AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)TICD-COPDNCT01893476

A Pragmatic Cluster Trial of a Tailored Intervention to Improve COPD Management

A study testing Implementation educational programme in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), run by Medical University of Lodz at 1 site in Poland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) remains a major health problem, which is strongly related to smoking. Despite publication of guidelines on the prevention and treatment of COPD, not all COPD patients receive the best available healthcare. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Implementation educational programme
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
540 participants
Where
1 sitePoland
Study dates
Sep 2013to Feb 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patients with diagnosed COPD via the medical records with code J44

Who cannot join

  • terminal illness
  • cognitive impairments

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Poland1 site
  • Medical University of Lodz

    Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 90-419

Other trials in Poland

About this study

Official title: Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases.

Background: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) remains a major health problem, which is strongly related to smoking. Despite publication of guidelines on the prevention and treatment of COPD, not all COPD patients receive the best available healthcare. Investigators developed a tailored implementation strategy for improving primary care physicians' adherence to COPD management guidelines. The primary aim of the presented trial is to evaluate the effects of this strategy on physician's performance. The secondary aim is to examine the validity of the tailoring of implementation interventions.

Primary Trial Hypothesis: To study if the rate of adherence to the COPD guideline over a 1 year will increase among participants assigned to the intervention group in comparison to those assigned to the control group?

Read more

Methods/Design: A two-arm pragmatic cluster randomized trial is planned. A total of 540 patients with diagnosed COPD will be included from 18 general practices in Poland. A tailored implementation program will be offered to general practitioners. Participating physicians in the intervention practices (n=18) will receive training to provide brief anti-smoking counselling. An additional form containing COPD severity scale will be inserted into patient's medical records. The checklist with key information about the disease and its management while consulting a patient with COPD will be provided to practitioners. Investigators will provide practices with training inhaler devices for general practitioners (GPs) to teach patients in correct use of each device and to note this education/training in patient's medical records. The control practices will provide usual care.

Discussion: The results of this trial will be directly applicable to primary care in Poland and add to the growing body of evidence on interventions to improve chronic illness care.

Read the detailed description

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) remains a major health problem. Worldwide it has been ranked as the sixth leading cause of death for both genders. In 2020 COPD is projected to rank fifth worldwide in burden of disease. It is also projected to be the fourth leading cause of death worldwide by 2030 due to an increase in smoking rates and demographic changes in many countries. The national survey conducted in Poland in 2007 indicated that 34% of men smoked daily, 2% were occasional smokers, 19% were former smokers and 45% never smoked. In women, these percentages were, respectively, 23%, 3%, 10% and 64%. Although COPD has received increasing attention from the medical community in some countries in recent years, it is still relatively unknown or ignored by the public as well as many healthcare providers and government officials.

Epidemiological studies of COPD on a representative sample have not been performed in Poland, but estimates from smaller suggested a relatively high prevalence. Studies which covered a selected geographical population found that signs and symptoms of COPD are seen in about 10% of patients over 40 years old. Studies in big cities in Poland showed a 9,8% prevalence of COPD in populations between 41 and 72 years old. These data are similar to European data, describing prevalence rates of 4-11% of COPD in adults in Europe. The absolute number of people suffering from COPD in Poland is estimated on about 2 million. This places COPD as the third most frequent - concerning frequency - chronic illness, and it is the fourth most common cause of death in Poland.

In Poland, many guidelines on COPD are used, some of which are national and some are international. There is no guideline in Poland which is designed for primary care.

Implementation of interventions directed on health professionals knowledge programme can change the professionals behavior. In this study the support strategy is applied to improve implementation process.

Being tested
Implementation educational programme
Keywords
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, implementation
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Implementation educational programmeOther

    Also called implementation programme

    Implementation educational programme will include: brief anti-smoking counseling, mMRC scale, checklist, training patient on correct use of inhaling. Participating physicians will receive training in brief anti-smoking counselling and will be asked to record information about. Additional form containing the mMRC dyspnoea scale will be inserted into patients' medical records. We will elaborate a checklist for practitioners with information about what should be done while consulting a patient with COPD. Investigators will provide practices with training inhaler and train staff. Practitioners will be asked to teach patients in correct use of each device. Practitioners will be asked to put this information to the patient's medical records.

Study groups in NCT01893476
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
controlNo interventionIn this arm, practitioners will provide usual care for COPD patients.
adherence to guidelineOtherImplementation educational programme: guideline adherences. The results of this trial will be directly applicable to primary care settings. Should the interventions delivered at the level of the GP practice be found to be effective in improving patients' quality of life then the findings would have a wider application.
Receives: Other: Implementation educational programme

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The percentage of selected patients receiving anti-tabacco counseling recorded by the GPs in the labeled patients' medical records.

    Brief anti-smoking counseling will be provided for GPs.

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Health outcomes in patients' medical records.

    Investigators will review COPD patients' medical records to measure health outcomes such as smoking status change, quantity of and adherence to medication, change in modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale and number of exacerbations in the past and over the study period.

    Also, investigators will consider utilization of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ).

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completionSep 2014
  4. Study completionFeb 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
540 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01893476
Sponsor's protocol ID
258837
Acronym
TICD-COPD
Status last verified
Oct 2015
First submitted
2 Jul 2013
Last updated
30 Oct 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Godycki-Cwirko M, Zakowska I, Kosiek K, Wensing M, Krawczyk J, Kowalczyk A. Evaluation of a tailored implementation strategy to improve the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care: a study protocol of a cluster randomized trial. Trials. 2014 Apr 4;15:109. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-109.

    PubMed 24708623

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Implementation educational programme in people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), run by Medical University of Lodz at 1 site in Poland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Poland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The percentage of selected patients receiving anti-tabacco counseling recorded by the GPs in the labeled patients' medical records. (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01893476, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in