Exposure to Hepatitis B VirusPhase 1NCT01951677
Safety and Efficacy Study of Adjuvanted Prophylactic Hepatitis B Vaccine
A Phase 1 study testing HBsAg, PreS HBsAg and Advax-1(TM) in people with Exposure to Hepatitis B Virus, run by Vaxine Pty Ltd at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
There is a need for more effective and better-tolerated hepatitis B vaccines for low responder high-risk populations including patients with renal impairment and/or diabetes mellitus and those aged over 40 years. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Exposure to Hepatitis B Virus
- What is being tested?
- HBsAg, PreS HBsAg and Advax-1(TM)
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- Jul 2013to May 2019
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 years and above
- Male or female
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study.
- Has one or more of
- Age 40 years or above
- Impaired renal function (creatinine >120 mmol/L or calculated glomerular filtration rate <60mls/min)
- Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (any type)
Who cannot join
- History of prior hepatitis B vaccination
- History of serious vaccine allergy if in the opinion of the Investigator this represents a contraindication to hepatitis B vaccination
- Women of childbearing potential unless using a reliable and appropriate contraceptive method, specifically oral contraceptive pill, intrauterine device or mechanical barrier device.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- History of systemic autoimmune disease including Wegener's granulomatosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Guillain-Barre, scleroderma or multiple sclerosis.
- Participation in another clinical trial with an investigational agent within 28 days of the scheduled date of first immunization.
- Any other serious medical, social or mental condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would be detrimental to the subjects or the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Phase 1 Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Hepatitis B Vaccines in Individuals With Renal Impairment, Diabetes Mellitus or Age Greater Than 40 Years
There is a need for more effective and better-tolerated hepatitis B vaccines for low responder high-risk populations including patients with renal impairment and/or diabetes mellitus and those aged over 40 years. Several approaches are available to enhance the potency of hepatitis B virus vaccines including use of the more highly immunogenic antigens, replacing alum with potentially more effective adjuvants, and increasing the dose of vaccine antigen. A combination of these strategies is being tested in this study to identify the most promising candidate approaches to take forward into advanced clinical development
Read the detailed description
Adjuvants are a critical ingredient in most vaccines and act by boosting the immune response to the target protein (e.g. hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)). Despite considerable research, aluminium hydroxide or phosphate compounds (collectively referred to as "alum") remain the dominant adjuvants used in human hepatitis B virus vaccines. There is thus an unmet need for new HBV vaccine adjuvants, in particular, for adjuvants capable of boosting cell-mediated immunity (this is a particular type of immune response where killer T cells are activated that are then able to attack and destroy the infection) as alum, although good at stimulating antibodies is very poor at stimulating cell-mediated immunity. Alum, whilst generally accepted as safe, can be associated with significant local vaccine reactions and this is another reason why newer better-tolerated vaccine adjuvants would be beneficial. This study will compare a range of experimental adjuvant formulations to identify those that provide the safest and most effective enhancement of T- and B-cell immunity against hepatitis B
- Conditions
- Exposure to Hepatitis B Virus
- Being tested
- HBsAg, PreS HBsAg, Advax-1(TM), Advax-2(TM), Advax-3(TM)
- Keywords
- hepatitis B virus, vaccine, adjuvant, prophylaxis
- Medical subject headings
- Hepatitis B
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HBsAgDrug
Also called hepatitis B vaccine based on hepatitis B surface antigen
Standard hepatitis B vaccine antigen
PreS HBsAgBiological
Also called preS hepatitis B surface antigen
preS hepatitis B surface antigen
Advax-1(TM)Biological
Also called Delta inulin adjuvant
Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen
Advax-2(TM)Biological
Also called Supermix
Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen
Advax-3(TM)Biological
Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen
AlumBiological
Also called Alhydrogel, Aluminium hydroxide
Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| HBsAg + alum adjuvant | Active comparator | HBsAg + standard alum adjuvant Receives: Drug: HBsAg; Biological: Alum |
| HBsAg + Advax-1(TM) | Experimental | HBsAg + Advax-1 Receives: Drug: HBsAg; Biological: Advax-1(TM) |
| HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) | Experimental | HBsAg + Advax-2 Receives: Drug: HBsAg; Biological: Advax-2(TM) |
| HBsAg + Advax-3(TM) | Experimental | HBsAg + Advax-3 Receives: Drug: HBsAg; Biological: Advax-3(TM) |
| preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant | Active comparator | preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant Receives: Biological: PreS HBsAg; Biological: Alum |
