Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPhase 2NCT01903993
A Randomized Phase 2 Study of Atezolizumab (an Engineered Anti-PDL1 Antibody) Compared With Docetaxel in Participants With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Failed Platinum Therapy - "POPLAR"
A Phase 2 study testing Docetaxel and Atezolizumab in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 65 sites in 13 countries.
Trial summary
This multicenter, open-label, randomized study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Atezolizumab compared with docetaxel in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after platinum failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Docetaxel and Atezolizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 287 participants
- Where
- 65 sitesin 13 countries
- Study dates
- 6 Aug 2013to 6 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Locally advanced or metastatic (Stage IIIB, Stage IV, or recurrent) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens
- Disease progression during or following treatment with a prior platinum-containing regimen for locally advanced, unresectable/inoperable or metastatic NSCLC or disease recurrence within 6 months of treatment with a platinum-based adjuvant/neoadjuvant regimen
- Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
Who cannot join
- Known active or untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases as determined by CT or MRI evaluation during screening and prior radiographic assessments
- Malignancies other than NSCLC within 5 years prior to randomization, with the exception of those with a negligible risk of metastasis or death and treated with expected curative outcome
- History of autoimmune disease
- History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (including pneumonitis), drug-induced pneumonitis, organizing pneumonia, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest CT scan. History of radiation pneumonitis in the radiation field (fibrosis) is permitted.
- Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C
- Prior treatment with docetaxel
- Prior treatment with CD137 agonists, anti-CTLA4, anti-PD-1, or anti-PD-L1 therapeutic antibody or pathway-targeting agents
Trial locations and contacts
65 sites in 13 countries.
65 sites in 13 countries
United States29 sites
New York Oncology Hematology, P.C.
Albany, New York, 12206
Georgia Cancer Specialists
Atlanta, Georgia, 30341
Texas Oncology - South Austin
Austin, Texas, 78745
Billings Clinic; Research Center
Billings, Montana, 59101
Broome Oncology - Binghamton
Binghamton, New York, 13905
Karmanos Cancer Institute..
Detroit, Michigan, 48201
Willamette Valley Cancer Ctr - 520 Country Club
Eugene, Oregon, 97401-8122
Virginia Cancer Specialists, PC
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Texas Oncology, P.A. - Fort Worth
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Ingalls Memorial Hospital
Harvey, Illinois, 60426
Genesis Cancer Center
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Center for Biomedical Research LLC
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37909
Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada - Eastern Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89169
Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, 92354
Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers - Colorado Springs (Circle)
Lone Tree, Colorado, 80124
Virginia Oncology Associates
Norfolk, Virginia, 23502
Ocala Oncology Center
Ocala, Florida, 34471
The Valley Hospital
Paramus, New Jersey, 07652
Illinois Cancer Care
Peoria, Illinois, 61615
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903
Blue Ridge Cancer Care
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014
Kaiser Permanente - San Marcos
San Marcos, California, 92069
New England Cancer Specialists
Scarborough, Maine, 04074
Arizona Oncology Associates, PC - HOPE
Tucson, Arizona, 85704
Kaiser Permanente - Vallejo
Vallejo, California, 94589
Northwest Cancer Specialists - Vancouver
Vancouver, Washington, 98684
Providence St. Mary Regional Cancer Center
Walla Walla, Washington, 99362
Wenatchee Valley Hospital & Clinics
Wenatchee, Washington, 98801
Innovative Clinical Research Institute
Whittier, California, 90603
France5 sites
Hopital Gabriel Montpied; Service de Pneumologie
Clermont-Ferrand, 63003
Hôpital Nord Michallon; Pneumologie
La Tronche, 38700
Centre D'Oncologie de Gentilly; Oncology
Nancy, 54100
Centre Hospitalier de Saint Brieuc - Hôpital Yves Le Foll; Pneumologie
Saint-Brieuc, 22027
Hopital Larrey; Pneumologie
Toulouse, 31059
Germany4 sites
Asklepios-Fachkliniken Muenchen-Gauting; Onkologie
Gauting, 82131
Krankenhaus Martha-Maria Halle-Doelau gGmbH; Klinik fuer Innere Medizin II
Halle, 06120
Fachklinik für Lungenerkrankungen
Immenhausen, 34376
Universitätsklinikum Regensburg; Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Pneumologie
Regensburg, 93053
Poland4 sites
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne, Klinika Onkologii i Radioterapii
Gdansk, 80-214
Woj.Wielospecjalistyczne Centrum Onkologii i Traumatologii; Oddz.Hematologii Pododz.Chemioterapii
Lodz, 93-513
Mazowieckie Centrum Leczenia Chorob Pluc I Gruzlicy; Oddzial Iii
Otwock, 05-400
Centrum Onkologii - Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie Klinika Nowotworów Piersi i Chirurgii
Warsaw, 02-781
Spain4 sites
Hospital Ramon y Cajal; Servicio de Oncologia
Madrid, 28034
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Servicio de Oncologia
Madrid, 28041
Hospital La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet; Servicio Oncologia
Zaragoza, 50009
United Kingdom4 sites
Royal Free Hospital; Dept of Oncology
London, NW3 2QG
Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, Guys Hospital
London, SE1 9RT
Charing Cross Hospital; Medical Oncology.
