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: Baseline

  14. Corneal Neovascularization

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  15. Corneal Neovascularization

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  16. Corneal Infiltrates

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at baseline after removal of habitual lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: Baseline

  17. Corneal Infiltrates

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 2 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  18. Corneal Infiltrates

    Assessment of ocular health. Collected at 4 weeks after removal of lenses. Proportion of eyes with grades 0-1 (No eyes graded >1) (Biomicroscopy, 0-4, ½ grades; 0=none: no injection present, 4=severe)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  19. Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)

    Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  20. Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)

    Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last two weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)

    Measured: 2 weeks

  21. Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Lotrafilcon B)

    Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  22. Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or the First Study Lenses (Comfilcon A)

    Participant preference for their habitual lenses or the first study lenses during the last four weeks with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall. (Forced choice; habitual, study lenses)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  23. Participants Likelihood of Switching From Habitual Lenses to the Study Lenses

    Participants likelihood of switching from habitual lenses to either pair of the study lenses when asked; How likely are they to switch from their habitual lenses to either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks for each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  24. Participants Likelihood of Continuing to Wear the Study Lenses.

    Participants likelihood of continuing to wear either of the pairs of study lenses when asked; "How likely are they to continue to wearing either the first study lenses or the second study lenses?" Collected at 4 weeks fore each study pair. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)

    Measured: 4 weeks

  25. Participant Recommendation of a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues

    Percentage of participants that answer the question, "What study lens they will most likely recommend to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at end of study. (Forced choice; First Study Lenses, Second Study Lenses)

    Measured: 8 weeks

  26. Participant Likelihood of Recommending a Study Lens to Friends, Family or Colleagues.

    Percentage of participants that answer the question, "How likely are they to recommend either the first pair of study lenses or the second pair of study lenses to friends, family or colleagues?" Collected at study end. (4 point Likert scale; very likely, likely, unlikely, very unlikely)

    Measured: 8 weeks

  27. Participant Preference for Their Habitual Lenses or Either of the Study Lenses

    Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; habitual lenses, first study lenses, second study lenses)

    Measured: 8 weeks

  28. Participant Preference for Either of the Study Lenses

    Percentage of participants that answer the question, "Which type of study lens they prefer with regard to comfort, dryness, handling, vision, lens fit and overall performance?" Collected at study end. (Forced choice; first study lenses, second study lenses, neither)

    Measured: 8 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Oct 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01965288
Sponsor's protocol ID
EX-MKTG-42
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
11 Oct 2013
Last updated
30 Jul 2020
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing comfilcon A and lotrafilcon B in people with Astigmatism, run by CooperVision, Inc. at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Nov 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Daily and Comfortable Wearing Time (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 81 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in