Advanced, Metastatic Breast CancerPhase 3MONALEESA-2NCT01958021
Study of Efficacy and Safety of LEE011 in Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing Ribociclib and Letrozole in people with Advanced, Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 221 sites in 29 countries.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ribociclib, as measured by progression free survival (PFS), in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer who received no prior treatment for advanced disease. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 100 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced, Metastatic Breast Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Ribociclib and Letrozole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 668 participants
- Where
- 221 sitesin 29 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Dec 2013to 16 Mar 2023
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 100 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Women with advanced (locoregionally recurrent or metastatic) breast cancer that was not amenable to curative therapy.
- The patient was postmenopausal. Postmenopausal status was defined either by:
- Prior bilateral oophorectomy
- Age ≥60
- Age <60 and amenorrhea for 12 or more months (in the absence of chemotherapy, tamoxifen, toremifen, or ovarian suppression) and FSH and estradiol in the postmenopausal range per local normal range.
- There was no prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced disease.
Show all 11Show fewer
- The patient had a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of estrogen-receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer by the local laboratory.
- The patient had HER2-negative breast cancer defined as a negative in situ hybridization test or an IHC status of 0, 1+ or 2+. If IHC was 2+, a negative in situ hybridization (FISH, CISH, or SISH) test was required by local laboratory testing.
- The patient must have had either:
- Measurable disease, i.e., at least one measurable lesion as per RECIST 1.1 criteria (Tumor lesions previously irradiated or subjected to other locoregional therapy were considered measurable if disease progression at the treated site after completion of therapy was clearly documented). OR If no measurable disease was present, then at least one predominantly lytic bone lesion must have been present (Patients with no measurable disease and only one predominantly lytic bone lesion previously irradiated were eligible if there was documented evidence of disease progression of the bone lesion after irradiation).
- The patient had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
Who cannot join
- The patient had received any CDK4/6 inhibitor.
- The patient had received any prior systemic anti-cancer therapy (including hormonal therapy and chemotherapy) for advanced breast cancer.
- Note:
- Patients who had received (neo) adjuvant therapy for breast cancer were eligible. If the prior neo (adjuvant) therapy included letrozole or anastrozole, the disease-free interval had to be greater than 12 months from the completion of treatment until randomization.
- Patients who had received ≤ 14 days of letrozole or anastrozole for advanced disease prior to randomization were eligible.
- Any prior (neo) adjuvant anti-cancer therapy had to be stopped at least 5 half-lives or 7 days, whichever was longer, before randomization.
Show all 21Show fewer
- The patient was concurrently using other anti-cancer therapy.
- The patient had a concurrent malignancy or malignancy within 3 years of randomization, with the exception of adequately treated, basal or squamous cell carcinoma, non-melanomatous skin cancer, or curatively resected cervical cancer.
- The patient had active cardiac disease or a history of cardiac dysfunction, including any of the following:
- History of angina pectoris, symptomatic pericarditis, or myocardial infarction within 12 months prior to study entry.
- History of documented congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association functional classification III-IV).
- Documented cardiomyopathy.
- The patient had a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 50% as determined by Multiple Gated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram (ECHO).
- History of any cardiac arrhythmias, e.g., ventricular, supraventricular, nodal arrhythmias, or conduction abnormality in the previous 12 months.
- On screening, any of the following cardiac parameters: bradycardia (heart rate < 50 at rest), tachycardia (heart rate > 90 at rest), PR interval > 220 msec, QRS interval >109 msec, or QTcF >450 msec.
- Systolic blood pressure >160 or <90 mmHg.
- The patient was currently receiving any of the following medications and could not be discontinued 7 days prior to the start of treatment:
- Medications known to be strong inducers or inhibitors of CYP3A4.
- Medications known to have a risk of prolonging the QT interval or inducing Torsades de Pointes.
- Medications with a narrow therapeutic window and predominantly metabolized through CYP3A4.
- Herbal preparations/medications.
Trial locations and contacts
221 sites in 29 countries.
