AzTrials
AzTrials

PharyngitisPhase 2NCT01919996

PASS Study To Evaluate The Potential Of Zithromax To Cause Ocular Problems In Pediatric Patients

A Phase 2 study testing Azithromycin in people with Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis, run by Pfizer at 6 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) is intended to fulfill a regulatory post-marketing requirement to provide data regarding visual abilities in children taking azithromycin (immediate-release formulation) for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Pharyngitis, Tonsillitis
What is being tested?
Azithromycin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
8 participants
Where
6 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2013to Nov 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female patient, aged 12 to 17 years.
  • Requires outpatient treatment for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis infection.
  • Appropriate to treat with oral azithromycin as an alternative to intramuscular penicillin, in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Positive rapid antigen detection test.

Who cannot join

  • History of clinically significant eye disorder that would interfere with protocol test procedures.
  • Hypersensitivity to azithromycin, erythromycin, any macrolide, or ketolide antibiotic.
  • Increased risk of QT prolongation.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country.

6 sites in 1 country

United States6 sites
  • Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60611

  • Outpatient Center in Lincoln Park

    Chicago, Illinois, 60614

  • Infant Welfare Society of Chicago

    Chicago, Illinois, 60647

  • Murray Pediatrics

    Murray, Utah, 84107

  • Martel Eye Medical Group

    Rancho Cordova, California, 95670

  • Daynes Eye and Lasik

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Ocular Effects Of Azithromycin Oral Solution In Pediatric Patients With Pharyngitis/Tonsillitis

This Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) is intended to fulfill a regulatory post-marketing requirement to provide data regarding visual abilities in children taking azithromycin (immediate-release formulation) for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis. The primary objective of the study is to examine the incidence of clinically significant worsening in any of the following ophthalmic exams: best corrected visual acuity (distance), color vision, Amsler grid testing, anterior segment biomicroscopy, and fundus examination, in a group of approximately 30 pediatric patients taking azithromycin oral solution for treatment of an authorized indication of use (pharyngitis/ tonsillitis).

Read the detailed description

Study was terminated prematurely on October 16, 2015 following FDA decision to release Sponsor from post-marketing commitment. No safety and/or efficacy concerns identified.

Being tested
Azithromycin
Keywords
Ocular safety, azithromycin, pharyngitis, tonsillitis
Medical subject headings
Pharyngitis, Tonsillitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AzithromycinDrug

    Azithromycin oral suspension (immediate release) 12 mg/kg/day x 5 days

Study groups in NCT01919996
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AzithromycinExperimentalAzithromycin oral suspension (immediate release) 12 mg/kg/day x 5 days
Receives: Drug: Azithromycin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations

    Clinically significant worsening is an observed worsening in any of the five ophthalmic exams: 1) Clinically significant worsening in best corrected visual activity (BCVA) (distance) at the final visit, in either eye, is defined as a decrease in score of 5 or more letters from baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA. 2) An assessment of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in color vision Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test (FM-100) in either eye. 3) An assessment of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in Amsler Grid in either eye. 4) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in anterior segment biomicroscopy, in any of the 10 eye structures in either eye. 5) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy in any of the 5 eye structures in either eye.

    Measured: 14 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Improvement Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations

    1 or more of these conditions are clinically significant improvement based on five ophthalmic exams:1) clinically significant improvement in BCVA(distance) at the final visit, in either eye, defined as an increase in score of 5 or more letters from baseline in ETDRS BCVA.2) Assessment of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal or abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in color vision(FM-100) in either eye. 3) Assessment of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in Amsler Grid in either eye. 4) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in anterior segment biomicroscopy, in any of the 10 eye structures in either eye. 5)Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, nonclinically significant at final visit in dilated ophthalmoscopy in any of the 5 eye structures in either eye.

    Measured: 14 days

  2. Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Change (Improvement or Worsening) Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations

    Clinically significant change (improvement or worsening) is based on five ophthalmic exams at baseline and the final visit. Any 1 or more of these conditions are a clinically significant change: 1) A worsening in BCVA (distance), as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in BCVA (distance) as defined in outcome measure 2. 2) A worsening in color vision (FM-100), as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in color vision (FM-100) as defined in outcome measure 2. 3) A worsening in Amsler Grid, as defined in outcome measure 1, OR an improvement in Amsler Grid, as defined in outcome measure 2. 4) A worsening in anterior segment biomicroscopy, as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in anterior segment biomicroscopy as defined in outcome measure 2. 5) A worsening in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy, as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy as defined in outcome measure 2.

    Measured: 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2013
  3. Primary completionOct 2015
  4. Study completionNov 2015

Why it stopped: See Termination Statement in the Detailed Description below

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
8 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01919996
Sponsor's protocol ID
A0661206
Other IDs
208291, 2016-001119-19, 2016
Status last verified
Jul 2016
First submitted
7 Aug 2013
Last updated
5 Aug 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Azithromycin in people with Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis, run by Pfizer at 6 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jul 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations (time frame: 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in