Acute PancreatitisNCT01911689
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Acute Pancreatitis
An observational study of Acute Pancreatitis, run by Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
To quantitatively analyze the T2* values of the head, body, and tail of normal pancreas, and observe the value of GRE T2*-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and the relationship between the T2* value and the severity of AP. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Pancreatitis
- How many people
- 168 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Aug 2013to Mar 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with AP admitted to our institution between August 2013 and March 2015 were considered for inclusion in this study. The inclusion criteria for patients in this study were as follows: (a) acute onset of abdominal pain; (b) pancreatitis at first onset; (c) three-fold elevated amylase or lipase, excluding other causes of elevated enzymes; and (d) abdominal MR examination.
Who may be able to join
- acute onset of abdominal pain;
- pancreatitis at first onset;
- three-fold elevated amylase or lipase, excluding other causes of elevated enzymes; and
- abdominal MR examination.
Who cannot join
- inability to cooperate when MR imaging was performed;
- a history of chronic pancreatitis;
- AP due to pancreatic carcinoma;
- hypoproteinemia;
- with hypoproteinemia and other peritoneal/ retroperitoneal infection diseases ;
- with iron deposition disorder (e.g. diabetes or blood system diseases).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College
Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000
About this study
To quantitatively analyze the T2* values of the head, body, and tail of normal pancreas, and observe the value of GRE T2*-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and the relationship between the T2* value and the severity of AP.
Read the detailed description
- We design a prospective study about "Magetic Resonance Imaging Study of Acute Pancreatitis".
- We apply for an account and register our study on the clinicalTrials.
- In patients with acute pancreatitis, imaging is recommended to confirm the clinical diagnosis, investigate the etiology, and grade the severity of the disease . MR had the excellent resolution of soft tissue,and it has earned an ever more important role in the diagnosis of AP. With the continuous development of MR scanning techniques, the sequence of a multi-echo gradient recalled echo (GRE) T2*-weighted imaging (T2*WI), which acquires a spin echo signal, T2* relaxation acquires a gradient echo signal, is a relatively new MRI technique. The sequence of a GRE T2*WI requires high uniformity of the magnetic field, plus it can provide the T2* value, which can indirectly reflect changes in tissue biochemical components, thus it can be used for the early diagnosis quantitative diagnosis of some diseases .
- This calculation process for T2* value is completed using post-processing software on the workstation(Advantage workstation 4.4; GE Halthcare) directly after scanning.
- AP is a process of inflammation diffusion, in which cell edema will lead to hydrogen proton increase. In the inflammatory exudation process, T2* value will change. So we conduct our research. In this study, we will observe pancreas in the normal pancreas and AP, and discuss the relationship between T2* value and that of AP graded by the MR severity index (MRSI) and Acute Physiology And Chronic Healthy Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores.
- However, until now, there is no research on the sequence applied in the patients with AP.
- Conditions
- Acute Pancreatitis
- Keywords
- pancreatitis, MRI, APACHEⅡ, T2*, T2 star
- Medical subject headings
- Pancreatitis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| acute pancreatitis | acute pancreatitis group:(a) acute onset of abdominal pain; (b) pancreatitis at first onset; (c) three-fold elevated amylase or lipase, excluding other causes of elevated enzymes; and (5) abdominal MR examination. | |
| controlgroup | normal control group:without pancreatic disorders.The exclusion criteria in this study were as follows: (a) inability to cooperate when MR imaging was performed; (b) a history of chronic pancreatitis; (c) AP due to pancreatic carcinoma; (d) hypoproteinemia; and (e) with hypoproteinemia and other peritoneal/ retroperitoneal infection diseases ;(f) with iron deposition disorder (e.g. diabetes or blood system diseases). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The T2* Values in the Diagnosis of AP
Compare the difference of the T2* value between the AP group and the control group.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
The Difference of T2* Value Between the Edematous AP and Necrotizing AP
Compare the difference of the T2* value between the edematous AP group and necrotizing AP group
Measured: 1 year
The T2* Value in Different Severity of AP According to MRSI
AP was graded as mild (0-3 points), moderate (4-6 points) or severe (7-10 points), according to the MR-severity index (MRSI) which was derived from the CT-severity index .