221 sites in 29 countries
United States73 sites
Lehigh Valley Hospital
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
Univ of Colorado School of Medicine
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Sidney Kimmel CCC At JH
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Texas Oncology P A
Bedford, Texas, 76022
Alta Bates Cancer Center
Berkeley, California, 94704
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
University Cancer Institute
Boynton Beach, Florida, 33426
Cooper Cancer Center
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Ironwood Cancer and Research Centers
Chandler, Arizona, 85224
Chattanooga Onc And Hem Assoc PC
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404
University of Illinois Cancer Center at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Oncology Hematology Care Inc
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43221
Texas Oncology
Dallas, Texas, 75251
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Florida Cancer Research Institute
Davie, Florida, 33328
Georgia Cancer Specialists
Decatur, Georgia, 30033
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010 3000
Duke Univ Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
Hackensack Meridian Health
Edison, New Jersey, 88837
NorthShore University Health System
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Providence Regional Cancer Partnership
Everett, Washington, 98201
Virginia Cancer Specialists
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Highlands Oncology Group
Fayetteville, Arkansas, 72703
Florida Cancer Specialists
Fort Myers, Florida, 33901
Ctr For Cancer And Blood Disorders
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Texas Oncology P A
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Frederick Memorial Hospital
Frederick, Maryland, 21701
Glendale Adventist Medical Center
Glendale, California, 91206
C R Wood Cancer Center at Glens Falls Hospital
Glens Falls, New York, 12801
Ingalls Memorial Hospital
Harvey, Illinois, 60426
Penn State Hershey Cancer Institute
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
Memorial Hospital
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Moanalua Medical Center Attn Oncology Dept
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96817
Texas Oncology Houston Memorial City
Houston, Texas, 77024
Uni Of TX MD Anderson Cancer Cntr
Houston, Texas, 77030
Millennium Research Clin Develop
Houston, Texas, 77090
IU Simon Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Jackson Oncology Associates
Jackson, Mississippi, 39202
NEA Baptist Cancer Center
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401
St Lukes Hos Marion Bloch Neur Inst
Kansas City, Missouri, 64111
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers
Longmont, Colorado, 80501
The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute
Los Angeles, California, 90025
Cedars Sinai Medical Center SC-5
Los Angeles, California, 90048
Dean Health System
Madison, Wisconsin, 53717
Mercy Medical Research Institute
Manchester, Missouri, 63021
Texas Oncology
McAllen, Texas, 78503
University Of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Winthrop University Hospital
Mineola, New York, 11501
Allina Hlth Cancer Inst Minneapolis
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55407
Edward Hospital
Naperville, Illinois, 60540
Foundation Medical Partners
Nashua, New Hampshire, 03060
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Vanderbilt University Medical Ctr
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Cancer Institute of New Jersey
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901
NYU Langone Med Center CV Research
New York, New York, 10016
Mount Sinai School Of Medicine
New York, New York, 10029
Mercy Clinic Oklahoma Communities Mercy Oncology
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73120
Florida Retina Institute
Orlando, Florida, 32804
Sacred Heart Medical Oncology
Pensacola, Florida, 32504
Richardson Hematology Oncology Associates
Richardson, Texas, 75082
Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817
Oncology and Hematology Associates of Southwest Virginia Inc
Salem, Virginia, 24153
Utah Cancer Specialists
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84106
Texas Oncology P A
San Antonio, Texas, 78217
Arizona Oncology Associates PC HAL
Sedona, Arizona, 86336
Avera Cancer
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105
Florida Cancer Specialists-North
St. Petersburg, Florida, 33705
Northwest Medical Specialties
Tacoma, Washington, 98405
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Lewis Hall Singletary Onc Ctr at John D. Archbold Mem Hosp.
