AzTrials
AzTrials

AnemiaPhase 2NCT01906489

20-Week Repeat Oral Dose Study of AKB-6548 in Participants With Chronic Kidney Disease and Anemia

A Phase 2 study testing AKB-6548 in people with Anemia and Chronic Kidney Disease, run by Akebia Therapeutics at 47 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hemoglobin response (efficacy), safety, and tolerability of orally administered AKB-6548 in participants with Chronic Kidney Disease (pre-dialysis) with anemia with dosing for 20 weeks. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 82 years
Conditions the study is for
Anemia, Chronic Kidney Disease
What is being tested?
AKB-6548
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
210 participants
Where
47 sitesUnited States
Study dates
23 Jul 2013to 3 Sep 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 82 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 to 82 years of age, inclusive
  • Chronic Kidney Disease with a GFR category of G3a-G5 and not yet on dialysis
  • eGFR ≥ 10 and ≤ 65 mL/minute/1.73 m2
  • Anemia secondary to CKD with an ESA status and a Screening HGB as per protocol
  • Iron replete with ferritin and TSAT levels as defined per protocol

Who cannot join

  • BMI > 44.0 kg/m2
  • Red blood cell transfusion within 11 weeks prior to the Screening visit
  • Androgen therapy within the previous 21 days prior to the Screening visit
  • Intravenous iron within the past 4 weeks prior to the Screening visit
  • AST or ALT >1.8x ULN, alkaline phosphatase >2x ULN, or total bilirubin >1.5x ULN
  • Screening ECG with QTc > 500 msec
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Uncontrolled hypertension
  • Class III or IV congestive heart failure
  • Myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, or stroke within 6 months prior to the Screening visit

Trial locations and contacts

47 sites in 1 country.

47 sites in 1 country

United States47 sites
  • Study site

    Albuquerque, New Mexico

  • Study site

    Arlington, Texas

  • Study site

    Arvada, Colorado

  • Study site

    Asheville, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Augusta, Georgia

  • Study site

    Austin, Texas

  • Study site

    Azusa, California

  • Study site

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Chula Vista, California

  • Study site

    Cincinnati, Ohio

  • Study site

    Columbia, South Carolina

  • Study site

    Detroit, Michigan

  • Study site

    Downey, California

  • Study site

    Edinburg, Texas

  • Study site

    El Centro, California

  • Study site

    Evergreen Park, Illinois

  • Study site

    Farmington, Missouri

  • Study site

    Flushing, New York

  • Study site

    Glendale, Arizona

  • Study site

    Houston, Texas

  • Study site

    Kansas City, Missouri

  • Study site

    Knoxville, Tennessee

  • Study site

    La Mesa, California

  • Study site

    Lafayette, Louisiana

  • Study site

    Lansing, Michigan

  • Study site

    Las Vegas, Nevada

  • Study site

    Lauderdale Lakes, Florida

  • Study site

    Long Beach, California

  • Study site

    Macon, Georgia

  • Study site

    Meridian, Idaho

  • Study site

    Mineola, New York

  • Study site

    New Rochelle, New York

  • Study site

    Petoskey, Michigan

  • Study site

    Pontiac, Michigan

  • Study site

    Port Charlotte, Florida

  • Study site

    Riverside, California

  • Study site

    Rocky Mount, North Carolina

  • Study site

    Rosedale, New York

  • Study site

    Sacramento, California

  • Study site

    San Antonio, Texas

  • Study site

    San Diego, California

  • Study site

    Shreveport, Louisiana

  • Study site

    St. George, Utah

  • Study site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Study site

    Tucson, Arizona

  • Study site

    Westminster, Colorado

  • Study site

    Wilmington, North Carolina

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Phase 2b Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Pharmacodynamic Response, Safety, and Tolerability to 20 Weeks of Oral Dosing of AKB-6548 in Participants With Anemia Secondary to Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), GFR Categories G3a-G5 (Stages 3, 4, AND 5) (Pre-Dialysis)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the hemoglobin response (efficacy), safety, and tolerability of orally administered AKB-6548 in participants with Chronic Kidney Disease (pre-dialysis) with anemia with dosing for 20 weeks.

