AzTrials
AzTrials

Obstetric FistulaNCT01891149

Ultrasonographic and Hormonal Characteristics of Malawian Women With and Without Obstetric Fistula

An observational study of Obstetric Fistula, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in Malawi.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is a cross-sectional study of 110 Malawian women to compare the ultrasonographic and hormonal characteristics of women and without obstetric fistula. Hypothesis #1: Women with obstetric fistula have a mean cervical length measurement that is at least 10 mm shorter than the mean cervical length measurement… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Obstetric Fistula
How many people
112 participants
Where
1 siteMalawi
Study dates
Dec 2012to Jun 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Study population: We will be enrolling 100 Malawian women with obstetric fistula and 10 Malawian women without obstetric fistula.

Who may be able to join

  • Presentation to the Fistula Care Centre in Lilongwe for medical evaluation
  • Ability to consent for study participation in Chichewa
  • Female aged 18-45 years
  • Willingness to undergo pelvic ultrasound for assessment of pelvic organs

Who cannot join

  • No history of pregnancy
  • History of hysterectomy
  • Current pregnancy or pregnancy within the past six weeks
  • Seriously or terminally ill

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Malawi1 site
  • Fistula Care Centre

    Lilongwe

Other trials in Malawi

About this study

This study is a cross-sectional study of 110 Malawian women to compare the ultrasonographic and hormonal characteristics of women and without obstetric fistula.

Hypothesis #1: Women with obstetric fistula have a mean cervical length measurement that is at least 10 mm shorter than the mean cervical length measurement of similar women without obstetric fistula.

Hypothesis #2: Evaluation of the hormonal and ultrasonographic characteristics of women with obstetric fistula will allow us to assess the cause of amenorrhea in these women.

Read the detailed description

This study is a cross-sectional study of 110 Malawian women who present for medical evaluation at the Fistula Care Centre in Lilongwe, Malawi. If a woman enrolls in the study, her demographic, medical history, physical exam, and lab data will be abstracted from her medical records at the Fistula Centre. She will also a pelvic ultrasound on each participant so that the characteristics of her cervix, uterus, and ovaries (such as the cervical length, endometrial thickness and ovarian volume) can be evaluated. If the participant has an obstetric fistula, she will also complete an additional blood draw for lab testing. The laboratory tests will evaluate three hormones that are associated with amenorrhea and infertility: follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, and antimullerian hormone.

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01891149
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Malawian womenMalawian women who present for care at the Fistula Care Centre

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cervical length

    Measured: baseline

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Hormonal levels

    FSH, Estradiol, AMH

    Measured: baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2012
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionJun 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
112 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01891149
Sponsor's protocol ID
12-1880
Status last verified
Feb 2015
First submitted
25 Jun 2013
Last updated
4 Feb 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Obstetric Fistula, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in Malawi.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Feb 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Malawi. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cervical length (time frame: baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Feb 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in