Thomasville, Georgia, 31792
Texas Oncology Northeast Texas
Tyler, Texas, 75702
Germany20 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aschaffenburg, 63739
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 14169
Novartis Investigative Site
Berlin, 14195
Novartis Investigative Site
Bielefeld, North Rhine-Westphalia, 33604
Novartis Investigative Site
Bonn, 53111
Novartis Investigative Site
Bottrop, 46236
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, 40225
Novartis Investigative Site
Erlangen, 91054
Novartis Investigative Site
Essen, 45136
Novartis Investigative Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79110
Novartis Investigative Site
Fürth, 90766
Novartis Investigative Site
Goslar, 38642
Novartis Investigative Site
Heidelberg, 69120
Novartis Investigative Site
München, 80335
Novartis Investigative Site
Offenbach, 63069
Novartis Investigative Site
Ravensburg, 88214
Novartis Investigative Site
Recklinghausen, 45657
Novartis Investigative Site
Tübingen, 72076
Novartis Investigative Site
Ulm, 89081
Novartis Investigative Site
Velbert, 42551
Italy15 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aviano, PN, 33081
Novartis Investigative Site
Brescia, BS, 25123
Novartis Investigative Site
Candiolo, TO, 10060
Novartis Investigative Site
Genova, GE, 16132
Novartis Investigative Site
Lecco, LC, 23900
Novartis Investigative Site
Messina, ME, 98158
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, MI, 20133
Novartis Investigative Site
Naples, 80131
Novartis Investigative Site
Padova, PD, 35100
Novartis Investigative Site
Perugia, PG, 06129
Novartis Investigative Site
Pisa, PI, 56124
Novartis Investigative Site
Reggio Calabria, RC, 89100
Novartis Investigative Site
Roma, RM, 00168
Novartis Investigative Site
Terni, TR, 05100
Novartis Investigative Site
Viterbo, VT, 01100
France12 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Angers, 49055
Novartis Investigative Site
Avignon, 84082
Novartis Investigative Site
Besançon, 25030
Novartis Investigative Site
Bordeaux, 33000
Novartis Investigative Site
Créteil, 94000
Novartis Investigative Site
Le Mans, 72000
Novartis Investigative Site
Lyon, 69373
Novartis Investigative Site
Nice, Alpes Maritimes, 06189
Novartis Investigative Site
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Novartis Investigative Site
Rouen, 76038
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint-Herblain, 44805
Novartis Investigative Site
Villejuif, 94800
Spain12 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08024
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08035
Novartis Investigative Site
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalonia, 08907
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28009
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28040
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28041
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28046
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, Andalusia, 29010
Novartis Investigative Site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, 38320
Novartis Investigative Site
Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, 15706
Novartis Investigative Site
Seville, Andalusia, 41013
Novartis Investigative Site
Valencia, Valencia, 46009
Netherlands10 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alkmaar, 1815 JD
Novartis Investigative Site
Deventer, 7416 SE
Novartis Investigative Site
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Groningen, 9728 NZ
Novartis Investigative Site
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA
Novartis Investigative Site
Maastricht, 6229 HX
Novartis Investigative Site
Sittard-Geleen, BG, 6162 BG
Novartis Investigative Site
Tilburg, 5042 AD
Novartis Investigative Site
Zoetermeer, NL-2722 EP
Novartis Investigative Site
Zwolle, 8025 AB
Canada8 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Burnaby, British Columbia, V5G 2X6
Novartis Investigative Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
Novartis Investigative Site
Hamilton, Ontario, L8V 5C2
Novartis Investigative Site
Kitchener, Ontario, N2G 1G3
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H2X 0A9
Novartis Investigative Site
Ottawa, Ontario, K1H 8L6
Novartis Investigative Site
Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Sweden6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Eskilstuna, SE-631 88
Novartis Investigative Site
Gothenburg, 413 45
Novartis Investigative Site
Jönköping, 551 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Lund, 221 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Uppsala, 751 85
Novartis Investigative Site
Vaxjo, SE-351 85
Belgium5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Hasselt, 3500
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Novartis Investigative Site
Namur, 5000
Novartis Investigative Site
Sint-Niklaas, Oost Vlaanderen, 9100
Novartis Investigative Site
Wilrijk, 2610
South Korea5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bundang Gu, Gyeonggi-do, 13620
Novartis Investigative Site
Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 10408
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03080
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 03722
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 05505
Taiwan5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 80756
Novartis Investigative Site
New Taipei City, 23561
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 10002
Novartis Investigative Site
Taipei, 11217
Novartis Investigative Site
Taoyuan, 33305
Turkey (Türkiye)5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, 06230
Novartis Investigative Site
Ankara, 06590
Novartis Investigative Site
Diyarbakır, 21000
Novartis Investigative Site
Istanbul, 35100
Novartis Investigative Site
Izmir, 35100
Czechia4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, Czech Republic, 656 53
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno-Bohunice, 625 00
Novartis Investigative Site
Liberec, 46063
Novartis Investigative Site
Olomouc, 779 00
Denmark4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Aarhus, DK-8000
Novartis Investigative Site
Copenhagen, DK-2100
Novartis Investigative Site
Odense C, DK 5000