Being tested
AKB-6548, Placebo
Keywords
anemia, chronic kidney disease, CKD, chronic renal insufficiency, renal impairment, erythropoietin, kidney, oral anemia treatment, hemoglobin, hypoxia-inducible factor, HIF, hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor, HIF-PHI, efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics
Medical subject headings
Anemia, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Renal Insufficiency

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AKB-6548Drug

    Oral dose administered once daily for 20 weeks. Dose adjustment based on hemoglobin level as defined in the protocol.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Oral Placebo administered once daily for 20 weeks. Dose adjustment based on hemoglobin level as defined in the protocol.

Study groups in NCT01906489
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AKB-6548ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: AKB-6548
PlaceboPlacebo comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response

    Hemoglobin (Hgb) response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 grams per deciliter (g/dL) (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESA) or transfusion.

    Measured: Weeks 19 and 20

Secondary outcomes (24)
  1. Percentage of Participants With Hemoglobin Value ≥13.0 g/dL at Any Time During the Study

    Participants who have experienced an excursion in Hgb to ≥13.0 g/dL at any time during the study were considered as "failures". Data was presented for failures.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response, Determined Solely Based on the Hemoglobin Value

    Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing). Analysis of this secondary outcome measure is a reanalysis of the primary outcome measure whereby the response was determined solely by the Hgb value and receiving rescue therapy did not make the participant a failure.

    Measured: Weeks 19 and 20

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Treatment naïve Group

    Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving ESA or transfusion. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study groups based on their ESA status at the screening visit: Naïve, Previously Treated and Actively Treated. Analysis of this secondary outcome measure was performed in the ESA Treatment Naïve group, defined as participants who had never received treatment with an ESA and who had a screening Hgb level of ≤10.5 g/dL.

    Measured: Weeks 19 and 20

  4. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Previously Treated Group

    Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving ESA or transfusion. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study groups based on their ESA status at the screening visit: Naïve, Previously Treated and Actively Treated. Analysis of this secondary outcome measure was performed in the ESA Previously Treated group, defined as participants who had previously received ≥1 dose of an ESA, had been off of ESA therapy for ≥11 weeks at the time of screening, and had a screening Hgb level of ≤10.5 g/dL.

    Measured: Weeks 19 and 20

  5. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response in ESA Actively Treated Group

    Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving ESA or transfusion. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 study groups based on their ESA status at the screening visit: Naïve, Previously Treated and Actively Treated. Analysis of this secondary outcome measure was performed in the ESA Actively Treated group, defined as participants who had been actively treated with an ESA for a minimum of 4 months before screening, had received at least 2 doses within the last 4 months, had received their last dose within 6 weeks before screening, and had a screening Hgb level ≥9.5 g/dL and ≤12.0 g/dL.

    Measured: Weeks 19 and 20

  6. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response, Analyzed in mITT Population

    Hgb response was defined as participants with mean Hgb ≥11.0 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) or increase in Hgb by ≥ 1.2 g/dL (average of Weeks 19 and 20) over pre-dose average (average of the two Hgb values obtained prior to dosing) without receiving ESA or transfusion. Analysis of this secondary outcome measure was performed in the mITT population.

