Abdominal Aortic AneurysmSCOPE1NCT01878240
Prevention of Type II Endoleaks During Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Treatment Versus Combination With Coil Embolisation of the Aneurysmal Sac
A study testing EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR in people with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, run by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue at 3 sites in France.
Trial summary
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) continue to be a leading cause of death in older age groups. In the 60-85 year-old population, AAA represents the 14th-leading cause of death. Federal funding through Medicare has been allocated for early detection using abdominal ultrasound screening programs. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
- What is being tested?
- EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- May 2013to May 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Carrying a sub-renal AAA with a diameter of at least 5 cm at a rate of growth or greater 1cm/an diameter (according to Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) recommendations toE VAR treatment),
- Patients with high risk of type II endoleak (clouding of an aortic aneurysm sac by collateral branch), respondents with at least one of the following criteria on the scanner to be included:
- The presence of a pair of permeable lumbar arteries.
- The presence of a patent inferior mesenteric artery.
Who cannot join
- Sub renal Collet <10 mm
- Angulated > 60 °
- No collateral arising from the aneurysmal sac
- Iliac aneurysms associated
- Ruptured AAA
- Pregnant Women
- Lack of consent
- Lack of social security
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
France3 sites
Hopital Henri Mondor - APHP
Créteil, Île-de-France Region, 94000
Centre Chirurgical MarieLannelongue
Le Plessis-Robinson, Île-de-France Region, 92350
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75014
About this study
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) continue to be a leading cause of death in older age groups. In the 60-85 year-old population, AAA represents the 14th-leading cause of death. Federal funding through Medicare has been allocated for early detection using abdominal ultrasound screening programs. Despite these more aggressive screening programs and concerted efforts by surgeons for timely repair, the incidence of ruptured AAA has continued to increase.
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been the most common type of repair since 2006. Multiple studies reflecting decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality over open repair make this an attractive option for patients. EVAR requires more intensive follow-up than standard open surgical repair, however. Secondary interventions are more common to maintain "seal" of the endograft within the aorta and subsequent exclusion of the aneurysmal component.
Read more
The term endoleak is specific to EVAR, and describes the primary means by which endografts fail. Type I endoleaks occur because of inadequate graft seal proximally or distally, resulting in perigraft flow and aneurysm sac pressurization. Type II endoleaks occur when branch arteries arising from the aneurysmal aorta back-bleed into the aneurysm sac due to collateral flow. Type III endoleaks occur when flow persists between segments of a modular graft. Type IV endoleaks occur when flow persists through endograft material (graft porosity). Type V endoleaks have also been called "endotension", and occur when pressurization of the sac occurs in the absence of any demonstrable endoleak. Type I and Type III endoleaks are most concerning for rupture, although persistent Type II endoleaks can also lead to aneurysm rupture and premature death.
The most common method of EVAR follow-up is computed tomographic angiography (CTA). These studies allow accurate measurement of aneurysm sac diameters and volumes. They also are highly sensitive and specific for endoleaks. Type II endoleaks are treated if they remain persistent and are present in the setting of aneurysm sac enlargement. Type I and III endoleaks are immediately treated when identified. Type IV endoleaks are rarely seen with current endograft technology.
Read the detailed description
Study Objectives:
The purpose of the current study is to compare the level of endoleaks between group 1 and 2 at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Study Design Prospective interventional study, multicenter, open, randomized trial comparing the type II endoleak level in patients who benefited the endovascular AAA repair (group 1: without coils) versus combination with coil embolization of the aneurysmal sac (group II: with coils).
The choice of treatment is randomized.
- Conditions
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
- Being tested
- EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR
- Keywords
- Vascular surgery, Abdominal Aortic aneurysm, endovascular
- Medical subject headings
- Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVARProcedure or surgery
Also called Coil embolization during endovascular Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm repair
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EVAR | Active comparator | Endovascular repair of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Receives: Procedure: EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR |
| Coil embolization during EVAR | Experimental | coil embolization during Endovascular repair Receives: Procedure: EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluation at one month the presence or absence of endoleak type II in all patients for each group by Computer Tomography and Doppler.
Measured: 1 month
Secondary outcomes (7)
• Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -The rate of type II endoleak
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
• Mortality and morbidity .