Novartis Investigative Site
Vejle, 7100
Hungary4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, Pest County, 1134
Novartis Investigative Site
Debrecen, 4032
Novartis Investigative Site
Győr, H-9024
Novartis Investigative Site
Gyula, 5700
Lebanon4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beirut, 10999
Novartis Investigative Site
Beirut, 1107 2020
Novartis Investigative Site
El Achrafiyé, 166830
Novartis Investigative Site
Saida, 652
Argentina3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Córdoba, X5002AOQ
Novartis Investigative Site
La Rioja, 5300
Novartis Investigative Site
San Miguel de Tucumán, Tucumán Province, T4000IAK
Australia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
East Melbourne, Victoria, 3002
Novartis Investigative Site
Kurralta Park, South Australia, 5037
Novartis Investigative Site
Nedlands, Western Australia, 6009
Austria3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Salzburg, 5020
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, A-1090
Novartis Investigative Site
Vienna, A-1100
Brazil3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, 14048-900
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01246 000
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01317-002
Israel3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Petah Tikva, 4941492
Novartis Investigative Site
Ramat Gan, 52621
Novartis Investigative Site
Tel Aviv, 6423906
Russia3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Arkhangelsk, 163045
Novartis Investigative Site
Nizhny Novgorod, 603000
Novartis Investigative Site
Ryazan, 390011
Finland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Helsinki, 00029
Novartis Investigative Site
Turku, FIN-20520
Ireland2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Cork, 190384
Novartis Investigative Site
Dublin, DO4
Norway2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bergen, NO-5021
Novartis Investigative Site
Oslo, NO-0407
United Kingdom2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7DN
Novartis Investigative Site
Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3LJ
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of LEE011 in Combination With Letrozole for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative, Advanced Breast Cancer Who Received no Prior Therapy for Advanced Disease
The primary purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ribociclib, as measured by progression free survival (PFS), in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer who received no prior treatment for advanced disease.
Read the detailed description
This was an international, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled Phase III trial to determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received no prior therapy for advanced disease.
Eligible patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to either ribociclib group or placebo group. Study treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation from the study treatment for any other reason.
Participants who discontinued treatment due to reasons other than disease progression or withdrawal of consent for efficacy follow-up continued to be monitored until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or subject/guardian decision (post-treatment efficacy follow-up).
All participants who discontinued treatment were followed for survival until the predetermined number of overall survival (OS) events was reached.
Following the final OS analysis (performed when approximately 400 deaths were recorded) and with protocol amendment 10 (dated 30-Apr-2021), participants and investigators were unblinded and those participants in the placebo arm had the opportunity to cross-over to the ribociclib arm to receive ribociclib plus letrozole. Cross-over was optional and was conducted at the investigator's discretion and upon participant consent.
- Conditions
- Advanced, Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Being tested
- Ribociclib, Letrozole, Placebo
- Keywords
- HR-positive, HER2-negative, Advanced breast cancer, LEE011, Letrozole, CDK, CDK4, CDK6, CDK4/6, Phase III, ER-positive, PR-positive, Postmenopausal
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RibociclibDrug
Also called LEE011
Ribociclib (600 mg, in three 200 mg hard gelatin capsules or tablets) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
LetrozoleDrug
Letrozole (2.5 mg, tablets) was administered orally once daily on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle)
PlaceboDrug
Placebo (hard gelatin capsules or tablets) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ribociclib+ letrozole | Experimental | Ribociclib 600 mg daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral Receives: Drug: Ribociclib; Drug: Letrozole |
| Placebo + letrozole | Placebo comparator | Placebo daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral.
Participants were unblinded once the final OS analysis was completed and after the implementation of protocol amendment 10 (30-Apr-21) and were given the option to crossover to treatment with ribociclib + letrozole Receives: Drug: Letrozole; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment
PFS was defined as the period starting from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death caused by any reason. In cases where patients did not experience an event, the PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Clinical deterioration without objective radiological evidence was not considered as documented disease progression.PFS was assessed by investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS, and the median PFS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. A stratified Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of PFS, along with 95% confidence interval
Measured: Up to 23 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death from any cause. In cases where the patient's death was not recorded, the OS value was censored at the date of the last known patient's survival status.OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. As per protocol, the final OS analysis was conducted after approximately 400 deaths were documented.