| preS HBsAg + Advax-1(TM) | Experimental | preS HBsAg + Advax-1 Receives: Biological: PreS HBsAg; Biological: Advax-1(TM) |
| preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) | Experimental | preS HBsAg + Advax-2 Receives: Biological: PreS HBsAg; Biological: Advax-2(TM) |
| preS HBsAg + Advax-3(TM) | Experimental | preS HBsAg + Advax-3 Receives: Biological: PreS HBsAg; Biological: Advax-3(TM) |
| high dose preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant | Active comparator | high dose preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant Receives: Biological: PreS HBsAg; Biological: Alum |
| high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-1(TM) | Experimental | high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-1 Receives: Biological: PreS HBsAg; Biological: Advax-1(TM) |
| high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) | Experimental | high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) Receives: Biological: PreS HBsAg; Biological: Advax-2(TM) |
| high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-3(TM) | Experimental | high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-3 Receives: Biological: PreS HBsAg; Biological: Advax-3(TM) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety
Safety as assessed by incidence of adverse events
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Hepatitis B surface antibody geometric mean titer
Geometric mean titer of HBsAg titers
Measured: one-month post each immunization and 10 months post-final immunization
T cell responses
HBsAg-specific T cell responses as measured by cytokine enzyme-linked immunospot and carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester T-cell proliferation assay will be compared between groups
Measured: 7 days and one month post each immunization and 10 months post-final immunization
Efficacy
Seroconversion and seroprotection rates will be compared between groups using titers of antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen at each major time point
Measured: one month post each immunization and 10 months post final immunization
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2013
- Primary completionOct 2017
- Study completionMay 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Exposure to Hepatitis B VirusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vaxine Pty Ltd
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Flinders Medical Centre
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jeffrey Barbara, MBBS PhD, Principal investigator, Flinders Medical Centre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01951677
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HBV002
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 16 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 7 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Currently no plan
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 1 Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Hepatitis B Vaccines in Individuals With Renal Impairment, Diabetes Mellitus or Age Greater Than 40 Years
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01951677
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HBV002
- Conditions
- Exposure to Hepatitis B Virus
- Keywords
- hepatitis B virus, vaccine, adjuvant, prophylaxis
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Vaxine Pty LtdIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Flinders Medical Centre
- Study start
- Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Oct 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There is a need for more effective and better-tolerated hepatitis B vaccines for low responder high-risk populations including patients with renal impairment and/or diabetes mellitus and those aged over 40 years. Several approaches are available to enhance the potency of hepatitis B virus vaccines including use of the more highly immunogenic antigens, replacing alum with potentially more effective adjuvants, and increasing the dose of vaccine antigen. A combination of these strategies is being tested in this study to identify the most promising candidate approaches to take forward into advanced clinical development
Detailed description
Adjuvants are a critical ingredient in most vaccines and act by boosting the immune response to the target protein (e.g. hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)). Despite considerable research, aluminium hydroxide or phosphate compounds (collectively referred to as "alum") remain the dominant adjuvants used in human hepatitis B virus vaccines. There is thus an unmet need for new HBV vaccine adjuvants, in particular, for adjuvants capable of boosting cell-mediated immunity (this is a particular type of immune response where killer T cells are activated that are then able to attack and destroy the infection) as alum, although good at stimulating antibodies is very poor at stimulating cell-mediated immunity. Alum, whilst generally accepted as safe, can be associated with significant local vaccine reactions and this is another reason why newer better-tolerated vaccine adjuvants would be beneficial. This study will compare a range of experimental adjuvant formulations to identify those that provide the safest and most effective enhancement of T- and B-cell immunity against hepatitis B