Measured: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
• Number of additional procedures -endovascular -surgical
Measured: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
• Complications of endovascular procedures away from the EVAR -Thrombosis of leg -Limb occlusion -Evolution of the aneurysmal neck
Measured: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
• Monitoring of renal function (creatinine clearance).
Measured: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
• Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -Measurement of the maximum transverse aneurysm diameter
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
• Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -volumetric measurement of the sac aneurysmal
Measured: 6, 12 and 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2013
- Primary completionApr 2017
- Study completionMay 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Abdominal Aortic AneurysmStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Unité de Recherche Clinique du Centre chirurgical marie Lannelongue
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Dominique FABRE, Vascular surgeon, Principal investigator, Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01878240
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- P12-37813003/2012A01258-35
- Other IDs
- IDRCB 2012-A0125-35
- Acronym
- SCOPE1
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 17 May 2013
- Last updated
- 22 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Matsumura JS, Padberg FT Jr, Kohler TR, Kougias P, Jean-Claude JM, Cikrit DF, Swanson KM; OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):1988-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207481.
PubMed 23171095Jackson RS, Chang DC, Freischlag JA. Comparison of long-term survival after open vs endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1621-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.453.
PubMed 22511690Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):863-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9101. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
PubMed 23475697Piazza M, Frigatti P, Scrivere P, Bonvini S, Noventa F, Ricotta JJ 2nd, Grego F, Antonello M. Role of aneurysm sac embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair in the prevention of type II endoleak-related complications. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.078. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
PubMed 23384494Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, Robinson WP, Eslami MH, Goldberg RJ, Messina L. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011 Jun 21;123(24):2848-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014902. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
PubMed 21478500Fabre D, Mougin J, Mitilian D, Cochennec F, Garcia Alonso C, Becquemin JP, Desgranges P, Allaire E, Hamdi S, Brenot P, Bourkaib R, Haulon S. Prospective, Randomised Two Centre Trial of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm With or Without Sac Embolisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;61(2):201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.028. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
PubMed 33342658
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prevention of Type II Endoleaks During Endovascular Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Endovascular Treatment Versus Combination With Coil Embolisation of the Aneurysmal Sac
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01878240
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCOPE1 / P12-37813003/2012A01258-35
- Conditions
- Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
- Keywords
- Vascular surgery, Abdominal Aortic aneurysm, endovascular
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Chirurgical Marie LannelongueUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Unité de Recherche Clinique du Centre chirurgical marie Lannelongue
- Study start
- May 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) continue to be a leading cause of death in older age groups. In the 60-85 year-old population, AAA represents the 14th-leading cause of death. Federal funding through Medicare has been allocated for early detection using abdominal ultrasound screening programs. Despite these more aggressive screening programs and concerted efforts by surgeons for timely repair, the incidence of ruptured AAA has continued to increase.
Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has been the most common type of repair since 2006. Multiple studies reflecting decreased perioperative morbidity and mortality over open repair make this an attractive option for patients. EVAR requires more intensive follow-up than standard open surgical repair, however. Secondary interventions are more common to maintain "seal" of the endograft within the aorta and subsequent exclusion of the aneurysmal component.
The term endoleak is specific to EVAR, and describes the primary means by which endografts fail. Type I endoleaks occur because of inadequate graft seal proximally or distally, resulting in perigraft flow and aneurysm sac pressurization. Type II endoleaks occur when branch arteries arising from the aneurysmal aorta back-bleed into the aneurysm sac due to collateral flow. Type III endoleaks occur when flow persists between segments of a modular graft. Type IV endoleaks occur when flow persists through endograft material (graft porosity). Type V endoleaks have also been called "endotension", and occur when pressurization of the sac occurs in the absence of any demonstrable endoleak. Type I and Type III endoleaks are most concerning for rupture, although persistent Type II endoleaks can also lead to aneurysm rupture and premature death.
The most common method of EVAR follow-up is computed tomographic angiography (CTA). These studies allow accurate measurement of aneurysm sac diameters and volumes. They also are highly sensitive and specific for endoleaks. Type II endoleaks are treated if they remain persistent and are present in the setting of aneurysm sac enlargement. Type I and III endoleaks are immediately treated when identified. Type IV endoleaks are rarely seen with current endograft technology.