The median OS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group.The distribution of OS between the two treatment arms was compared using a log-rank test at one-sided cumulative 2.5% level of significance. A stratified Cox regression was used to estimate the OS hazard ratio and the associated 95% CI.
Measured: Up to approximately 87 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
ORR is the percentage of participants with the best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1 as per investigator assessment. . CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: Up to 23 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment
Percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) lasting 24 weeks or longer as defined in RECIST 1.1 as per investigator assessment. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease: PD = At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameter of all measured target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of diameter of all target lesions recorded at or after baseline. In addition to the relative increase of 20% the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm.
Measured: Up to 23 months
Time to Definitive Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) by at Least One Category of the Score
ECOG PS categorized patients based on their ability to perform daily activities and self-care, with scores ranging from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicated no restrictions in activity, while higher scores indicated increasing limitations. Time to definitive deterioration was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the event, defined as experiencing an increase in ECOG PS by at least one category from the baseline or death. A deterioration was considered definitive if no improvements in the ECOG PS were observed at a subsequent time. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution, and the median time to definitive deterioration, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. Patients receiving any further therapy prior to definitive worsening were censored at their date of last assessment prior to start of therapy. Patients that had not worsened at the data cutoff point were censored at the date of last assessment.
Measured: From baseline up to 23 months
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that includes 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 1 GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items. GHS/QoL scale score ranges between 0 and 100. A high score for GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL.The time to definitive 10% deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which is defined as at least 10% relative to baseline worsening of the QoL score (without further improvement above the threshold) or death due to any cause. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the distribution, and the median time to definitive 10% deterioration, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. If a patient had not had an event, time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate QoL evaluation.
Measured: From baseline up to 23 months
Change From Baseline in the GHS/QoL Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire that includes 5 functional scales, 3 symptom scales, 1 GHS/QoL scale, and 6 single items. GHS/QoL scale score ranges between 0 and 100. A high score for GHS/QoL represents better functioning or QoL.The change from baseline in the GHS/QoL score was assesed. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.
For subjects who discontinued treatment earlier and without disease progression, post-treatment efficacy follow-up visits occurred every 8 weeks after End of treatment (EOT) during the initial 18 months since start of treatment, followed by visits every 12 weeks until disease progression or end of study.
Measured: Baseline, every 2 cycles for 18 months, then every 3 cycles until last dose; at EOT (within 15 days from last dose);every 8 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), assessed up to 23 months. Cycle=28 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study start17 Dec 2013
- Primary completion29 Jan 2016
- Study completion16 Mar 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (13)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Advanced, Metastatic Breast CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 668 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01958021
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CLEE011A2301
- Other IDs
- 2013-003084-61
- Acronym
- MONALEESA-2
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 7 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Publications
Ji Y, Wang C, Combes FP, Ho YY, Fasching PA, Untch M, Zarate JP, Crown J. Quantitative Pharmacology Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Early Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2026 Aug;65(8):1217-1228. doi: 10.1007/s40262-026-01643-3. Epub 2026 Jun 23.
PubMed 42334791Jhaveri K, O'Shaughnessy J, Fasching PA, Tolaney SM, Yardley DA, Sharma VK, Biswas C, Thuerigen A, Pathak P, Rugo HS. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of PFS and OS comparing ribociclib plus letrozole versus palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Dec 14;15:17588359231216095. doi: 10.1177/17588359231216095. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 38107828Andre F, Su F, Solovieff N, Hortobagyi G, Chia S, Neven P, Bardia A, Tripathy D, Lu YS, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Slamon D, Arteaga CL. Pooled ctDNA analysis of MONALEESA phase III advanced breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol. 2023 Nov;34(11):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
PubMed 37673211Rugo HS, Harmer V, O'Shaughnessy J, Jhaveri K, Tolaney SM, Cardoso F, Bardia A, Maheshwari VK, Tripathi S, Haftchenary S, Pathak P, Fasching PA. Quality of life with ribociclib versus abemaciclib as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Feb 24;15:17588359231152843. doi: 10.1177/17588359231152843. eCollection 2023.