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 12
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| HBsAg + alum adjuvant | Active comparator | Drug: HBsAg, Biological: AlumHBsAg + standard alum adjuvant |
| HBsAg + Advax-1(TM) | Experimental | Drug: HBsAg, Biological: Advax-1(TM)HBsAg + Advax-1 |
| HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) | Experimental | Drug: HBsAg, Biological: Advax-2(TM)HBsAg + Advax-2 |
| HBsAg + Advax-3(TM) | Experimental | Drug: HBsAg, Biological: Advax-3(TM)HBsAg + Advax-3 |
| preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant | Active comparator | Biological: PreS HBsAg, Biological: AlumpreS HBsAg + alum adjuvant |
| preS HBsAg + Advax-1(TM) | Experimental | Biological: PreS HBsAg, Biological: Advax-1(TM)preS HBsAg + Advax-1 |
| preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) | Experimental | Biological: PreS HBsAg, Biological: Advax-2(TM)preS HBsAg + Advax-2 |
| preS HBsAg + Advax-3(TM) | Experimental | Biological: PreS HBsAg, Biological: Advax-3(TM)preS HBsAg + Advax-3 |
| high dose preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant | Active comparator | Biological: PreS HBsAg, Biological: Alumhigh dose preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant |
| high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-1(TM) | Experimental | Biological: PreS HBsAg, Biological: Advax-1(TM)high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-1 |
| high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) | Experimental | Biological: PreS HBsAg, Biological: Advax-2(TM)high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) |
| high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-3(TM) | Experimental | Biological: PreS HBsAg, Biological: Advax-3(TM)high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-3 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Age 18 years and above
- Male or female
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study.
- Has one or more of
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- History of prior hepatitis B vaccination
- History of serious vaccine allergy if in the opinion of the Investigator this represents a contraindication to hepatitis B vaccination
- Women of childbearing potential unless using a reliable and appropriate contraceptive method, specifically oral contraceptive pill, intrauterine device or mechanical barrier device.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- History of systemic autoimmune disease including Wegener's granulomatosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Guillain-Barre, scleroderma or multiple sclerosis.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HBsAgAlso: hepatitis B vaccine based on hepatitis B surface antigenStandard hepatitis B vaccine antigen | Drug | HBsAg + Advax-1(TM), HBsAg + Advax-2(TM), HBsAg + Advax-3(TM), HBsAg + alum adjuvant |
| PreS HBsAgAlso: preS hepatitis B surface antigenpreS hepatitis B surface antigen | Biological | high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-1(TM), high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM), high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-3(TM), high dose preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant, preS HBsAg + Advax-1(TM), preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM), preS HBsAg + Advax-3(TM), preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant |
| Advax-1(TM)Also: Delta inulin adjuvantAdjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen | Biological | HBsAg + Advax-1(TM), high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-1(TM), preS HBsAg + Advax-1(TM) |
| Advax-2(TM)Also: SupermixAdjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen | Biological | HBsAg + Advax-2(TM), high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM), preS HBsAg + Advax-2(TM) |
| Advax-3(TM)Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen | Biological | HBsAg + Advax-3(TM), high dose preS HBsAg + Advax-3(TM), preS HBsAg + Advax-3(TM) |
| AlumAlso: Alhydrogel, Aluminium hydroxideAdjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen | Biological | HBsAg + alum adjuvant, high dose preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant, preS HBsAg + alum adjuvant |
Primary outcome
Safety
Time frame: 12 months
Safety as assessed by incidence of adverse events
3 secondary outcomes
Hepatitis B surface antibody geometric mean titer
Time frame: one-month post each immunization and 10 months post-final immunization
T cell responses
Time frame: 7 days and one month post each immunization and 10 months post-final immunization
Efficacy
Time frame: one month post each immunization and 10 months post final immunization
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2019.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Currently no plan
Related trials for Exposure to Hepatitis B Virus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Duo: A Phase IIIb Individual-Level Randomized Controlled Trial of an Integrated Strategy
HIV Infection, Sexually Transmitted Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jeffrey Barbara, MBBS PhD principal investigator
Flinders Medical Centre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing HBsAg, PreS HBsAg and Advax-1(TM) in people with Exposure to Hepatitis B Virus, run by Vaxine Pty Ltd at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2019.