Detailed description
Study Objectives:
The purpose of the current study is to compare the level of endoleaks between group 1 and 2 at 1, 6, 12 and 24 months.
Study Design Prospective interventional study, multicenter, open, randomized trial comparing the type II endoleak level in patients who benefited the endovascular AAA repair (group 1: without coils) versus combination with coil embolization of the aneurysmal sac (group II: with coils).
The choice of treatment is randomized.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EVAR | Active comparator | Procedure: EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAREndovascular repair of an Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm |
| Coil embolization during EVAR | Experimental | Procedure: EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVARcoil embolization during Endovascular repair |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Carrying a sub-renal AAA with a diameter of at least 5 cm at a rate of growth or greater 1cm/an diameter (according to Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS) recommendations toE VAR treatment),
- Patients with high risk of type II endoleak (clouding of an aortic aneurysm sac by collateral branch), respondents with at least one of the following criteria on the scanner to be included:
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Sub renal Collet <10 mm
- Angulated > 60 °
- No collateral arising from the aneurysmal sac
- Iliac aneurysms associated
- Ruptured AAA
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVARAlso: Coil embolization during endovascular Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm repair | Procedure or surgery | Coil embolization during EVAR, EVAR |
Primary outcome
Evaluation at one month the presence or absence of endoleak type II in all patients for each group by Computer Tomography and Doppler.
Time frame: 1 month
7 secondary outcomes
• Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -The rate of type II endoleak
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
• Mortality and morbidity .
Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
• Number of additional procedures -endovascular -surgical
Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
• Complications of endovascular procedures away from the EVAR -Thrombosis of leg -Limb occlusion -Evolution of the aneurysmal neck
Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
• Monitoring of renal function (creatinine clearance).
Time frame: 1, 6, 12 and 24 months
• Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -Measurement of the maximum transverse aneurysm diameter
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
• Evaluation at 6, 12 and 24 months by CT and doppler: -volumetric measurement of the sac aneurysmal
Time frame: 6, 12 and 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jan 2020.
- Results publication: PubMed 23171095Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, Matsumura JS, Padberg FT Jr, Kohler TR, Kougias P, Jean-Claude JM, Cikrit DF, Swanson KM; OVER Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med. 2012 Nov 22;367(21):1988-97. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207481.
- Results publication: PubMed 22511690Jackson RS, Chang DC, Freischlag JA. Comparison of long-term survival after open vs endovascular repair of intact abdominal aortic aneurysm among Medicare beneficiaries. JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1621-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.453.
- Results publication: PubMed 23475697Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N, Choke E, Bown MJ, Sayers RD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg. 2013 Jun;100(7):863-72. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9101. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 23384494Piazza M, Frigatti P, Scrivere P, Bonvini S, Noventa F, Ricotta JJ 2nd, Grego F, Antonello M. Role of aneurysm sac embolization during endovascular aneurysm repair in the prevention of type II endoleak-related complications. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):934-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.078. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 21478500Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, Robinson WP, Eslami MH, Goldberg RJ, Messina L. Predictors of abdominal aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair. Circulation. 2011 Jun 21;123(24):2848-55. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.014902. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33342658Fabre D, Mougin J, Mitilian D, Cochennec F, Garcia Alonso C, Becquemin JP, Desgranges P, Allaire E, Hamdi S, Brenot P, Bourkaib R, Haulon S. Prospective, Randomised Two Centre Trial of Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm With or Without Sac Embolisation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Feb;61(2):201-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.11.028. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
RecruitingPhase 4
Effect of Remimazolam Versus Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Intraoperative Hemodynamic Stability in Patients Undergoing Thoracic or Abdominal Endovascular Aortic Repair
Aortic Aneurysm, Thoracoabdominal, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Aortic Size and Height Indices in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Ruptured
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Real-World Data Collection of GORE Devices Used In the Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Aneurysms Which Incorporate Visceral Arteries.
Complex Aortic Aneurysms, Thoracoabdominal Aneurysm
Enrolling by invitation
Endovascular Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Disease
Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms, Dissecting, Aneurysm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dominique FABRE, Vascular surgeon principal investigator
Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EVAR without coils embolization/ Coils embolization during EVAR in people with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, run by Centre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue at 3 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluation at one month the presence or absence of endoleak type II in all patients for each group by Computer Tomography and Doppler. (time frame: 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01878240, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2020.