AzTrials
AzTrials

Consumer ResearchNCT01932827

Attidutes and Understanding of Oat Fibre Claims on Food Labels

An observational study of Consumer Research and General Population, run by University of Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Oat fibre consumption has been shown to lower blood cholesterol, which is advantageous for heart health. Oat and fibre claims on food labels should help people find heart healthy food choices; however consumer attitudes and understanding of such claims are unknown. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 69 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Consumer Research, General Population
What is being tested?
Mock Package Questionnaire
How many people
1,002 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 2011to Oct 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: A subsection of the Canadian Consumer Monitor Panel - a national representative online consumer panel comprised of 30,000 Canadians

Who may be able to join

  • Primary grocery shoppers
  • Canadian adults between the ages 20 to 69 years

Who cannot join

  • Did not have an email address or have access to internet

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University of Guelph

    Guelph, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Oat fibre consumption has been shown to lower blood cholesterol, which is advantageous for heart health. Oat and fibre claims on food labels should help people find heart healthy food choices; however consumer attitudes and understanding of such claims are unknown.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitudes and understanding to different types of permitted oat fibre claims.

Being tested
Mock Package Questionnaire
Keywords
Attitudes and understanding of oat fibre claims, Food labels, General Canadian population
Medical subject headings
Behavior

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mock Package QuestionnaireBehavioural

    Within a online questionnaire we exposed participants randomly to 4 mock cereal packages differing only by the nutrition claim it carried and asked participants to answer several questions on attitudes and understanding after each mock package.

Study groups in NCT01932827
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Canadian Consumer Monitor PanelCanadian Consumer Monitor Panel is a online consumer monitor panel which answers surveys every 8-10 weeks about diet and health.
Receives: Behavioral: Mock Package Questionnaire

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Response to survey questions measuring attitudes towards sodium claims using 5-point likert rating scales

    Within an online survey, participants were exposed to 4 mock cereal packages that differed only by the claim it carried. After being exposed to each mock package, participants were asked to rate their perceived attractiveness, healthiness, credibility, usefulness of the tested oat fibre claims using 5-point likert scales. Participants were also asked to rate their purchasing intentions of the mock cereal product with the different oat fibre claims

    Measured: On average the survey took 25 minutes to complete

  2. Response to survey questions evaluating participants understanding of oat fibre claims

    After each mock cereal package, understanding of oat fibre claims was evaluated using various survey methods. First, participants were asked to rate their perceived clarity of the wording of the claim using a 5-point likert scale (a subjective measure of understanding). Second, participants were ask to rate, on 5-point likert scales, the perceived benefit of consuming the mock package for subgroups with different health conditions (an indirect measure of understanding). Finally we asked participants, in an open ended question, to explain what a claim means to a friend (an objective measure of understanding).

    Measured: On average the survey took 25 minutes to complete

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2011
  3. Primary completionOct 2011
  4. Study completionOct 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
1,002 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01932827
Sponsor's protocol ID
AFMnet-02
Status last verified
Aug 2013
First submitted
27 Aug 2013
Last updated
30 Aug 2013
Results posted
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Consumer Research and General Population, run by University of Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Response to survey questions measuring attitudes towards sodium claims using 5-point likert rating scales (time frame: On average the survey took 25 minutes to complete). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in