PharyngitisPhase 2NCT01919996
PASS Study To Evaluate The Potential Of Zithromax To Cause Ocular Problems In Pediatric Patients
A Phase 2 study testing Azithromycin in people with Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis, run by Pfizer at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) is intended to fulfill a regulatory post-marketing requirement to provide data regarding visual abilities in children taking azithromycin (immediate-release formulation) for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pharyngitis, Tonsillitis
- What is being tested?
- Azithromycin
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2013to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patient, aged 12 to 17 years.
- Requires outpatient treatment for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis infection.
- Appropriate to treat with oral azithromycin as an alternative to intramuscular penicillin, in the opinion of the investigator.
- Positive rapid antigen detection test.
Who cannot join
- History of clinically significant eye disorder that would interfere with protocol test procedures.
- Hypersensitivity to azithromycin, erythromycin, any macrolide, or ketolide antibiotic.
- Increased risk of QT prolongation.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Outpatient Center in Lincoln Park
Chicago, Illinois, 60614
Infant Welfare Society of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60647
Murray Pediatrics
Murray, Utah, 84107
Martel Eye Medical Group
Rancho Cordova, California, 95670
Daynes Eye and Lasik
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124
About this study
Official title: Ocular Effects Of Azithromycin Oral Solution In Pediatric Patients With Pharyngitis/Tonsillitis
This Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) is intended to fulfill a regulatory post-marketing requirement to provide data regarding visual abilities in children taking azithromycin (immediate-release formulation) for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis. The primary objective of the study is to examine the incidence of clinically significant worsening in any of the following ophthalmic exams: best corrected visual acuity (distance), color vision, Amsler grid testing, anterior segment biomicroscopy, and fundus examination, in a group of approximately 30 pediatric patients taking azithromycin oral solution for treatment of an authorized indication of use (pharyngitis/ tonsillitis).
Read the detailed description
Study was terminated prematurely on October 16, 2015 following FDA decision to release Sponsor from post-marketing commitment. No safety and/or efficacy concerns identified.
- Conditions
- Pharyngitis, Tonsillitis
- Being tested
- Azithromycin
- Keywords
- Ocular safety, azithromycin, pharyngitis, tonsillitis
- Medical subject headings
- Pharyngitis, Tonsillitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AzithromycinDrug
Azithromycin oral suspension (immediate release) 12 mg/kg/day x 5 days
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Azithromycin | Experimental | Azithromycin oral suspension (immediate release) 12 mg/kg/day x 5 days Receives: Drug: Azithromycin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations
Clinically significant worsening is an observed worsening in any of the five ophthalmic exams: 1) Clinically significant worsening in best corrected visual activity (BCVA) (distance) at the final visit, in either eye, is defined as a decrease in score of 5 or more letters from baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA. 2) An assessment of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in color vision Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test (FM-100) in either eye. 3) An assessment of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in Amsler Grid in either eye. 4) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in anterior segment biomicroscopy, in any of the 10 eye structures in either eye. 5) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy in any of the 5 eye structures in either eye.
Measured: 14 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Improvement Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations
1 or more of these conditions are clinically significant improvement based on five ophthalmic exams:1) clinically significant improvement in BCVA(distance) at the final visit, in either eye, defined as an increase in score of 5 or more letters from baseline in ETDRS BCVA.2) Assessment of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal or abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in color vision(FM-100) in either eye. 3) Assessment of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in Amsler Grid in either eye. 4) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, non-clinically significant at final visit in anterior segment biomicroscopy, in any of the 10 eye structures in either eye. 5)Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at baseline and normal/abnormal, nonclinically significant at final visit in dilated ophthalmoscopy in any of the 5 eye structures in either eye.
Measured: 14 days
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Change (Improvement or Worsening) Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations
Clinically significant change (improvement or worsening) is based on five ophthalmic exams at baseline and the final visit. Any 1 or more of these conditions are a clinically significant change: 1) A worsening in BCVA (distance), as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in BCVA (distance) as defined in outcome measure 2. 2) A worsening in color vision (FM-100), as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in color vision (FM-100) as defined in outcome measure 2. 3) A worsening in Amsler Grid, as defined in outcome measure 1, OR an improvement in Amsler Grid, as defined in outcome measure 2. 4) A worsening in anterior segment biomicroscopy, as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in anterior segment biomicroscopy as defined in outcome measure 2. 5) A worsening in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy, as defined in outcome measure 1 OR an improvement in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy as defined in outcome measure 2.