PubMed 36861085Ji Y, Yartsev V, Quinlan M, Serra P, Wang Y, Chakraborty A, Miller M. Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer with Renal Impairment Based on PK, Safety, and Efficacy Data: An Innovative Approach Integrating Data from a Dedicated Renal Impairment Study and Oncology Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Mar;62(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01206-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
PubMed 36800111Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Hart L, Campone M, Petrakova K, Winer EP, Janni W, Conte P, Cameron DA, Andre F, Arteaga CL, Zarate JP, Chakravartty A, Taran T, Le Gac F, Serra P, O'Shaughnessy J. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 10;386(10):942-950. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114663.
PubMed 35263519Burris HA, Chan A, Bardia A, Thaddeus Beck J, Sohn J, Neven P, Tripathy D, Im SA, Chia S, Esteva FJ, Hart L, Zarate JP, Ridolfi A, Lorenc KR, Yardley DA. Safety and impact of dose reductions on efficacy in the randomised MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7 trials in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(5):679-686. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01415-9. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
PubMed 34158598Prat A, Chaudhury A, Solovieff N, Pare L, Martinez D, Chic N, Martinez-Saez O, Braso-Maristany F, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Su F. Correlative Biomarker Analysis of Intrinsic Subtypes and Efficacy Across the MONALEESA Phase III Studies. J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;39(13):1458-1467. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02977. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
PubMed 33769862Yardley DA. MONALEESA clinical program: a review of ribociclib use in different clinical settings. Future Oncol. 2019 Aug;15(23):2673-2686. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0130. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
PubMed 31305131Hortobagyi GN. Ribociclib for the first-line treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a review of subgroup analyses from the MONALEESA-2 trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 19;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1050-7.
PubMed 30340505Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Petrakova K, Blackwell KL, Winer EP, Janni W, Verma S, Conte P, Arteaga CL, Cameron DA, Mondal S, Su F, Miller M, Elmeliegy M, Germa C, O'Shaughnessy J. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1541-1547. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy155.
PubMed 29718092Janni W, Alba E, Bachelot T, Diab S, Gil-Gil M, Beck TJ, Ryvo L, Lopez R, Tsai M, Esteva FJ, Aunon PZ, Kral Z, Ward P, Richards P, Pluard TJ, Sutradhar S, Miller M, Campone M. First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(3):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4658-x. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
PubMed 29404806Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Blackwell KL, Andre F, Winer EP, Janni W, Verma S, Conte P, Arteaga CL, Cameron DA, Petrakova K, Hart LL, Villanueva C, Chan A, Jakobsen E, Nusch A, Burdaeva O, Grischke EM, Alba E, Wist E, Marschner N, Favret AM, Yardley D, Bachelot T, Tseng LM, Blau S, Xuan F, Souami F, Miller M, Germa C, Hirawat S, O'Shaughnessy J. Ribociclib as First-Line Therapy for HR-Positive, Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 3;375(18):1738-1748. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1609709. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
PubMed 27717303
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of LEE011 in Combination With Letrozole for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative, Advanced Breast Cancer Who Received no Prior Therapy for Advanced Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01958021
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MONALEESA-2 / CLEE011A2301
- Conditions
- Advanced, Metastatic Breast Cancer
- Keywords
- HR-positive, HER2-negative, Advanced breast cancer, LEE011, Letrozole, CDK, CDK4, CDK6
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 668 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 17 Dec 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 29 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of ribociclib, as measured by progression free survival (PFS), in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer who received no prior treatment for advanced disease.
Detailed description
This was an international, multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled Phase III trial to determine the efficacy and safety of treatment with ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received no prior therapy for advanced disease.
Eligible patients were randomized in 1:1 ratio to either ribociclib group or placebo group. Study treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, death, or discontinuation from the study treatment for any other reason.
Participants who discontinued treatment due to reasons other than disease progression or withdrawal of consent for efficacy follow-up continued to be monitored until disease progression, death, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or subject/guardian decision (post-treatment efficacy follow-up).
All participants who discontinued treatment were followed for survival until the predetermined number of overall survival (OS) events was reached.