    Measured: Weeks 19 and 20

  7. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin

    Blood samples were collected to assess Hgb. Baseline was defined as the mean of two samples obtained prior to dosing (Screening and Baseline). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicated Hgb concentration increased.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20

  8. Absolute Values of Hemoglobin

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for analysis of hemoglobin

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20

  9. Change From Baseline in Hematocrit

    Blood samples were collected to assess Hematocrit. Baseline was defined as the mean of two samples obtained prior to dosing (Screening and Baseline). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicated Hematocrit concentration increased.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20

  10. Absolute Values of Hematocrit

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for analysis of Hematocrit.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20

  11. Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell Count

    Blood samples were collected to assess red blood cell count. Baseline was defined as the mean of two samples obtained prior to dosing (Screening and Baseline). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicated red blood cell count increased.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20

  12. Absolute Values of Red Blood Cell Count

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for analysis of red blood cell count.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20

  13. Change From Baseline in Reticulocyte Count

    Blood samples were collected to assess reticulocyte count. Baseline was defined as mean of two samples obtained prior to dosing (Screening and Baseline). Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. A positive change from Baseline indicated reticulocyte count increased.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20

  14. Absolute Values of Reticulocyte Count

    Blood samples were collected at indicated time points for analysis of reticulocyte count.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, Week 4, Week 6, Week 8, Week 12, Week 16, Week 19 and Week 20

  15. Percentage of Participants Who Received ESA Rescue

    Participants were administered epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa as a rescue medication who met the Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  16. Mean Number of ESA Rescue Doses Administered Per Participant

    Participants were administered epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa as a rescue medication who have met the Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  17. Percentage of Participants Who Received Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion Rescue

    Participants were administered packed red blood cell transfusion as a rescue medication who have met the Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  18. Number of Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion Administered Per Participant

    Participants were administered packed red blood cells as a rescue medication who have met the Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  19. Time to First Transfusion or ESA Rescue Medication Intake

    Rescue therapy was defined as red blood cell transfusion or ESA administration in participants meeting Hgb rescue criteria in addition to having experienced a clinically significant worsening of their anemia or the symptoms of anemia.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  20. Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence, signs, symptoms, disease, or laboratory or physiological observations occurring in a participant administered with drug, regardless of a causal relationship with that treatment or usage. This also included all suspected adverse medication reactions, reactions from medication overdose, abuse, withdrawal, sensitivity, toxicity, unrelated illnesses, including worsening a pre-existing condition, injury, or accidents. Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) was defined as any life-threatening condition; hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly/birth defect; or death.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  21. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter Values

    Parameters assessed for laboratory values included hematology, serum chemistry, and urinalysis. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant changes.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  22. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs

    Parameters assessed for vital signs included sitting (at rest for a minimum of 5 minutes) heart rate, respiratory rate, body temperature, and blood pressure. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant changes.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  23. Number of Participants With Clinically Abnormal 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings

    A standard 12-lead ECG was performed following dosing in a supine position for approximately 10 minutes. ECGs were taken prior to blood draws when possible. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinical significance.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

  24. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes From Baseline in Physical Examination Findings

    A Baseline physical examination was performed at screening. Otherwise, abbreviated physical examinations were conducted and were to include heart, lung, and abdomen. The investigator was responsible for reviewing laboratory results for clinically significant changes.

    Measured: Up to 20 Weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study start23 Jul 2013
  3. Primary completion3 Sep 2014
  4. Study completion3 Sep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
210 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01906489
Sponsor's protocol ID
AKB-6548-CI-0007
Status last verified
Jun 2022
First submitted
20 Jul 2013
Last updated
21 Jul 2022
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Natale P, Palmer SC, Jaure A, Hodson EM, Ruospo M, Cooper TE, Hahn D, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Strippoli GF. Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 25;8(8):CD013751. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013751.pub2.

    PubMed 36005278
  • Pergola PE, Spinowitz BS, Hartman CS, Maroni BJ, Haase VH. Vadadustat, a novel oral HIF stabilizer, provides effective anemia treatment in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2016 Nov;90(5):1115-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.07.019. Epub 2016 Sep 17.

    PubMed 27650732

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing AKB-6548 in people with Anemia and Chronic Kidney Disease, run by Akebia Therapeutics at 47 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 47 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jul 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Successful Hemoglobin Response (time frame: Weeks 19 and 20). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01906489, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in