AzTrials
AzTrials

Malignant Distal Biliary ObstructionNCT01889953

EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage in Patients With Inoperable Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction and Failed ERCP: a Prospective Feasibility Multicenter Trial

A study testing EUS-guided biliary drainage in people with Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction, run by Johns Hopkins University at 13 sites in 5 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This research is being done to study the safety and feasibility of recruiting patients eligible for EUS-guided biliary drainage (EGBD). Our goal is to prospectively study safety and effectiveness of this procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction
What is being tested?
EUS-guided biliary drainage
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
96 participants
Where
13 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
Dec 2012to Jan 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Consecutive adult patients (18-80 years of age) with jaundice due to inoperable (by EUS and/or CT criteria or due to health status) malignant distal (more than 2cm distal to hilum) biliary obstruction and who have failed prior ERCP attempt. Failure is considered to be 2 unsuccessful attempts, according to each institution's definition of "failed" procedure (patients may be consented for EGBD prior to repeat ERCP due to higher likelihood of failure). One failure at outside institution and one failure at your institution can be considered as total of two failures.
  • Ability to give informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Unable to give informed consent
  • Life expectancy < 1month
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Acute gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Coagulopathy defined by prothrombin time < 50% of control; PTT > 50 sec, or INR > 1.5), or on chronic anticoagulation
  • Inability to tolerate sedated upper endoscopy due to cardio-pulmonary instability or other contraindication to endoscopy.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Prior total gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, esophagectomy and sleeve gastrectomy
  • ESLD with portal hypertension, varices, and/or ascites
  • Liver metastases burden > 30%

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 5 countries.

13 sites in 5 countries

United States7 sites
  • University of Colorado

    Aurora, Colorado, 80045

  • Johns Hopkins Hospital

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21287

  • Indiana University

    Bloomington, Indiana, 47405

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    Charleston, South Carolina, 29425

  • University of Florida

    Gainesville, Florida, 32607

  • Winthrop University Hospital

    Mineola, New York, 11501

  • Florida Hospital

    Orlando, Florida, 32803

Other trials in United States

India2 sites
  • All India Institute of Medical Sciences

    Delhi, 110029

  • Institute of advanced endoscopy

    Mumbai, 400036

Other trials in India

Netherlands2 sites
  • Academic Medical Center of Amsterdam

    Amsterdam, 1105

  • Erasmus Medical Center

    Rotterdam, 3000

Other trials in Netherlands

Italy1 site
  • Ismett/Upmc

    Palermo, 90100

Other trials in Italy

Japan1 site
  • Aichi Cancer Center Hospital

    Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 464-8681

Other trials in Japan

About this study

This research is being done to study the safety and feasibility of recruiting patients eligible for EUS-guided biliary drainage (EGBD). Our goal is to prospectively study safety and effectiveness of this procedure.

Read the detailed description

Our central hypothesis is that EGBD is equally effective and safe to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) but is associated with better quality of life than PTBD in patients with inoperable malignant distal biliary obstruction who have failed prior ERCP. Furthermore, EGBD may be associated with decreased procedure-related costs. Patients who undergo PTBD usually require multiple procedures for stent exchange/upsize. Our initial study will be a prospective multicenter feasibility study that will include patients with inoperable distal biliary obstruction who have failed ERCP. If feasibility is demonstrated, our goal will be to compare EGBD and PTBD in a randomized multicenter international trial with a crossover design.

Being tested
EUS-guided biliary drainage
Keywords
EUS-Guided Biliary Drainage, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Malignant Biliary Obstruction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EUS-guided biliary drainageOther

    Based on the patient's condition, the will receive:

    • Rendezvous technique
    • Direct transluminal access transesophageal technique
    • Direct transluminal access transduodenal technique
    • or direct transluminal access using transgastric approach
Study groups in NCT01889953
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EUS-guided biliary drainageOtherPatients in this arm will receive EUS-guided biliary drainage.
Receives: Other: EUS-guided biliary drainage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Effectiveness (Clinical success is defined as drop in bilirubin by 50%)

    Clinical success is defined as drop in bilirubin by 50% at 2 weeks and to below 3 (level

    Measured: From date of intervention up to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Quality of life (QOL)

    Determine improvement in QOL of patients after PTBD. QOL will be assessed using the EORTC-QLQ-30 instrument (at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the procedure).

    Measured: From date of intervention up to 12 weeks

  2. Procedure-related costs

    Cost will be determined according to Medicare reimbursement of billed CPT codes. The cost of all related follow-up procedures will be included (e.g. cost of PTBD in case of failed EGBD, cost of managing complications, cost of reintervention in case of stent occlusion, etc)

    Measured: Lifetime (These patients have a life expectancy of less than 2 years)

  3. Number of required procedures

    Measured: From date of intervention up to death (These patients have a life expectancy of less than 2 years)

  4. Technical success

    This is defined as success of stent placement in the desired location as determined endoscopically and radiographically.

    In addition, success of each step during EUS will be tracked and recorded (e.g. needle puncture, cholangiography, tract dilation, etc

    Measured: Intra- and post intervention (These patients have a life expectancy of less than 2 years)

  5. Stent patency

    Determine stent patency which is defined as time period between stent placement and need for reintervention for signs and symptoms of recurrent biliary obstruction

    Measured: Lifetime (These patients have a life expectancy of less than 2 years)

  6. Determine safety of EGBD (Complications include the following: Bile leak, Perforation, Peritonitis, Cholecystitis)

    Complications include the following: Bile leak, Perforation, Peritonitis, Cholecystitis

    Measured: Lifetime (These patients have a life expectancy of less than 2 years)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2012
  3. Primary completionDec 2014
  4. Study completionJan 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
96 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01889953
Sponsor's protocol ID
NA_00077483
Status last verified
Jan 2015
First submitted
4 Dec 2012
Last updated
25 May 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Khashab MA, Van der Merwe S, Kunda R, El Zein MH, Teoh AY, Marson FP, Fabbri C, Tarantino I, Varadarajulu S, Modayil RJ, Stavropoulos SN, Penas I, Ngamruengphong S, Kumbhari V, Romagnuolo J, Shah R, Kalloo AN, Perez-Miranda M, Artifon EL. Prospective international multicenter study on endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endosc Int Open. 2016 Apr;4(4):E487-96. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-102648. Epub 2016 Mar 30.

    PubMed 27092334

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EUS-guided biliary drainage in people with Malignant Distal Biliary Obstruction, run by Johns Hopkins University at 13 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 13 sites in United States, India, Netherlands, Italy, Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Effectiveness (Clinical success is defined as drop in bilirubin by 50%) (time frame: From date of intervention up to 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01889953, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 May 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in