Crohn's DiseaseCERTNCT01876264
Crohn's Extent of Resection Trial
A study testing Extended resection and Conventional resection in people with Crohn's Disease and Recurrence, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The trial will investigate if removing an additional length of small bowel will result in lower risk of recurrence at the surgical join (anastomosis), thereby decreasing the need for further surgery in the future. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 16 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Crohn's Disease, Recurrence
- What is being tested?
- Extended resection and Conventional resection
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 16 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 16 years or above.
- Patients with ileocolic Crohn's disease requiring surgical resection
Who cannot join
- Patients unable to give informed consent
- Patients requiring formation of a stoma at the time of surgical resection
- Patients having less than 200cm of small bowel as assessed intra-operatively
- Simultaneous strictureplasty or small bowel resection
- Age <16 or >80
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
Oxford, OX3 7LJ
About this study
Official title: Crohn's Extent of Resection Trial (CERT): A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Anastomotic Disease Recurrence Following 2cm Versus 10cm Resection Margins for Patients With Ileocolic Crohn's Disease
The trial will investigate if removing an additional length of small bowel will result in lower risk of recurrence at the surgical join (anastomosis), thereby decreasing the need for further surgery in the future.
Read the detailed description
The study will be conducted as a randomised controlled trial. The patient will be blinded to the procedure undertaken, as will the endoscopist performing the 6 month post operative colonoscopy. It is not possible to blind the operating team, for obvious reasons.
Patients undergoing elective or urgent ileocolic resection, both primary and redo resections, will be invited to participate in the trial. Randomisation will take place in the operating theatre after a conventional ileocolic resection has been performed. Those patients randomised to the modest resection (10cm margin) will have an additional 8cm of distal small bowel resected prior to the formation of the surgical anastomosis.
All patients will be seen in the colorectal clinic at approximately 6 weeks post operatively for their routine follow up appointment, as is current practice. A colonoscopy will be performed at 6 months post operatively to assess the anastomosis, in keeping with our current practice. Any additional follow up will be at the discretion of the colorectal or gastroenterological teams, in keeping with their clinical practice.
Patients recruited to the trial will not have any additional ongoing following up directly related to their trial participation. At 5 years following the recruitment of the a patient, the medical notes will be reviewed to identify those patients who have had symptomatic recurrence, further surgery and to assess the duration of medication-free interval following surgery.
Performing a colonoscopy at 6 months post operatively to assess the appearances of the surgical anastomosis will assess the primary endpoint. This will be performed by a senior gastroenterological trainee or consultant gastroenterologist who is familiar with assessment of post operative Crohn's disease and the Rutgeert's score. The appearances of the anastomosis will be scored, and biopsies taken from around the anastomosis to assess for microscopic changes. The use of the Rutgeert's score is widely accepted by the gastroenterological community as the standard assessment tool for post operative anastomotic disease recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease.
The duration of medication-free interval following resection will be assessed from review of the medical notes. This is clinically relevant to patients, as it has been previously shown that quality of life is improved in patients who do not have to take regular medication.
The duration of symptom-free interval will be assessed from review of the medical notes. This is clinically relevant to patients, as abdominal symptoms such as pain and bloating have a significantly deleterious effect on quality of life.
The duration of time to reoperation for Crohn's disease recurrence at the surgical anastomosis will be assessed from the clinical notes. This is of relevance to the patient population as well as the medical community. Crohn's disease commonly recurs, necessitating further surgery. Multiple operations resulting in resection of the bowel results in a reduction in the length of bowel available for absorption of nutrients from food. Ultimately, patients may develop short bowel syndrome. This requires total parenteral nutrition, with the associated risks this carries, and may require small bowel transplantation.
- Conditions
- Crohn's Disease, Recurrence
- Being tested
- Extended resection, Conventional resection
- Keywords
- Colorectal surgery, Colonoscopy, Randomized controlled trial
- Medical subject headings
- Crohn Disease, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Extended resectionProcedure or surgery
Conventional resectionProcedure or surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Extended resection | Experimental | Patients undergoing an extended resection are subjected to a traditional ileocolic resection with a 2cm macroscopically normal proximal margin. A further 8cm of ileum is then resected from the proximal margin prior to formation of the ileocolic anastomosis Receives: Procedure: Extended resection |
| Conventional resection | Active comparator | Patients undergoing a traditional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with a 2cm proximal macroscopically disease-free margin Receives: Procedure: Conventional resection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Endoscopic recurrence
The primary objective of the study is to assess whether undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margins) leads to a reduction in the incidence of Crohn's disease recurrence at the surgical anastomosis as assessed by colonoscopy 6 months post operatively, when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin).
Measured: 6 months post operatively
Secondary outcomes (4)
Medication-free interval
To assess the impact of undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margin) on the duration of medication-free interval following surgery, with respect to disease-modifying drugs (e.g. azathioprine), when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin)
Measured: 5 years post operatively
Symptom-free interval
To assess the impact of undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margin) on the duration of the symptom-free interval following surgery, when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin)
Measured: 5 years post operatively
Time to reoperation
To assess the impact of undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margin) on the interval to reoperation (if clinically needed) for anastomotic recurrence when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin)
Measured: 5 years post operatively
Extent of plexitis
To assess the extent of plexitis through the length of macroscopically normal small bowel that is resected
Measured: 1 month postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013 (estimated)
- Primary completionJun 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2013 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Study abandoned
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Crohn's DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Richard E Lovegrove, MBBS MD FRCS, Principal investigator, Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01876264
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CERT2013
- Acronym
- CERT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Crohn's Extent of Resection Trial (CERT): A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Anastomotic Disease Recurrence Following 2cm Versus 10cm Resection Margins for Patients With Ileocolic Crohn's Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01876264
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CERT / CERT2013
- Conditions
- Crohn's Disease, Recurrence
- Keywords
- Colorectal surgery, Colonoscopy, Randomized controlled trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study abandoned
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The trial will investigate if removing an additional length of small bowel will result in lower risk of recurrence at the surgical join (anastomosis), thereby decreasing the need for further surgery in the future.