Measured: 1 year
The Relationship Between the T2* Value and the Severity of AP According to Apache II
In clinical practice, the physician usually used the APACHE II to evaluate the severity of acute pancreatitis. AP was graded as mild (0-7 points) and severe AP (≥8 points) according to the APACHE II scoring system.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2013
- Primary completionMar 2015
- Study completionMar 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Acute PancreatitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- zhang x ming, PHD, Study chair, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01911689
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SKLMC-2013-001
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 26 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 24 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of Acute Pancreatitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01911689
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SKLMC-2013-001
- Conditions
- Acute Pancreatitis
- Keywords
- pancreatitis, MRI, APACHEⅡ, T2*, T2 star
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 168 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2013
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 30 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 24 Aug 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To quantitatively analyze the T2* values of the head, body, and tail of normal pancreas, and observe the value of GRE T2*-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and the relationship between the T2* value and the severity of AP.
Detailed description
- We design a prospective study about "Magetic Resonance Imaging Study of Acute Pancreatitis".
- We apply for an account and register our study on the clinicalTrials.
- In patients with acute pancreatitis, imaging is recommended to confirm the clinical diagnosis, investigate the etiology, and grade the severity of the disease . MR had the excellent resolution of soft tissue,and it has earned an ever more important role in the diagnosis of AP. With the continuous development of MR scanning techniques, the sequence of a multi-echo gradient recalled echo (GRE) T2*-weighted imaging (T2*WI), which acquires a spin echo signal, T2* relaxation acquires a gradient echo signal, is a relatively new MRI technique. The sequence of a GRE T2*WI requires high uniformity of the magnetic field, plus it can provide the T2* value, which can indirectly reflect changes in tissue biochemical components, thus it can be used for the early diagnosis quantitative diagnosis of some diseases .
- This calculation process for T2* value is completed using post-processing software on the workstation(Advantage workstation 4.4; GE Halthcare) directly after scanning.
- AP is a process of inflammation diffusion, in which cell edema will lead to hydrogen proton increase. In the inflammatory exudation process, T2* value will change. So we conduct our research. In this study, we will observe pancreas in the normal pancreas and AP, and discuss the relationship between T2* value and that of AP graded by the MR severity index (MRSI) and Acute Physiology And Chronic Healthy Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores.
- However, until now, there is no research on the sequence applied in the patients with AP.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| acute pancreatitis | – | –acute pancreatitis group:(a) acute onset of abdominal pain; (b) pancreatitis at first onset; (c) three-fold elevated amylase or lipase, excluding other causes of elevated enzymes; and (5) abdominal MR examination. |
| controlgroup | – | –normal control group:without pancreatic disorders.The exclusion criteria in this study were as follows: (a) inability to cooperate when MR imaging was performed; (b) a history of chronic pancreatitis; (c) AP due to pancreatic carcinoma; (d) hypoproteinemia; and (e) with hypoproteinemia and other peritoneal/ retroperitoneal infection diseases ;(f) with iron deposition disorder (e.g. diabetes or blood system diseases). |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with AP admitted to our institution between August 2013 and March 2015 were considered for inclusion in this study. The inclusion criteria for patients in this study were as follows: (a) acute onset of abdominal pain; (b) pancreatitis at first onset; (c) three-fold elevated amylase or lipase, excluding other causes of elevated enzymes; and (d) abdominal MR examination.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- acute onset of abdominal pain;
- pancreatitis at first onset;
- three-fold elevated amylase or lipase, excluding other causes of elevated enzymes; and
- abdominal MR examination.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- inability to cooperate when MR imaging was performed;
- a history of chronic pancreatitis;
- AP due to pancreatic carcinoma;
- hypoproteinemia;
- with hypoproteinemia and other peritoneal/ retroperitoneal infection diseases ;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
The T2* Values in the Diagnosis of AP
Time frame: 1 year
Compare the difference of the T2* value between the AP group and the control group.
3 secondary outcomes
The Difference of T2* Value Between the Edematous AP and Necrotizing AP
Time frame: 1 year
The T2* Value in Different Severity of AP According to MRSI
Time frame: 1 year
The Relationship Between the T2* Value and the Severity of AP According to Apache II
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Aug 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Acute Pancreatitis
Recruiting
Efferon LPS Hemoadsorption in Patients With Acute Pancreatitis
Pancreatitis, Acute
Recruiting
Timing of CHolecystectomy In Severe PAncreatitis
Acute Pancreatitis, Cholelithiasis
Not yet recruiting
Cold Water Papillary Irrigation Plus Rectal NSAIDs vs Rectal NSAIDs Alone for Post-ERCP Pancreatitis (COLD)
Post ERCP Pancreatitis, Acute Pancreatitis (AP)
RecruitingObservational study
CytOSorb TreatMent Of Critically Ill PatientS Registry
Septic Shock, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Soy Tomato Juice to Improve Outcomes in Pancreatitis
Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis, Chronic Pancreatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
zhang x ming, PHD study chair
Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Acute Pancreatitis, run by Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 24 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The T2* Values in the Diagnosis of AP (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Aug 2015.