AzTrials
AzTrials

Post-operative NeurosurgeryNCT01879488

Effect of Ventilation Mode on Lung Deposition of a Radiolabeled Aerosol During Mechanical Ventilation: Barometric Versus Volumetric

A study testing technetium-99m - Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Vibrating-mesh nebulizer and Gamma scintigraphy in people with Post-operative Neurosurgery, run by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Controlling the respiratory pattern of mechanically ventilated patients in volume control mode is recommended during nebulization. No studies looked into conditions of nebulization during assisted mechanical ventilation to define the optimal nebulization technique and its effect on pulmonary deposition. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Post-operative Neurosurgery
What is being tested?
technetium-99m - Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Vibrating-mesh nebulizer and Gamma scintigraphy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
19 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
Jul 2013to Jun 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Healthy lungs

Who cannot join

  • Change of ventilation mode during nebulization

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Belgium1 site
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc

    Brussels, 1200

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

Controlling the respiratory pattern of mechanically ventilated patients in volume control mode is recommended during nebulization. No studies looked into conditions of nebulization during assisted mechanical ventilation to define the optimal nebulization technique and its effect on pulmonary deposition.

The aim of this study is to analyse the effect of ventilation mode (barometric versus volumetric) on deposition by planar scintigraphy during mechanical ventilation.

Being tested
technetium-99m - Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Vibrating-mesh nebulizer, Gamma scintigraphy, Preoperative spirometry
Keywords
Aerosol, Lung deposition, Mechanical ventilation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • technetium-99m - Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acidDrug

  • Vibrating-mesh nebulizerDevice

  • Gamma scintigraphyOther

  • Preoperative spirometryOther

Study groups in NCT01879488
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Nebulization during pressure support ventilationActive comparatorPatients ventilated in pressure support mode during nebulization
Receives: Drug: technetium-99m - Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; Device: Vibrating-mesh nebulizer; Other: Gamma scintigraphy; Other: Preoperative spirometry
Nebulization during volume assist control modeActive comparatorPatients ventilated in volume assist control mode during nebulization
Receives: Drug: technetium-99m - Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid; Device: Vibrating-mesh nebulizer; Other: Gamma scintigraphy; Other: Preoperative spirometry

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pulmonary deposition

    Measured: Immediately after nebulization by imaging assessment, an expected average of 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Penetration index

    Measured: Immediately after nebulization by imaging assessment, an expected average of 30 minutes

  2. Mechanical ventilation settings

    Measured: During nebulisation time, an expected average of 15 minutes

  3. Lung function

    Measured: Preoperative assessment, the day before inclusion

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2013
  3. Primary completionJun 2015
  4. Study completionJun 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
19 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01879488
Sponsor's protocol ID
AeroVent-01
Status last verified
Nov 2015
First submitted
10 Jun 2013
Last updated
17 Nov 2015
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Dugernier J, Reychler G, Wittebole X, Roeseler J, Depoortere V, Sottiaux T, Michotte JB, Vanbever R, Dugernier T, Goffette P, Docquier MA, Raftopoulos C, Hantson P, Jamar F, Laterre PF. Aerosol delivery with two ventilation modes during mechanical ventilation: a randomized study. Ann Intensive Care. 2016 Dec;6(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13613-016-0169-x. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

    PubMed 27447788

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing technetium-99m - Diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, Vibrating-mesh nebulizer and Gamma scintigraphy in people with Post-operative Neurosurgery, run by Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain at 1 site in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pulmonary deposition (time frame: Immediately after nebulization by imaging assessment, an expected average of 30 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01879488, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in