London, W6 8RF
Christie Hospital Nhs Trust; Medical Oncology
Manchester, M2O 4BX
South Korea3 sites
National Cancer Center; Medical Oncology
Gyeonggi-do, 410-769
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
Seoul, 03722
Samsung Medical Centre; Division of Hematology/Oncology
Seoul, 135-710
Thailand3 sites
Chulalongkorn Hospital; Medical Oncology
Bangkok, 10330
Rajavithi Hospital; Division of Medical Oncology
Bangkok, 10400
Faculty of Med. Siriraj Hosp.; Med.-Div. of Med. Oncology
Bangkok, 10700
Belgium2 sites
UZ Leuven Gasthuisberg
Leuven, 3000
Chr de La Citadelle
Liège, 4000
Canada2 sites
Cite de La Sante de Laval; Hemato-Oncologie
Laval, Quebec, H7M 3L9
McGill University; Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital; Oncology
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Italy2 sites
Citta Ospedaliera; Divisione Oncologia Medica
Avellino, Campania, 83100
Irccs Ospedale San Raffaele;Oncologia Medica
Milan, Lombardy, 20132
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Akdeniz University Medical Faculty; Medical Oncology Department
Antalya, 07070
Istanbul Uni Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty Hospital; Medical Oncology
Istanbul, 34300
Sweden1 site
Universitetssjukhuset Linköping; Lungmedicinkliniken
Linköping, 581 85
About this study
Official title: A Phase II, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of MPDL3280A (Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) Compared With Docetaxel in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Platinum Failure
This multicenter, open-label, randomized study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Atezolizumab compared with docetaxel in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after platinum failure. Participants will be randomized to receive either Atezolizumab 1200 milligram (mg) intravenously every 3 weeks or docetaxel 75 milligram per meter square (mg/m^2) intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment with Atezolizumab may be continued as long as participants are experiencing clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator, i.e., in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression.
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- Docetaxel, Atezolizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DocetaxelDrug
Participants received starting dose of 75 mg/m^2 every three week (q3w) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Dose modifications were according to the locally approved label. Participants randomized to receive docetaxel had to be premedicated with corticosteroids according to local practice.
AtezolizumabDrug
Participants received atezolizumab of 1200 mg (equivalent to an average body weight-based dose of 15 milligram per kilogram [mg/kg]) which was administered by IV infusion q3w on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Participants were allowed to continue treatment beyond progression per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 if they were experiencing clinical benefit per investigator, did not have a decline in performance status, did not have signs or symptoms of unequivocal progression, did not have tumor progression at critical sites, and signed an informed consent signature page acknowledging deferment any standard treatment options that may exist in favor of continuing atezolizumab.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Docetaxel | Active comparator | Participants received docetaxel 75 milligram per meter square (mg/m^2) administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or death. Receives: Drug: Docetaxel |
| Atezolizumab | Experimental | Participants were administered atezolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle at a fixed dose of 1200 mg. Atezolizumab treatment were to continued as long as participants were experiencing clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator. Receives: Drug: Atezolizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Data for participants who were not reported as dead at the time of analysis was censored at the date when they were last known to be alive.
Measured: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)
Secondary outcomes (6)
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed objective tumor response, complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as determined by investigator using RECIST v1.1 criteria. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: Baseline until date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Disease progression was determined based on investigator assessment using response evaluation criteria In solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Progressive disease (PD): at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions including baseline In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.