Detailed description
The study will be conducted as a randomised controlled trial. The patient will be blinded to the procedure undertaken, as will the endoscopist performing the 6 month post operative colonoscopy. It is not possible to blind the operating team, for obvious reasons.
Patients undergoing elective or urgent ileocolic resection, both primary and redo resections, will be invited to participate in the trial. Randomisation will take place in the operating theatre after a conventional ileocolic resection has been performed. Those patients randomised to the modest resection (10cm margin) will have an additional 8cm of distal small bowel resected prior to the formation of the surgical anastomosis.
All patients will be seen in the colorectal clinic at approximately 6 weeks post operatively for their routine follow up appointment, as is current practice. A colonoscopy will be performed at 6 months post operatively to assess the anastomosis, in keeping with our current practice. Any additional follow up will be at the discretion of the colorectal or gastroenterological teams, in keeping with their clinical practice.
Patients recruited to the trial will not have any additional ongoing following up directly related to their trial participation. At 5 years following the recruitment of the a patient, the medical notes will be reviewed to identify those patients who have had symptomatic recurrence, further surgery and to assess the duration of medication-free interval following surgery.
Performing a colonoscopy at 6 months post operatively to assess the appearances of the surgical anastomosis will assess the primary endpoint. This will be performed by a senior gastroenterological trainee or consultant gastroenterologist who is familiar with assessment of post operative Crohn's disease and the Rutgeert's score. The appearances of the anastomosis will be scored, and biopsies taken from around the anastomosis to assess for microscopic changes. The use of the Rutgeert's score is widely accepted by the gastroenterological community as the standard assessment tool for post operative anastomotic disease recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease.
The duration of medication-free interval following resection will be assessed from review of the medical notes. This is clinically relevant to patients, as it has been previously shown that quality of life is improved in patients who do not have to take regular medication.
The duration of symptom-free interval will be assessed from review of the medical notes. This is clinically relevant to patients, as abdominal symptoms such as pain and bloating have a significantly deleterious effect on quality of life.
The duration of time to reoperation for Crohn's disease recurrence at the surgical anastomosis will be assessed from the clinical notes. This is of relevance to the patient population as well as the medical community. Crohn's disease commonly recurs, necessitating further surgery. Multiple operations resulting in resection of the bowel results in a reduction in the length of bowel available for absorption of nutrients from food. Ultimately, patients may develop short bowel syndrome. This requires total parenteral nutrition, with the associated risks this carries, and may require small bowel transplantation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Extended resection | Experimental | Procedure: Extended resectionPatients undergoing an extended resection are subjected to a traditional ileocolic resection with a 2cm macroscopically normal proximal margin. A further 8cm of ileum is then resected from the proximal margin prior to formation of the ileocolic anastomosis |
| Conventional resection | Active comparator | Procedure: Conventional resectionPatients undergoing a traditional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease with a 2cm proximal macroscopically disease-free margin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 16 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 16 years or above.
- Patients with ileocolic Crohn's disease requiring surgical resection
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients unable to give informed consent
- Patients requiring formation of a stoma at the time of surgical resection
- Patients having less than 200cm of small bowel as assessed intra-operatively
- Simultaneous strictureplasty or small bowel resection
- Age <16 or >80
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Extended resection | Procedure or surgery | Extended resection |
| Conventional resection | Procedure or surgery | Conventional resection |
Primary outcome
Endoscopic recurrence
Time frame: 6 months post operatively
The primary objective of the study is to assess whether undertaking a modest ileocolic resection (10cm margins) leads to a reduction in the incidence of Crohn's disease recurrence at the surgical anastomosis as assessed by colonoscopy 6 months post operatively, when compared to a conventional ileocolic resection (2cm margin).
4 secondary outcomes
Medication-free interval
Time frame: 5 years post operatively
Symptom-free interval
Time frame: 5 years post operatively
Time to reoperation
Time frame: 5 years post operatively
Extent of plexitis
Time frame: 1 month postoperatively
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2020.
Related trials for Crohn's Disease
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
An Open-label, DDI Study to Investigate the Effects of Duvakitug on the PK of Selected Cytochrome P450 Substrates
Ulcerative Colitis, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Longitudinal Immunophenotyping of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Crohn's Disease
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingObservational study
Characterization of Colorectal Dysplasic Lesions and Stratification of Their Evolving Risk in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients: a Prospective, Observational and Multicenter Study
Crohn Disease (CD), Colitis Ulcerative
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
MOdel-Informed Precision Dosing of Ustekinumab and VEdolizumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Richard E Lovegrove, MBBS MD FRCS principal investigator
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Extended resection and Conventional resection in people with Crohn's Disease and Recurrence, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Endoscopic recurrence (time frame: 6 months post operatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2020.