Health BehaviorNCT01943734
The Influence of Health Information in Stretch Break Program Participant's Lifestyle
A study testing Information passed on anthropometric assessment in people with Health Behavior, run by Federal University of Paraíba.
Trial summary
Objective: To verify the influence of information passed during anthropometric assessment would have in physical exercise (PhE) and eating habits of 14 participants (female=11; 51,07+-8,17 years) from the Stretch Break Program of Federal University of Paraíba (SBP of FUPb). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 28 to 63 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Health Behavior
- What is being tested?
- Information passed on anthropometric assessment
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 14 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2010to May 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 28 to 63 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- FUPb white collar workers of either gender
Who cannot join
- Anyone who did not complete anthropometric measurements
About this study
Official title: The Influence of Health Information in Stretch Break Program Participant's Lifestyle: a Quantitative and Qualitative Study
Objective: To verify the influence of information passed during anthropometric assessment would have in physical exercise (PhE) and eating habits of 14 participants (female=11; 51,07+-8,17 years) from the Stretch Break Program of Federal University of Paraíba (SBP of FUPb). Methods: The research was a descriptive cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative approach. Were applied, between March and May of 2010, anthropometric evaluation and semi-structured interviews. During the evaluation were provided information and guidance on health.
- Conditions
- Health Behavior
- Being tested
- Information passed on anthropometric assessment
- Keywords
- Information, Lifestyle, Occupational Health
- Medical subject headings
- Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Information passed on anthropometric assessmentBehavioural
Information passed on worker's anthropometric assessment.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lifestyle counseling | Experimental | Information passed on anthropometric assessment Receives: Behavioral: Information passed on anthropometric assessment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Anthropometric evaluation
Height (cm) was measured with a stadiometer (Sanny), body weight (kg) was measured using a digital scale (TechLine), circumference (cm) was measured (Sanny) at the midpoint between lower costal margin and the superior iliac crest and blood pressure (mmHg) was measured with a sphygmomanometer and a stethoscope (Premium). Direct measurement assessed body mass index, waist-to-height-ratio and blood pressure classification (determined by highest blood pressure category - systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure).
Measured: Up to 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2010
- Primary completionMar 2010
- Study completionMay 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Health BehaviorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of Paraíba
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Caroline de Oliveira Martins, Federal University of Paraíba
- Investigators
- Caroline Martins, PhD, Principal investigator, Federal University of Paraiba
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01943734
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CEPHULW298/09
- Status last verified
- Sep 2013
- First submitted
- 10 Sep 2013
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Influence of Health Information in Stretch Break Program Participant's Lifestyle: a Quantitative and Qualitative Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01943734
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CEPHULW298/09
- Conditions
- Health Behavior
- Keywords
- Information, Lifestyle, Occupational Health
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 14 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Federal University of ParaíbaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2010
- Primary completion
- Mar 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Sep 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Objective: To verify the influence of information passed during anthropometric assessment would have in physical exercise (PhE) and eating habits of 14 participants (female=11; 51,07+-8,17 years) from the Stretch Break Program of Federal University of Paraíba (SBP of FUPb). Methods: The research was a descriptive cross-sectional quantitative and qualitative approach. Were applied, between March and May of 2010, anthropometric evaluation and semi-structured interviews. During the evaluation were provided information and guidance on health.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lifestyle counseling | Experimental | Behavioral: Information passed on anthropometric assessmentInformation passed on anthropometric assessment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 28 to 63 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- FUPb white collar workers of either gender
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Anyone who did not complete anthropometric measurements
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Information passed on anthropometric assessmentInformation passed on worker's anthropometric assessment. | Behavioural | Lifestyle counseling |
Primary outcome
Anthropometric evaluation
Time frame: Up to 6 weeks
Height (cm) was measured with a stadiometer (Sanny), body weight (kg) was measured using a digital scale (TechLine), circumference (cm) was measured (Sanny) at the midpoint between lower costal margin and the superior iliac crest and blood pressure (mmHg) was measured with a sphygmomanometer and a stethoscope (Premium). Direct measurement assessed body mass index, waist-to-height-ratio and blood pressure classification (determined by highest blood pressure category - systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2013.
Related trials for Health Behavior
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Not yet recruiting
Preventive and Personalized Digital Emotion Regulation Skills Intervention to Reduce Depression and Anxiety in Youths With Adverse Childhood Experiences
Adverse Childhood Experience, Depression / Major Depressive Disorder
Recruiting
Effect of a Brief Daily Digital Meditation on Well-Being in US Young Adults (BEGIN II)
Mental Health and General Well-being
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Caroline Martins, PhD principal investigator
Federal University of Paraiba
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Information passed on anthropometric assessment in people with Health Behavior, run by Federal University of Paraíba.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Anthropometric evaluation (time frame: Up to 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2013.