Measured: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)
Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was defined as the duration from the first tumor assessment that supports the participant's objective response (CR or PR, whichever is first recorded) to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)
ORR (Modified RECIST)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with confirmed objective tumor response, CR or PR, as determined by investigator using modified RECIST criteria. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to l< 10 mm. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Measured: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 08 May 2015 (up to 21 months)
PFS (Modified RECIST)
PFS was defined as the time (in months) between the date of randomization and the date of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurs first. Disease progression was determined based on investigator assessment using modified RECIST criteria. PD: at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is also considered progression.
Measured: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 08 May 2015 (up to 21 months)
DOR (Modified RECIST)
DOR was defined as the duration from the first tumor assessment that supports the participant's objective response (CR or PR, whichever is first recorded) to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first.
Measured: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 08 May 2015 (up to 21 months)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study start6 Aug 2013
- Primary completion19 Nov 2015
- Study completion6 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Non-Small Cell Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 287 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01903993
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GO28753
- Other IDs
- 2013-001142-34
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 17 Jul 2013
- Last updated
- 2 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Liu J, Chu C, Yi B, Chen MH. A Max 0-1 Weighted Log-Rank Test for Time-to-Event Data With Random Delayed Treatment Effect. Stat Med. 2026 Oct;45(23-24):e70773. doi: 10.1002/sim.70773.
PubMed 42888494Dong Y, Zhu Y, Zhuo M, Chen X, Xie Y, Duan J, Bai H, Hao S, Yu Z, Yi Y, Guan Y, Yuan J, Xia X, Yi X, Wang J, Wang Z. Maximum Somatic Allele Frequency-Adjusted Blood-Based Tumor Mutational Burden Predicts the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 17;14(22):5649. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225649.
PubMed 36428744Shemesh CS, Chan P, Legrand FA, Shames DS, Das Thakur M, Shi J, Bailey L, Vadhavkar S, He X, Zhang W, Bruno R. Pan-cancer population pharmacokinetics and exposure-safety and -efficacy analyses of atezolizumab in patients with high tumor mutational burden. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00685. doi: 10.1002/prp2.685.
PubMed 33241650Chalabi M, Cardona A, Nagarkar DR, Dhawahir Scala A, Gandara DR, Rittmeyer A, Albert ML, Powles T, Kok M, Herrera FG; imCORE working group of early career investigators. Efficacy of chemotherapy and atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors: pooled post hoc analyses of the OAK and POPLAR trials. Ann Oncol. 2020 Apr;31(4):525-531. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
PubMed 32115349Fehlings M, Jhunjhunwala S, Kowanetz M, O'Gorman WE, Hegde PS, Sumatoh H, Lee BH, Nardin A, Becht E, Flynn S, Ballinger M, Newell EW, Yadav M. Late-differentiated effector neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells are enriched in peripheral blood of non-small cell lung carcinoma patients responding to atezolizumab treatment. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Sep 12;7(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0695-9.
PubMed 31511069Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, Park K, Smith D, Artal-Cortes A, Lewanski C, Braiteh F, Waterkamp D, He P, Zou W, Chen DS, Yi J, Sandler A, Rittmeyer A; POPLAR Study Group. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00587-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
PubMed 26970723
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase II, Open-label, Multicenter, Randomized Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of MPDL3280A (Anti-PD-L1 Antibody) Compared With Docetaxel in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Platinum Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01903993
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GO28753
- Conditions
- Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 287 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 6 Aug 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 May 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multicenter, open-label, randomized study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Atezolizumab compared with docetaxel in participants with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after platinum failure. Participants will be randomized to receive either Atezolizumab 1200 milligram (mg) intravenously every 3 weeks or docetaxel 75 milligram per meter square (mg/m^2) intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment with Atezolizumab may be continued as long as participants are experiencing clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator, i.e., in the absence of unacceptable toxicity or symptomatic deterioration attributed to disease progression.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Docetaxel | Active comparator | Drug: DocetaxelParticipants received docetaxel 75 milligram per meter square (mg/m^2) administered intravenously on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or death. |
| Atezolizumab | Experimental | Drug: AtezolizumabParticipants were administered atezolizumab intravenously on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle at a fixed dose of 1200 mg. Atezolizumab treatment were to continued as long as participants were experiencing clinical benefit as assessed by the investigator. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Adult participants, >/= 18 years of age
- Locally advanced or metastatic (Stage IIIB, Stage IV, or recurrent) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
- Representative formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor specimens
- Disease progression during or following treatment with a prior platinum-containing regimen for locally advanced, unresectable/inoperable or metastatic NSCLC or disease recurrence within 6 months of treatment with a platinum-based adjuvant/neoadjuvant regimen
- Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Known active or untreated central nervous system (CNS) metastases as determined by CT or MRI evaluation during screening and prior radiographic assessments
- Malignancies other than NSCLC within 5 years prior to randomization, with the exception of those with a negligible risk of metastasis or death and treated with expected curative outcome
- History of autoimmune disease
- History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (including pneumonitis), drug-induced pneumonitis, organizing pneumonia, or evidence of active pneumonitis on screening chest CT scan. History of radiation pneumonitis in the radiation field (fibrosis) is permitted.
- Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DocetaxelParticipants received starting dose of 75 mg/m^2 every three week (q3w) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or death. Dose modifications were according to the locally approved label. Participants randomized to receive docetaxel had to be premedicated with corticosteroids according to local practice. | Drug | Docetaxel |
| AtezolizumabParticipants received atezolizumab of 1200 mg (equivalent to an average body weight-based dose of 15 milligram per kilogram [mg/kg]) which was administered by IV infusion q3w on Day 1 of each 21 day cycle. Participants were allowed to continue treatment beyond progression per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) v1.1 if they were experiencing clinical benefit per investigator, did not have a decline in performance status, did not have signs or symptoms of unequivocal progression, did not have tumor progression at critical sites, and signed an informed consent signature page acknowledging deferment any standard treatment options that may exist in favor of continuing atezolizumab. | Drug | Atezolizumab |
Primary outcome
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Data for participants who were not reported as dead at the time of analysis was censored at the date when they were last known to be alive.
6 secondary outcomes
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Baseline until date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)
Duration of Response (DOR)
Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)
ORR (Modified RECIST)
Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 08 May 2015 (up to 21 months)
PFS (Modified RECIST)
Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 08 May 2015 (up to 21 months)
DOR (Modified RECIST)
Time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 08 May 2015 (up to 21 months)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Oct 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42888494Liu J, Chu C, Yi B, Chen MH. A Max 0-1 Weighted Log-Rank Test for Time-to-Event Data With Random Delayed Treatment Effect. Stat Med. 2026 Oct;45(23-24):e70773. doi: 10.1002/sim.70773.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36428744Dong Y, Zhu Y, Zhuo M, Chen X, Xie Y, Duan J, Bai H, Hao S, Yu Z, Yi Y, Guan Y, Yuan J, Xia X, Yi X, Wang J, Wang Z. Maximum Somatic Allele Frequency-Adjusted Blood-Based Tumor Mutational Burden Predicts the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 17;14(22):5649. doi: 10.3390/cancers14225649.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33241650Shemesh CS, Chan P, Legrand FA, Shames DS, Das Thakur M, Shi J, Bailey L, Vadhavkar S, He X, Zhang W, Bruno R. Pan-cancer population pharmacokinetics and exposure-safety and -efficacy analyses of atezolizumab in patients with high tumor mutational burden. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020 Dec;8(6):e00685. doi: 10.1002/prp2.685.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32115349Chalabi M, Cardona A, Nagarkar DR, Dhawahir Scala A, Gandara DR, Rittmeyer A, Albert ML, Powles T, Kok M, Herrera FG; imCORE working group of early career investigators. Efficacy of chemotherapy and atezolizumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors: pooled post hoc analyses of the OAK and POPLAR trials. Ann Oncol. 2020 Apr;31(4):525-531. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31511069Fehlings M, Jhunjhunwala S, Kowanetz M, O'Gorman WE, Hegde PS, Sumatoh H, Lee BH, Nardin A, Becht E, Flynn S, Ballinger M, Newell EW, Yadav M. Late-differentiated effector neoantigen-specific CD8+ T cells are enriched in peripheral blood of non-small cell lung carcinoma patients responding to atezolizumab treatment. J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Sep 12;7(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s40425-019-0695-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26970723Fehrenbacher L, Spira A, Ballinger M, Kowanetz M, Vansteenkiste J, Mazieres J, Park K, Smith D, Artal-Cortes A, Lewanski C, Braiteh F, Waterkamp D, He P, Zou W, Chen DS, Yi J, Sandler A, Rittmeyer A; POPLAR Study Group. Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): a multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Apr 30;387(10030):1837-46. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00587-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10.
Related trials for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)
Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC
Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma
NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
65 sites in 13 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Docetaxel and Atezolizumab in people with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 65 sites in 13 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 65 sites in United States, France, Germany, Poland, Spain and 8 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 May 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Survival (OS) (time frame: From the time of randomization to the date of death due to any cause or up to data cut off date: 01 Dec 2015 (up to 28 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01903993, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Oct 2019.