Following the final OS analysis (performed when approximately 400 deaths were recorded) and with protocol amendment 10 (dated 30-Apr-2021), participants and investigators were unblinded and those participants in the placebo arm had the opportunity to cross-over to the ribociclib arm to receive ribociclib plus letrozole. Cross-over was optional and was conducted at the investigator's discretion and upon participant consent.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ribociclib+ letrozole | Experimental | Drug: Ribociclib, Drug: LetrozoleRibociclib 600 mg daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral |
| Placebo + letrozole | Placebo comparator | Drug: Letrozole, Drug: PlaceboPlacebo daily oral (3 weeks on/ 1 week off) in combination with letrozole 2.5 mg daily oral. Participants were unblinded once the final OS analysis was completed and after the implementation of protocol amendment 10 (30-Apr-21) and were given the option to crossover to treatment with ribociclib + letrozole |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 100 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Women with advanced (locoregionally recurrent or metastatic) breast cancer that was not amenable to curative therapy.
- The patient was postmenopausal. Postmenopausal status was defined either by:
- There was no prior systemic anti-cancer therapy for advanced disease.
- The patient had a histologically and/or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of estrogen-receptor positive and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer by the local laboratory.
- The patient had HER2-negative breast cancer defined as a negative in situ hybridization test or an IHC status of 0, 1+ or 2+. If IHC was 2+, a negative in situ hybridization (FISH, CISH, or SISH) test was required by local laboratory testing.
Key exclusion criteria (21 listed)
- The patient had received any CDK4/6 inhibitor.
- The patient had received any prior systemic anti-cancer therapy (including hormonal therapy and chemotherapy) for advanced breast cancer.
- The patient was concurrently using other anti-cancer therapy.
- The patient had a concurrent malignancy or malignancy within 3 years of randomization, with the exception of adequately treated, basal or squamous cell carcinoma, non-melanomatous skin cancer, or curatively resected cervical cancer.
- The patient had active cardiac disease or a history of cardiac dysfunction, including any of the following:
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RibociclibAlso: LEE011Ribociclib (600 mg, in three 200 mg hard gelatin capsules or tablets) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Ribociclib+ letrozole |
| LetrozoleLetrozole (2.5 mg, tablets) was administered orally once daily on a continuous daily schedule (days 1-28 of each 28-day cycle) | Drug | Placebo + letrozole, Ribociclib+ letrozole |
| PlaceboPlacebo (hard gelatin capsules or tablets) was administered orally once daily on Days 1-21 of each 28-day cycle. | Drug | Placebo + letrozole |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to 23 months
PFS was defined as the period starting from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death caused by any reason. In cases where patients did not experience an event, the PFS was censored at the date of the last adequate tumor assessment. Clinical deterioration without objective radiological evidence was not considered as documented disease progression.PFS was assessed by investigator assessment according to RECIST 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS, and the median PFS, along with 95% confidence intervals, was reported for each treatment group. A stratified Cox regression model was used to estimate the hazard ratio of PFS, along with 95% confidence interval
6 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to approximately 87 months
Overall Response Rate (ORR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to 23 months
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) by Investigator Assessment
Time frame: Up to 23 months
Time to Definitive Deterioration of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) by at Least One Category of the Score
Time frame: From baseline up to 23 months
Time to Definitive 10% Deterioration in the Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) Scale Score of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30)
Time frame: From baseline up to 23 months
Change From Baseline in the GHS/QoL Scale Score of the EORTC QLQ-C30
Time frame: Baseline, every 2 cycles for 18 months, then every 3 cycles until last dose; at EOT (within 15 days from last dose);every 8 or 12 weeks post-treatment until progression (post-treatment efficacy visits), assessed up to 23 months. Cycle=28 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Mar 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42334791Ji Y, Wang C, Combes FP, Ho YY, Fasching PA, Untch M, Zarate JP, Crown J. Quantitative Pharmacology Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Early Breast Cancer. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2026 Aug;65(8):1217-1228. doi: 10.1007/s40262-026-01643-3. Epub 2026 Jun 23.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38107828Jhaveri K, O'Shaughnessy J, Fasching PA, Tolaney SM, Yardley DA, Sharma VK, Biswas C, Thuerigen A, Pathak P, Rugo HS. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of PFS and OS comparing ribociclib plus letrozole versus palbociclib plus letrozole as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Dec 14;15:17588359231216095. doi: 10.1177/17588359231216095. eCollection 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37673211Andre F, Su F, Solovieff N, Hortobagyi G, Chia S, Neven P, Bardia A, Tripathy D, Lu YS, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Slamon D, Arteaga CL. Pooled ctDNA analysis of MONALEESA phase III advanced breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol. 2023 Nov;34(11):1003-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36861085Rugo HS, Harmer V, O'Shaughnessy J, Jhaveri K, Tolaney SM, Cardoso F, Bardia A, Maheshwari VK, Tripathi S, Haftchenary S, Pathak P, Fasching PA. Quality of life with ribociclib versus abemaciclib as first-line treatment of HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison. Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023 Feb 24;15:17588359231152843. doi: 10.1177/17588359231152843. eCollection 2023.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36800111Ji Y, Yartsev V, Quinlan M, Serra P, Wang Y, Chakraborty A, Miller M. Justifying Ribociclib Dose in Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer with Renal Impairment Based on PK, Safety, and Efficacy Data: An Innovative Approach Integrating Data from a Dedicated Renal Impairment Study and Oncology Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Mar;62(3):493-504. doi: 10.1007/s40262-022-01206-2. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35263519Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Hart L, Campone M, Petrakova K, Winer EP, Janni W, Conte P, Cameron DA, Andre F, Arteaga CL, Zarate JP, Chakravartty A, Taran T, Le Gac F, Serra P, O'Shaughnessy J. Overall Survival with Ribociclib plus Letrozole in Advanced Breast Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 10;386(10):942-950. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114663.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34158598Burris HA, Chan A, Bardia A, Thaddeus Beck J, Sohn J, Neven P, Tripathy D, Im SA, Chia S, Esteva FJ, Hart L, Zarate JP, Ridolfi A, Lorenc KR, Yardley DA. Safety and impact of dose reductions on efficacy in the randomised MONALEESA-2, -3 and -7 trials in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(5):679-686. doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01415-9. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33769862Prat A, Chaudhury A, Solovieff N, Pare L, Martinez D, Chic N, Martinez-Saez O, Braso-Maristany F, Lteif A, Taran T, Babbar N, Su F. Correlative Biomarker Analysis of Intrinsic Subtypes and Efficacy Across the MONALEESA Phase III Studies. J Clin Oncol. 2021 May 1;39(13):1458-1467. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02977. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31305131Yardley DA. MONALEESA clinical program: a review of ribociclib use in different clinical settings. Future Oncol. 2019 Aug;15(23):2673-2686. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0130. Epub 2019 Jul 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30340505Hortobagyi GN. Ribociclib for the first-line treatment of advanced hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a review of subgroup analyses from the MONALEESA-2 trial. Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Oct 19;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1050-7.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29718092Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, Yap YS, Sonke GS, Paluch-Shimon S, Campone M, Petrakova K, Blackwell KL, Winer EP, Janni W, Verma S, Conte P, Arteaga CL, Cameron DA, Mondal S, Su F, Miller M, Elmeliegy M, Germa C, O'Shaughnessy J. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1541-1547. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy155.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29404806Janni W, Alba E, Bachelot T, Diab S, Gil-Gil M, Beck TJ, Ryvo L, Lopez R, Tsai M, Esteva FJ, Aunon PZ, Kral Z, Ward P, Richards P, Pluard TJ, Sutradhar S, Miller M, Campone M. First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Jun;169(3):469-479. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4658-x. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent expert panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data is currently available according to the process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com.
Related trials for Advanced, Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Multiple Treatment Combinations in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Metastatic Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Study of MR001 in Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study With NKT3964 for Adults With Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors
Solid Tumor, Advanced Solid Tumor
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
P-MUC1C-ALLO1 Allogeneic CAR-T Cells in the Treatment of Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
Breast Cancer, Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Beamion BCGC-1: A Study to Find a Suitable Dose of Zongertinib Used Alone and in Combination With Other Treatments to Test Whether it Helps People With Different Types of HER2+ Cancer That Has Spread
Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
221 sites in 29 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ribociclib and Letrozole in people with Advanced, Metastatic Breast Cancer, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 221 sites in 29 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 21 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 221 sites in United States, Germany, Italy, France, Spain and 24 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator Assessment (time frame: Up to 23 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01958021, which also lists 13 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Mar 2025.