Measured: 14 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2013
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionNov 2015
Why it stopped: See Termination Statement in the Detailed Description below
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PharyngitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01919996
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A0661206
- Other IDs
- 208291, 2016-001119-19, 2016
- Status last verified
- Jul 2016
- First submitted
- 7 Aug 2013
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ocular Effects Of Azithromycin Oral Solution In Pediatric Patients With Pharyngitis/Tonsillitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01919996
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A0661206
- Conditions
- Pharyngitis, Tonsillitis
- Keywords
- Ocular safety, azithromycin, pharyngitis, tonsillitis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: See Termination Statement in the Detailed Description below
- Enrolment
- 8 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 6 Jul 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This Post-Authorization Safety Study (PASS) is intended to fulfill a regulatory post-marketing requirement to provide data regarding visual abilities in children taking azithromycin (immediate-release formulation) for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis. The primary objective of the study is to examine the incidence of clinically significant worsening in any of the following ophthalmic exams: best corrected visual acuity (distance), color vision, Amsler grid testing, anterior segment biomicroscopy, and fundus examination, in a group of approximately 30 pediatric patients taking azithromycin oral solution for treatment of an authorized indication of use (pharyngitis/ tonsillitis).
Detailed description
Study was terminated prematurely on October 16, 2015 following FDA decision to release Sponsor from post-marketing commitment. No safety and/or efficacy concerns identified.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Azithromycin | Experimental | Drug: AzithromycinAzithromycin oral suspension (immediate release) 12 mg/kg/day x 5 days |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Male or female patient, aged 12 to 17 years.
- Requires outpatient treatment for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis infection.
- Appropriate to treat with oral azithromycin as an alternative to intramuscular penicillin, in the opinion of the investigator.
- Positive rapid antigen detection test.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- History of clinically significant eye disorder that would interfere with protocol test procedures.
- Hypersensitivity to azithromycin, erythromycin, any macrolide, or ketolide antibiotic.
- Increased risk of QT prolongation.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AzithromycinAzithromycin oral suspension (immediate release) 12 mg/kg/day x 5 days | Drug | Azithromycin |
Primary outcome
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations
Time frame: 14 days
Clinically significant worsening is an observed worsening in any of the five ophthalmic exams: 1) Clinically significant worsening in best corrected visual activity (BCVA) (distance) at the final visit, in either eye, is defined as a decrease in score of 5 or more letters from baseline in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA. 2) An assessment of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in color vision Farnsworth Munsell 100 Hue Test (FM-100) in either eye. 3) An assessment of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in Amsler Grid in either eye. 4) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in anterior segment biomicroscopy, in any of the 10 eye structures in either eye. 5) Assessments of abnormal clinically significant at final visit in dilated indirect ophthalmoscopy in any of the 5 eye structures in either eye.
2 secondary outcomes
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Improvement Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations
Time frame: 14 days
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Change (Improvement or Worsening) Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations
Time frame: 14 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Pharyngitis
Not yet recruiting
Intracuff Dexmedetomidine Versus Alkalinized Lidocaine for Peri-Extubation Cough and Hemodynamic Responses in Elderly Patients
Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Hemodynamic Instability
RecruitingPhase 4
A Single Dose of Intravenous Penicillin as an Adjunct to Oral Penicillin in the Treatment of Acute Tonsillitis, Peritonsillar Phlegmon, and Peritonsillar Abscess
Acute Tonsillitis, Peritonsillar Abscess
Recruiting
Pharyngeal Mucosal Conditioning to Prevent Postoperative Sore Throat in Septoplasty Patients With Severe Nasal Obstruction
Postoperative Sore Throat, Nasal Obstruction
RecruitingObservational study
A Multicenter Evaluation of SalivIQ™ Strep A for Detecting Group A Streptococcus From Saliva and Throat Swabs in Patients With Acute Pharyngitis
Streptococcal Pharyngitis, Group A Streptococcal Infection
Not yet recruiting
Enhanced Telemedicine in Primary Care for Acute Respiratory Tract Infections Study
Acute Respiratory Tract Infection, Ear Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Azithromycin in people with Pharyngitis and Tonsillitis, run by Pfizer at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Jul 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Occurrence of a Clinically Significant Worsening Based on Five Ophthalmic Examinations (time frame: 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2016.