AzTrials
AzTrials

Surgical TrainingNCT01877824

Study of Fast-track Surgery in Hernia Repair and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

A study testing Fast-track training in people with Surgical Training, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

All Danish trainees in surgery in a two-year period asked for participation when enrolled in the formal five-year training program for specialty in surgery. The participants are randomized for either educational intervention or control (without intervention). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Surgical Training
What is being tested?
Fast-track training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
35 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Mar 2010to Mar 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Medical doctors accepted for formal surgical training in Denmark in 2010-11.

Who cannot join

  • Current experience in surgery exceeding need of supervision in groin hernia and cholecystectomy procedures.
  • Employed at a non-participating hospital.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Centre of Medical Education

    Aarhus, 8200

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Consequences of Fast-track Training in Surgery in Denmark in Selected Operative Skills.

All Danish trainees in surgery in a two-year period asked for participation when enrolled in the formal five-year training program for specialty in surgery. The participants are randomized for either educational intervention or control (without intervention). The intervention group receive a skills-lab course in hernia repair followed by an opportunity to perform 20 groin hernia repairs in their departments within 4-8 weeks. Their performance will be video recorded three times during the intervention and as follow-up at end of the first year of training. After termination of the hernia training program a similar program for laparoscopic cholecystectomies are made. Each participant receive both intervention. The control group are video recorded at start of their first year and at end. All videos are blindly assessed with a validated rating scale of operative performance. The purpose is to assess if a fast-track program improves technical skills and if a change is sustained. Furthermore we want to compare outcome in similar training programs in open and laparoscopic skills.

Being tested
Fast-track training
Keywords
Surgery, Training

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fast-track trainingOther

Study groups in NCT01877824
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fast-track trainingExperimentalA skills-lap course (1 day) followed by opportunity to perform 20 planned surgical procedures of each type (open groin hernia repair and laparoscopic cholecystectomy) under supervision and within 4-8 weeks. Videorecording at start, mid and end and at follow-up before ending first year of training.
Receives: Other: Fast-track training
ControlNo interventionFollows the existing training program without intervention. Video recording of the trainee performing a open groin hernia repair and a laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure at start end end of first training year.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Technical skills in performed surgical procedures

    Blinded video recordings of the trainees' performances are rated with a validated rating scale of technical skills.

    Measured: Three years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Operative time

    The time in performing the surgical procedures are recorded.

    Measured: Three years

  2. Satisfaction

    The intervention group participants are asked for their experience and satisfaction with a fast-track program

    Measured: Three years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Jun 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2010
  3. Primary completionMar 2013
  4. Study completionMar 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
35 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01877824
Sponsor's protocol ID
MEDU001
Status last verified
Jun 2013
First submitted
27 May 2013
Last updated
14 Jun 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Carlsen CG, Lindorff-Larsen K, Funch-Jensen P, Lund L, Konge L, Charles P. Module based training improves and sustains surgical skills: a randomised controlled trial. Hernia. 2015 Oct;19(5):755-63. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1357-6. Epub 2015 Mar 3.

    PubMed 25731946

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fast-track training in people with Surgical Training, run by University of Aarhus at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Technical skills in performed surgical procedures (time frame: Three years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01877824, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jun 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in